User talk:Rakuten06~metawiki

Hello!!

If Anyone wants to talk with me about the things like the languages, please put your messages below this message Rakuten06 15:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

...

Could you please explain your opposition for belarusian proposal? Thank you -- 82.209.209.162 23:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

"The reason is that there should be one Belorussian wikipedia, not two languages that are today's language and 1959 revision, so there should be one Belorussian wikipedia and that is today's langugage."

Of course, there should be. But since "classical" belarusians "restored original belarusian language" (as they say), there are two standarts, and i won't surely be wrong if i say there are 2 languages at the moment, from what one (codified and normalised in 1957-59) is called belarusian, and the second (pack of its rules is published in 2005) pretends to be called "belarusian". Second one is not recongised by National Academy of Science (institution, that regulates rules of the language), and is.. the language be.wikipedia is written in. There is no support for official belarusian language in be.wikipedia - only a formal right to right in it. When admins translate wiki's interface they DO NOT MAKE TRANSLATION TO ACADEMIC OFFICIAL language, and explain that as they "fight for the right language". There was a definite try by one user to make converter, but he gave up in october since the differents between normalised language (which is btw, called, "narkamauka" in be.wikipedia - in the manner that insults speakers of this language), so since the differences between languages are too big to be simply converted. I think the situation is now clear for you, and you will reconsider your voice, or, at least, remove it. Thank you -- 82.209.209.162 00:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)