Steward requests/Global permissions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by DannyS712 (talk | contribs) at 16:57, 9 July 2019 (→‎Global sysop for Turkmen: typo in my comment). It may differ significantly from the current version.
Shortcut:
SRGP
This page hosts requests for global permissions. To make a request, read the relevant policy (global rollback , global sysop , global rename , …) and make a request below. Explain why membership is needed for that group, and detail prior experience or qualifications.

This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.

Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).

Quick navigation: Dynamic pages:
Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests


Requests for global rollback permissions

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global rollback policy.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that: You have sufficient activity to meet the requirements to be allocated the global rollback flag

To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable.
=== Global rollback for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
::''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+5 days}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than 5 days (with rare exceptions , no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Requests for global sysop permissions

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global sysops policy.
Stewards
When you give someone global sysop rights, please list them on Users with global sysop access and ask them to subscribe to the global sysops mailing list.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account ;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).
=== Global sysop for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential. Please note: Since 2019 all global sysops are required to have two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled.

Global sysop for Turkmen

Not ending before 11 July 2019 21:11 UTC

Hello. I'am a global rollbacker, and a sysop on three Azerbaijani Wikiprojects (Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wikisource) and Turkmen Wikipedia.

Sometimes after reverting vandal edits and add the "delete" template vandals don't stop vandalizing. They remove the "delete" template from the page, continue vandalizing, or create unnecessary pages. I think this right will be effective for me to combat such edits carried out by users/IPs in Wikipedias with inactive sysops, or for someone who is not a sysop.

Thanks--Turkmen talk 21:11, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Turkmen, I think you can report such cases to Global sysops who are active on IRC or in SRM page. These issues are common during crosswiki patrol especially while dealing with LTAs.--BRP ever 11:18, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support At the time of my vote, he is op on 6 wikis and rb on so many others. I bet that he will know how untangle on other wikis and in other languages. Whole confidence on an obvious application, quite simply. Salam əleykum. —Eihel (talk) 00:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support -J. Ansari Talk 04:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak support. Turkmen is doing fine as a Global Rollbacker and did not have much experience yet. I don't see a real demonstrated need for the tool (the example quoted of continual vandalism is something many GR, including me faced). In addition, the tenure as a GR is extremely short as well as I don't see very active crosswiki vandalism combating (as compared to the rest of the GS when they stand for candidacy). However, his multiple temporary permissions which he didn't abuse them is a sign that more tools to them will not be a harm. As what I said in my GR application, I believe candidates who know the tool shouldn't be denied based on a weak index / matrix. This is what leaned me to support rather than remains on the fence. A caveat for them, GS is a very powerful tool (and my homewiki is a GS wiki so I am very concerned) so please use it judiciously. All the best. --Cohaf (talk) 06:55, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"IMO test edit" is trashing the wikis in a way. Especially the wikis with less sysop activity, or no sysops at all. Users or IPs can test their acitivity on wikis' general draft pages or test wikis. Be sure that, from my adminship experience, I know that they ask about it, or search themselves. Edits like these are only vandalistic in nature. The article that I deleted without explanation was an article that was written in English language, in Uzbek Wikipedia. Thus, I added the "Delete" template without any explanation. Sometimes, while looking at wikis with SW Viewer, I'am alone and because of that, to not have anything pass by without my review, I edit oftenly. And this is why I added that template fast, and closed my tab. I can understand and speak the Uzbek language. I probably look at the last changes page of that wiki daily. This is why I can be active more comfortably in Uzbek Wikipedia, rather than other Wikipedia projects.--Turkmen talk 14:23, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
For English articles, somewiki like zh will allow for 14 days to translate or else deletion, so I am a little puzzled. I now know it is a wiki you understood the language, it's better then. I don't think they are truly vandalism but they aren't useful, this I agree. Thanks Turkmen for explaining. I think I am more reassured now. Fair explanation given. --Cohaf (talk) 15:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Cohaf:, thank you. :)--Turkmen talk 15:57, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @TonyBallioni: and @Ajraddatz:. First of all, thank you for your attention. But I think there is no need to worry. When I was nominated for this right, I understood the seriousness of the law. That is, I know that the wrong actions can create problems for me in the future. However, when I get new rights in a project, I look at the behavior of other administrators and users and practice it. I actively participate in projects such as Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wiktionary, Wikisource and Wikinews (Azerbaijan Wikinews now in Incubator). That is, I know about many projects. I think the number of global administrators is small. Some are not active at all. This weakens the effective fight against vandalism. I think that if I become a global administrator, I can more effectively deal with users and IP addresses who continue their vandalism. In this way, I can reduce the burden of global administrators and global rolbackers. I can do it. Kind regards, :) Turkmen talk 19:57, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I do think that a few more months of cross-wiki work would be beneficial so you could learn more about the way things are done outside the azwiki community. I've noticed a few times recently when you've said/done things that, while being normal on your home project, are frowned upon here. That said, I am fairly confident that you'll be able to use the sysop tools properly and won't abuse them, so I am not opposing. – Ajraddatz (talk) 23:45, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ajraddatz sums up my views fairly well, but I also don’t really see the point in neutral votes/comments. If this passes, I’ll be very happy for you, and if it doesn’t, I expect I’ll support again in a few months, but I do think a few months more experience would help you :) TonyBallioni (talk) 15:45, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Global sysop for BRPever

Not ending before 15 July 2019 13:50 UTC

Hello everyone, I am BRPever. I am an SWMT patroller active in crosswiki anti-vandalism and anti-spam works. These tools will help me in dealing with vandalism and spam on small wikis. I can also read Devanagari and have basic knowledge of many languages written in it. Thank you!--BRP ever 13:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global IP block exemption

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions. Please review Global IP block exemption. You may request Global IP block exemption via stewards(_AT_)wikimedia.org if you can not edit this page.
Please note: Global IP block exemption does NOT make one immune to locally-created blocks of any sort, only global blocks.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting global IP block exemption, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account ;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To request global IP block exemption
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why you need the access and why you're suitable. If needed, link to relevant discussions.
=== Global IP block exempt for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if there is demonstrated need for the permission, such as bypassing a global block from someone who is not the intended target.

Global IP block exempt for Rowingbohe

Hello, I'm Rowingbohe and I'm from Mainland China. I'm editing in zhwiki, zhwikivoyage and commonswiki(and so on). Because of GFW, I have to use open proxies and some of them were blocked. I'm writing to get this permission, and I promise not to abuse this permission. I hope you can allow. Best wishes, Rowingbohe♬ (Talk/zhwiki) 04:51, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global rename permissions

Steward requests/Global permissions/Global renamers

Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Testing this service may result in the loss of your access and is not recommended for inexperienced users.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting 2FA tester global permissions, make sure that:

  1. You are logged in on this wiki;
  2. You have read the help page about two-factor authentication and understand how it could lead to irrecoverable loss of access to your account ;
To request 2FA tester global permissions
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and INDICATE you have read the Help page.
If the request page is currently protected, please file as an edit request on the talk page.
=== 2FA Tester for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global <!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if there is no reason not to grant one. A steward will review the request.

2FA Tester for Screenname27

I would like to enable 2FA. I have read the help page, thanks, Screenname27 --Screenname27 (talk) 15:52, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:37, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2FA Tester for AreYouConfused2

I try to add 2FA to all new accounts and would like to incorporate it here, too. Thanks, --AreYouConfused2

@AreYouConfused2: Have you read the help page? Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:50, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jon Kolbert: Yes, my apologies for not including that. AreYouConfused2

2FA Tester for Realitym

I was doing a sweep of my accounts enabling 2FA and realized that the Wiki offers it and thought I would like to enable it here as well. I have read the Help page and everything seems pretty straightforward from there, thanks, --Realitym (talk) 06:10, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:38, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for other global permissions

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting additional global permissions, make sure that:

  1. You are logged in on this wiki;
  2. No specific section on this page exists for the permission you want to request;
To request additional global permissions
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain what kind of access you need and why. If needed, link to relevant discussions. If you hold, or have previously held, the right and are asking for either a renewal or revival of that right, please add a link to the previous discussion.
=== <Add requested permission here> for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = Username
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration. A steward will review the request.

Global abuse filter helper for Praxidicae

Not ending before 11 July 2019 13:35 UTC

Hi everyone, I'm requesting global abuse filter helper to assist in my normal activities as a global sysop. I have held abuse filter helper for over a year on enwiki and I often request details and changes to filters globally. I primarily utilize them for tracking abuse and spam and think it would be immensely helpful. Praxidicae (talk) 13:35, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux: Sure. I asked for them to be removed because I am taking an indefinite leave on enwiki because of all the recent drama. I realized after my request to remove them I should have kept EFH there (and plan to request it back) because it's useful to me globally as well, but the tl;dr is really what I said above. Praxidicae (talk) 13:57, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I can confirm this was why the removal was requested. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(Edit conflict.) @Praxidicae: thank you for the reply, in the trust-but-verify mantra I did contact the admin that processed your removal, who has confirmed it was a self-request. This access will "work" on enwiki as it is truly global, though if you resume regular contributions there you may want to pick back up the local group. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 14:09, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See also