File talk:Gutza23Jun2003a.png: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
IMHO, this has the most finished/professional look of all logos currently. Could this be combined with the unfinished sphere idea of #4? Perhaps the unfinished part should be in the same area where the arrows are missing. Also, I think the "Wikipedia" text should be slightly darker. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 02:01 23 Jul 2003 (UTC) |
IMHO, this has the most finished/professional look of all logos currently. Could this be combined with the unfinished sphere idea of #4? Perhaps the unfinished part should be in the same area where the arrows are missing. Also, I think the "Wikipedia" text should be slightly darker. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 02:01 23 Jul 2003 (UTC) |
||
This is very good ! Just one thing bothering me on the first particularly...how are we gonna adapt this to the different languages easily if the name is distorted ? Ant |
|||
Revision as of 13:29, 23 July 2003
Author's comments
- WARNING! The page linked here contains intellectual spoilers!
For clarifications on my design's rationale, please see my talk page.
very nice!!
Not bad. I'd like to see some more variations though... not quite perfect as it is. Can you put something else besides arrows? mix it up a bit.
IMHO, this has the most finished/professional look of all logos currently. Could this be combined with the unfinished sphere idea of #4? Perhaps the unfinished part should be in the same area where the arrows are missing. Also, I think the "Wikipedia" text should be slightly darker. --Eloquence 02:01 23 Jul 2003 (UTC)
This is very good ! Just one thing bothering me on the first particularly...how are we gonna adapt this to the different languages easily if the name is distorted ? Ant
