Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce McMahan (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:39, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce McMahan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this business man passes either WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Current article sources are trivial mentions at best. A search on NewsBank found only trivial mentions also. Kevin (talk) 06:10, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - looks like just another NN-BIO, and reads like a vanity piece. No reason to have this here, IMO - Alison ^❤ 09:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above.--Karljoos (talk) 11:27, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If the Powers That Be continue to be determined to whitewash the whole "He fucked his daughter" thing, there's no reason to have this article. Props to your PR/legal company, bro. Chris Croy (talk) 21:55, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Kill this article. exeunt (talk) 23:36, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Alison. No real assertion of notability. Enigma^msg 04:40, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.