Steward requests/Permissions/2013-01

Administrator access

MIKHEIL@ka.wikiquote

Status:    Done

• Wiki: ka.wikiquote.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: MIKHEIL (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: here --Mikheil ^Talk 17:11, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-07-02. -- Jusjih (talk) 09:39, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! —Mikheil ^Talk 09:41, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Rschen7754@wikidatawiki

Status:    Done

• Wiki: wikidata.org (list 'crats • no standard bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Rschen7754 (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Rschen7754

Please close this RFP as successful. Thanks. Techman224^Talk 19:51, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

The general leaning of the community is to keep adminship temporary [1] until the RFC on administrators closes [2]. --Rschen7754 19:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-04-02. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Masahiro Naoi@tl.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

• Wiki: tl.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Masahiro Naoi (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: Discussion

Not done, please ask your local bureaucrat. --Bencmq (talk) 07:46, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton@ptwikivoyage

Status:    Done

• Wiki: pt.wikivoyage.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)

I have granted Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton temporary adminship to assist with the construction of ptwikivoyage, to expire 05 February 2013. PeterSymonds (talk) 23:58, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Tokvo@frp.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

• Wiki: frp.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Tokvo (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: [3]

There are no active users or speakers on the wiki, there is a bureaucrat, but he only comes there from time to time, mainly to make corrections. There is need for an active administrator. Thank you in advance. Tokvo (talk) 16:56, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

• The local bureaucrat has been active this week, therefore should be the one to make the call. -- Avi (talk) 18:13, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Sk!d@wikidata

Status:    Done

• Wiki: wikidata.org (list 'crats • no standard bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Sk!d (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: d:Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Sk!d

Unanimous support. Consensus in the community is for three month temporary adminship. Techman224^Talk 00:16, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Done. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:59, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Masahiro Naoi@tl.wikibooks

Status:    Not done

• Wiki: tl.wikibooks.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Masahiro Naoi (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)

Please link to a discussion on the local wiki, without which the request will not be honored; thank you. -- Avi (talk) 17:29, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

• It has been over a week without a link to a discussion. -- Avi (talk) 04:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

H.b.sh@fa.wikinews

Status:    Not done

• Wiki: fa.wikinews.org (list 'crats • bot policy_{[no automatic approval]} • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: H.b.sh (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: here

Hi! H.b.sh in fa.wikinews need a Bureaucrat access. thank you for attention --^Ομιλία Sahim 14:42, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately this is declined, as there are not enough comments to show that the community really needs additional bureaucrats. Please make use of the steward requests pages in the meantime, and when the community grows, we will be happy to create additional bureaucrats. Many thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 16:20, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

ok, thank you peter.--^Ομιλία Sahim 15:57, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

CheckUser access

MBisanz@enwiki

Status:    Done

• Wiki: en.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy_{[no automatic approval]} • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: MBisanz (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: [4]

MBisanz has been appointed to the English Wikipedia's Audit Subcommittee, and requires access to Checkuser (he already has oversight). Could someone please also subscribe him to checkuser-l? Thank you! For the English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee, Hersfold ^(talk) 04:35, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

• Done -- Avi (talk) 05:19, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Inas@en.wikivoyage

Status:    Not done

• Wiki: en.wikivoyage.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: inas (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: [5]

--Inas (talk) 23:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Regardless of the lack of identification as this time, which would be needed and the procedures for that are listed at Steward handbook/email templates#Notification that identification is required, I am declining this request and marking it as Not done. As I have warned on the local page, joint nomination and voting is not proper procedure and it raises a number of questions. Specifically, I do not think it is a appropriate, valid, fair or transparent process. Each candidate should be separately elected. I have already consulted my colleagues and they likewise agree. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 23:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

That makes no sense whatsoever. How in the world is it in any way unfair, invalid, or opaque? Unanimous support isn't clear enough? That's absurd. LtPowers (talk) 02:11, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi Lt. It's because the stewards can't be 100% sure that when people were voting support they were voting to elect both candidates. Although it's probably not the case here, someone could have voted to support Peter, who wrote the initial nomination statement for example, but not have really considered whether Inas would be suitable as a CheckUser. Separate voting for each candidate provides the stewards with the assurance that the community does indeed want both candidates elected, and ultimately I can see why this has been done especially because of the nature of the data that Peter and Inas could be handling, extra precautions are quite justified. Thehelpfulone 02:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Oversight access

Sangam@zea.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

• Wiki: zea.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Sangam (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: I asked if the Zealandic wikipedia, where I'm active since october, could use Oversigters, and Overkante said that I could ask Oversight acces if I could use it against vandalism. Seehere.

Not done, see the requirements on OS. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 16:31, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Removal of access

Siebrand@nlwiki

Status:    Done

• Wiki: nl.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy_{[no automatic approval]} • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Siebrand (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: Local policy on activity criteria

User Siebrand has not made enough edits (250 since the change of policy, as decided by the community here) to sustain his admin rights. --Kippenvlees1 (talk) 20:36, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Done, with regret. Many thanks for your efforts over the years, Siebrand. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 20:42, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

PeterSymonds@simplewiki

Status:    Done

• Wiki: simple.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: PeterSymonds (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: self-request

Please remove my admin rights on the Simple English Wikipedia. Thanks! PeterSymonds (talk) 21:23, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Oh, that was most kind. Thank you for the fast response. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Make sure you thank Peter for his years of service, Peter. ;) Come back soon! Osiris (talk) 21:54, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

EhJJ@simplewiki

Status:    Done

• Wiki: simple.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: EhJJ (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: [6] done per simple:Wikipedia:Inactive administrators

Sysop rights were removed due to inactivity, non-admins cannot be bureaucrats per this policy. --Osiris (talk) 22:22, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Done, with thanks for his service. :-) PeterSymonds (talk) 22:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Juliancolton@simplewiki

Status:    Done

• Wiki: simple.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Juliancolton (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: [7] done per simple:Wikipedia:Inactive administrators

Sysop rights were removed due to inactivity, non-admins cannot be bureaucrats per this policy. --Osiris (talk) 22:22, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 22:30, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Can't believe I forgot to put this request in. Whoops. -Djsasso (talk) 00:14, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Érico Júnior Wouters@cawikinews

Status:    Done

• Wiki: ca.wikinews.org (list 'crats • bot policy_{[no automatic approval]} • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Érico Júnior Wouters (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)

Please, remove my sysop rights, because It's not used for months and my work was done on ca.wikinews. Thanks, Érico Wouters ^msg 19:31, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 19:41, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

podzemnik@cs.wikipedia

Status:    Done

• Wiki: cs.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy_{[no automatic approval]} • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: podzemnik (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)

Please remove my sysop rights. Thank you, --Podzemnik (talk) 15:29, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

 On hold for 24 hours to prevent a rage-quit. Trijnstel_talk 15:30, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Very sorry to see you go :-(
— Danny B. 15:35, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Done, with many thanks for your past service as an administrator. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:22, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Peter. --Podzemnik (talk) 07:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Zumbulka@bs.wikiquote

Status:    Done

• Wiki: bs.wikiquote.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Zumbulka (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: q:bs:Wikicitati:Upravnici#Remove Zumbulka from administrator and bureaucrat flags

Please remove both bureaucrat and administrator flags of this inactive user. --Jusjih (talk) 19:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Done. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:55, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Quackor@fo.wiktionary

Status:    Done

• Wiki: fo.wiktionary.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Quackor (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: wikt:fo:Wiktionary:Umboðsstjórar#Remove Quackor from administrator and bureaucrat flags

Please remove both bureaucrat and administrator flags of this inactive user. --Jusjih (talk) 19:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 16:41, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Stefán Ingi@is.wikisource

Status:    Done

• Wiki: is.wikisource.org (list 'crats • no standard bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Stefán Ingi (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: s:is:Wikiheimild:Stjórnendur#Remove Stefán Ingi from administrator and bureaucrat flags

Please remove both bureaucrat and administrator flags of this inactive user. --Jusjih (talk) 19:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 16:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Mendor@sco.wikipedia

Status:    Done

• Wiki: sco.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Mendor (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: w:sco:Wikipedia:Administrators#Remove Mendor from administrator and bureaucrat flags

Please remove both bureaucrat and administrator flags of this inactive user. --Jusjih (talk) 19:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 16:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Theopolisme@wikidata

Status:    Done

• Wiki: wikidata.org (list 'crats • no standard bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Theopolisme (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: n/a

Please remove administrator flag; my work with initial project-wise tasks is done, and as such I have no need for the tools. Cheers! Theopolisme _talk! 03:01, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Done, thank you for your help! Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 03:06, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Sotiale@wikidata

Status:    Done

• Wiki: wikidata.org (list 'crats • no standard bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Sotiale (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: n/a

Please remove my admin flag. My purpose of admin flag was that; helping any Korean users for joining easily in new project. I think my work is all done here.. I don't have to have the flag. Thank you in advance :) --Sotiale (talk) 11:23, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Done, best regards. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:47, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Bisgaard@dawikisource

Status:    Done

• Wiki: da.wikisource.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Bisgaard (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: [8]

Can you please remove sysop. --Simeondahl (talk) 10:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Done per [9] and [10] -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 12:42, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Vogone@wikidatawiki

Status:    Done

• Wiki: www.wikidata.org (list 'crats • no standard bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Vogone (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: self-request

Please remove my sysop access due to private reasons. --Vogone (talk) 19:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Done, and thank you for your service there. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:46, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

In_twilight@fa.wikipedia

Status:    Done

• Wiki: fa.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy_{[no automatic approval]} • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: In twilight (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)

As a Bureaucrat, as I was giving fa:user:in_twilight adminship per community consensus. I, by mistake, gave him cratship as well. Can someone please remove cratship access. Thanks.Behaafarid (talk) 08:06, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Could you kindly log in for authentication purposes? Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 08:03, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

You guys are fast. Behaafarid (talk) 08:06, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Done. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 08:07, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Caffelice@ko.wikisource

Status:    Done

• Wiki: ko.wikisource.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Caffelice (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: s:ko:위키문헌:관리자 선거/Caffelice (De-adminship)

Please remove both bureaucrat and administrator flags of this inactive user. --Jusjih (talk) 12:22, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Done. --Millosh (talk) 14:13, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

All of the votes in this case are from users with less than 20 edits to the project. I am not sure that this should be enough to remove flags. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 14:17, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

I don't know it is enough for removing the flags. Korean Wikisource isn't inactive project now. At least 2 administrators are active, at least 4 active users(including 2 admins) exist. Although I edited Sitenotice, just 7 days isn't enough time for removing his flag, IMHO. Would you please give our project more time for considering? --Sotiale (talk) 05:37, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Hm. I fulfilled the request because Jusjih asked. I can give the permissions back or any other steward could do it if the dominant position is not to remove permissions. --Millosh (talk) 12:06, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

I mean, it's not a big deal to give back permissions. But, let's not remove, then give back, then remove again. So, I'll give them back as soon as ko.ws community decides that they should be given back. --Millosh (talk) 12:08, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

kirq@pl.wikipedia

Status:    Done

• Wiki: pl.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • no standard bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: kirq (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)

Please remove my sysop status on Pl-Wiki. --Kirq (talk) 19:59, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Done Thanks for your work ! -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 17:56, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Zooro-Patriot@ru.wikinews

Status:    Done

• Wiki: ru.wikinews.org (list 'crats • no standard bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Zooro-Patriot (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: ru:n:Викиновости:Администраторы#Лишение статуса неактивных администраторов

Please, remove the sysop rights of the user due to inactivity and according to our policies. The user confirmed that he doesn't object this. --Artem Korzhimanov (talk) 13:37, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 14:17, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

PCode@cv.wikipedia

Status:    Done

• Wiki: cv.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: PCode (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: w:cv:Википеди:Бюрократсем#Remove PCode and w:cv:Википеди:Администраторсем#Remove PCode

Please remove both bureaucrat and administrator flags of this inactive user. --Jusjih (talk) 19:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

• This wiki has active users and I believe no inactivity policy, so I do not see why this should be a Meta issue. Please try to get the local policy first.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

  The communities have the power to remove admins without an inactivity policy. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 03:10, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

  Sure, but there was no reasonable discussion. The user was not notified on-wiki. I am editing that wiki every day and I am familiar with the situation.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:27, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

  Why not comment in that local discussion made by Jusjih then? --Bencmq (talk) 11:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

  I somehow missed it when it started. I will comment now. However, I do not think it is a good idea when someone without any contribution in the project shows up and open a deadminship discussion.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:47, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

  What's the reason of your oppose, by the way ? I don't understand much because having inactive users with bureaucrat status could be a security issue if the account was hijacked. Anyway, there will be no problems for this user to have his flags back when he comes back if he still have the approval of the community. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 18:11, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

  PCode is a kind of Jimbo Wales of Chavash Wikipedia, a person who founded the project and recruited the editors himself, making it the most successfull of all projects in minor languages spoken in the former USSR. The project is active, there are at least two active admins. If they do not consider his inactivity as a problem and do not respond on the deadmin page, why should Jusjih, without any contribution to the project, single-handedly deadmin PCode? I believe insufficient efforts have been made. Try to contact the admins, ask them whether they know what is going on, they may even contact him off-wiki, ask their opinion, then may be if everybody agrees, deadmin him. But not just like this - first open the discussion, vote for deadminship, then come here and request desysop.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

  This request was posted here before your local response. Being a bureaucrat means responsibility, not honor.--Jusjih (talk) 07:20, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

  Sure, it is just your contribution to that project is five edits, all of which are related with this deadminship. Compare it to mine contribution, if you wish. You are just not a member of the community.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:59, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

  Ok, now PCode showed up and voted for his deburaucrateship. I asked him a question to confirm it (if I remember correctly, he does not speak English, and this may be an error), but obviously if he does not want to be a bureaucrat I am not going to object.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:06, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

  Could you ask PCode to post that here, or are you certain that he is happy with the removal of the crat bit? -- Avi (talk) 22:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

  Done I will proceed to the removal of permissions per this. If PCode wants to return and to get his tools back, just ask the community opinion and there will be no problem at all for us to give them back. Many thanks to him for helping the project to grow up. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 17:47, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

GálaBot@se.wikipedia

Status:    Done

• Wiki: se.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: GálaBot (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)

I'm forgotten the password of my bot, GálaBot. --Gálaniitoluodda (talk) 16:22, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:44, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

I remembred the password i was forgotten 1/2 years ago today, but can add sysop-rights with local system. :) Gálaniitoluodda (talk) 19:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Silthor@pl.wikipedia

Status:    Done

• Wiki: pl.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • no standard bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Silthor (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: pl:Wikipedia:Administratorzy/Odbieranie uprawnień

Due to our policy, I hereby request removal of sysop acces due to inactivity in main namespace longer than one year. The user has been notified two weeks earlier. Tar Lócesilion|queta! 19:39, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:53, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Hman@ja.wikipedia

Status:    Done

• Wiki: ja.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy_{[no automatic approval]} • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Hman (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: own

Please remove my sysop flag, on ja-wikipedia --Hman (talk) 06:33, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

After 24 hours, I guess :) -- Avi (talk) 07:24, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your consideration. I retires from all wiki projects. --Hman (talk) 08:39, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

@Avraham: Yes, I think there is a good reason for giving time for possible reconsideration in this case. It apparently came out of recent (and perhaps stressful) discussions showing subtle disagreement between participants. Hmanさんへ：お疲れさまです。色々と気遣いが求められるであろう案件に辛抱強くとりくんでいらっしゃるのをいつも拝見しています。もしお心がわりがありましたら遠慮なくおっしゃってください。 --whym (talk)

48 hours passed.I must say a word of farewell to erstwhile mate. and I have to start for the next work. Please remove the flag quickly.

Please.--Hman (talk) 12:14, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

I confirm pending is no longer needed, just in case it matters any. I have notified locally. and ja:User:Hman's decision seems firm. --whym (talk) 12:40, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Done, thank you for efforts. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 12:43, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for running the removal sysop flag. I wish good luck and long prosperity of the project ... and you. good bye! --Hman (talk) 13:50, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

No problem, best of luck in your future endeavors :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:52, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Abuse filter@itwikivoyage

Status:    Done

• Wiki: it.wikivoyage.org (list 'crats • no standard bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Abuse filter (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: Community approval here

A very strange request!  Raoli  02:39, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Already done by Vito a week ago. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 02:40, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Yep, I already said it locally. --Vituzzu (talk) 17:06, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Aaron Schulz@enwiki

Status:    Done

• Wiki: enwiki.org (list 'crats • no standard bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Aaron Schulz (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: Remove CheckUser and Oversight, no longer required for WMF staff work. Per Arbitration Committee notice

With our thanks for his work as an active member of the English Wikipedia Checkuser team, and as a developer of these tools. Risker (talk) 06:29, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Done by User:Matanya. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 06:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

User Brion VIBBER@enwiki

Status:    Done

• Wiki: enwiki.org (list 'crats • no standard bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Brion VIBBER (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: Remove CheckUser, no longer required for WMF staff work. Per Arbitration Committee notice

With our thanks for his work that has long supported the Wikimedia family of projects, including this tool. Risker (talk) 06:29, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Done by User:Matanya. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 06:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

Mvkulkarni23@mr.wikisource

Status:    Done

• Wiki: mr.wikisource.org (list 'crats • no standard bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Mvkulkarni23 (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: [11]

Would like to request permanent sysopship for Marathi Language Wikisource. The local request was placed on 16th May 2012 at above given link at current central discussion page at mr wikisource .Undersigned is already admin at mr wikipedia. I am core team member for wikisource and developed and created basic setups. I have contributed more than 100 articles in Wikisource and support new members for marathi language WMF wikis. Leading as Pune SIG for all wikipeia activities for Wikimedia chapter for Wikipedia and wikisource. Thanks and Regards Mvkulkarni23 (talk) 18:11, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

grantedExisting permissions have been granted as temporary and for 6 months, with there being no comment, I am only inclined to replicate existing practice.[12] — billinghurst sDrewth 05:09, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Expiration notice posted on mr.wikisource (here). Trijnstel_talk 23:17, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

removed -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:05, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Tamara Ustinova@vepwiki

Status:    Done

• Wiki: vep.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Tamara Ustinova (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: here

Hello, I propose here to grant me the administrator's flag in Veps Wikipedia, because I'm very active in this project (I am the only really active vep.wiki-user in fact), and the adminship can be helpful for me. Local discussion (written in Russian) has been created. Thank you.--Tamara Ustinova (talk) 08:01, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

 On hold until 3 September. The discussion should be open for at least one week. -Barras talk 08:15, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Done, the local community has approved my candidacy.--Tamara Ustinova (talk) 17:00, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2012-12-04. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

OK, thank you!--Tamara Ustinova (talk) 13:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Expiration notice posted on vep.wikipedia (here). Trijnstel_talk 23:17, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

removed -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Lionslayer@mywiktionary

Status:    Done

• Wiki: my.wiktionary.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Lionslayer (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)

I am still maintaining this wiktionary. Please extend my adminship. Thank you. @=={Lionslayer> ^☎ 05:22, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Would 6 more months sufficient? Also, consider seeking permanent adminship by gathering community support. Thanks. ✒ Bennylin 08:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2012-12-06. The community is not large enough to grant it for 1 year or even permanent. Trijnstel_talk 10:35, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. @=={Lionslayer> ^☎ 11:43, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Expiration notice posted on my.wiktionary (here). Trijnstel_talk 23:17, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

extended [13] -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

TariButtar@pa.wiktionary

Status:    Done

• Wiki: pa.wiktionary.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: TariButtar (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: The wiki is yet orphan but, however, the discussion is here.

The wiki needs it's first active administrator as there is much to fix e.g. many articles created with just pure vandalism, many having entirely non-Punjabi text, empty pages and much more. I'm much experienced on en.wiki and have admin's right on pa.wiki and now, also, want to improve the orphan pa.wiktionary. TariButtar (talk) 16:17, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

It's really strange to find my request unanswered on such up-to-date page. Where are you stewards? --TariButtar (talk) 14:01, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

I think some of the hesitation may come from the fact that you've just been promoted to admin on pa.wiki a month ago per your request, and it might seem that you're not heavily engaged in pa.wiktionary at the moment. Pundit (talk) 14:12, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

And what is the urgency? The fact is that stewards require that a notification be made to the community, which we require to be in place for a minimum of a week, and to this point you have not done it. It would seem that there is an implicit refusal, by your not having done so, when you know that it is a requirement. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:40, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm not requesting rights on the basis of my contributions to pa.wiktionary; I've just started there but as being an experienced user of en.wiki I know the dos and don'ts well so not to worry about anything unusual, vandal etc. from me. I just expressed my interest in improving it in a better way. And yes, notified the community about my interest of being an admin at community portal but as the wiki is yet orphan, the response may rare. Tari Buttar (talk) 12:21, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Why there is no response to my request? Why it is unnoticed on such a highly watched page? I want this to be come to an end. Please at least tell me, this request is denied, on hold or what? I want a response. If you're waiting for the local community response, I wanna tell you that the response may rare as there is no community, for now. --Tari Buttar (talk) 02:56, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Apologies if it wasn't clear. The request is currently "in progress". You need to provide a link to the community discussion on your request. Pundit (talk) 11:38, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

I've provided a link to the community discussion in the "discussion" parameter, but the response may rare as there is no community yet. The wiki needs it's first admin (better active of course). --tari Buttar (talk) 11:55, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Again, sorry if I'm confused or misunderstand (I can't read this alphabet), but it somewhat seems that the discussion page you linked is orphaned (not linked to a village pump, for example). Was it properly advertised? Pundit (talk) 14:33, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

What alphabet, dear? If you talking about the page title I've linked to, then I wanna tell you that, it is the local community portal. And, what you mean by advertised? --tari Buttar (talk) 08:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

I mean, linked to (from the announcements, village pump, etc.). I hope you understand that it is up to you to properly explain what you post, how does it satisfy the community discussion criteria, etc. Pundit (talk) 13:34, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

The wiki doesn't have a village pump and for now, I don't think it should have one. I've told earlier that there is no community then which I should satisfied? I just fulfilled the formality by positing there. And, just want this request to come to an end as I'm seeing no one other is interseted in this request and than of stewads I've increased the size more. --tari Buttar (talk) 04:18, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Dear TariButtar, your admin access is granted temporarily for 3 months. We naturally understand that budding wikis may not have sufficient community to foster a proper discussion. Caution and taking the procedure slowly is also a measure to spot potential discrepancies and concerns, which you as an admin yourself should certainly understand. I hope your community will flourish and soon be able to vote for admins! :)  Granted for 3 months to expire on 2012-12-10. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Pundit (talk) 06:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

removed from User:Itar buttar@pawiktionary; which he renamed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:15, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Zylbath@got.wikipedia

Status:    Done

• Wiki: got.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Zylbath (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: http://got.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Admin_candidatures

Hello, I'm asking for expansion of my admin status, thank you. And another question I don't get an answer for at any place at wikipedia. Why is the translation function closed for the gothic wikipedia? And where can I ask to open that again? Zylbath (talk) 14:05, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

 On hold until 3 July. I'm afraid I can't answer your question - anyone else here who can? Trijnstel_talk 16:21, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Seems that I still can translate on translatewiki? Bencmq (talk) 15:03, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, it is possible to type in things, but they don't get changed on the wikipedia and when I asked there they just told me, that the function is closed because they used too many latin letters instead of gothic letters. When I told them that I want to use gothic letters aswell and that they should please open the function again, they just said, it's not possible. But the wikipedia can't be developped, when we cannot translate the interface. :/ Zylbath (talk) 11:42, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-01-03. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Trijnstel_talk 10:12, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Removed. PeterSymonds (talk) 00:03, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Hemant wikikosh@pi.wikipedia.org

Status:    Done

• Wiki: pi.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Hemant wikikosh (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: pi:Wikipedia:Community portal#Reqest for Adminship Placed

I have made several grammatical corrections on Pali wiki main page and other pages, but I see that admin rights are needed for changing many important pages. I would appreciate if you grant me the same. I have good knowledge of Pali and its literature. It would not be out of place to mention that currently sidebar as well as logo of Pali wiki are having serious grammatical mistakes. (To cite the least, logo declares the name of project as विकिपीङिया (=wikipenia) and the tagline declares it as सद्दकोसो i.e. a dictionary. Recent changes is written as नूतन विपरिणामेति (Nūtana vipariṇāmeti), which means 'new modifies' not 'modifications'). Without correction to them it is not possible for a Pali knowing newcomer to stay there for a while, let aside building up of community.
Please let me know if there is any further requirement. For info, I am working as a sysop on Sanskrit wikipedia. -Hemant wikikosh (talk) 07:36, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

We require the community to be consulted. In lieu of finding a better page, please consider placing the message to the community at pi:Wikipedia:Community portal expressing that you are applying for temporary adminship, and seeking the community's thoughts, and affirmation if they support the notion. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:37, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Okay. ...I've placed the message there. -Hemant wikikosh (talk) 17:10, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-01-05. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Trijnstel_talk 21:09, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll take due care. -Hemant wikikosh (talk) 06:11, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Removed. PeterSymonds (talk) 00:05, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Olsi@sqwikinews

Status:    Done

• Wiki: sq.wikinews.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Olsi (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)

I want to prolong my temporary sysop status at Albanian Wikinews. Olsi 16:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Please, post an onwiki notice. Ruslik 19:45, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

I posted a notice here. Olsi 17:58, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

What should I do now? Olsi 17:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

We'll wait for about a week and if nobody objects, somebody will assign the flag. All best, PeterSymonds (talk) 17:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Ok, thank you! Olsi 17:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

┌────────────────┘
 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2013-01-06. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 15:00, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Removed. PeterSymonds (talk) 00:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

Bjankuloski06@wikidata

Status:    Done

• Wiki: wikidata.org (list 'crats • no standard bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Bjankuloski06 (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: Request for translation adminship

As closing admin Sven Manguard (talk) 15:27, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Raoli@it.wikivoyage

Status:    Done

• Wiki: it.wikivoyage.org (list 'crats • no standard bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Raoli (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: Community approval here

As admin of it.wikivoyage.  Raoli  20:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 23:02, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Hazard-SJ@wikidatawiki

Status:    Done

• Wiki: wikidata.org (list 'crats • no standard bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
• User: Hazard-SJ (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discussion: d:Wikidata:Project chat/Archive/2012/11#Translation administrators

Per d:Wikidata:Translation administrators, administrators can request the translation administrator right without community consensus.  Hazard-SJ  ✈  05:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Done Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 06:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)