Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Matiia

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards‎ | Elections 2016
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Mountbatton (talk | contribs) at 19:57, 9 February 2016 (Voted yes). It may differ significantly from the current version.

Matiia

ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: es, en-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hi, I registered on Wikimedia projects in June 2014, I speak Spanish as my native language, English at an intermediate level and I can understand a few other romance languages on a basic level (e.g. Portuguese & Italian). My timezone is UTC-3.

    I started doing global counter vandalism/spam on Wikimedia projects in October 2014, although I wasn't very active on this task at that moment, since I was more active on Wikia projects, I became more active in December 2014 here. I became a global rollbacker in February 2015, a global sysop in June 2015 and an admin here on Meta-Wiki in September 2015. I've been very active both reverting vandalism/spam and performing other global sysop actions.

    I nominated myself for stewardship in order to be able to lock/gblock spambots, spammers, LTAs & vandals myself, but I'll help out with other steward tasks (both on-wiki and on IRC) as well. Thanks for your time. :)
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Matiia


Yes

  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I'm convinced Matiia will be a very helpful and especially clueful addition to the steward team. --Vogone (talk) 14:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Syum90 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  No doubt.--Syum90 (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Very good user--6AND5 (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Seems well suited for the task. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Matiia has the required skills and his activity level is sufficiant. I am sure he would be a great steward. Polite, helpfull and excellent communicative skills. Natuur12 (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Very active, trusted and helpful user. No reason to oppose. RadiX∞ 15:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Holder (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yeza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Yeza (talk) 15:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Vituzzu (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Very active cross-wiki, could use the tools well. eurodyne (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. RomanLier (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --RomanLier (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oscar_. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Oscar_. (talk) · @ 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Always there to give a hand.[reply]
  14. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Żyrafał (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Cárdenas (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Cárdenas (talk) 16:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Olsi (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Olsi (talk) 16:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  trusted and experienced —Ah3kal (talk) 17:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. GeoO (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --geo ») 17:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Very active on SWMT and has a lot of crosswiki experience. Very good candidate. Reguyla (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Definitely. You do very good work on here, and would make a good addition to the steward team. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Widr (talk) 17:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Alan (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Leništudent (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  very active cross-wiki Leništudent (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Why not? He is very active. White Master (es) 18:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Armbrust (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ejensyd (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Does great work Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Very helpful in global patrol tasking. Good luck! Taichi - (あ！) 19:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Raystorm (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Very active cross-wiki. Raystorm (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Petronas (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Trusted and helpful user. Petronas (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Lsanabria (talk) 20:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Wolmar (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Active crosswiki user. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Riley Huntley (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Very active and would be a good addition to the team Riley Huntley (talk) 21:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Wiki13 talk 21:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Helmy oved (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Helmy oved 21:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Mar del Este (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  I hope Matiia will be a good asset.Mar del Este:)안녕하세요 (talk) 22:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. C. Jonel (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  C. Jonel (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Gato Preto (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Gato Preto (talk) 23:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hubertl (talk) 23:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Very active on IRC and in the SWMT. Hoo man (talk) 00:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. HakanIST (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HakanIST (talk) 00:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  SQLQuery me! 00:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Nrautava (talk) 00:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. -jkb- (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2016 •  +1 -jkb- 00:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Good activity and very convincing answers, particularly the answer to a tough question about CU wiki — NickK (talk) 01:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Gharouni (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Gharouni (talk) 02:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Legoktm (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hkjacksonhk (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Does deserve a try. Not being an admin on any project is not a big problem IMHO. The proof is in the pudding, we'll see how Matiia will react. I think it will be just fine. Hedwig in Washington (talk) 04:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Yash! 04:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 05:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. ANKAN GHOSH DASTIDER (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  ANKAN GHOSH DASTIDER (talk) 09:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Babymissfortune (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Assianir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Assianir (talk) 11:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  David1010 (talk) 12:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Gimmy dd (talk) 13:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ellery (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  A bunch of experience due to his work for the SWMT team. No-brainer. Trijnsteltalk 13:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Knows the basics, acts maturely, makes good recommendations. I have no concerns.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 13:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Ochilov (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Ochilov (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Bodhisattwa (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Trusted Bodhisattwa (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Herby talk thyme 15:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  --Uğurkenttalk 16:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. FN Markus (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  FN Markus (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Geohakkeri (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  No problem. Geohakkeri (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Satdeep Gill (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Satdeep Gill (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Laura Fiorucci (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Laura Fiorucci (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  DCB (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Ernstol (Verification pending) •  Ernstol (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Gereon K. (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  While Matiia has some good crosswiki experience, they have been active on Wikimedia for less than two years, and are not an administrator on a content wiki. Considering how powerful the steward toolset is and the damage that can be done with it, I would prefer that they had another year of experience, and more admin experience on a content wiki so that we can see how they react in more tense situations. Please don't be discouraged from running again in the future, if this does not succeed. Rschen7754 15:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ganímedes (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Ganímedes (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Per Rschen7754. Also it took too many time to get for an answer. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Sujalajus (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  per Rschen Sujalajus (talk) 17:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Hypergio (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  НУРшЯGIO(beware of the moose) 17:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per Rschen, but would definitely be open to supporting in the future. Mh7kJ (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Asav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Asav (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Lacks experience.[reply]
  10. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per Rschen7754. Miniapolis 18:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Mar del Sur (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Just a year and a half of experience here and still very unsound ideas on the law and about the legal importance of protecting privacy. Mar del Sur (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Checkingfax (talk) 02:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Discasto (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Dubious privacy statements Discasto (talk) 09:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Laberinto16 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Per Rschen7754 Laberinto16 (talk) 13:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Sodeif (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  your experience for Steward is very low and you can't speak to many languages. Sodeif (talk) 18:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  I think this is way too big of a jump. CLCStudent (talk) 19:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Too young on the Wiki projects. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ulflarsen (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Flyingfischer (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Would've like to have seen a bit longer duration of experience. OlEnglish (Talk) 19:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  That is a candidate I would like to support but not now. Similar with what I said to Defender, countervandalism is not enough IMO. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I am undecided so far. Mainly per Teles. MF-W 00:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HalanTul (talk) 02:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yasir72.multan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Yasir72.multan (talk) 08:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Deb (talk) 12:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Vinckie (talk) 12:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2016/Votes/Matiia&oldid=15332475"