Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 March 7

Ten months ago, when User:Prodego closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Obama's arms and deleted the article, User:Prodego commented, "This is obviously not a topic that is appropriate for an encyclopedia."

I'd like to ask that Michelle Obama's arms be undeleted because:

1) There is no wikipedia policy for what is "obviously" a topic for the encyclopedia.

2) Here in the year 2010, the subject is still being covered by The Chicago Sun Times, The Daily Mail, Oneindia.in, The Australian Broadcastng Corporation, ABC News, The Sydney Morning Herald, The Wall St. Journal, Huffington Post, Fox News, and Fitness Magazine.

3) During the deletion discussion, some of the reasons given for deletion were that the subject was "trivial" and "just plain silly." These are not official wikipedia policies.

4) The subject meets the criteria for Wikipedia:Notability.

5) Wikipedia has a category called Category:Famous body parts which would be appropriate for this subject.

Grundle2600 (talk) 06:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]