通用行為準則/2021諮詢

點此投票

通用行為準則

• 政策
• 執行規範
• 協調委員會（U4C） 章程 / 2024年选举 (候选人 / 提问 / 投票)
• 项目概要
• 常见问题
• 培训模块

是次協商計劃於2021年4月進行有關通用行為準則之應用的討論。 此協商以獨立項目形式舉行，並將集中總結。如有任何疑問或意見，請以任何語言於 討論頁 進行討論。

添加並查看下面的本地討論！ 查看或翻譯討論文本

維基媒體基金會正在尋求全球社群對通用行為準則(Universal Code of Conduct, 簡稱UCoC)的應用提出意見。該意見徵詢期計劃從2021年4月5日開始，到2021年5月5日為止。

這些諮詢之目的是幫助為通用行為準則起草委員會概述清晰的執法途徑，以設計今年稍後進行全面社群審核的建議。提議方案可以與現有過程或可能提出的其他途徑整合而成。這些諮詢將補充在整個UCoC項目中聚集的討論。有關通用行為準則(Universal Code of Conduct, 簡稱UCoC)專案的更多信息，請參見通用行為準則概述。

這些諮詢需要全球廣泛的意見，以使《通用行為準則》及其應用對於不同的維基媒體社群都是合理的。

諮詢目的

每一個維基媒體社群都有不同的需求和結構。在是次協商中，我們將收集並組織各個社群對這些需求和結構的反饋，以支持通用行為準則第二階段起草委員會的工作。該起草委員會的任務是概述明確的執法途徑，並為今年稍後進行的全面社群審核提出建議。

收集來自維基媒體社群的反饋貫穿了整個通用行為準則的專案。 通用行為準則(Universal Code of Conduct, 簡稱UCoC)專案的第二階段於2021年2月開始，針對性地擴展到一些維基媒體社群。例如，當地語言諮詢要求邀請了11個目標社群提供意見。維基媒體分支機構諮詢正在進行，維基媒體工作人員的諮詢計劃於4月10日至11日進行。

是次諮詢旨在從所有維基媒體社群收集有關通用行為準則(Universal Code of Conduct, 簡稱UCoC)專案第二階段的反饋，尤其是那些尚未提供有關項目第二階段反饋的社群。這些諮詢之目的是幫助通用行為準則起草委員會概述明確的執法措施，並於今年稍後進行的全面社群審核提出建議。如果您已經提交了反饋，請繼續進行對話，但是如果您已經在其他第二階段的對話中提交了反饋，則可不必再次重複。

作為對反饋之回應，執法途徑可以與現有做法保持一致，或幫助支援新的解決途徑。我們希望聽到有經驗的用戶，以及不熟悉如何解決衝突或報告問題的專案新用戶，以及熟悉其他全球性平台如何應對這些挑戰的用戶之資訊。我們希望支持良好的對話——每個人都可以分享觀點，並向他人學習。

諮詢結構

全球性的對話正在不同的維基媒體專案上以多種語言進行。各個社群被邀請以該專案的語言或內容展開討論。每個社群都應要求一名可信任的用戶或一組用戶以英語提交具有代表性的公正摘要。如果社群內沒有英語翻譯，則可以以任何語言提交摘要——專案團隊將尋找翻譯。

您可以選擇自己喜歡的語言和參與方式。我們的協調員團隊正在觀察多個渠道，並組織來自各個社群和團體的反饋。參與者可以在已經開始的任何討論中進行討論，也可以在元維基(Meta)上進行討論；同時可以使用我們提供的問題開始對專案進行討論。協調員可為組織過程提供幫助。

討論主題

本節中的內容是討論子頁面中的轉錄。

There are five topics with several questions to help start conversations. Feedback provided will have a significant impact on the draft for enforcement guidelines that will be prepared following the comment period.

• Please do not feel obligated to answer every question, focusing on what is important or impactful. We understand giving opinions on this topic can be difficult.
• While it will be necessary to describe experiences in a general way, these discussions are not the place to re-visit previously decided matters which should be handled at a more appropriate location.
• Each topic has several questions to help understand how the Universal Code of Conduct might interface with different communities.
• For answers to some frequently asked questions, please see this page.

Please note: If you wish to report a specific incident, please use existing pathways. If that is not an acceptable pathway, outlining in more general terms why the existing process does not work will be useful. Please avoid sending incident reports or appeals to facilitators or organizers. The people organizing discussions are not the staff that handle specific abuse reports or appeals and are not able to respond in that capacity.

Community Support

1. How can the effectiveness of anti-harassment efforts be measured?
2. What actions can be taken and what structures should be available to support those being targeted by harassment and those that respond to conduct issues?
3. What formal or informal support networks are available for contributors? What is necessary for these groups to function well, and what challenges are there to overcome?
4. What additional opportunities are there to deliver effective support for contributors? What would be useful in supporting communities, contributors, targets of harassment, and responders?

Reporting Pathways

1. How can reporting pathways be improved for targets of harassment? What types of changes would make it more or less challenging for users to submit appropriate reports?
2. What is the best way to ensure safe and proper handling of incidents involving i) vulnerable people; ii) serious harassment; or iii) threats of violence?
3. In your experience, what are effective ways to respond to those who engage in behaviours that may be considered harassment?
4. In what ways should reporting pathways provide for mediation, reform, or guidance about acceptable behaviours?

Managing Reports

1. Making reporting easier will likely increase the number of reports: in what ways can the management of reports be improved?
2. What type of additional resources would be helpful in identifying and addressing harassment and other conduct issues?
3. Are there human, technical, training, or knowledge-based resources the Foundation could provide to assist volunteers in this area?
4. How should incidents be dealt with that take place beyond the Wikimedia projects but are related to them, such as in-person or online meetings?

Handling Reports

1. In what ways should reports be handled to increase confidence from affected users that issues will be addressed responsibly and appropriately?
2. What appeal process should be in place if participants want to request a review of actions taken or not taken?
3. When private reporting options are used, how should the duty to protect the privacy and sense of safety of reporters be balanced with the need for transparency and accountability?
4. What privacy controls should be in place for data tracking in a reporting system used to log cross-wiki or persistent abusers?

Global Questions

1. How should issues be handled where there is no adequate local body to respond, for example, allegations against administrators or functionary groups?
2. In the past, the global movement has identified projects that are struggling with neutrality and conduct issues: in what ways could a safe and fair review be conducted in these situations?
3. How would a global dispute resolution body work with your community?

參與

現在進行的對話在以下列出。如果您所在社群尚未開始討論，則可以通過將問題從討論子頁面複製到本地專案的頁面上來創建一個討論。請注意，文本可能需要翻譯。準備就緒後，您可以邀請用戶參加，並包括指向以下頁面的鏈接。如要需要幫助，請以任何語言發佈到對話頁 。

請在開始對本地專案的討論之後，於下面添加討論：

查看或翻譯討論文本 複製討論文本 添加本地討論