User talk:MarcoAurelio
 | MarcoAurelio is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Meta soon. |
--~~~~ at the end of your comment. I will answer all messages left to me in this talk page so the conversations are not fragmented. Some additional notes:
- I am a human and I can make mistakes. If you think I did something wrong, please tell me and we will discuss and review the situation.
- That said, communication is a two-way street, and good communication requires civility.
- As such, I reserve the right to remove, archive, ignore or leave unreplied messages addressed to me or left on this talk page which are insulting, provocative, disruptive or otherwise not helpful, at my own discretion.
- Requests to add or remove domains to the spam blacklist should be addressed at Talk:Spam blacklist.
- Requests for help from an administrator or bureaucrat should be addressed to Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat for wider attention.
- Requests for CheckUser information for Meta-Wiki should be posted at Meta:Requests for CheckUser information.
- Please see Meta:Oversighters for how to request permanent removal of content from this project. Please do not make your request in public. Use this form instead.
- Requests for CentralNotice banners and campaigns are only addressed at CentralNotice/Requests.
- I do not do dispute resolution. Please do not ask me to mediate between editors or resolve conflicts between them.
- Older discussions on this page are kept in the archive.
| Cross-wiki requests |
|---|
| Meta-Wiki requests |
CheckUser bit
Hello, as a result of the unanimous consensus within the election held on meta Rfp page, and since you were already identified to the WMF, I have granted you (again) the CheckUser permission on meta.wiki and listed you on the relevant page.
- My best wishes and congratulation!
- --M/ (talk) 21:29, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Congrat --Grind24 (talk) 21:34, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Grazie M7. Un abraccio :-) -- M\A 21:33, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks Grind24 :-) Regards, -- M\A 21:38, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Congrat --Grind24 (talk) 21:34, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Congrats! :) Trijnsteltalk 15:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
AF
Hi, I see you have edited Special:AbuseFilter/65 so I hope you can help me with this. I was recently contacted by an editor I do not know, but who seems to be a good faith editor. His edit was blocked by this filter, and he believes he was blocked (though I believe it was his IP address that was blocked, as his account does not show a block).
The odd thing is, it appears this AF rule is only supposed to affect users with a low number of edits; but this users has greatly exceeded the threshold. It has been a few years since his most recent edit, but otherwise he is clearly over the limit. So I am not sure it the filter did something it shouldn't, or if there's something I should advise him to do.
Since the AF is set to private view only, I have been a bit vague in this message. If you'd like to discuss this in more detail, please send an email. Thanks for any help you can offer. -Pete F (talk) 02:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- You are a sysop too, so you should be able to see the details and the logs. (I can, too!) — Revi 08:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Peteforsyth: The edit count is a local count, not a global count, does that make a difference to the situation? It only hits low edit counts, so for someone to avoid the impact of the filter they just need to do some non-spam-like edits. If anyone is adversely affected by the AF they can just leave a note on the meta admin page, and someone will have a poke. I regularly review the abuse log, and I am not seeing false positives, though not to say that there are none. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Peteforsyth: I have sent you an email as you requested. Best regards, -- M\A 11:53, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- thank you all, it turns out there was some confusion about what user account was affected. I think I have all the info I need now. -Pete F (talk) 20:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- My pleasure. Poke me if you need me further. Best regards, -- M\A 22:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- thank you all, it turns out there was some confusion about what user account was affected. I think I have all the info I need now. -Pete F (talk) 20:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Peteforsyth: I have sent you an email as you requested. Best regards, -- M\A 11:53, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Peteforsyth: The edit count is a local count, not a global count, does that make a difference to the situation? It only hits low edit counts, so for someone to avoid the impact of the filter they just need to do some non-spam-like edits. If anyone is adversely affected by the AF they can just leave a note on the meta admin page, and someone will have a poke. I regularly review the abuse log, and I am not seeing false positives, though not to say that there are none. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Happy new year 2015
Happy New Year to you Dear MarcoAurelio --Grind24 (talk) 23:24, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- And a very Happy New Year to you too. Best, -- M\A 10:50, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
¡Feliz año!
Querido MA, ¡muchas gracias por tu mensaje! Siempre es una alegría leer tus comentarios. Gracias por tus buenos deseos, que son los mismos que tengo para ti. En lo personal, me alegro de que te asomes por aquí, aunque solo sea de vez en cuando. Espero que estés bien. Un fuerte abrazo, --Góngora (T•ES) 00:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)