Jump to content

Stewards/elections 2007/statements/Dmcdevit: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 218: Line 218:
# Have had overwhelmingly positive interactions with this user even before I ever registered an account. '''Strong support'''. --[[User:Neskaya|Neskaya]] 17:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
# Have had overwhelmingly positive interactions with this user even before I ever registered an account. '''Strong support'''. --[[User:Neskaya|Neskaya]] 17:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
# By all means. — [[User:Rdsmith4|Dan]] | [[User talk:Rdsmith4|talk]] 00:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
# By all means. — [[User:Rdsmith4|Dan]] | [[User talk:Rdsmith4|talk]] 00:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
# [[User:Jayvdb|John Vandenberg]] 02:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


==== No / Non / Nein / Tidak / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对/ ضد الترقية / Ei / Não ====
==== No / Non / Nein / Tidak / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对/ ضد الترقية / Ei / Não ====

Revision as of 02:18, 6 December 2007

Dmcdevit

íedit multilingual text
Identity has been previously confirmed by Cary Bass.
English:
  • Languages: en, es-2/3
  • Personal information: I have been a Wikimedia contributor for several years. I am an administrator, oversight, CheckUser and former member of the Arbitration Committee on the English Wikipedia; an administrator and CheckUser on the English Wiktionary; and also an administrator here on Meta. I also have OTRS access, and have been active on info-en and wikt-info-en in the past. I think that I am reasonably well-known and trusted enough for this position, and feel I have a good awareness of Foundation-level issues. I also have more experience at CheckUser than any other current steward or candidate, which is an area I will help out with. I have also done quite a bit of translation work, on Wikipedia, Meta, and especially Wiktionary—where the majority of my content edits are probably Spanish edits. I try to be approachable and responsive to criticism. Thanks for your time. (Also, I should already be identified to the Foundation as an oversight/CheckUser.) Dmcdevit 11:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
العربية:
  • اللغات: en, es-2/3
  • المعلومات الشخصية: أنا مساهم في ويكيميديا منذ عدة سنوات. أنا إداري, إداري, مدقق مستخدم وعضو سابق في لجنة التحكيم في ويكيبيديا الإنجليزية; إداري ومدقق مستخدم في ويكاموس الإنجليزي؛ وإداري أيضا هنا في الميتا. أمتلك أيضا حساب أو تي آر إس، وكنت نشطا على info-en و wikt-info-en في الماضي. أعتقد أنني معروف بشكل معقول وموثوق في بشكل كاف لهذا المنصب, وأشعر أنني أمتلك معرفة جيدة بالقضايا على مستوى المؤسسة. أمتلك أيضا خبرة بتدقيق المستخدم أكثر من أي مضيف أو مرشح آخر، وهي منطقة سأساعد فيها. لقد قمت أيضا بالقليل من عمل الترجمة، في ويكيبيديا، ميتا، وخصوصا ويكاموس—حيث أغلبية تعديلاتي في نطاق المحتوى على الأغلب تعديلات أسبانية. أحاول أن أرد بشكل إيجابي على الانتقاد . شكرا لوقتكم. (أيضا، ينبغي أن أكون معروفا للمؤسسة كأوفرسايت/مدقق مستخدم.) Dmcdevit 11:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Español :
  • Idiomas: en, es-2/3
  • Información personal: He sido un contribuyente de Wikimedia durante varios años. Soy un bibliotecario, oversight, CheckUser, y antiguo miembro del Comité de Arbitraje de la Wikipedia inglesa; un bibliotecario y CheckUser del Wikcionario inglés; y también un bibliotecario aquí en Meta. Tengo acceso a OTRS y ayudo con info-en y wikt-info-en. Creo que estoy bien conocido y tengo suficiente confianza para esta posición, y creo que tengo buen conocimiento de los temas al nivel de la Fundación. También, tengo más experiencia con CheckUser que cualquier otro steward o candidato, y eso es una área donde quiero contribuir. Además, hago algunos traducciones: en Meta, Wikipedia, y Wikcionario—donde la mayoría de mis ediciones son concerniente a artículos españoles. Trato de ser accesible y receptivo a la crítica. Gracias por tu tiempo. Dmcdevit 11:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: en, es2/3
  • Informationen zur Person: Seit einigen Jahren bin ich Wikimedia-Mitarbeiter. Ich bin Administrator, Oversight, und ein ehemaliges Mitglied des Arbitration-Komitees der englischen Wikipedia; ein Administrator und CheckUser des englischen Wiktionarys; und ebenfalls ein Administrator hier auf Meta. Ich habe außerdem OTRS-Zugang und war auf info-en und wikt-info-en in der Vergangenheit aktiv. Ich denke ich bin ziemlich bekannt und vertrauenswürdig genug für diese Position und ich denke ich habe ein gutes Bewusstsein für Foundation-Level-Anliegen. Ich habe auch mehr Erfahrung als CheckUser als jeder andere derzeitige Steward oder Kandidat, was ein Bereich ist, in welchen ich aushelfen möchte. Ich habe auch ein bisschen Übersetzungsarbeit auf Wikipedia, Meta und besonders auf Wiktionary geleistet— wo der Großteil meiner inhaltlichen Bearbeitungen vermutlich Spanisch betreffen. Ich versuche zugänglich und ansprechbar für Kritik zu sein. Danke für deine Zeit. (Gleichfalls sollte ich bereits der Foundation als Oversight/CheckUser bekannt sein) Dmcdevit 11:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Français :
  • Langues : en, es-2/3
  • Renseignements personnels : Je contribue aux projets Wikimedia depuis plusieurs années. Je suis administrateur, oversight, checkuser et ex-arbitre sur la Wikipédia anglophone, administrateur et checkuser au Wiktionnaire anglophone, et administrateur sur meta. Je suis volontaire OTRS, actif autrefois sur info-en et wikt-info-en. Je crois que je suis assez connu et qu'on me fait assez confiance pour avoir ce statut, et que je connais bien tout ce qui concerne la Foundation. J'ai également plus d'expérience en tant que checkuser que toute autre steward ou candidat à steward ; c'est un domaine dans lequel j'aiderai. J'ai aussi fait pas mal de traductions sur Wikipédia, meta, et particulièrement le Wiktionnaire, où la majorité de mes contributions concernent probablement l'espagnol. J'essaie d'être d'accès facile et ouvert aux critiques. Merci de votre attention. (En plus, je dois déjà être identifié auprès de la Foundation en tant qu'oversight/checkuser.)
Bahasa Indonesia:
  • Bahasa yang dikuasai:
  • Informasi pribadi:
Italiano:
  • Lingue: en, es-2/3
  • Informazioni personali: Contribuisco ai progetti Wikimedia da diversi anni. Sono un amministratore, oversight, CheckUser e sono stato in passato membro dell'Arbitration Committee sulla Wikipedia in lingua inglese; sono inoltre amministratore e CheckUser sul Wiktionary in lingua inglese e amministratore qui su Meta. Ho accesso a OTRS e sono stato attivo in passato su info-en e wikt-info-en. Penso di essere abbastanza conosciuto per questa posizione e credo di avere una discreta conoscenza dei meccanismi della Foundation. Ho inoltre un'esperienza più estesa come CheckUser rispetto a quella di ogni altro steward o candidato ed è questo un settore nel quale darò una mano. Ho cercato di svolgere alcuni lavori di traduzione, , su Wikipedia, Meta e in particolare sul Wiktionary—qui la maggior parte dei miei edit sono in lingua spagnola. Cerco di essere accessibile e di reagire positivamente alle critiche. Grazie per l'attenzione. Dmcdevit 11:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
日本語：
  • 言語: en, es-2/3
  • 候補者についての情報: 私はウィキメディアに数年来投稿して来ました。英語版ウィキペディアでは管理者、オーバーサイト権限 (oversight)保持者, チェックユーザ、また以前は裁定委員会のメンバーでした。メタでも管理者をしています。私は OTRS のお手伝いもしており、 info-en および wikt-info-en で活動してきました。私が思いますに、私はスチュワード権限に十分相応するくらいには知られておりまた信頼を寄せられています。また財団レベルのこともよく知っていると思います。また私は Checkuser として現在のスチュワードや他のどの候補者よりも経験を積んでおり、この分野でお手伝いできると思います。また私はメタ・ウィキペディア・また特にウィクショナリでいくらか翻訳のお手伝いをしてきました。ウィクショナリでの私の投稿の大部分はスペイン語なのではないかと思います。私はご批判に対して耳を傾け、またお返事できるように努めたく思います。お時間を割いていただきありがとうございました。（身元確認については、オーバーサイト／チェックユーザ権限保持者として私の身元はすでに財団に確認されています）Dmcdevit 11:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Polski:
  • Języki: en, es-2/3
  • Informacje o mnie: Wnoszę swój wkład w projekty Wikimedia od kilku lat. Jestem administratorem, oversightem, Checkuserem i byłym członkiem Komitetu Arbitrażowego angielskiej Wikipedii; administratorem i Chekuserem angielskiego Wikisłownika; jak również administratorem tu na na Meta. Mam również dostęp do OTRS i byłem aktywny na info-en i wikt-info-en w przeszłości. Wydaje mi się, że jestem wystarczająco dobrze znany i zaufany by objąć tą pozycję, i wydaje mi się, że mam wystarczającą znajomość problemów Fundacji. Mam również większe doświadczenie jako Checkuser niż jakikolwiek obecny steward czy kandydat, co jest obszarem w którym chciałbym pomóc. Wykonałem, również sporo tłumaczeń na Wikipedii, Meta i, w szczególności, na Wikisłowniku, gdzie większość moich edycji dotyczy hiszpańskiego. Staram się być dostępny i reguję na krytykę. Dziękuje za poswięcony mi czas. (dodatkowo, powinienem być już zidentyfikowany przez Fundację jako Chekcuser/oversight).
Português :
  • Idiomas: en, es-2/3
  • Informação pessoal: Tenho sido um contribuinte da Wikimedia por vários anos. Sou um administrador, oversight, CheckUser, e antigo membro do Comitê de Arbitragem da Wikipédia em inglês; administrador e CheckUser do Wikicionário em inglês; e também administrador aqui no Meta. Tenho acesso a OTRS e ajudo com info-en e wikt-info-en. Creio que estou bem conhecido e tenho suficiente confiança para esta posição, e creio que tenho bom conhecimento dos temas a nível da Fundação. Também tenho mais experiência com CheckUser que qualquer outro Steward ou candidato, e essa é uma área onde quero contribuir. Além disso, faço algumas traduções: no Meta, Wikipédia, e Wikicionário—onde a maioria das minhas edições são referentes a artigos em espanhol. Trato de ser acessível e receptivo à críticas. Obrigado por seu tempo. Dmcdevit 11:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
中文：
  • 語言： en, es-2/3
  • 個人資訊：我在維基媒體作了好幾年的貢獻。我是英語維基百科的管理員，Arbitration Committee|仲裁委員會前委員，且擁有oversight和CheckUser的權限；在元維基上我也是管理員。我有OTRS的權限，並且曾在info-en和wikt-info-en上活躍。我認為自己有一定的名氣和能夠讓大家信任我擔此職位，另外我覺得自己對基金會層面的事情有一定的認識。比起其他候選人，我在CheckUser的崗位有較多的經驗，可以提供更多的幫助。我也做了不少翻譯的工作，在維基百科和元維基，特別是在維基辭典上，可能主要的貢獻在西班牙語方面。我嘗試對批評意見持開放態度和善意回應。感謝大家付出時間(來投票)！ (另外，我已在申請oversight/CheckUser權限時向基金會表明身分。) Dmcdevit 11:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


粵語:
  • 話：
  • 個人資料：

Questions / Frage / Domande / Pertanyaan / Kysymykset / Perguntas/ أسئلة

  1. Beyond stewardness, are they other things you would like to be more involved at the Foundation level ? Anthere 10:27, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    As you know I was interested in trying to get the recent Ombudsman reform through, and I hope the new blood will help. :-) Involvement in more Foundation-level activities is something I would consider, though I don't have specific plans at the moment. I've always been hesitant to commit myself to something that would have myself spending too much time away from the actual community, but I would be happy to serve on a committee that deals with something I'm passionate about. Dmcdevit 02:17, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes / Sí / Oui / Ya / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持 / مع الترقية / Kyllä / Sim

  1. support —DerHexer (Talk) 00:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Of course Jaranda | wat's sup 00:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yes —Animum (talk) 00:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Nishkid64 (talk) 00:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Yes. FloNight 00:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Sim. Alex Pereira falaê 00:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Yes--Doc glasgow 00:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Nick1915 - all you want 00:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yes. en:User:Mercury Navou 00:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support. ElinorD 00:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Yes, he's a good and trusted fellow. --M/ 00:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Hoch auf einem Baum 00:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. James F. (talk) 00:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Mackensen (talk) 00:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Mr.Z-man 00:33, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Slade ♠ 00:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Yup..--Cometstyles 00:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. FunPika 00:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. what I know from some of his CU statements in the past, he's trying to act with the needed caution, and he also seems to be unagitated enough to handle more difficult issues --:Bdk: 00:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Yes. Philippe 01:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Picaroon (t) 01:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Captain panda 01:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Cbrown1023 talk 02:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Trusted and capable. Will do the job well. Redux 02:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Thoughtful, well-balanced and hard working Wikimedian. --Aphaia 03:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Oh yes. drini [es:] [commons:] 03:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Shizhao 03:34, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Extremely qualified user, excellent asset to en-wikipedia. Mbisanz 03:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support. Danny 03:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Kurykh 03:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. John Reaves (talk) 05:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Indeed. Kwsn 06:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. SQLQuery me! 06:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Bien sûr Icestorm815 06:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 06:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --.snoopy. AKA dario vet · (talk) 08:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  37. The CU experience is influential, an aspect of stewarding not always handled well in my view --Herby talk thyme 08:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --Gianfranco 10:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Sure! Snowolf 10:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  40. ----Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  41. + --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 11:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Actarux 11:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  43. oscar 11:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  44. bonne chance ! Ofol 12:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  45. .anaconda 12:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Kronin▄¦▀ 12:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Already has a position of trust on many projects and does a fine job. Ryan Postlethwaite 13:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Ral315 (talk) 13:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --cj | talk 13:38, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Enough people known to me voted for :) --Millosh 14:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Jon Harald Søby 14:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Jacoplane 15:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  53. --Nanae 15:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  54. ~ Riana ⁂ 16:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Sí, un buen candidato, SqueakBox 16:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --filip ⁂ 16:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Ja. Heimstern 18:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Gaillimh 18:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support --WiganRunnerEu 19:03, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  60. UninvitedCompany 19:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Trustworthy. Acalamari 20:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  62. PDD 20:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  63. --Freegiampi 20:14, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  64. No brainer -- Tawker 21:17, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  65. --Marbot 21:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Anthere 22:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  67. -- MaxEnt 01:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Waldir 01:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  69. -- MaxEnt 02:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Titoxd(?!?) 06:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Support - one of the good guys! - Alison ❤ 07:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  72. guillom 09:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  73. --Fabexplosive The archive man 11:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Semolo75 12:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Nick 14:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  76. --Thogo (talk) 14:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Yup. --Dweller 15:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Yes.Danntm 16:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  79. JayHenry 17:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Yes. Rudget 19:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Yes, trusted user --BigDT 19:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  82. --GDonato (talk) 20:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 20:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  84. --Maxim(talk) 22:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  85. --Alastor Moody (talk) 23:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  86. --Jusjih 03:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Giggy\Talk 07:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  88. --Gdgourou 09:26, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  89. -- lucasbfr talk 10:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Anthøny 19:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  91. --Coredesat (en.wp) 21:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  92. The traditional "Sup" here. Prodego talk 03:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  93. xaosflux Talk 05:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Ecemaml 09:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  95. en:Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:18, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  96. -Royalguard11(Talk·@en) 19:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  97. WjBscribe 19:27, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  98. --Celestianpower (wp, wikt, books) 21:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Zginder 22:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  100. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 00:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Christopher Parham (talk) 01:38, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  102. I trust this user not to misbehave with the steward rights. James086Talk | Email 09:17, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Support - Candidate has proven himself trustworthy as both an en.wp arbitrator and an admin on more than one project --Versageek 18:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Oh yes, please! Миша13 19:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Support - great admin and arbitrator --Cmelbye 20:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support. R. Baley 23:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  107. --chaser - t 08:18, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Support Support KTC 16:35, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Absolutely. Wizardman 18:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Yes. Spartaz 18:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Lots of experience with checkuser, dealing with difficult users, trustworthy.--Shanel 20:18, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Support. More than qualified. Wikiacc | (talk) (en.w | en.w.t) 20:56, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  113. William M. Connolley 22:22, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Samsara 08:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  115. honoured to Support Support--clamengh 13:47, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  116. It's an honour. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 15:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Support Support -- Avi 20:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Zscout370 22:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  119. OK. Utkarshraj Atmaram 04:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Very strong support. Excellent candidate for the job. AmiDaniel 05:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Easy choice. --Deskana 10:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  122. I wonder if Dmcdevit will have the time to steward with all of his other great work, but I know from experience that Dmcdevit is easy to get ahold of, and his previous positions show that he must be responsible. Miltopia 14:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  123. --MONGO 08:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Strong support Orderinchaos 11:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Spebi 05:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Crockspot 06:11, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Quiddity 07:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Have had overwhelmingly positive interactions with this user even before I ever registered an account. Strong support. --Neskaya 17:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  129. By all means. — Dan | talk 00:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  130. John Vandenberg 02:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No / Non / Nein / Tidak / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对/ ضد الترقية / Ei / Não

  1. Oppose, not a lot of contributions to Meta, and on a personal note, I wasn't his biggest fan while he was on the enwp ArbCom. —Locke Cole • t • c 19:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Mike R 15:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No. - Mailer Diablo 18:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. No. Majorly (talk) 18:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. No. --badlydrawnjeff talk 23:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. No. --Mcginnly 16:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Poupou l'quourouce 16:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC) don't like accumulation of posts[reply]
  8. Angusmclellan 21:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 21:32, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Candidate has proven himself untrustworthy as both a sysop and an Arbitrator--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 11:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Wish you the best, but don't feel I can support you at this time. Davilla 03:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. No. Patstuart 08:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. No. Lahiru k 03:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. My one interaction with this user was surprisingly frustrating. Terrible communications skills. Firsfron 05:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Same with my one interaction. Húsönd 06:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. I don't think I have to explain. — CharlotteWebb 19:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --MF-Warburg(de) 18:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Netral / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立 / Tyhjää / Neutro/ محايد

  1. Refus de vote, à cause du système de confirmation des stewards. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 05:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "Refusal to vote, because of the stewards confirmation system." —translated by Pathoschild.
  2. --OosWesThoesBes 18:40, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2007/statements/Dmcdevit&oldid=779280"