Stewards/Elections 2015/Votes/DidiWeidmann

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards‎ | Elections 2015
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Tempodivalse (talk | contribs) at 01:26, 12 February 2015 (→‎{{sr-heading|yes}}: eraro). It may differ significantly from the current version.

DidiWeidmann

ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: de-N, gsw-N, eo-N, fr-3, en-3, it-3, es-2, nl-1, rm-1, la-1, pt-1, hu-1, vo-1, ca-1, ro-1, sv-1, da-1, nn-1, no-1, nov-1, io-1, af-1, vec-1, oc-1, pdc-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    • My real name is Dietrich Michael Weidmann
    • My user account on Meta
    • My user account on my home Wiki
    • About my person: I was born in 1960 in Zurich, Switzerland, and I am linguist, translator and journalist. I was graduated in 1988 at the University of Zurich in general linguistics as lic. phil. My activities on Wikimedia projects: EO-Wikipedia: Administrator (since 2007) and burocrate (since 2014), about 125000 edits since 2006 on EO-Wikipedia (creation of more than 3000 articles), about 30000 edits on Commons (upload of more than 15000 pictures), about 15000 edits on German Wikipedia, active contributions to 156 different projects. Globally I did in all Wikimedia projects about 300'000 edits, i.e. I am among the 500 most active collaborators of Wikimedia. - I have special knowledge about international copy right law and did several research about questions of panoramic law for pictures in Switzerland to clear up and resolve a copyright conflict on Commons for about 2000 pictures taken inside of Swiss churches. I am actively fighting vandalism. With steward access I could due to my language knowledge help fighting vandalism in small Wiki projects (like for example Volapuk, Ido or Novial, where active administrators are missing).
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2015/Questions#DidiWeidmann


    • Yes

    1. Mö1997 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mö1997 (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Filterkaffee (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 • --Filterkaffee (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    3. Bildoj (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 • --Bildoj (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Green Giant (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Detailed responses to questions. As for sending an email to the wrong queue, I have seen many such emails in OTRS. As long as he sent it to Wikimedia, it will most likely have been read by a trustworthy person and shunted along to the correct queue. Better to see this as a learning experience. Green Giant (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Fenikals (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Fenikals (talk) 19:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Fine. Vogone (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Jü (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  --Jü (talk) 19:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    7. Clemensfranz (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  -- Clemensfranz (talk) 19:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    8. Pelz (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Pelz (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    9. Joachim Mos (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Joachim Mos (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    10. ChamithN (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  ChamithN (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    11. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Mirer (talk) 20:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    12. C3r4 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  --C3r4 (talk) 20:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    13. Bigbossfarin (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Bigbossfarin (talk) 20:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    14. Rome2 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rome2 (talk) 20:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    15. Chicbyaccident (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Chicbyaccident (talk) 20:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    16. Man77 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  → «« Man77 »» [de] 21:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    17. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  By candidate's answers to these questions. Good luck! Leon saudanha (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    18. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  No real problem, but would prefer it if he were more active around Meta. PiRSquared17 (talk) 21:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    19. Scooter (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Scooter (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    20. Rax (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Rax (talk) 22:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    21. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Żyrafał (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    22. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mazuritz (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    23. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    24. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  DangSunM (talk) 22:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    25. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Courcelles 23:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Nannadeem (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  His enthusiasm in his respectable life turn (DOB-1960) with his contributions is self explanatory for me to favor him Nannadeem (talk) 23:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    26. Nahum (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Looks like a good candidate. We all make mistakes, I'm sure he will take extra care next time. Nahum (talk) 23:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    27. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Per above, mmm Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    28. Xania (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Very strong Yes. I'm not interested in the comments below regarding sending his/her details to the wrong address. To me, that indicates a lack of clarity and simplification with regards to Wikimedia and how it communicates with its users. Xania (talk) 02:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    29. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jusjih (talk) 03:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Kavdiamanju (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  Kavdiamanju (talk) 03:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    30. Albertus Aditya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Albertus Aditya (talk) 03:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    31. !dea4u (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •   !dea4u  05:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    32. Cncmaster (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  No one is entirely perfect, and I think that one mistake (that had no extremely severe ramifications from what I've read) should not automatically disqualify an otherwise great candidate from Stewardship. Cncmaster (talk) 05:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    33. Xoristzatziki (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Xoristzatziki (talk) 05:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    34. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    35. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    36. Micha L. Rieser (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Micha (talk) 08:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         喜小羊羊 (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  喜小羊羊 (talk) 09:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    37. Schumir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Schumir (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    38. Renschi81 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Renschi81 (talk) 10:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Star Flyer (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  Star Flyer (talk) 10:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    39. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Rberchie (talk) 11:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    40. Schudi 45 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Very good! Schudi 45 (talk) 11:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    41. Alexey88 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Alexey88 (talk) 12:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    42. Stefan Weil (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Stefan Weil (talk) 12:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    43. Stigfinnare (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Stigfinnare (talk) 12:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    44. Caronna (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Caronna (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    45. Nastoshka (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Nastoshka (talk) 13:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    46. Wischmat (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Wischmat (talk) 13:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    47. Austral blizzard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Austral blizzard (talk) 14:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    48. Wahrerwattwurm (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  --Wahrerwattwurm (talk) 14:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    49. Shii (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Shii (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    50. Kroji (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Kroji (talk) 16:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    51. Suriyaa Kudo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Suriyaa Kudo (talk) 16:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    52. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Miniapolis (talk) 18:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    53. Hannes_24 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  --Hannes 24 (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    54. Nezdek (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Nezdek (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    55. Macuser10 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Macuser10 (talk) 19:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    56. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    57. Kilith (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Kilith (talk) 20:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    58. ThomasPusch (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  ThomasPusch (talk) 20:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    59. Ray Van De Walker (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Ray Van De Walker (talk) 20:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    60. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Litlok (talk) 21:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    61. Gus.dan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Gus.dan (talk) 23:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    62. Серега Спартак (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Серега Спартак (talk) 23:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    63. Be..anyone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  –Be..anyone (talk) 00:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    64. Hinnerk11 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Hinnerk11 (talk) 01:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    65. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Shizhao (talk) 02:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    66. Gilc (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I agree with Green Giant. Gilc (talk) 02:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    67. PP2014 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  PP2014 (talk) 03:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    68. Indlekoferw (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Indlekoferw (talk) 08:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    69. Bookvaedina (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Bookvaedina (talk) 08:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    70. Elfix (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Candidate's expertise in languages, maturity and experience on the Wikimedia projects are things that I believe are valuable for a Steward. He will be careful next time about how to identify. Elfix 10:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    71. Holder (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Holder (talk) 11:28, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    72. Green Zero (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  — Green Zero обг 12:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    73. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Not perfect, but is still suitable for the role. CT Cooper · talk 14:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    74. Kantatiskiwa (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Kantatiskiwa (talk) 14:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    75. IJA (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  IJA (talk) 15:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    76. Hirolovesswords (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Hirolovesswords (talk) 16:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    77. Congolandia.g (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Congolandia.g (talk) 21:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    78. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Zeljko (talk) 21:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    79. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Könnte ein echte Stütze werden. ST ○ 22:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    80. Tiptoety (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Tiptoety talk 00:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    81. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Marcus Cyron (talk) 04:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    82. GeoO (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Good Luck :) geo ») 06:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    83. Howan Hansi (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Howan Hansi (talk) 06:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    84. Widr (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Posivite (such as variety of spoken languages) overcomes the negative for me. Widr (talk) 07:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    85. Torne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Torne (talk) 10:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    86. Y 6 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Y 6 (talk) 10:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    87. Talmid3 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Talmid3 (talk) 12:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    88. Adriano Morelli (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Trust him. Adriano Morelli (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    89. Joe Watzmo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Joe Watzmo (talk) 13:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    90. Emericpro (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Emericpro (talk) 13:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    91. Cadfaell (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    92. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Approved. Abaddon1337 (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    93. 23artashes (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  23artashes (talk) 21:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    94. Nioger (Verification pending) •  Nioger (talk) 00:01, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    95. Tempodivalse (Verification pending) •  Kvankam mi mem neofte interagas kun Didi, mi ankoraŭ trovas lin valorega EO-Vikipediisto meritanta mian plenan subtenon kaj fidon. Li antaŭ longe montras sin kiel afablan, helpeman, kaj kompetentan uzulon. Pro tiu eraro pri alsendado retleterojn mi apenaŭ povas zorgi. Ĉu lian kandidatecon vere povas nuligi nur unu eraro? Eĉ jamaj stevardoj faras de temp' al temp' misaĵojn. Tempodivalse [talk] 01:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    No

    2. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I see in terms of the contribution globally to prevent vandalism. --Uğurkenttalk 18:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    3. M7 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  People running for this role should be able to successfully read instructions and to take additional care in using emails, especially when containing personal data. "Appealing" to correct such errors is not always possible in the real life, and sometimes even when dealing with this Project. M/ (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Emin • message 18:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  You doing a good job in some projects, but your countervandalism experience seems not very high. Érico Wouters (msg) 18:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Aldnonymous (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  No I don't need clueless steward who sent their identification to WMF to info- , what will happen stewwy who wrongly lock account just because confusing name? I (really) don't need a clueless steward.--AldNonBicara? 18:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    7. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per Aldnon. Rschen7754 18:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    8. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  –Davey2010Talk 18:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    9. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    10. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Obelix (talk) 20:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    11. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per Rschen7754. Jasper Deng (talk) 20:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    12. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  No contributions to any Wikiversity. --Marshallsumter (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    13. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Eurodyne (talk) 22:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    14. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I am concerned about the user's handling of private information, given they mistakenly sent their own identification info to all the volunteers on OTRS rather than the secure address meant for it. Snowolf How can I help? 22:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    15. Barras (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Exactly per Snowolf. I don't see a problem with the identification arriving little too late, but the fact that the user sent the information to the wrong mail makes worrying about his ability to really understand rules, policies and guidelines. (Reading and understanding the how-to guide for the identification process surely isn't really hard.) That already those very basic things were done wrongly worry me too much to trust him now with steward rights. -Barras talk 22:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    16. Woodshed (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Woodshed (talk) 01:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    17. Inks.LWC (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per Aldnon. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    18. Kggucwa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Kggucwa (talk) 10:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    19. KTC (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Per M7, Snowolf & Barras. Mistake happens, but I would rather be safe than sorry. Maybe in the future. KTC (talk) 12:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    20. Savh (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Whilst making mistakes is understandable and human, these kind of mistakes should be avoided. What put me off the most, however, was the candidate's handling of the situation. First of all, I believe the user should have been aware earlier that his identification had not been processed, with the approaching deadline. Secondly, once disqualified, I would like a steward to check his work first instead of inmediately starting to complain about others, to later notice that it had been sent to the incorrect email address. Savhñ 15:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    21. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    22. Teles (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  What Savh said. Concerns with how sensitive data was sent to wrong place and how bad situation was handled afterwards. Seems to have good skills and would be a great addition with a few more experience with stewards' tasks, but not now. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 19:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    23. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  FASTILY 05:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    24. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Wpollard (talk) 08:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    25. Bladyniec (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Tomasz Bladyniec (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    26. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Per above. SPQRobin (talk) 21:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    27. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  KTo288 (talk) 22:39, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    28. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I don't really think he has the cross-wiki experience which I would like to see in a steward (e.g. in SWMT areas) - the thousands of edits globally outside of the home wikis are from adding interwiki links. Also, the incident with the identification not having arrived at the Foundation before the deadline is really embarassing. Actually that should have lead to disqualification anyway; but the complaining then was even worse. The candidates have the requirement to ensure that they send the identifying information to the right address, and to check that it is received and processed, not anyone else. Whatismore, I am appalled by the answer to Rschen's question for all candidates ("I[f] a[=I] am not involved directly or indirectly in the case, there is no problem by acting also in the home Wikipedia"). MF-W 23:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    29. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Az1568 (talk) 06:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    30. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  per Snowolf, see there. Holmium (talk) 12:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Neutral

    2. Alan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Alan (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    3. George.Edward.C (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Really unsure per M7's comments. George.Edward.C (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Patriot8790 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Patriot8790 (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    5. NahidSultan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  ~ Nahid Talk 18:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Jeremy77186 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jeremy77186 (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    7. Rich Farmbrough (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rich Farmbrough 18:53 8 February 2015 (GMT). 18:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Fork me (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Fork me (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    8. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rzuwig► 20:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    9. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Armbrust (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    10. NickK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I would have supported the nomination, but I have doubts per M7 — NickK (talk) 22:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    11. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Obviously experienced, trying to be polite, but with some answers which I do not understand. I favor short, clear answers from stewards because this minimizes chance of confusion. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    12. QEDK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  QEDK (talk) 05:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    13. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    14. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Unsure. He gave good answers, but I get the feeling he doesn't have the right image from the stewards with all the legal talk. Also, everyone makes mistakes obviously, but sending your private information to the wrong email address ... Trijnsteltalk 12:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    15. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Not sure. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    16. JurgenNL (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  JurgenNL (talk) 16:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    17. The Theosophist (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  The Theosophist (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    18. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Southparkfan 18:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    19. Andre S. (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Andre S. (talk) 19:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    20. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Not sure. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 22:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    21. Hint000 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Hint000 (talk) 06:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    22. Elcobbola (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Эlcobbola talk 00:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    23. Yogesh Khandke (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Yogesh Khandke (talk) 05:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    24. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per Trijnstel Matanya (talk) 07:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    25. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  I'm not know this user Poti Berik (talk) 12:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    26. Gonzolito (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Idk. You seem to be well-involved, but the mistake risen by M7 makes me raise an eyebrow. Gonzolito (talk) 13:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2015/Votes/DidiWeidmann&oldid=11241458"