Jump to content

File talk:Gutza23Jun2003a.png: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
Gutza (talk | contribs)
Just in case you were wondering...
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
----
----
Not bad. I'd like to see some more variations though... not quite perfect as it is. Can you put something else besides arrows? mix it up a bit.
Not bad. I'd like to see some more variations though... not quite perfect as it is. Can you put something else besides arrows? mix it up a bit.
----
IMHO, this has the most finished/professional look of all logos currently. Could this be combined with the unfinished sphere idea of #4? Perhaps the unfinished part should be in the same area where the arrows are missing. Also, I think the "Wikipedia" text should be slightly darker. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 02:01 23 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:01, 23 July 2003

Author's comments

WARNING! The page linked here contains intellectual spoilers!

For clarifications on my design's rationale, please see my talk page.


very nice!!


Not bad. I'd like to see some more variations though... not quite perfect as it is. Can you put something else besides arrows? mix it up a bit.


IMHO, this has the most finished/professional look of all logos currently. Could this be combined with the unfinished sphere idea of #4? Perhaps the unfinished part should be in the same area where the arrows are missing. Also, I think the "Wikipedia" text should be slightly darker. --Eloquence 02:01 23 Jul 2003 (UTC)