RK
On Wikipedia user:RK, rather compiled and commented evidence of inappropriate and "intolerable" behaviour and complaints against him. This page and all subpages should be protected in case anyone tries to wipe them.
RK/notes - from Wikipedia:Community case RK RK/notes 2 - from Wikipedia talk:Community case RK
Threatening NetEsq with a ban
On 24 Aug, RK wrote in an edit summary, on two occasions: "Netesq is now added to list of those risking a ban".
Context
Netesq restored the page on four occasions, following attempts by RK to blank it. Those occasions are:
- 01:02, 24 Aug 2003 . . RK (Reverting harassment. WikiEn list has been notified. Netesq is now added to list of those risking a ban.)
- 01:00, 24 Aug 2003 . . Netesq (RV to last edit by Jiang)
- 00:56, 24 Aug 2003 . . RK (Reverting harassment. WikiEn list has been notified. Netesq is now added to list of those risking a ban.)
- 00:55, 24 Aug 2003 . . Netesq (Rv to last edit by Jiang)
(skipping intervening edits)
- 00:37, 24 Aug 2003 . . Netesq (Reverting RK's page blanking)
- 00:35, 24 Aug 2003 . . RK (Reverting harassment. Sysop WikiEn list has been notified of this abuse.)
- 00:29, 24 Aug 2003 . . Netesq (Reverting RK's page blanking)
- 00:26, 24 Aug 2003 . . RK (Removing sick and hateful comments by some rather sick, disturbed people. Sysops, I am requesting an official vandalism alert.)
- 00:24, 24 Aug 2003 . . Netesq
The edit by NetEsq at 00:24 consisted of adding the following comment:
- What Martin said. As the diversity and number of complaints about RK's behavior increases, it is only a matter of time before he takes note of this fact and figures out how to peacefully co-exist with other Wikipedians. -- NetEsq 20:45, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Prior to this point, NetEsq was editing the creationism and creationism (theology) articles, in an entirely blameless fashion.
- This is confusing. Where can I view the page history of these disputed edits, so I can examine the full context. These edits didn't take place on creationism articles, right, but on a completely inappropriate page ('Community case', which is nonsense of course) set up specifically to criticize RK? Or did they take place on the creationism article? Can you please add a link so we can check the evidence for ourselves? Jimbo Wales 02:59, 28 Aug 2003 (UTC)
References
- version NetEsq restored on first occasion
- version NetEsq restored on second occasion
- Netesq's contributions (time-sensitive)
- Wikipedia:Community case RK history (time-sensitive)