Proposals for more female editors

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by James Salsman (talk | contribs) at 03:40, 10 February 2011 (→‎Making wikis more welcoming to women: these are additional reasons). It may differ significantly from the current version.
Please link to the rationale(s) for and/or against at the end of each proposal.

Posted to the Gendergap list without objections raised

Knowledge generation

  • Study other online communities that have sucessfully addressed gender imbalances.[1]

Helping women with editing

  • Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[2]

Making wikis more welcoming to women

  • Improve articles on interesting women and womens' issues such as simple:birth control and birth control in developing world language wikipedias.[3][4]
  • Remove WP:NOTHOWTO because it is used to argue against topic notability but is not well respected.[5] (This would also remove a pointless exclusion which overlaps with subjects of traditional interest to women -- e.g. recipes -- and information which is known to be used asymmetrically to disadvantage women economically -- e.g., brake repair.)
  • Demote Wikipe-tan from English Wikipedia mascot to WikiProject Anime mascot, replacing her with Puzzly.[6] (partly done)

Supporting women via their economic disadvantages

  • Less javascript for mobile devices.[7] (This is potentially in tension with WYSIWYG editing on high-end devices)

Supporting women via their greater de facto child rearing responsibilities

Posted to Gendergap list with objections raised

  • Support a multilateral tax haven treaty in the US and any other countries that might still be opposing one.[11] (there is a detailed discussion of this proposal on the talk page)
  • Revive Esperanza and the Association of Editors' Advocates with a focus on editor mentoring.[12] -- why is there opposition to reviving these groups?

Not yet posted to the Gendergap list