Karma: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
related links |
m fmt |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* '''''[[Meta:Catalytic|Catalytic]]''''' |
* '''''[[Meta:Catalytic|Catalytic]]''''' |
||
* '''''[[Meta:Clogged talk pages|Clogged talk pages]]''''' |
* '''''[[Meta:Clogged talk pages|Clogged talk pages]]''''' |
||
* '''''[[Meta:Karma|Karma]]''''' |
|||
|} |
|} |
||
''[[:wikt:Karma|Karma]]'' is a term denoting points accumulated to one's account. At Wikimedia projects in various languages, such concepts include number of barnstars, edit count, number of FAs I contributed to. These are disastrous, barbarous concepts; apart from being confusing, they mislead contributors' work. Examples are included, as an illustration of the concept. |
''[[:wikt:Karma|Karma]]'' is a term denoting points accumulated to one's account. At Wikimedia projects in various languages, such concepts include number of barnstars, edit count, number of FAs I contributed to. These are disastrous, barbarous concepts; apart from being confusing, they mislead contributors' work. Examples are included, as an illustration of the concept. |
Revision as of 12:57, 25 January 2014
(English) This is an essay. It expresses the opinions and ideas of some Wikimedians but may not have wide support. This is not policy on Meta, but it may be a policy or guideline on other Wikimedia projects. Feel free to update this page as needed, or use the discussion page to propose major changes. |
Meta has relevant essays: |
Karma is a term denoting points accumulated to one's account. At Wikimedia projects in various languages, such concepts include number of barnstars, edit count, number of FAs I contributed to. These are disastrous, barbarous concepts; apart from being confusing, they mislead contributors' work. Examples are included, as an illustration of the concept.
- Good Humour barnstar — misused to apply more humour and pay less attention to the content and context being worked on.
- GA and FA class style guidelines (a follow-up) — considered more valuable when justifying work on article, over reaching agreement and understanding with another contributor.