Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Browse history interactively
← Older edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Saibo (talk | contribs)
44,136 edits
{{done}}
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Shortcut|COM:AN/U|COM:ANU|COM:ANI}}
__NEWSECTIONLINK__
{{Shortcut|COM:AN/U}}
{{Administrators' noticeboard}}
{{Administrators' noticeboard}}
{{Discussion menu}}
{{autotranslate|base=Discussion menu}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archive = Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive %(counter)d
|algo = old(7d)
|counter = 113
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|minthreadsleft = 0
|counter = 26
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(10d)
|key = 434e13d517484f0c8c2c823c4f08dc9b
|key = 434e13d517484f0c8c2c823c4f08dc9b
|archive = Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}
<big>'''Note'''</big>
<big>'''Note'''</big>
* Before reporting one or more users here, try to resolve the dispute by discussing with them first. (Exception: obvious vandal accounts, spambots, etc.)
* Keep your report as short as possible, but include links as evidence.
* Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (<code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
* Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (<code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
* If appropriate, notify the user(s) concerned. {{tlx|1=Discussion-notice|2=noticeboard=COM:AN/U|3=thread=|4=reason=}} is available for this.
* Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s). <code><nowiki>{{subst:</nowiki>[[Template:Discussion-notice|Discussion-notice]]<nowiki>|noticeboard=COM:AN/U|thread=|reason=}} ~~~~</nowiki></code> is available for this.
* It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; Please try to remain civil with your comments.
* Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.
* Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.
<br/>
__TOC__
__TOC__
{{clear}}


== Requesting mass deletion of {{ping|DeepstoneV}}'s uploads. ==
== [[User:Artem Karimov]] ==

On top of previously mentioned problems, now he engaged himself into edit warring: [[:File:Standard time zones of the world.png]].--[[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 19:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
:'''Protected''' for one week. Discussion is to occur on the talk page. Use {{tl|editprotected}} to request changes before expiration of protection. [[User:Russavia|russavia]] ([[User talk:Russavia|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 19:43, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
:: Great, thanks. May be at some point he will realize that if everybody tells him that black is black and he is the only one to insist that black is white, than smth might be wrong, but protection as a temporary decision is fine.--[[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 19:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
::: It is more important that all involved understand that slow-revert wars on files such as this are disruptive not only to Commons, but also to other projects which are using the image. Is it imperative that all parties discuss the issues on the talk page of the file concerned. There is nothing more really to say in this matter from where I am sitting. [[User:Russavia|russavia]] ([[User talk:Russavia|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 22:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
::: Funny. No exceptions for Kosovo. All separatist movements or none. That simple. [[User:Artem Karimov|Artem Karimov]] ([[User talk:Artem Karimov|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 23:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
:::: By the way, nice monitoring of my contribs. Waste your time more. :) [[User:Artem Karimov|Artem Karimov]] ([[User talk:Artem Karimov|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 23:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
:::: That doesn't make any sense. Would you really exclude the United States from the map? At a certain point a separatist movement becomes a legitimate nation. Kosovo has achieved at least some of the markers of being a legitimate nation, and therefore it's not being exceptional to list it as one.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] ([[User talk:Prosfilaes|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 10:17, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
::::: In that case Abkhazia and South Ossetia should be included as well. Along with Trasnistria and Northern Cyprus. They are all de-facto states. [[User:Artem Karimov|Artem Karimov]] ([[User talk:Artem Karimov|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:58, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
I hope you will also help to protect the [[:File:Terlezky-2010-doloi.jpg]] with its previous detailed description, instead of the current one that appears to hide the relevant details about the subject of this photo. See the story above.--[[User:PereslavlFoto|PereslavlFoto]] ([[User talk:PereslavlFoto|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 21:37, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
:How about I, instead, leave the file unprotected, remove the English description entirely, and place all on notice that the next person to revert, or add any English description at all, without engaging in at least a one-week discussion on the talk page, and with some resemblance of consensus, will receive, courtesy of myself, a two week no-expenses paid vacation from Commons. '''No-one''' has used the talk page on the file, so no-one is innocent in this instance. [[User:Russavia|russavia]] ([[User talk:Russavia|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 22:42, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

::How about the following purely-factual text (which is necessary for ordinary English speakers to have any understanding of the context) be permanently left in place: "Grafitti reads: «Долой власть жидов», where the word «жид» is a derogatory term for «Jew». (The non-derogatory Russian word for «Jew» is «еврей».)" [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] ([[User talk:AnonMoos|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 23:13, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
:::I have always included this in English description, as your addition is important, but not full explanation of the photographed scene. So, if we include it, we are to include other details. With your explanation it becomes visible that the slogan is derogatory, but is stays unclear about why the slogan is against governing ''powers''.--[[User:PereslavlFoto|PereslavlFoto]] ([[User talk:PereslavlFoto|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 23:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

::Seems fair, because the most full description was collected in the same way. I discussed the question with other editors and they either added something or explained the theme to research. Also, the question does not depend on the language. The trouble is, one side is inclusive and prefers to show all attitudes; other is not, and prefers to show only their own attitude. To protect his short description and to avoid any other opinion but his own, one administrative user preferred to block me, and he seems to be against any details and explanations in this description. You may see the discussions. They started [[:User talk:Андрей Романенко|here]] with no result, and continued [[:User talk:Blacklake|there]]. In the 2nd discussion I learned there was «место собраний праворадикальных группировок», so I checked the mass media and added the explanation in Russian about «Russian national unity». The 3rd discussion was [[:User talk:Mitrius|there]], and it appeared that the description must avoid «own idiosyncratic views», so I kept and increased the number of hyperlinks to the sources in the description. Next discussion was kept [[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Terlezky-2010-doloi.jpg|in DR]] and helped to improve the translation.--[[User:PereslavlFoto|PereslavlFoto]] ([[User talk:PereslavlFoto|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 23:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
:::Let's say that we have a picture of the gathering of Flat Earth Society, and somebody in the description spends 2 paragraphs explaining how these people actually do not believe that the earth is flat, but actually oppose the doctrine that earth quakes are caused by the plate techtonics. That "full description" would not be helpful. The main reason for that is that it's misleading. In other words the fact that some description is longer doesn't mean that it's better. It's the same with this photo, the shorter description with the translation of the text written actually gives clearer understanding of what is depicted there than a wishwash of "The word 'kike' actually means something different, because the park has been known for kicking out nazis who wrote this slogan". [[User:Beta_M|VolodyA! V Anarhist]] <small>Beta_M</small> ([[User talk:Beta_M|converse]]) 16:44, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

To all groups, please take it to the talk pages of the files concerned. That is the essence of what I have stated above. There is no more need to reply here, when valuable time could be spent on discussion of issues relating to the files in question. Thanks, [[User:Russavia|russavia]] ([[User talk:Russavia|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 09:46, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

== Copyvios: Sakawat crsc ==

Can somebody please take care of {{user|Sakawat crsc}} – I started going through his uploads and they appear to be virtually all of them copyvios. I tagged about one third of them. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 09:24, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
: Oh, and please watch out for the Wikinger vandal [//commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/83.30.142.197] messing up all the taggings and warnings. Annoying. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 09:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

{{done}} --[[User:Ezarate|Ezarate]]<small>[[User Talk:Ezarate|esteban]]</small> 14:12, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
: Well, not quite – what I meant was for the remaining, not-yet-tagged files to be nuked too. Do I really have to search Google-images and tag every one of the remaining ones? [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 14:24, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

::I went through them one by one. Deleted half a dozen as obvious copyvios, tagged some as out of scope or probable copyvios, and left some, all taken with two Nokia phone at 1200x1600px , which seem to be unlikely copyvios. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<strong>Jim</strong> . . . . <small><small>[[User:Jameslwoodward|Jameslwoodward]]</small> ([[User talk:Jameslwoodward|talk to me]])</small> 13:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

== {{user|MichelleTaylorr}} and serial copyright violation ==

I've recently tagged two of [[User:MichelleTaylorr|MichelleTaylorr]]'s uploads as potential and proven copyright violations, and find that the user has [[User talk:MichelleTaylorr|a history]] of this behavior. Is it possible to either block the user from uploading, or require their uploads to be vetted before going live? — '''[[User:Fourthords|<span style="color:#CC0000;">Fourthords</span>]]''' <small>|''' [[User_talk:Fourthords|=/\=]]''' |</small> 20:46, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
:[[User:Mmxx|Mmxx]] blocked this user for 1 week [[User:Morgankevinj|<span style="color:darkgreen">Morgan</span><span style="color:blue">'''Kevin'''</span><span style="color:red">J</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Morgankevinj|''(talk)'']]</sup> 00:38, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

== User who has uploaded tons of (exclusively?) copyvios ==

See [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Jorge_horacio_richino here]. Can someone sort this out? Thanks, [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] ([[User talk:Calliopejen1|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 22:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

== [[User talk:Errùwen]] ==

Hi Admins! This User is uploading a lot of stuff, lots got deleted already. Seems to be very resistant against any kind of counseling. Latest works are some .ogg files which he/she claims as own work. The files have different speakers, so that can't be true. Maybe a little block for a few days helps? [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Err%C3%B9wen Contributions]Thanks! --[[User:Hedwig in Washington|<span style="color:blue">Hedwig in Washington</span>]] '''<sup>[[User talk:Hedwig in Washington|<span style="color:red">(MAIL?)</span>]]</sup>''' 04:58, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
:Warned user about blocking policy. Let us know if the user continues [[User:Morgankevinj|<span style="color:darkgreen">Morgan</span><span style="color:blue">'''Kevin'''</span><span style="color:red">J</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Morgankevinj|''(talk)'']]</sup> 19:37, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

== {{User|Annab 99}} ==

All the uploads from {{user|Annab 99}} are from the flickr album http://www.flickr.com/photos/96336933@N00/ and none of them are free. Please nuke all the copyright violations. --[[User:Sreejithk2000|Sreejith K]] ([[User talk:Sreejithk2000|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 10:28, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

:[[User:Annab 99]] left me a notice on my talk page that the licenses of these files has been changed to a free license. I have put a message at [[Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Five_flickr_files]] to undelete these files. --[[User:Sreejithk2000|Sreejith K]] ([[User talk:Sreejithk2000|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 04:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

== [[User:Martin H.]] ==

{{userlinks|Martin H.}} Multiple edit warring against several users in [[:Category:Quality images by country]] and all subcategories, where he removes the topic categories (e.g. [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Quality_images_of_the_United_Kingdom&diff=prev&oldid=67461448 "Photographs of the UK" from "Quality images of the UK"]). I [[User_talk:Martin_H.#QI_subcats|requested]] on his talk page (as well as a further user did), but user Martin H. does not see a need for any discussion on this issue. The most strange thing is, that user Martin H. removes topic categories from just a part of QI subcats, without doing it for other ones (like [[:Category:Quality images of Japan]] and many more; not to mention similar categories for Valued or Featured images) and bringing chaos in the system this way. - [[User:A.Savin|A.Savin]] 13:24, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

The same situation was with other category tree, when a user took categories with typical names of "This street" or "That street" or "Third street", removed them from a mother-category "Buildings of Town" and collected them into into a mother-category "Streets of the Town". The issue was, there were no images of streets in these categories, only images of buildings. When asked about the reason to collect the buildings images into the streets super-category, that user kept silence and avoided any explaining speech. Now there exist several empty and useless "streets" categories. Maybe someone will pay attention and solve this issue.--[[User:PereslavlFoto|PereslavlFoto]] ([[User talk:PereslavlFoto|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 13:58, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

:Give us some specific images, please. The cat names are not very helpful. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<strong>Jim</strong> . . . . <small><small>[[User:Jameslwoodward|Jameslwoodward]]</small> ([[User talk:Jameslwoodward|talk to me]])</small> 14:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

:You're free to open a separate topic, but in this section I expect only comments on the issue I submitted. And the edit warring by Martin H. unfortunately seems to [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Quality_images_of_Singapore&diff=prev&oldid=67465970 go on]. - [[User:A.Savin|A.Savin]] 16:22, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
::The quality images related issues are a long standing disagreement (See for example [[:User_talk:Martin_H./Archive_19#Featured_pictures_of_the_United_States]]) between "maintenance" and "topical" categories. I could not find immediately other similar discussions.
::While I share Martin's concerns about the danger of deeper and deeper side categories that form a parallel system to the current category system (it could lead to quality image categories for each "topical" category), I disagree that those are really maintenance categories. The fundamental problem is that indeed we have on Commons no "labelling" system that allows to select in a certain category media with a certain attribute, such as B&W, video, audio, SVG, QI, VI, Featured pictures, aerial, panoramic, date (range), superseded, ... and more arguably heritage buildings, author, ... So we have a permanent problem to find compromises about the depth and visibility of such categories. It is true that Martin is rather inflexible on his point and that he don't want the same discussion to be repeated over and over again. --[[User:Foroa|Foroa]] ([[User talk:Foroa|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:51, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

This seems more like a policy issue than a user issue. It needs to be settled whether QI categories and the like are to be within the topic category tree or not (and that's a job for the Village Pump or a [[COM:RFC|RFC]], or perhaps elsewhere, but not here). Of course, long-term it would be best if Commons' browsing system was intelligent enough to do filtering and sorting, including by quality status... [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ([[User talk:Rd232|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 22:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

== User:Sanzana45 & User:Sanzana ==

*{{userlinks|Sanzana45}}
*{{userlinks|Sanzana}}

Keeps uploading copyvios after final warning. '''[[:User:Moros y Christianos|Moros y Cristianos]]''' 19:00, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

:From a [[:en:Wikipedia:DUCK|duck test]] I guess Sanzana45 is a sockpuppet from Sanzana (same kind of copyvio, same nickname). I have blocked Sanzana45 for 1 week (double of Sanzana current block). However I doubt we can get something from this user, he seems to just ignore warnings. --[[User:PierreSelim|PierreSelim]] ([[User talk:PierreSelim|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 19:36, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

== {{userlinks|Shining Sky}} ==

All her images are/were copyright violations. She was warned a lot of times. [[User:Allan Javier Aguilar Castillo|Allan Javier Aguilar Castillo]] ([[User talk:Allan Javier Aguilar Castillo|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
: All images deleted and the account was blocked for a week. [[User:Beria|<font size="3" face="Vivaldi" color="#4069e1">Béria Lima</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Beria|<font size="3" face="Vivaldi" color="#4069e1">msg</font>]]</sup> 18:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

== Removal of file list [[Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-Afghanistan]] ==

I have compiled the list of files under [[Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-Afghanistan]] that are tagged with the template in question. Seemingly all of the images tagged with this template has a problem one way or another (some should even be re-tagged). The images are expected to comply with the three conditions below.
# ''The work was first published in Afghanistan.''
# ''The authors of the work are citizens of Afghanistan and are not also citizens or permanent residents of any country that participates in the Berne Convention.''
# ''Within thirty days of its first publication in Afghanistan, the work was never published in any country that participates in the Berne Convention.''

I was going to make an effort (with the help of others) to review the individual images to make sure if they are complying with the three conditions the template presents and try to re-tag them with something more suitable.

A user (admin) {{User|Cambalachero}} has removed my entry to the above page twice so far: [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3ADeletion_requests%2FTemplate%3APD-Afghanistan&diff=67557551&oldid=67557391 with this edit a second time]. I will not revert a second time.

I find this disruptive as the user has removed the entry twice so far making the individual analysis of every image difficult. The list would have made it possible for the discussion of individual images to be more visible. This is the purpose of COM:DEL. Alternative method is individually nominating 703 files one at a time with 703 new entries to com:del which in my view would be very disruptive.

--<small> [[User:とある白い猫/11|とある白い猫]]</small> <sup>[[User talk:とある白い猫/11|ちぃ？]]</sup> 15:43, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

:See [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3ADeletion_requests%2FTemplate%3APD-Afghanistan&diff=67557391&oldid=67557050 here]. Stefan4 agrees as well that the list is out of place there. I must point that so far there's only a single user proposing to delete that template, which in fact was kept with large consensus two times before. I must point as well that even if there are files with that licence without enough author info, that's not a problem of the license itself but of each individual file, and this licence is not more subject to insufficient info than any other random one. I pointed him that he may tag images without such info '''on a case by case basis''', which is not the 703 files of the whole category. [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
:I must point as well that mass deletion requests to purge copyright violations from a group of images (such as a user's uploads, a certain category, or in this case all images using PD-Afganistan) are only accepted if there's an actual evidence or reasoning to go on. For example, a user with 20 confirmed copyright violations and 10 remaining suspected images, or a portion of US WWII photos tagged with PD-1923. If no such reason is provided, then there will be no mass deletion. [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 18:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
::COM:DEL is the location where such items can be listed in bulk so that multiple people can process it demanding that I process 703 files all by my self is hardly fair. --<small> [[User:とある白い猫/11|とある白い猫]]</small> <sup>[[User talk:とある白い猫/11|ちぃ？]]</sup> 18:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
:::You can ask for help on Village Pump. I agree that nominating files for deletion without looking at them is not helpful. When you nominate for deletion, you already say that you believe that the file should be deleted... [[User:Beta_M|VolodyA! V Anarhist]] <small>Beta_M</small> ([[User talk:Beta_M|converse]]) 18:59, 26 February 2012 (UTC)


I have nominated their recently uploaded pictures [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Gupta_empire_Map.jpg][https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:View_of_Shergarh_Fort.png] for deletion due to ambiguous copyright information. And a cursory glance at their contribution reveals that almost all of their uploads are copyright violations in one form or another.
== OTRS needed ==


For example:
I loaded up today 35 pictures, which were donated by Mrs. Natália Carrascalão Antunes, but I couldn't find the place, where I can add her eMail-adress for the confirmation, that I am allowed to load up the pictures here. Her eMail is [removed to stop spam harvesters] . Greetings, --[[User:J. Patrick Fischer|Patrick]] ([[User talk:J. Patrick Fischer|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
*[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Asar_Mahaal.jpg This] is a zoomed in version of this file [https://www.tripadvisor.com/Attraction_Review-g608472-d3705376-Reviews-Mithari_and_Asar_Mahals-Bijapur_Bijapur_District_Chhattisgarh.html]
:The email for OTRS is permissions-commons{{@}}wikimedia.org [[User:Zscout370]] <sup>[[User_talk:Zscout370|(Return fire)]]</sup> 17:18, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
::Thank you! I requested now the confirming eMail by Mrs. Carrascalao. --[[User:J. Patrick Fischer|Patrick]] ([[User talk:J. Patrick Fischer|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 18:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC)


*[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Epic_View_of_Murud-Janjira_Fory.jpg This] is a higher contrast version of this [https://alibagtourism.com/things-to-do/murud-janjira-fort/]
== Social Survey ==


To save the community's time i believe any willing admin should scrutinise their uploads. [[User:Ratnahastin|Ratnahastin]] ([[User talk:Ratnahastin|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 13:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
After I enter wikipedia.org on my web browser URL, I was greeted with this Social Survey, after which it offered a MAC Book Air as a reward. Is this real? Is this an authorized Wiki offer? ''-- 22:10, 26 February 2012‎ 98.148.242.146''
*I've went ahead and tagged most of their uploads for deletion[[User:Ratnahastin|Ratnahastin]] ([[User talk:Ratnahastin|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 11:07, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
*:I don't think [[:File:Asar_Mahaal.jpg]] is "a zoomed in version" of [https://www.tripadvisor.com/Attraction_Review-g608472-d3705376-Reviews-Mithari_and_Asar_Mahals-Bijapur_Bijapur_District_Chhattisgarh.html]. Seeing the sky and the resolution, these are different pictures. [[User:Yann|Yann]] ([[User talk:Yann|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 11:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
*::Concur. Lots of differences (staining of the seawall, marks on walls near some of the windows, a power-line running to the post front-center, appearance of the tree to the right of the building. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 17:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


== Jinmez23 ==
:That's more of a [[Commons:Help Desk|Help desk]] question... [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] ([[User talk:AnonMoos|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 22:39, 26 February 2012 (UTC)


{{user8|Jinmez23}} has uploaded copyright violations despite [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jinmez23&diff=prev&oldid=876026607 being warned]. --[[User:Ovruni|Ovruni]] ([[User talk:Ovruni|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 20:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
::No idea, but it seems dubious. -''[[User:Mattbuck|mattbuck]]'' <small>([[User talk:Mattbuck|Talk]])</small> 23:47, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
:{{done}}. Yann warned the user once more. All contributions are deleted. [[User:Taivo|Taivo]] ([[User talk:Taivo|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 08:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


== Gerwin171717 ==
:You probably misspelled the address. wikipedi.org and wikipeia.org, for example, are scam sites. ''—[[User:LX|LX]] ([[User_talk:LX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/LX|contribs]])'' 08:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


{{User5|Gerwin171717}} Upload Copyrighted Video game files. [[User:メイド理世|メイド理世]] ([[User talk:メイド理世|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 04:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
== [[Special:Contributions/๋]] and [[:User:Pinkie Pie]] ==
:{{d}} Blocked for a week, all files deleted. [[User:Yann|Yann]] ([[User talk:Yann|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 07:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


== Dronebogus name calling and bad faith comment ==
Good morning,


Dronebogus reported my post as porn. I point out images that are more obviously porn and he [[Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by NuManDavid|started name calling in bad faith]] [[User:NuManDavid|NuManDavid]] ([[User talk:NuManDavid|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 03:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
๋ has created an account to (i) tag himself as a sockpuppet from SalfEnergy (ii) tag similarly the account Pinkie Pie.
:Just an FYI, but [[:COM:PORN]] is a thing and at some of the files in that DR clearly seem to cross the line. --[[User:Adamant1|Adamant1]] ([[User talk:Adamant1|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 03:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
:BTW, you should also notify {{ping|Dronebogus}} about this on their talk page per the text at the top "Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s)." Although I'm sure they know about it now since I just pinged them, but it's still good practice regardless. Thanks. --[[User:Adamant1|Adamant1]] ([[User talk:Adamant1|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 03:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
::Literally all I said was “I don’t know why you’re citing the only two quality videos of gay anal sex on Commons in contrast to your low-quality heterosexual pics, unless it’s to ''come across'' as homophobic.” (Emphasis retroactive) Instead of refuting or at least just respectfully disagreeing with them, you report me. This is a frivolous bad-faith request; if you don’t want your posts nominated for deletion as porn, or people to think you’re homophobic, don’t post porn or make comparisons that obviously could be read as homophobic (which I never called the user or even thought the user was). [[User:Dronebogus|Dronebogus]] ([[User talk:Dronebogus|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 05:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
:::{{nd}} No admin action needed. [[User:The Squirrel Conspiracy|The Squirrel Conspiracy]] ([[User talk:The Squirrel Conspiracy|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 05:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
::::Agreed. I warned NuManDavid and deleted the files. [[User:Yann|Yann]] ([[User talk:Yann|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 07:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)


== Continued copyright violations / advertising by User:Mipagolf ==
This last account claimed to have immediately pictures to upload and asked for a confirmed flag (but uploaded nothing). His activity were to open a DR on a .xxx logo, [[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Xxx tld logo.jpg]].


This is a suspect behavior. --[[User:Dereckson|Dereckson]] ([[User talk:Dereckson|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 08:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
I noticed [[:User:Yann]]'s previous notice on their talk page, and it seems like they are continuing to upload the same copyrighted images seemingly for advertisement purposes, see [[:Special:Contributions/Mipagolf]]. [[User:Palemeditation|Palemeditation]] ([[User talk:Palemeditation|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 17:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
:{{d}} Blocked for a week. All files were already deleted by Jonatan Svensson Glad. [[User:Yann|Yann]] ([[User talk:Yann|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 19:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
::Oh, sorry - forgot to block. Thanks Yann! --[[User:Josve05a|Jonatan Svensson Glad]] ([[User talk:Josve05a|talk]]) 19:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)


== [[User:PoundinMyCock4U]] ==
P.S. While I were writing this section, Tiptoety blocked the account with the reason ''Cross wiki blocks due CU information'', the CU in question done on en.wikipedia. The account Pinkie Pie should be watched. --[[User:Dereckson|Dereckson]] ([[User talk:Dereckson|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 08:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
:Just picking up on that myself - I think all accounts are now locked. --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 08:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
::Indeed: Tiptoety reports there is a global block on Pinkie Pie. --[[User:Dereckson|Dereckson]] ([[User talk:Dereckson|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 08:22, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


Inappropriate username. [[User:Dronebogus|Dronebogus]] ([[User talk:Dronebogus|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
== [[User :TheDarkFever]] ==
:{{done|Blocked}} per [[Commons:Username policy]]. --[[User:Túrelio|Túrelio]] ([[User talk:Túrelio|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


== Alice0815 ==
This user is repeatedly uploading copyvio pics taken from other sites passing them as his own work. He has been repeatedly warned here and in En wiki, but has ignored the warnings. Please block this user.--[[User:Sodabottle|Sodabottle]] ([[User talk:Sodabottle|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 13:55, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
:{{done}} Blocked for a week. [[User:Techman224|<font color="339933">'''Techman224'''</font>]][[User talk:Techman224|<font color="3300ff">'''<sup>Talk</sup>'''</font>]] 14:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


{{user5|Alice0815}}
== [[User:Paperquest]] actions ==


As pointed out on Village Pump, this user is uploading PNG files made from JPGs (not a very productive thing to do). But all the files I've looked at have extraneous sites listed as the source rather than the JPG image. So it appears to be a spam excercise. Block & rolback? --[[User:Tony Wills|Tony Wills]] ([[User talk:Tony Wills|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 11:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Indiscriminately mass-nominated a bunch of files with the same rambling, incomprehensible rationale; mostly posting this here so someone with more patience than will see this and speedy close all these frivolous, invalid nominations. [[User:Dronebogus|Dronebogus]] ([[User talk:Dronebogus|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 10:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
: [[Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive_22#Alice0815|Not the first problem from this account]]. - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] ! [[User talk:Jmabel|talk]] 14:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
:I'm starting to clean up this and I put an indef block on this user: he is not here to contribute to commons (if someone wants to be nicer than me feel free to change the duration or lift the block). --[[User:PierreSelim|PierreSelim]] ([[User talk:PierreSelim|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 13:24, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
:I concur, seems to be a rambling form of [[:en:WP:IDONTLIKEIT]]. See also [[Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive_22#Alice0815]]. &nbsp; — 🇺🇦<span style="font-size:115%;background:#FFA">[[User:Jeff G.|Jeff G.]]</span> ツ<small> please [[Template:Ping|ping]] or [[User:Jeff G./talk|talk to me]]</small>🇺🇦 14:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
: {{ping|Jeff G.}} same link I posted.
: '''However''', it looks like these are all pictures of one person, a cross-dressed man or MTF transsexual (can't guess from images how someone identifies), many with potentially disparaging file names, and this person seems to be saying it is them, that these were accidentally given free licenses on Flickr, that they are scrubbing them from Flickr and would like them scrubbed here. If I understand correctly, that would be a reasonable courtesy deletion request.
: {{ping|Alice0815}} if I have understood that correctly, please say so here and I would support a courtesy deletion request. Since these are all the same issue, this really should have been done as a [[Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request|Mass deletion request]] and you certainly should have written the rationale more coherently, but those aren't enormous issues.
: I will ask Alice0815 not to make any further edits before replying here. If they abide by that, no need for a block. - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] ! [[User talk:Jmabel|talk]] 14:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


== User:Hatomizinko3 Hatomizinko3 insults using photo description ＋ Multiple account operation ==
== {{userlinks|Andreyxavier}} ==


This is a story in the Japanese version, but I wasn't sure where to report it, so I decided to report it here.Hatomizinko3 used the photo description to insult me ​​for [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3A%E3%82%B8%E3%83%A3%E3%82%B9%E3%83%86%E3%82%A3%E3%83%B3%E3%83%9F%E3%83%A9%E3%83%8E_%E7%9A%90%E6%9C%88%E8%B3%9E_%E5%84%AA%E5%8B%9D%E6%99%82.jpg&diff=871215372&oldid=869183855 posting a photo taken with an old camera.] I warned him in a user note on the Japanese version of Wikipedia, but [https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%88%A9%E7%94%A8%E8%80%85%E2%80%90%E4%BC%9A%E8%A9%B1:Hatomizinko3?markasread=41589345&markasreadwiki=jawiki#c-Hatomizinko3-20240419040000-%E3%82%B8%E3%83%A7%E3%83%B3%E3%83%89%E3%82%A6-20240418231400 he not only recruited me, but also insulted me by saying that the quality of the photos was poor.] While we were discussing how to respond, [https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:%E3%82%B3%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88%E4%BE%9D%E9%A0%BC/Hatomizinko3&diff=prev&oldid=100365474 he threatened to find me and told me he didn't care if I was blocked because he would keep posting pictures on the commons.] He runs another account on Commons called [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Hatomizinko&action=edit&redlink=1 Hatomizinko]. [[User:ジョンドウ|ジョンドウ]] ([[User talk:ジョンドウ|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 15:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
All his images are/were copyright violations. He was warned a lot of times. [[User:Allan Javier Aguilar Castillo|Allan Javier Aguilar Castillo]] ([[User talk:Allan Javier Aguilar Castillo|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 03:39, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
: {{ping|ジョンドウ}} when you posted here, you should have put a notice at [[User talk:Hatomizinko3]]. I have now done that for you. - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] ! [[User talk:Jmabel|talk]] 18:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
: At [[:File:ジャスティンミラノ 皐月賞 優勝時.jpg]], according to Google translate, the original caption "EOSKissX4ごときでとられた写真を貼るんじゃねーよ" means "Don't post photos taken with something like EOSKissX4." {{ping|ジョンドウ}} I'm not immediately sure why that is supposed to be an insult to you in particular. - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] ! [[User talk:Jmabel|talk]] 18:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
: Not sure what you mean by "recruited," that word makes no sense here.
: The remark [https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%88%A9%E7%94%A8%E8%80%85%E2%80%90%E4%BC%9A%E8%A9%B1:Hatomizinko3?markasread=41589345&markasreadwiki=jawiki#c-Hatomizinko3-20240419040000-%E3%82%B8%E3%83%A7%E3%83%B3%E3%83%89%E3%82%A6-20240418231400 here] seems a bit out of line, especially the apparent obscenity of "クソ面白いです, " which I suspect is more extreme in Japanese than its English equivalent. But that is on ja-wiki, not Commons. Similarly for the last link: again, a bit rude, probably particularly unacceptable in Japanese, but I don't see anything that amounts to a threat to "find you." - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] ! [[User talk:Jmabel|talk]] 18:35, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
:The word "ごとき" is a word that looks down on the subject and has the meaning of discriminating against old cameras.I don't think it's acceptable to make comments that discriminate in editorial policy because the camera is old. Intimidation refers to the part where both parties "meet and talk" knowing that each other will be at the racetrack. He feels that a person can be identified by the camera model. [[User:ジョンドウ|ジョンドウ]] ([[User talk:ジョンドウ|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 23:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


== User:Amaterasu_1-1 ==
{{done}} Speedied his latest and blocked for three days. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<strong>Jim</strong> . . . . <small><small>[[User:Jameslwoodward|Jameslwoodward]]</small> ([[User talk:Jameslwoodward|talk to me]])</small> 12:04, 29 February 2012 (UTC)


* {{User3|Amaterasu_1-1}}
== [[User:Jpullokaran]] 's abuse language on [[User_talk:Kiran_Gopi]] ==
After releasing from block, this user restarted uploading copyvio or unfree logos and these files were removed; [[:File:Logo workman.svg]], [[:File:Logo Far Eastern Federal University.svg]] and [[:File:ROC Ministry of Foreign Affairs Emblem.svg]]. [[User:Netora|Netora]] ([[User talk:Netora|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 03:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
:{{done}}. 3 months block (third block). [[User:Taivo|Taivo]] ([[User talk:Taivo|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 13:39, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


== User:Malttew9983 and socks ==
I felt sad to see that [[User:Jpullokaran]] has used an uncivil and becoming language for [[User:Kiran_Gopi]] on [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kiran_Gopi&oldid=67645562#What.27s_is_your_problem_guy his talk page]. I request the admins to look into the matter. [[User:Hindustanilanguage|Hindustanilanguage]] ([[User talk:Hindustanilanguage|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 07:46, 1 March 2012 (UTC).
:I am not much worried about [[User:Jpullokaran]] language, beacuse he may got irritated with my DR requests. As it is occurred only once please ignore. Thanks [[User:Hindustanilanguage|Hindustanilanguage]] for pointing out the issue here. But I am seriously concerned on some of his [[Special:ListFiles/Jpullokaran|uploads]].--[[User:Kiran Gopi|Kiran Gopi]] ([[User talk:Kiran Gopi|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 08:52, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
:: The most uncivil there was "Have you waked from your sleep?" and it's not really something horrible. Somebody whose english abilities would be higher could write something significantly more stinging while staying much lower than that on the radar. [[User:Beta_M|VolodyA! V Anarhist]] <small>Beta_M</small> ([[User talk:Beta_M|converse]]) 09:34, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::: I have left a notice on the user talk page asking him to be civil. I do not think we need to do any more than this in this case. --[[User:Sreejithk2000|Sreejith K]] ([[User talk:Sreejithk2000|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 09:44, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
:::::VolodyA! V Anarhist, How do you rate use of the word "Idiots" for Kiran Gopi? [[User:Hindustanilanguage|Hindustanilanguage]] ([[User talk:Hindustanilanguage|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 09:49, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::::::In that context i didn't even notice it. Probably because it's not "You are an idiot" (where it'd be a noun) but rather "Idiots..." (an exclamation). So one can easily have substituted it with "Geez" just with a raised tone of voice. Of course if you are looking through the short post waiting to be insulted about something, you will; but that isn't a statement about the language, but rather about the intelligence of the person feeling an insult. [[User:Beta_M|VolodyA! V Anarhist]] <small>Beta_M</small> ([[User talk:Beta_M|converse]]) 09:54, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
:: So, in essence, if someone uses this language, you won't feel insulted. But then, there have been instances when I differed with people on Commons and elsewhere on totally different issues. But I never resort to such adjectives. Do you? [[User:Hindustanilanguage|Hindustanilanguage]] ([[User talk:Hindustanilanguage|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]])
::: He has been warned by Sreejith and I think we shall not do more because to me it's an isolated fact. Do you suggest another action or shall we close this topic ? --[[User:PierreSelim|PierreSelim]] ([[User talk:PierreSelim|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 10:16, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::::: No, I think we should close the issue for now. However, if the user again resorts to this language again, we'll have take this background into consideration. [[User:Hindustanilanguage|Hindustanilanguage]] ([[User talk:Hindustanilanguage|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 11:22, 1 March 2012 (UTC).


* {{User3|Malttew9983}}
== Arbitrary discussion deletion by Rd232 ==
* {{User3|Matt60092}}
* {{User3|Matt9035}}


The three accounts are the same user, focused with uploading the same political flags, there are requests and speedy deletions but the user creates new accounts with the same objective (changing slightly the name of file). [[User:Taichi|Taichi]] ([[User talk:Taichi|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 06:09, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
::<small>moved from [[Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism]] to here since some people think here is no vandalism involved. --[[User:Saibo|Saibo]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Saibo|<small>Δ</small>]]) 14:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)</small>
:{{done}}. I blocked them all. [[User:Taivo|Taivo]] ([[User talk:Taivo|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 13:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
[//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Requests_for_comment/PD_review&diff=67716486&oldid=67716171 here] - please revert. --[[User:Saibo|Saibo]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Saibo|<small>Δ</small>]]) 02:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
:What an ironic post. [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3ARequests_for_comment%2FPD_review&diff=67716171&oldid=67714897 This reversion] by Saibo arbitrarily deletes discussion; his diff is me restoring it. The content he was trying to restore through reversion was all moved to the talk page ([[Commons talk:Requests for comment/PD review]]). Also quite amazing to see an administrator, having provided enough disruptive comments to require them to be moved to the talk page, then to treat the removal as "vandalism" ([[Commons:Vandalism]]: a "malicious change"). [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ([[User talk:Rd232|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 10:09, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::Not my problem that you have inserted some other comments in the meantime to hide your deletion. You are welcome to reinsert them. --[[User:Saibo|Saibo]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Saibo|<small>Δ</small>]]) 13:15, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
:::It ''is'' your problem, since you deleted them, and it is quite obvious that my additional comments were nothing to do with you (don't be so egocentric). And you can cut [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Requests_for_comment/PD_review&diff=67731111&oldid=67716486 this sort of nonsense] right out - the ''relevant'' part of your comments was preserved, and you're welcome to make more ''relevant'' comments. You are ''not'' welcome to attempt to further disrupt an RFC about how to apply Commons policy because you disagree with that policy. In my email to you I commented
::::As I said in the closure at [[Commons:Deletion_requests/All_files_copyrighted_in_the_US_under_the_URAA]], "Most of the rest of this discussion relates to moving all or part of Commons to outside the US, or using uploads to local projects more. Users who want to discuss that further would be best served with a separate RFC on that topic - perhaps [[Commons:Requests for comment/Commons Abroad and related ideas]]." If you want to do that, feel free, but please don't seek to further comment in unhelpful ways on an attempt to figure out how to comply with current legal requirements.
:::Now, please understand that you are being disruptive, and that this is not acceptable behaviour, especially from an admin. Additionally, you're using an inappropriate dispute resolution mechanism (vandalism noticeboard). [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ([[User talk:Rd232|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 13:50, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::::Moved. --[[User:Saibo|Saibo]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Saibo|<small>Δ</small>]]) 14:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)


== Malversation ==
What exactly do the both of you want? I'd be more than happy to look at both of what you have to say, and likely come up with the result of sending you both to your rooms without dinner, if you want me to. Or you can both act like admins and discuss this on your talk pages and resolve it. We are probably used to pissing matches such as what seems to be occurring by less-experienced editors, but from admins...wow...just wow. [[User:Russavia|russavia]] ([[User talk:Russavia|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 15:32, 1 March 2012 (UTC)


Bonjour,
:Hi russavia, thanks for your comment. What I want is stated right at the start. Rd232 restructured (in fact it is a deletion) a discussion in the way he likes (up to now I avoided to mention: some here might remember that this occurrence is not the first time if this controversial restructuring) and I do not agree with that but he insists to delete my comments by reverting. --[[User:Saibo|Saibo]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Saibo|<small>Δ</small>]]) 15:39, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Un contributeur juge une personne d'extrême-droite alors que c'est une liste citoyenne composée de 81 personnes.
::Actually when i came across this discussion, i first thought that Saibo has lost it. But then [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Requests_for_comment/PD_review&diff=prev&oldid=67714635 this] is out of line. Removing discussion because it's 'heated' is equivalent with trying to channel it in the direction that one wants it to go. Such moves, '''especially during the heated discussion''' are very contravercial, and should be avoided wherever possible. [[User:Beta_M|VolodyA! V Anarhist]] <small>Beta_M</small> ([[User talk:Beta_M|converse]]) 16:19, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Sachant qu'il y a des personnes de tout bord politique à l'intérieur.
:::It would help if you quoted the full edit summary: ''move heated '''meta discussion''' to talk, keeping quote of materially relevant part'' [emphasis added]. All the comments moved to talk were because they were disruptive, or responses to those comments which added nothing to the discussion of the RFC subject. Moreover they were almost entirely ''meta'' comments (complaining ''about'' the RFC or the Commons policy it's based on, not ''participating'' in it). Moving these comments was necessary because such disruption should not be tolerated. I tolerated quite a bit, but when Saibo came back ''again'' with the same [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3ARequests_for_comment%2FPD_review&diff=67389998&oldid=67355572 disruptive comments], it was too much. After those comments a previously active discussion had no contributions for a week, and a causal element cannot be ruled out. But whether the disruption succeeded or not, there is no doubt that Saibo ''intended'' to stop the RFC achieving anything, and by definition that is disruptive. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ([[User talk:Rd232|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:32, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Gauche radicale, gauche, communiste, droite, centre, etc...


Il ne s'est même pas renseigné sur toutes les personnes présentent mais affiche que tout le monde est d'extrême-droite.
I clearly stated what I want in the AN section you (Russavia) closed:
Pourriez-vous y remédier ? Car c'est de la discrimination pour les 80 autres personnes.
:[[User:Saibo]] has repeatedly made disruptive comments at [[Commons:Requests for comment/PD review‎]], per his apparent belief that the second bullet point in the heading of [[COM:L]] (media must be "in the public domain in at least the United States ''and'' in the source country of the work") is not in fact policy, and that therefore attempts to ensure that PD-tagged images comply with this are some sort of "US-centric" chauvinism. I eventually moved those disruptive comments to the RFC talkpage (quoting on the main RFC page the only part that actually was relevant to the RFC), and pointed out by email that if he wanted to change policy, he was welcome to try. In response he raised [[Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Vandalism#Arbitrary_discussion_deletion]]. He is now edit-warring [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3ARequests_for_comment%2FPD_review&diff=67732186&oldid=67731922 this claim] into the RFC page, and from discussion at AIV and his user talk page clearly is not going to desist.


https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_des_listes_aux_%C3%A9lections_europ%C3%A9ennes_de_2024_en_France
:Please assist in preventing further disruption. I ask that an admin give him a final warning, and remove his [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3ARequests_for_comment%2FPD_review&diff=67732186&oldid=67731922 inappropriate claim]. Thanks. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ([[User talk:Rd232|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 14:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
[[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ([[User talk:Rd232|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:32, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::As for "...discuss this on your talk pages and resolve it..." - I already emailed Saibo (immediately after moving the material to the RFC talk page, to explain), and attempted further discussion at his talk page. You can see the results for yourself. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ([[User talk:Rd232|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:35, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::: Is "...discuss this on your talk pages and resolve it..." meaning a ''deletion of discussion content and ensuring that it stays deleted by reverting'' its restore? Do you know [[:en:Doublespeak|Doublespeak]]? --[[User:Saibo|Saibo]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Saibo|<small>Δ</small>]]) 19:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::::The content wasn't deleted, it was moved from the RFC main page to the RFC talk page, where it should have been in the first place. And you're replying to a comment about user talk page discussions. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ([[User talk:Rd232|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 23:24, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
:::::I do not know what you mean with "And you're replying to a comment about user talk page discussions". But, really, I stop that discusion here with you now. Enough time wasted. --[[User:Saibo|Saibo]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Saibo|<small>Δ</small>]]) 23:53, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::::::'' "...discuss this on your talk pages and resolve it..."'' just above - you even quoted it! [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ([[User talk:Rd232|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 00:19, 2 March 2012 (UTC)


Je vous remercie [[User:Archess Ney|Archess Ney]] ([[User talk:Archess Ney|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 13:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Well, as a gesture of goodwill, I've created [[Commons:Requests for comment/Commons Abroad and related ideas]] to enable more discussion of how to reduce the need for Commons and other Wikimedia projects to comply with US copyright laws, an issue obviously of great concern to him. And I've mentioned it at [[Commons:Requests_for_comment/PD_review#Reducing_dependence_on_US_copyright_laws]]. Can we now remove [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3ARequests_for_comment%2FPD_review&diff=67732186&oldid=67731922 this claim] from the RFC page, and draw a line under this silliness? [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ([[User talk:Rd232|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 18:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
:Again doublespeak. You are the one who demands this discussion - not me (like you try to put it here). I fail to see how this should be "goodwill" - to the opposite since you use try to coin (or establish/push it as solution) the term "Commons abroad" (that is a non-neutral page title). More comments on this on ''your'' RFC page.
:If you which to "draw a line" then restore the deleted discussion parts. --[[User:Saibo|Saibo]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Saibo|<small>Δ</small>]]) 19:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::Well there goes ''that'' olive branch... Look, I'm not coining or "pushing" anything. "Commons Abroad" was coined by Dcoetzee [[Commons:Deletion_requests/All_files_copyrighted_in_the_US_under_the_URAA#4_-_Commons_Abroad|in the URAA DR]] (as far as I know) as a perfectly reasonable handle for the idea of hosting files outside the US, where they might not be subject to US copyright laws (though it's probably not that easy to really dissociate WMF from such a non-US-based Commons). The fact that you cannot seem to get your head around the fact that Commons is hosted in the US and run by a US organisation and subject to US laws is not ''my'' fault: I've tried to explain it to you. And I've raised the RFC I previously suggested you start, because it gives you (and others who were interested, the DR had plenty of activity) a chance to discuss whether there is a way for Commons (or at least other Wikimedia projects) to host content currently subject to US copyright restrictions. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ([[User talk:Rd232|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 20:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
:::Again, I do not need that discussion - the content ever was and belongs to Commons. And if the WMF does see any need that hosting this public domain (except in one country) content does not fit their home jurisdiction ''they'' can think about what they want to do (that may be moving to another country). --[[User:Saibo|Saibo]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Saibo|<small>Δ</small>]]) 20:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC) But, ehm, that here is the wrong place to discuss that. --[[User:Saibo|Saibo]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Saibo|<small>Δ</small>]]) 20:50, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::::I raised it with Jimbo in December, and the response made it clear that moving abroad wasn't something the WMF would consider at the moment (practicalities, plus moving to another jurisdiction means then being subject to ''those'' laws, which may be much more restrictive in some regards like free speech or fair use). The WMF position is quite clear, that copyright violations should be removed, and URAA creates a new class of copyright violations. Nobody likes it, but that's the situation. I wouldn't mind if you were energetically trying to ''change'' that somehow, but all your efforts seem to involve some form of denial of the facts. That denial (to bring this back ontopic) extends to disrupting attempts to deal with the situation as it exists, and that disruption is what I attempted to deal with. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ([[User talk:Rd232|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 21:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::::: I do not agree with your deletion attempts and you don't like that so you deleted my comments ("deal[t] with"). Of course my comment and even my presence is disruption from your point of view since it is the opposite of helping with your "effort" (quoted from somewhere else). Probably it is also disrupting by the community that you have very few people behind your back and willing to help you with this "effort", hmm? --[[User:Saibo|Saibo]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Saibo|<small>Δ</small>]]) 22:18, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::::::I've explained my and your actions repeatedly, and engaged with your bizarre, unsupported and illogical position on Commons not needing to respect US law (which you'd previously tried repeatedly to inject disruptively into a discussion on how to comply with US law), and tried to feed that into a constructive direction (ways to reduce the impact of US law on what Commons wants to achieve). At this point you're just repeating yourself, with decreasing amounts of rationality, both here and elsewhere. Frankly, I'm starting to wonder how compatible with Commons adminship is the belief (which you apparently sincerely hold and cannot be shifted from) that Commons does not need to comply with US law. That's quite separate from the disruptive ''way'' in which you have expressed that belief, and then attacked me when I dealt with that - which is in itself a problem. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ([[User talk:Rd232|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 23:24, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
:::::::I am not really sure why you are commenting on my admin rights here, but, well: If you think that the community wishes that I, the disruptor, should not be an admin, then please make a desysop request (note that this is no recommendation you to do so). As said above: I will not further waste my time in this discussion with you. --[[User:Saibo|Saibo]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Saibo|<small>Δ</small>]]) 23:53, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::::::::No, a desysop request needs some prior consensus and anyway I don't wish to pursue it on the back of a single incident which hopefully can be settled fairly soon (even though your unwillingness to respect the laws applicable to Commons ''is'' rather concerning). If you wish to end this incident, just remove [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3ARequests_for_comment%2FPD_review&diff=67732186&oldid=67731922 this claim] or allow me to do it. That's all. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ([[User talk:Rd232|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 00:19, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
:::::::::That is why I did not recommend that - I am happy that you are able to see it the same way. --[[User:Saibo|Saibo]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Saibo|<small>Δ</small>]]) 01:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:57, 18 May 2024

Shortcuts: COM:AN/U • COM:ANU • COM:ANI

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section] 		User problems
[new section] 		Blocks and protections
[new section] 		Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Translate this page
COMMONS DISCUSSION PAGES (index)

Note

  • Before reporting one or more users here, try to resolve the dispute by discussing with them first. (Exception: obvious vandal accounts, spambots, etc.)
  • Keep your report as short as possible, but include links as evidence.
  • Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
  • Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s). {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/U|thread=|reason=}} ~~~~ is available for this.
  • It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; Please try to remain civil with your comments.
  • Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.

Requesting mass deletion of @DeepstoneV: 's uploads.[edit]

I have nominated their recently uploaded pictures [1][2] for deletion due to ambiguous copyright information. And a cursory glance at their contribution reveals that almost all of their uploads are copyright violations in one form or another.

For example:

  • This is a zoomed in version of this file [3]
  • This is a higher contrast version of this [4]

To save the community's time i believe any willing admin should scrutinise their uploads. Ratnahastin (talk) 13:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jinmez23[edit]

Jinmez23 (talk • contribs • block log • filter log) has uploaded copyright violations despite being warned. --Ovruni (talk) 20:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Yann warned the user once more. All contributions are deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gerwin171717[edit]

Gerwin171717 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) Upload Copyrighted Video game files. メイド理世 (talk) 04:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blocked for a week, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 07:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dronebogus name calling and bad faith comment[edit]

Dronebogus reported my post as porn. I point out images that are more obviously porn and he started name calling in bad faith NuManDavid (talk) 03:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI, but COM:PORN is a thing and at some of the files in that DR clearly seem to cross the line. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, you should also notify @Dronebogus: about this on their talk page per the text at the top "Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s)." Although I'm sure they know about it now since I just pinged them, but it's still good practice regardless. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Literally all I said was “I don’t know why you’re citing the only two quality videos of gay anal sex on Commons in contrast to your low-quality heterosexual pics, unless it’s to come across as homophobic.” (Emphasis retroactive) Instead of refuting or at least just respectfully disagreeing with them, you report me. This is a frivolous bad-faith request; if you don’t want your posts nominated for deletion as porn, or people to think you’re homophobic, don’t post porn or make comparisons that obviously could be read as homophobic (which I never called the user or even thought the user was). Dronebogus (talk) 05:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done No admin action needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. I warned NuManDavid and deleted the files. Yann (talk) 07:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Continued copyright violations / advertising by User:Mipagolf[edit]

I noticed User:Yann's previous notice on their talk page, and it seems like they are continuing to upload the same copyrighted images seemingly for advertisement purposes, see Special:Contributions/Mipagolf. Palemeditation (talk) 17:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blocked for a week. All files were already deleted by Jonatan Svensson Glad. Yann (talk) 19:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, sorry - forgot to block. Thanks Yann! --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:PoundinMyCock4U[edit]

Inappropriate username. Dronebogus (talk) 09:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Blocked per Commons:Username policy. --Túrelio (talk) 09:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alice0815[edit]

Alice0815 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Indiscriminately mass-nominated a bunch of files with the same rambling, incomprehensible rationale; mostly posting this here so someone with more patience than will see this and speedy close all these frivolous, invalid nominations. Dronebogus (talk) 10:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not the first problem from this account. - Jmabel ! talk 14:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I concur, seems to be a rambling form of en:WP:IDONTLIKEIT. See also Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive_22#Alice0815.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: same link I posted.
However, it looks like these are all pictures of one person, a cross-dressed man or MTF transsexual (can't guess from images how someone identifies), many with potentially disparaging file names, and this person seems to be saying it is them, that these were accidentally given free licenses on Flickr, that they are scrubbing them from Flickr and would like them scrubbed here. If I understand correctly, that would be a reasonable courtesy deletion request.
@Alice0815: if I have understood that correctly, please say so here and I would support a courtesy deletion request. Since these are all the same issue, this really should have been done as a Mass deletion request and you certainly should have written the rationale more coherently, but those aren't enormous issues.
I will ask Alice0815 not to make any further edits before replying here. If they abide by that, no need for a block. - Jmabel ! talk 14:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hatomizinko3 Hatomizinko3 insults using photo description ＋ Multiple account operation[edit]

This is a story in the Japanese version, but I wasn't sure where to report it, so I decided to report it here.Hatomizinko3 used the photo description to insult me ​​for posting a photo taken with an old camera. I warned him in a user note on the Japanese version of Wikipedia, but he not only recruited me, but also insulted me by saying that the quality of the photos was poor. While we were discussing how to respond, he threatened to find me and told me he didn't care if I was blocked because he would keep posting pictures on the commons. He runs another account on Commons called Hatomizinko. ジョンドウ (talk) 15:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ジョンドウ: when you posted here, you should have put a notice at User talk:Hatomizinko3. I have now done that for you. - Jmabel ! talk 18:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At File:ジャスティンミラノ 皐月賞 優勝時.jpg, according to Google translate, the original caption "EOSKissX4ごときでとられた写真を貼るんじゃねーよ" means "Don't post photos taken with something like EOSKissX4." @ジョンドウ: I'm not immediately sure why that is supposed to be an insult to you in particular. - Jmabel ! talk 18:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what you mean by "recruited," that word makes no sense here.
The remark here seems a bit out of line, especially the apparent obscenity of "クソ面白いです, " which I suspect is more extreme in Japanese than its English equivalent. But that is on ja-wiki, not Commons. Similarly for the last link: again, a bit rude, probably particularly unacceptable in Japanese, but I don't see anything that amounts to a threat to "find you." - Jmabel ! talk 18:35, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The word "ごとき" is a word that looks down on the subject and has the meaning of discriminating against old cameras.I don't think it's acceptable to make comments that discriminate in editorial policy because the camera is old. Intimidation refers to the part where both parties "meet and talk" knowing that each other will be at the racetrack. He feels that a person can be identified by the camera model. ジョンドウ (talk) 23:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Amaterasu_1-1[edit]

After releasing from block, this user restarted uploading copyvio or unfree logos and these files were removed; File:Logo workman.svg, File:Logo Far Eastern Federal University.svg and File:ROC Ministry of Foreign Affairs Emblem.svg. Netora (talk) 03:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. 3 months block (third block). Taivo (talk) 13:39, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Malttew9983 and socks[edit]

The three accounts are the same user, focused with uploading the same political flags, there are requests and speedy deletions but the user creates new accounts with the same objective (changing slightly the name of file). Taichi (talk) 06:09, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. I blocked them all. Taivo (talk) 13:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Malversation[edit]

Bonjour, Un contributeur juge une personne d'extrême-droite alors que c'est une liste citoyenne composée de 81 personnes. Sachant qu'il y a des personnes de tout bord politique à l'intérieur. Gauche radicale, gauche, communiste, droite, centre, etc...

Il ne s'est même pas renseigné sur toutes les personnes présentent mais affiche que tout le monde est d'extrême-droite. Pourriez-vous y remédier ? Car c'est de la discrimination pour les 80 autres personnes.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_des_listes_aux_%C3%A9lections_europ%C3%A9ennes_de_2024_en_France

Je vous remercie Archess Ney (talk) 13:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems&oldid=877303738"