Steward requests/Checkuser: Difference between revisions

Edit links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 222: Line 222:
===Yuri_Venlaykov@cvwikipedia===
===Yuri_Venlaykov@cvwikipedia===
{{CU request
{{CU request
|status=done
|status=
|language code=cv
|language code=cv
|project shortcut=w
|project shortcut=w

Revision as of 19:03, 24 April 2012

Shortcut:
SRCU
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}:  Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale
{{Declined}}:  Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}:  It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball

<translate> This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also [[<tvar name="SRP">Steward requests/Permissions</tvar>|requesting checkuser access]]). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.</translate>

<translate> Before making a request:</translate>

  1. <translate> Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.</translate>
  2. <translate> Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using [[<tvar name="diff">mw:Special:MyLanguage/Help:Diff</tvar>|diff links]] or other evidence.</translate>
  3. <translate> Make sure there are no local checkusers.</translate>
  4. <translate> Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:</translate>


<translate> How to make a request</translate>

<translate> How to make a request:</translate>

  • <translate> Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also [[<tvar name="Srcu">Template:Srcu/doc#Usage</tvar>|<tvar name="Srcu2">{{srcu}}</tvar> help]]).</translate> 
    === Username@xx.project ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = 
 |project shortcut= 
 |user name1      = 
 |user name2      = 
 |user name3      = 
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = <translate><!--T:11--> [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link --></translate>
 |reason          = <translate><!--T:12--> Reasons here</translate>. ~~~~
}}

    <translate> For example:</translate> 

    === Example@en.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = en
 |project shortcut= w
 |user name1      = Example
 |user name2      = Foo
 |user name3      = Bar
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = <translate><!--T:14--> [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link --></translate>
 |reason          = <translate><!--T:15--> Reasons here.</translate> ~~~~
}}
  • <translate> Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.</translate>
Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests

D&S@pt.wikt

Status:    In progress
List of users
Riam (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Merriam (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Quoda (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
LoboBobo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Jorge Bruno Canadá (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Jorge Messe (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Gualdim (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Vale Jorge Canadá (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Charroque da Boca Profunda‎ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Djuzé (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): Suspected sock puppets of known pt.wikt vandal D&S. Please see my previous request related to this vandal for more information. And please, check them not only among themselves (to see if they are the same person) but also with other accounts used by this vandal in the past. Also take into account that he has been known to use open proxies in his vandalisms.

If you could check some of the new accounts created today in pt.wikt as well, I would be very grateful. There has been an unusual spur of activity, and some of the user names are slightly suspect, but I cannot say for sure.

Thanks.

--ValJor (talk) 20:06, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Riam and Merriam are definitely  Confirmed, but I've asked other stewards to give some assistence in this case. You'll hear soon more. Trijnsteltalk 20:23, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I added Quoda to the list, I'm almost sure it's him as well. Please check this one. Thanks again.
--ValJor (talk) 13:19, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would call it  Confirmed billinghurst sDrewth 13:32, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to keep extending this, but I have now added LoboBobo to the list. Thanks!
--ValJor (talk) 12:55, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Interestingly two IP addresses, one clear match for service provider and the behaviour, the other belongs to same location, though through TV cable. Enough of a duck to say  Confirmed. billinghurst sDrewth 14:51, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for all the work so far, but I really need that overall check of new accounts. There has been way too much suspect activity this past few days, this guy is on a roll, I can't keep coming back here to list each case. Thanks.
--ValJor (talk) 08:51, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
CheckUser is not a prophylactic, nor is WMF able to filter new users. We simply have to judge users on their edits, and if there are problematic edits or editors then we will deal with them as they appear. Even (especially?) stewards are to comply with CheckUser#Use of the tool. billinghurst sDrewth 13:51, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like the good guys have their hands tied and the bad guys can do whatever they want. Sad state of affairs...
As I mentioned before, this guy is really insidious, his first "contributions" look very innocent for someone looking at them for the first time. He then establishes his puppets and after that starts the real vandalism. I have been trying to stop him before he can do real harm.
Anyway, in the past it has happened that you guys would find more sockpuppets than I had originally listed. I was asking for something like that.
Well, I listed a few more names that may be puppets of this vandal. Please check those. Thanks again for all the hard work!
--ValJor (talk) 14:40, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Comment Request reopened. The last five accounts (Jorge Bruno Canadá, Jorge Messe, Gualdim, Vale Jorge Canadá and Mecanismo) aren't checked yet. Trijnsteltalk 16:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We really can't check every new account. There must have a good reason to do it (i.e something on the username, something on the user edits that matches any pattern) or we run the risk of checking innocent users. For example, 'Mecanismo' is a regular user from pt.wiki and - though I can't assure that - it is very unlikely that he is related.‴ Teles (T @ L C S) 00:22, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh well, while we here discuss the merits and problems of checking all new users, he has created another one: I replaced Mecanismo with Charroque da Boca Profunda‎. I really need your help guys!
It seems pt.wikt needs a dedicated CU person...
--ValJor (talk) 15:20, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed:

  • Charroque da Boca Profunda
  • Jorge Messe
  • Djuzé
  • Jorge Bruno Canadá
  • Vale Jorge Canadá
I didn't check Gualdim as I could not identify any reason to do it. I'm ok if another steward wants to do it.‴ Teles (T @ L C S) 16:38, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Now it seems he's trying to impersonate me, to create even more confusion. I just got the following message in my e-mail address:
Alguém, provavelmente você, com o endereço de IP 188.37.163.134, registou uma conta
"José Sócrates" com este endereço de e-mail no Wikcionário.

Para confirmar que esta conta realmente é sua, e para activar
as funcionalidades de e-mail do Wikcionário, abra o seguinte endereço no seu navegador:

http://pt.wiktionary.org/wiki/Special:ConfirmEmail/***

Caso este *não* seja você, não siga o endereço. Este código de confirmação
irá expirar 18h27min de 29 de abril de 2012.
Can you guys do something about this? Or is there another place to take this request, now that it is not related to checkuser?
--ValJor (talk) 12:46, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In my message to you yesterday, I explained about the range blocks, and your ability to modify them. I would suggest that you discuss the email facility with your fellow administrators and determine whether that should be modified. At some point we simply have to let the irritations be seen as just that. This person is just an irritating prat, and will keep pushing the bruises. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:02, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

佛學@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
佛學 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
人人微博 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
北京淘寶 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
台北基金 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
購物 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
求職 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
電子書 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
影片 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): We are seeing some pattern accounts being created everyday since this week, and some of them started to spam on their user page/talk page. You may find a longer (incomprehensive) list at zh:User:Alberth2/temp2. Also, if possible, please place a local block on the underlying IP(s). Thanks. Bencmq (talk) 08:43, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
more:

--Shizhao (talk) 14:11, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Results

The following accounts are  Confirmed. Unfortunately I can't block an IP address and/or range.

  • 佛學
  • 佛法
  • 東方黃金
  • 愛心圖片
  • 愛愛圖片
  • 人人微博
  • 北京淘寶
  • 遊戲餐廳
  • 電影達人
  • 台北基金
  • 三國棒球
  • 手機遊戲
  • 手錶品牌
  • 大樂透
  • 拍賣
  • 電視
  • 購物
  • 求職
  • 電子書
  • 影片
  • 論壇
  • 圖書
  • 佛經
  • 弘憶論壇
  • 牟尼佛法流通網
  • 法師
  • 佛法
  • 大寬法師
  • 大寬
  • 電腦節
  • 平板電腦
  • 下載
  • 軟體
  • 公益
  • 雜誌
  • 釋大寬法師

Trijnsteltalk 16:07, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Observatore@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
Observatore (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Gentlemen, My IP is blocked for three months. Had the same IP of a thug stubborn. I would like to know which user is suspected vandal sock me. Grateful. Observatore (talk) 21:17, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A lock that reaches 16,000 users. This is prudent? Still blocked due to zealously. Observatore (talk) 21:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Clarification, the range of IP was unlocked.Érico msg 21:42, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As I said before, in my state's near monopoly in fixed telephony. It has been clarified. Grateful. Observatore (talk) 21:46, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: A large IP range was blocked by a pt.wiki sysop, which ended by disallowing edits by Observatore. This range block was done with intentions to stop edits from a third user. As the range was too large, it was unblocked. Apparently, Observatore wanted to prove innocence with this request, but it doesn't seem to be necessary anymore per what he says.‴ Teles (T @ L C S) 02:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ou96choc1r@mediawikiwiki

Status:    Done
List of users
Ou96choc1r (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Ouchuquan1 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Inquisitor Ehrenstein (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): No local CheckUsers, CheckUser can be used to investigate socking. The first two especially appear to be related or otherwise the same. All three asked the same kind of question, but I'm not so certain about the last one because only the first two have made things against the project's rules.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:14, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The following accounts are  Confirmed. I locally blocked the underlying IP address for two weeks.
  • Birdnicho
  • Ouchuquan
  • Ouchuquan1
  • Ou96choc1r
  • Ou96choc1r1
  • Ou96choc1r11
Inquisitor Ehrenstein is Unrelated Unrelated to the socks mentioned above.
Trijnsteltalk 20:36, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Everyone blocked except Inquisitor Ehrenstein. Looks like they all wanted to impersonate him.--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:47, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK@sahwikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
OK (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
‎V. S. Nikolayev (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
I. N. Pryadeznikov (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Selena Gomez fan (cross-wiki vandal) (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): OK restored the template in the Selena Gomez article, which was first placed there by the previous reincarnation of SGF. V. S. Nikolayev and I. N. Pryadeznikov use the machine translation to solicite from other users some changes to Selena Gomez article. Thank you.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed and globally locked! --Vituzzu (talk) 19:00, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yuri_Venlaykov@cvwikipedia

Status:    In progress
List of users
Yuri Venlaykov (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Selena Gomez fan (cross-wiki vandal) (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Sorry for bothering you again, but now we got the same vandal in a different project.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser&oldid=3680166"