Talk:Wikiversity/Vote/en and User:Jak: Difference between pages

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 19:46, 13 October 2005

Hi, I'm Jak a sysop in arabic wikipedia.

You can contact me in my discussion page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+Hi, I'm [[ar:مستخدم:Jak|Jak]] a [http://ar.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D8%AE%D8%A7%D8%B5%3AListusers&group=sysop&username= sysop] in [[ar:|arabic wikipedia]].
-== 6 months pilot seems too long ==
+You can contact me in my [http://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%86%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%B4_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%AE%D8%AF%D9%85:Jak discussion page].
-I suggest a shorter pilot period, maybe 2 months. I know that it's difficult to make a decision about new languages after that amount of time, but it seems unfair to give English and German preferential treatment for 6 months. I also believe that it will probably be very difficult in practice to shut down a running project after 6 months, whereas it might still be possible after 2.--[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 01:31, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
-:I think Wikiversity should be given a chance, but I agree 6mo is a little long. 3-4 should be enough to see if there is a chance for it to work shouldn't it. Also, the voting question is a bit biased. The entire page talks about voting to see if the project should be given a chance, then the question asks if you want to participate. Not everyone that thinks it is a good idea will want to or be able to participate. That question combined with the requiring a supermajority before a pilot project is even allowed seems a bit like there are people that don't want to give this a chance. Maybe that's just me. I don't happen to think it will take off, but giving it a chance seems like a good idea. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] 02:16, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
-== My vote didn't register ==
-<s>I recently cast my vote but it is not showing up on the page, Did I make a mistake somehow?</s> --[[User:Robert Harrison|Robert Harrison]] 04:29, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
-:Nevermind --[[User:Robert Harrison|Robert Harrison]] 20:42, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
-== oppose the vote - from my undestanding of the reading I've managed to do..  ==
-I oppose this vote.  It seems we can only vote yes or no.  Call it "Wikiversity" and I think I have to vote no.
-* a University should be defined by ability to meet standards / outside examiners.  This isn't yet possible.
-* a University should be at a high level; more basic learning is also worthwhile.
-* a common criticism of wikipedia is that we don't undestand institutional learning, this title opens that accusation wide open.
-But at the same time, I think the idea of tutored learning should be supported if there are people willing to tutor, and developing course materials, apart from books, is an excellent idea.  I refuse to vote for the material to be deleted, which seems to me to mean I have to vote yes..
-I vote for renaming the project "Wikilearn" which has less baggage, is more open to different forms of learning, but at the same time less open to misinterpretation.  Wikiversity can be "founded" once there's a serious belief we know what it would mean and might achieve it.  [[User:Mozzerati|Mozzerati]] 21:56, 20 September 2005 (UTC)