User talk:Túrelio: Difference between revisions
Billinghurst (talk | contribs) →Out of the way: inwardly focused process |
|||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
:Possibly sub-optimal steps: 1) Uploader hadn't edited since April 2; thereby unlikely able to comment at the template deletion discussion. 2) Uploader was NOT notified about the no-permission-tagging. 3) Uploader was notified about file deletions only after the deletions had been performed. |
:Possibly sub-optimal steps: 1) Uploader hadn't edited since April 2; thereby unlikely able to comment at the template deletion discussion. 2) Uploader was NOT notified about the no-permission-tagging. 3) Uploader was notified about file deletions only after the deletions had been performed. |
||
:--[[User:Túrelio|Túrelio]] ([[User talk:Túrelio#top|talk]]) 19:06, 17 September 2014 (UTC) |
:--[[User:Túrelio|Túrelio]] ([[User talk:Túrelio#top|talk]]) 19:06, 17 September 2014 (UTC) |
||
::Yes, I saw the chain. Work is 1963, and should have been relicensed PD-UK-Gov as now out of crown copyright. Could have been done by the person removing tags, problem solved, work not deleted, no issue. Could have been done in next phase, no issue. Or, could have seen that the works are in use and dropped a note asking for the works to be curated by the host wiki. There is a DR on wiki that should have been referenced that talk about yet another licensing, not done. Too easily stepped to, through to a deletion. As I said though more provocatively … 'inwardly focused'. — [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 23:25, 17 September 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:25, 17 September 2014
Welcome to Meta!
Hello Túrelio, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Meta:Metapub (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). If you would like, feel free to ask me questions on my talk page. Happy editing!
--Herby talk thyme 08:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Wikimedia Travel Guide: Naming poll open
Hi there,
You are receiving this message because you voiced your opinion at the Request for Comment on the Wikimedia Travel Guide.
The proposed naming poll opened a few days ago and you can vote for as many of the proposed names as you wish, if you are eligible. Please see Travel Guide/Naming Process for full details on voting eligibility and how the final name will be selected. Voting will last for 14 days, and will terminate on 16 October at 06:59:59 UTC.
Thanks, Thehelpfulone 22:10, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Commons upload counter
Hello
Thanks for your input. I'm aware of the problem with non-ASCII characters, but I don't have the time to correct it right now. You can try this version instead.
Pleclown (talk) 09:12, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Out of the way
In relation to another discussion File:MALAYSIA BILL RHODESIA AND NYASALAND BILL (2) (Hansard, 11 Juli 1963).djvu — billinghurst sDrewth 13:22, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Chain of events: 1) PD-UK-EdictGov claimed as invalid (August 3) and deleted (August 11); 2) all PD-UK-EdictGov-licensed media tagged with no-permission (August 11) and deleted (August 19).
- Possibly sub-optimal steps: 1) Uploader hadn't edited since April 2; thereby unlikely able to comment at the template deletion discussion. 2) Uploader was NOT notified about the no-permission-tagging. 3) Uploader was notified about file deletions only after the deletions had been performed.
- --Túrelio (talk) 19:06, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, I saw the chain. Work is 1963, and should have been relicensed PD-UK-Gov as now out of crown copyright. Could have been done by the person removing tags, problem solved, work not deleted, no issue. Could have been done in next phase, no issue. Or, could have seen that the works are in use and dropped a note asking for the works to be curated by the host wiki. There is a DR on wiki that should have been referenced that talk about yet another licensing, not done. Too easily stepped to, through to a deletion. As I said though more provocatively … 'inwardly focused'. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:25, 17 September 2014 (UTC)