Karma: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
+link |
URL fix |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<div class="plainlinks"> |
<div class="plainlinks"> |
||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cyphoidbomb&oldid=592305043#Looking_into_the_details_of_the_helpme_queries... Good Humour barnstar] — misused to apply more humour and pay less attention to the content and context being worked on. |
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cyphoidbomb&oldid=592305043#Looking_into_the_details_of_the_helpme_queries... Good Humour barnstar] — misused to apply more humour and pay less attention to the content and context being worked on. |
||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dcheagle/Archive_7#2007_NFL_Draft_Fiasco GA and FA class style guidelines] ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dcheagle&oldid=590487285 a follow-up]) — considered more valuable when justifying work on article, over reaching agreement and understanding with another contributor. |
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dcheagle/Archive_7#2007_NFL_Draft_Fiasco GA and FA class style guidelines] ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dcheagle&oldid=590487285#Tables_and_prose a follow-up]) — considered more valuable when justifying work on article, over reaching agreement and understanding with another contributor. |
||
</div> |
</div> |
||
Revision as of 04:35, 1 February 2014
|
(English) This is an essay. It expresses the opinions and ideas of some Wikimedians but may not have wide support. This is not policy on Meta, but it may be a policy or guideline on other Wikimedia projects. Feel free to update this page as needed, or use the discussion page to propose major changes. |
| Meta has relevant essays: |
Karma is a term denoting points accumulated to one's account. At Wikimedia projects in various languages, such concepts include (but are not limited to):
- Number of barnstars
- Edit count
- Number of FAs you contributed to
- Service awards
These are disastrous, barbarous concepts; apart from being confusing, they mislead contributors' work. Examples are included, as an illustration of the concept.
- Good Humour barnstar — misused to apply more humour and pay less attention to the content and context being worked on.
- GA and FA class style guidelines (a follow-up) — considered more valuable when justifying work on article, over reaching agreement and understanding with another contributor.