Steward requests/Global permissions
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).
Quick navigation:Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests for global rollback permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Requests for global sysop permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global sysop for Turkmen
- Global user: Turkmen (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 11 July 2019 21:11 UTC
Hello. I'am a global rollbacker, and a sysop on three Azerbaijani Wikiprojects (Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wikisource) and Turkmen Wikipedia.
Sometimes after reverting vandal edits and add the "delete" template vandals don't stop vandalizing. They remove the "delete" template from the page, continue vandalizing, or create unnecessary pages. I think this right will be effective for me to combat such edits carried out by users/IPs in Wikipedias with inactive sysops, or for someone who is not a sysop.
Thanks--Turkmen talk 21:11, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support temporary sysops on several wikis. -- Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 22:45, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- You've been a global rollbacker for less than a month. I'd like to see more experience in dealing with xwiki vandalism, although I see you've been doing quite a bit of it and are trusted as a sysop on multiple projects. Could you give a few examples of where global sysop would have helped you? Thanks for volunteering, Vermont (talk) 23:02, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- Hello dear @Vermont:. For example, when I revert an IP's edits, that IP will still continue to vandalise. At that time, the local administrator was not active. There is a delete template, but it has been removed.--Turkmen talk 23:40, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- Hello Turkmen, I think you can report such cases to Global sysops who are active on IRC or in SRM page. These issues are common during crosswiki patrol especially while dealing with LTAs.--BRP ever 11:18, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support At the time of my vote, he is op on 6 wikis and rb on so many others. I bet that he will know how untangle on other wikis and in other languages. Whole confidence on an obvious application, quite simply. Salam əleykum. —Eihel (talk) 00:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support -J. Ansari Talk 04:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- Weak support. Turkmen is doing fine as a Global Rollbacker and did not have much experience yet. I don't see a real demonstrated need for the tool (the example quoted of continual vandalism is something many GR, including me faced). In addition, the tenure as a GR is extremely short as well as I don't see very active crosswiki vandalism combating (as compared to the rest of the GS when they stand for candidacy). However, his multiple temporary permissions which he didn't abuse them is a sign that more tools to them will not be a harm. As what I said in my GR application, I believe candidates who know the tool shouldn't be denied based on a weak index / matrix. This is what leaned me to support rather than remains on the fence. A caveat for them, GS is a very powerful tool (and my homewiki is a GS wiki so I am very concerned) so please use it judiciously. All the best. --Cohaf (talk) 06:55, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- "IMO test edit" is trashing the wikis in a way. Especially the wikis with less sysop activity, or no sysops at all. Users or IPs can test their acitivity on wikis' general draft pages or test wikis. Be sure that, from my adminship experience, I know that they ask about it, or search themselves. Edits like these are only vandalistic in nature. The article that I deleted without explanation was an article that was written in English language, in Uzbek Wikipedia. Thus, I added the "Delete" template without any explanation. Sometimes, while looking at wikis with SW Viewer, I'am alone and because of that, to not have anything pass by without my review, I edit oftenly. And this is why I added that template fast, and closed my tab. I can understand and speak the Uzbek language. I probably look at the last changes page of that wiki daily. This is why I can be active more comfortably in Uzbek Wikipedia, rather than other Wikipedia projects.--Turkmen talk 14:23, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- For English articles, somewiki like zh will allow for 14 days to translate or else deletion, so I am a little puzzled. I now know it is a wiki you understood the language, it's better then. I don't think they are truly vandalism but they aren't useful, this I agree. Thanks Turkmen for explaining. I think I am more reassured now. Fair explanation given. --Cohaf (talk) 15:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Dear @Cohaf:, thank you. :)--Turkmen talk 15:57, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- For English articles, somewiki like zh will allow for 14 days to translate or else deletion, so I am a little puzzled. I now know it is a wiki you understood the language, it's better then. I don't think they are truly vandalism but they aren't useful, this I agree. Thanks Turkmen for explaining. I think I am more reassured now. Fair explanation given. --Cohaf (talk) 15:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- "IMO test edit" is trashing the wikis in a way. Especially the wikis with less sysop activity, or no sysops at all. Users or IPs can test their acitivity on wikis' general draft pages or test wikis. Be sure that, from my adminship experience, I know that they ask about it, or search themselves. Edits like these are only vandalistic in nature. The article that I deleted without explanation was an article that was written in English language, in Uzbek Wikipedia. Thus, I added the "Delete" template without any explanation. Sometimes, while looking at wikis with SW Viewer, I'am alone and because of that, to not have anything pass by without my review, I edit oftenly. And this is why I added that template fast, and closed my tab. I can understand and speak the Uzbek language. I probably look at the last changes page of that wiki daily. This is why I can be active more comfortably in Uzbek Wikipedia, rather than other Wikipedia projects.--Turkmen talk 14:23, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Per Cohaf and others. --KMB-ATENU139 (Talk) 11:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- I am not sure if the user has the required amount of crosswiki experience, I suggest waiting for 2-3 months and re-requesting the right. Plus the recent mediawiki RFA makes me lean towards Oppose. Thanks--BRP ever 11:18, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 12:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support Trusted user. Kindly, --Mehman 97 19:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support--NewDataB (talk) 20:41, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support Why not? -- Catherine Laurence 00:50, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support.--Soul Train (talk) 11:09, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support ‐‐1997kB (talk) 03:44, 3 July 2019 (UTC) Hey Turkmen, IMHO this at hiwiki wasn't vandalism. My suggestion is that please do quality patrolling instead of quantity and be careful in tagging. Apart from that you doing great work and I still support you for that. Good luck! ‐‐1997kB (talk) 01:29, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- SupportAs Cohaf above.-- CreampieGolden State Finals Champion 06:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Turkmen is active and trusted wikipedia user and he has experience as a sysop in our wikiprocejts. --eldarado ✉ 07:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Hmm, I think it's too much soon, most of the activity is very recent. I also don't agree with tagging an empty page as vandalism, but this is relative and it depends the criterion of the user. Matiia (talk) 16:11, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think that you're one of the bad admins at azwiki, but this was not very good. --Rschen7754 18:24, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- I think that this might be a bit too soon. If you are elected, please go slow at first, make sure you adhere to the GS scope (routine maintenance and counter-vandalism, not on wikis with active admins) and ask questions! – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:24, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose too early--DiMon2711 16:48, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I've supported I think most of your previous global rights requests, but I'm agreeing with the above that this is probably too early. I'd look forward to supporting in 3-6 months. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:59, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Hi @TonyBallioni: and @Ajraddatz:. First of all, thank you for your attention. But I think there is no need to worry. When I was nominated for this right, I understood the seriousness of the law. That is, I know that the wrong actions can create problems for me in the future. However, when I get new rights in a project, I look at the behavior of other administrators and users and practice it. I actively participate in projects such as Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wiktionary, Wikisource and Wikinews (Azerbaijan Wikinews now in Incubator). That is, I know about many projects. I think the number of global administrators is small. Some are not active at all. This weakens the effective fight against vandalism. I think that if I become a global administrator, I can more effectively deal with users and IP addresses who continue their vandalism. In this way, I can reduce the burden of global administrators and global rolbackers. I can do it. Kind regards, :) Turkmen talk 19:57, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- I do think that a few more months of cross-wiki work would be beneficial so you could learn more about the way things are done outside the azwiki community. I've noticed a few times recently when you've said/done things that, while being normal on your home project, are frowned upon here. That said, I am fairly confident that you'll be able to use the sysop tools properly and won't abuse them, so I am not opposing. – Ajraddatz (talk) 23:45, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- Ajraddatz sums up my views fairly well, but I also don’t really see the point in neutral votes/comments. If this passes, I’ll be very happy for you, and if it doesn’t, I expect I’ll support again in a few months, but I do think a few months more experience would help you :) TonyBallioni (talk) 15:45, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Hi @TonyBallioni: and @Ajraddatz:. First of all, thank you for your attention. But I think there is no need to worry. When I was nominated for this right, I understood the seriousness of the law. That is, I know that the wrong actions can create problems for me in the future. However, when I get new rights in a project, I look at the behavior of other administrators and users and practice it. I actively participate in projects such as Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wiktionary, Wikisource and Wikinews (Azerbaijan Wikinews now in Incubator). That is, I know about many projects. I think the number of global administrators is small. Some are not active at all. This weakens the effective fight against vandalism. I think that if I become a global administrator, I can more effectively deal with users and IP addresses who continue their vandalism. In this way, I can reduce the burden of global administrators and global rolbackers. I can do it. Kind regards, :) Turkmen talk 19:57, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support per Zi Jony --DannyS712 (talk) 14:10, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- I agree with Matiia and Ajraddatz. I appreciate his work and enthusiasm, but I think this is a bit too soon. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:27, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Neutral. Agreed that it's a bit too soon but I can't find any other compelling reason to oppose at this moment. Hiàn (talk) 15:38, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support per Cohaf. --NMW03 (talk) 19:28, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:19, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Global sysop for BRPever
- Global user: BRPever (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 15 July 2019 13:50 UTC
Hello everyone, I am BRPever. I am an SWMT patroller active in crosswiki anti-vandalism and anti-spam works. These tools will help me in dealing with vandalism and spam on small wikis. I can also read Devanagari and have basic knowledge of many languages written in it. Thank you!--BRP ever 13:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Strong support They are one of the most collaborative editors I have ever work with in this project, so I am very confident in their ability to communicate decisions with other users if their actions are doubted. They are quite active in IRC and we certainly needs more people that are active in IRC. In addition, their competency of the tool cannot be doubted as they have +sysop in Simplewiki / wikidata. In addition, solid crosswiki work seen by all the patrolling and crosswiki deletion requests. They know languages that can be an asset to GS team as few or none know those languages in the nom statement. Isn't this a candidate that the community can wholeheartedly endorse? I am quietly confident of it. --Cohaf (talk) 13:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support He has a strong track record of crosswiki contributions and has been instrumental in removing and preventing vandalism on small wikis. I have no doubt BRPever would use global sysop permissions responsibly to help cleanup vandalism on wikis with few/no local patrollers. Vermont (talk) 14:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Absolutely yes! Amazing editor with solid experience. They will be great addition. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support sysop on a large project (Wikidata) that is active cross-wiki. Should be granted on request for stuff like this. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support per discussion--Turkmen talk 15:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support GMGtalk 16:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Trustworthy user. They would be a great addition. Esteban16 (talk) 16:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 17:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Full support. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:13, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Rschen7754 03:58, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Trustworthy user.--Biplab Anand (Talk) 09:22, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Strong support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:08, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support ofcourse. Very active and experienced. Rafael (stanglavine) msg 12:20, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Stryn (talk) 12:38, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support--NewDataB (talk) 13:37, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support .--HakanIST (talk) 13:43, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support –Ammarpad (talk) 15:03, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support They can be trusted with this right. Sincerely, Masum Reza☎ 21:15, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Clear and obvious use for the tool, more than competent for the job. Hiàn (talk) 21:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support —Thanks for the fish! talk•contribs 14:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support ---WikiBayer 👤💬 17:14, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Alaa :)..! 17:16, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support -FASTILY 05:44, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Mahir256 (talk) 05:51, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Strong support —Eihel (talk) 06:42, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support no reason to oppose —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:41, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Trustworthy user. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 07:05, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Thought I already did this. Praxidicae (talk) 13:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support no problem supporting this.-- CreampieGolden State Finals Champion 15:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support--DiMon2711 16:49, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support --DannyS712 (talk) 14:10, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Mehman 97 19:40, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:20, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Requests for global IP block exemption
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global IP block exempt for Rowingbohe
- Global user: Rowingbohe (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Hello, I'm Rowingbohe and I'm from Mainland China. I'm editing in zhwiki, zhwikivoyage and commonswiki(and so on). Because of GFW, I have to use open proxies and some of them were blocked. I'm writing to get this permission, and I promise not to abuse this permission. I hope you can allow. Best wishes, Rowingbohe♬ (Talk/zhwiki) 04:51, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Requests for global rename permissions
Steward requests/Global permissions/Global renamers
Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
2FA Tester for Screenname27
- Global user: Screenname27 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I would like to enable 2FA. I have read the help page, thanks, Screenname27 --Screenname27 (talk) 15:52, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- Done Ruslik (talk) 20:37, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
2FA Tester for AreYouConfused2
- Global user: AreYouConfused2 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I try to add 2FA to all new accounts and would like to incorporate it here, too. Thanks, --AreYouConfused2
- @AreYouConfused2: Have you read the help page? Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:50, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Jon Kolbert: Yes, my apologies for not including that. AreYouConfused2
2FA Tester for Realitym
- Global user: Realitym (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I was doing a sweep of my accounts enabling 2FA and realized that the Wiki offers it and thought I would like to enable it here as well. I have read the Help page and everything seems pretty straightforward from there, thanks, --Realitym (talk) 06:10, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Done Ruslik (talk) 20:38, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Requests for other global permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
Global abuse filter helper for Praxidicae
- Global user: Praxidicae (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 11 July 2019 13:35 UTC
Hi everyone, I'm requesting global abuse filter helper to assist in my normal activities as a global sysop. I have held abuse filter helper for over a year on enwiki and I often request details and changes to filters globally. I primarily utilize them for tracking abuse and spam and think it would be immensely helpful. Praxidicae (talk) 13:35, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Experienced with reasonable reason --Alaa :)..! 13:40, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Praxidicae is more than sufficiently experienced in this field, is trustworthy, and could use the tools to benefit Wikimedia projects. Vermont (talk) 13:42, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Has a clear need and experience. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:42, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Question: @Praxidicae: I was just about to hit support, when I noticed that while you may "have held" this at enwiki as you list above, you left off the part about how this access was just recently revoked from your account there per some sort of "private" reason. Can you further explain this? — xaosflux Talk 13:55, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: Sure. I asked for them to be removed because I am taking an indefinite leave on enwiki because of all the recent drama. I realized after my request to remove them I should have kept EFH there (and plan to request it back) because it's useful to me globally as well, but the tl;dr is really what I said above. Praxidicae (talk) 13:57, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- I can confirm this was why the removal was requested. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict.) @Praxidicae: thank you for the reply, in the trust-but-verify mantra I did contact the admin that processed your removal, who has confirmed it was a self-request. This access will "work" on enwiki as it is truly global, though if you resume regular contributions there you may want to pick back up the local group. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 14:09, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: Sure. I asked for them to be removed because I am taking an indefinite leave on enwiki because of all the recent drama. I realized after my request to remove them I should have kept EFH there (and plan to request it back) because it's useful to me globally as well, but the tl;dr is really what I said above. Praxidicae (talk) 13:57, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support trusted user with valid use-case. — xaosflux Talk 14:09, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Obvious need and competency.--Cohaf (talk) 14:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support of course!--BRP ever 14:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support TonyBallioni (talk) 14:20, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Sure. Thank you for the good works. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 15:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Rschen7754 16:05, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support.--HakanIST (talk) 16:18, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support--DiMon2711 16:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 17:29, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Hiàn (talk) 18:40, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support--Turkmen talk 19:30, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 21:41, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Érico (talk) 23:31, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support --DannyS712 (talk) 00:30, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for your great dedication. Esteban16 (talk) 01:29, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support –Ammarpad (talk) 05:17, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support —Thanks for the fish! talk•contribs 22:35, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
See also
- User groups — Information on user groups
- Global rights log — Log of global permissions changes
- Archives
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation