Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Penwhale (talk | contribs) at 15:36, 9 August 2011 (rm, passed). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Requests for amendment

Request to amend prior case: Date delinking

Initiated by Ohconfucius ¡digame! at 06:31, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Case affected
Date delinking
Clauses to which an amendment is requested
  1. Remedy 16) Ohconfucius topic banned
  2. Remedy 18) (as amended) Ohconfucius accounts
List of users affected by or involved in this amendment

Amendment 1

  • Link to principle, finding of fact, or remedy to which this amendment is requested
    16): "Ohconfucius is topic banned indefinitely from style and editing guidelines relating to the linking or unlinking of dates, and any related discussions."
    18) "Ohconfucius is limited to using only the account 'Ohconfucius' to edit. He may also use a separate bot account for any bot task or tasks approved by the bot approvals group."
  • Details of desired modification: Termination of both the above clauses.

Statement by your Ohconfucius

This week marks the second anniversary of the conclusion of the case, and six months since the remedies imposed on me were last amended. In the six months since the amendment, there have not been any issues arising from date linking, nor any drama involving same, with or without me. Although one might say that the remedies no longer have practical effect, I am seeking to having all remaining restrictions lifted. Call it housekeeping if you will. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 06:31, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Statement by other editor

{Other editors are free to comment on this amendment as necessary. Comments here should be directed only at the above proposed amendment.}

Further discussion

Statements here may address all the amendments, but individual statements under each proposed amendment are preferred. If there is only one proposed amendment, then no statements should be added here.

Clerk notes

This section is for administrative notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

Arbitrator views and discussion

  • Awaiting further statements. –xenotalk 15:38, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]