Commons:Administrators/Requests/Andrei Stroe: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Pmlineditor (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 15:
* {{oppose}} no acceptance, low activity. [[User:Multichill|Multichill]] ([[User talk:Multichill|talk]]) 14:39, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
*{{oppose}}, concerns about knowledge of the project, acceptance, low activity levels. -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 20:52, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
*{{oppose}} Did not accept the nomination; does not seem to active either. [[User:Pmlineditor|Pmlineditor]] ([[User talk:Pmlineditor|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Pmlineditor|c]] '''·''' [[Special:Logs/Pmlineditor|l]]) 10:08, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
===={{int:Abusefilter-history-comments}}====
| |||
Revision as of 10:08, 6 March 2011
Andrei Stroe
Andrei Stroe (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 12:48, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
A very good user, 27 quality images. An admin, bureaucrat and checkuser on romanian wikipedia, he knows what's the job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Memo18 (talk • contribs)
Votes
Support Memo18 (talk) 12:48, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Neutral (tending to a oppose). He is not really active here, and I can not see any ecperience with deletion-requests or copyvio-tagging. abf «Cabale!» 13:40, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- experience? :o he is checkuser, bureaucrat and admin on local wiki— Preceding unsigned comment added by Memo18 (talk • contribs) 13:54, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- And beeing a/b/c on a local wiki provides experience with commons' guidelines how? abf «Cabale!» 15:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- experience? :o he is checkuser, bureaucrat and admin on local wiki— Preceding unsigned comment added by Memo18 (talk • contribs) 13:54, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Weak oppose. No "candidate acceptance" or any comment by the candidate? Andrei's account also has zero activity since the posting of this nomination. I also share ABF's concerns. With Jim's comment below, I suggest s/he try again later. Rehman 10:39, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Oppose no acceptance, low activity. Multichill (talk) 14:39, 5 March 2011 (UTC)- Oppose, concerns about knowledge of the project, acceptance, low activity levels. -- Cirt (talk) 20:52, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Did not accept the nomination; does not seem to active either. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 10:08, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Comments
- Did the candidate accept the bid, at all? Voting in absentia? NVO (talk) 14:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- He has 8,000 edits here, so he's been around, but the vast majority of those were files or cats, not much in Commons space. Also, last summer he uploaded fifteen files with no source, twelve of which were subsequently deleted. That raises the question if he really knows the rules. On the plus side, there are only 61 items on his all time talk page -- and many of those are QI and FP, so he doesn't generate bad vibes. Perhaps -- and I say only "perhaps" -- this is another candidate that we might suggest come back in a few months after spending some time on DRs. I don't think I've ever seen his name before. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:36, 4 March 2011 (UTC)