Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social networking pedagogy
Social networking pedagogy
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Social networking pedagogy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No refs and nothing verified on the page for many years, with a notability tag since 2012. It looks possible that the topic is notable but the current page reads like an unverified essay and needs WP:TNT JMWt (talk) 14:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy and Education. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment. I've yet to complete a search on this, and I have to head offline now, but I will note this paper that describes a "social networking pedagogy", but attributes its creation to David Trend and Henry Giroux rather than Thomas Patrick Huston and Hallie DeCatherine Jones. This article also mentions the term, and gives a bit of an overview about applications in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Article text at present will need to be wholly rewritten if kept, so I'm half-inclined to go towards WP:TNT, but I want to complete a more comprehensive search first. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:24, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:28, 16 November 2023 (UTC)