Requests for permissions/Archives/2005/12

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Requests for permissions
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Angela (talk | contribs) at 16:52, 10 October 2005 (MalafayaBot@ka). It may differ significantly from the current version.

On this page are all recently archived permissions.

Please add at the top of the list. Please do not make new requests or comments on this page. They are likely to not be seen. Please use requests for permissions instead.

2005

October

ka:User:MalafayaBot

Please grant Bot status to ka:User:MalafayaBot for KA.Wikipedia.org -- Malafaya 11:47, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about bot here. First bot in KA Wikipedia for interwiki collection. Malafaya 16:02, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Angela 16:52, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

September

WarXboT

It's multipurpose bot based on source code of tawbot. My primary goal is recategorisation on pl.wiki, so I ask for bot status on pl.wiki. Discussion on polish wiki about permission is here.--WarX

Done. Datrio 19:58, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ちーぼっと

Please give a bot status to ja:User:ちーぼっと on Japanese Wikipedia. The bot is experienced for a year. I noticed this request at ja:Wikipedia:井戸端 (告知)#ちーぼっと. Tietew 08:32, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Datrio 19:56, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

KocjoBot

Could you please mark KocjoBot on:

Regards, --Klemen Kocjancic 18:10, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done on both wikis. Datrio 19:55, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Twidrobot

Hello, could I please request that user wikt:da:Bruger:Twidrobot be marked as bot on the Danish Wiktionary? Twidrobot is already a bot on the Danish Wikipedia. Thanks! --Twid 12:07, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please inform the local community that you plan to run a bot. Datrio 19:28, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
They have been informed (in Danish) on the bot's user page. If you look at the bot's discussion page, you can see recommendations from all of Danish Wiktionary's sysops. --Twid 20:43, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done ;). Datrio 20:44, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

LeonardoRob0t

Hi to all, I need bot status on wikiquote:pl agreement discussion here and wikiquote:pt agreement discussion here. Thanks, LeonardoGregianin 10:52, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done on both Wikis. Datrio 19:51, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

H-Bot

Bot flag for fi:Käyttäjä:H-Bot. See fi:Keskustelu Wikipediasta:Botit#H-Bot. There's a strong consensus about this. Thanks. –Hartz 10:42, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Datrio 19:35, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

MMBot

Bot flag for MMBot on French Wikipedia. No objection from fr:Discussion Utilisateur:MMBot. Asked to avoid flooding most recents with big replace.py regexp. Thanks. Marc Mongenet 11:30, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Datrio 19:33, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

zh

I would like to apply myself to become a bureaucrat at Chinese Wikisource where there is no bureaucrat yet. I have received two supporting votes at http://wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Language_domain_requests .--Jusjih 07:06, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

done --Shizhao 00:52, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

cs:Wikipedista:Tompecina temp. desysop

Completed by Danny. Discussion will probably continue at Requests for comments/Cswiki issues. Archived from Requests by Wikimol 22:24, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

cs:Wikipedista:Tompecina - temporary removal of admin flag is requested (1 day should be enough). Tompecina was blocked after breaking 3RR. Unfortunately he was unable to calm down and deblocked himself. Several blockings and self-deblockings followed - see cs:Speciální:Log. --Wikimol 20:42, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It should be pointed out that this account of the events is untrue. Regretfully, the whole case seems to be very similar to the recent expulsion of Vít Zvánovec. Without going into much detail, I would like to mention that a spelling change that violated an approved rule on cs.wiki was made and my alleged breach of the 3RR was merely due to my legitimate attempt to enforce the rule. I tried to discuss the matter with the other members involved in the dispute, who later admitted that I was absolutely correct in interpreting the rule. Therefore, the ban was wholly unwarranted and it was in order to overrule it. I always try to settle things peacefully, and it was only due to excessive use of reverts by the other members that the conflict escalated, but again, if it were not for my banning (without taking a vote, even without a word of warning), there would be no conflict now. I still hope for things to be resolved by discussion rather than by using (and potentially abusing) formal authorities. --Tompecina 21:20, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This request was annouced on cs wiki on Village pump --Zirland 21:02, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

the editor is not sysop according to our interface. So I did not remove the status. Anthere
Actually it was made by Danny on 18 September 2005 at 22:07, not bothering noticed that. I point out Wikimol asked only for temporary removal of admin flag (1 day should be enough), although even that is controversial. -- Vít Zvánovec 07:39, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a problem anymore. I left cs.wiki with no intention of coming back. Basically, as I said earlier, these people are bullies, knowing very little about what making an encyclopaedia is about (most of them posses no recognisable expert knowledge or skills they could contribute - some of them writing in hideous, semi-illiterate Czech at that). Their only concern is the POWER they can exert over those who actually work for the community, telling them how to do things they cannot do themselves, correcting their alleged spelling errors (which are no errors at all) and flexing their egos by punishing them for non-existent infractions. The prognosis is bleak: either the community is going to summon enough strength to get rid of the wimps who are terrorising it (which is unlikely to happen), or cs.wiki will become a quagmire run by worshippers of mediocrity, which it more or less is now. --Tompecina 09:07, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The problems with Tompecina in this case were breaking three reverts rule (six reverts!) and misusing of administrator's rights in his own case. It is a bit funny if he says our only concern is power. BTW, on Requests_for_comments/Cswiki_issues Tompecina says he was expelled from cs.wiki which is not true at all. --Radouch 09:24, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
As I wrote on Requests for comments/Cswiki issues#cs.wiki, Radouch and others fatally failed to punish Cinik's provocations, because he shares with them the membership in the same clique. 3RR is not a dogma, you should have tried IAR instead to find a compromise. That's why I must emphasise that the Group of lynchers is thirsty for power and lacks any common sense. -- Vít Zvánovec 15:53, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No only have I been suspended, but I was not even allowed to post a short statement on my own talk page, and a completely unrelated article I wrote - Výklad (právo) - was deleted as a punishment. I rest my case, nihil habeo cum cs.wiki. --Tompecina 09:37, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Now is more than one day when stewards were asked to desysop Mr. Pecina for one day. I see no restoration of his rights: Special:Log/rights and cs:Special:Listusers/sysop. -- Vít Zvánovec 07:19, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

cs:User:Ludek was in conntact with Tompecina. Before removal Tompecina wrote him he didnt want to be sysop. Tompecina also twice announced leaving cs wikipedia. There is probably nobody against return of rights if Tompecina announces change of his decisions. --Li-sung 08:19, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is absurd to set new and new conditions for restoring Mr. Pecina's rights. The application for temporary desysopping was unconditional. The term is now over, it's time to return his rights. -- Vít Zvánovec 08:45, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, a farcical end to a farcical story. Of the several explanations why my access rights cannot be restored, this one is my favorite: It is necessary to protect me from spoofers. What if someone used my (presumably poorly protected) password and harmed me by doing mischief in my name!? Fun, just pure fun... --Tompecina 08:58, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to explain to Beren & Malý čtenář unreasonableness of this claim, but in vain. I am sorry for that, but those who don't wish to hear they don't hear. -- Vít Zvánovec 12:21, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
@Tompecina: Stop laughing and give clear answer, please. Do you want to be sysop on cswiki (yes/no)? --80.250.18.19 09:03, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong question. I don't intend to go to Italy in order to use up the balance on my Viacard highway-toll prepaid card before it expires. Still, I am entitled to the balance. --Tompecina 09:42, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
As bureaucrat on the Czech Wikipedia I feel to write some short explanation.
On the 18th September in reaction of Tompecina's messages in summaries of his contributions I asked Tompecina by mail if he really wants to give up sysop rights. He answered me by mail: "Yes." It was before action of stewards. Tompecina later also wrote on his own page (as new user Tomáš Pecina, because account Tompecina was temporarily blocked), that he will not work on the Czech Wikipedia. He also wrote on meta: "I left cs.wiki with no intention of coming back."
It means that Tompecina once wrote he does not want to be a sysop. He twice wrote he does not want to work on the cs Wikipedia. So now I am surprised what he writes here. Detailed description I already sent to steward Datrio (including parts of mails with translation to Datrio's mother tongue). I promissed him that I can send whole mail correspondention if he ask for it.
Today morning I sent mail to Tompecina, that if he changed decision, then he himself has to write it and in that case let he himself ask stewards for sysop rights back. --Ludek 09:52, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
In my view this is meaningless. Tomáš Pecina was desysopped temporarily, there is no valid reason to be desysopped for ever. -- Vít Zvánovec 12:21, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Most likely "Rule Tompecina": temporary measures are permanent if the offender is unpopular with the sysops. --Tompecina 13:10, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the cs.wiki is busy disciplining another user (Jvano) who happened to vote against he majority on the issue of blocking Vít Zvánovec. No, nihil habeo... --Tompecina 11:06, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have already noticed much earlier (23 August 2005), Mr. Vaňo is often victim of the clique of lynchers. I am very sorry that no steward did any effective action. -- Vít Zvánovec 12:21, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

tg:wikt:User:RobotGMwikt

Could I please be made bot on this wiktionary as well .. Tajik :) Thanks GerardM 20:10, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

done. oscar 16:08, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

en:wikisource:User:CSNbot

As soon as en.wikisource.org is up and running I would like a bot flag there. I already have one at the main wikisource site. Local discussion is here. --CSN

I don't know how to make bots at the new Wikisources. Does anyone know the righr prefix? It's not ensourceswiki, enwikisource or ensources. Angela 11:36, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure but as far as I know, the en.wikisource domain doesn't exist yet. We are waiting on Brion to set it up. --CSN 22:01, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
Okay, en.wikisource is up and running. --CSN
So anytime is good for me. --CSN 00:06, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
New local discussion is here. --CSN 22:14, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Zhaladshar 22:16, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. The prefix enwikisource now works. Angela 01:52, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

After discussion with de:Benutzer:Mijobe and her reelection with only 59 supports to 29 contra, I ask you take her Adminflag away in the de.wikipedia. For any questions, please don't hestitate to ask me -- MichaelDiederich 11:57, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

done. Anthere 12:56, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

el

According to [1] please set bureaucrat status on User:Geraki on Greek wikisource. Thanks. --Geraki 13:12, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have any administrators yet, so please don't delay. --Geraki 15:40, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Snowdog 07:56, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Limburgish Wikipedia bureaucrat

I would like to request bureaucrat status for myself, li:Gebroeker:HaafLimbo, on the Limburgic Wikipedia. I have the support of our community. I am currently a sysop. Caesarion Velim, non opto 15:28, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

done. oscar 02:46, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikispecies: Benedikt and UtherSRG

Not so. Although we do have two approved to be. - UtherSRG 13:42, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Benedikt and UtherSRG is bureaucrat.--Shizhao 00:53, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! - UtherSRG 01:57, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

hr

I would like to become sysop on Croatian wikisource, which now has only 3 users, but user interface is annoying (my colleague who submitted LanguageHr.php to cvs himself corrected interface on hr wiki, but is not yet ready for new submission to cvs). Voting you can see on voting on old wikisource, I am sysop and bureaucrat on hr wikipedia. SpeedyGonsales 17:41, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Shizhao 00:48, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

French Wikipedia

done Anthere

Urdu Wikipedia

I want to translate my URDU wikipedia,the current sysop seems to be inactive
reference : 'To translate the interface you must edit the pages in the MediaWiki namespace. These pages can only be edited by sysops. You might need someone with sysop status very soon. Add your request on Requests for permissions.' [2]

What's your username on this Wikipedia? Datrio 15:17, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
My user name is WiseSabre .i need to edit interface,if i can do it with sysop rights then give me that, otherwise not
Wisesabre 10:30, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'm granting you temporary sysop rights for a week to translate the interface. Please post a message on the wiki in your local language that you've become a sysop for that, and leave a link to this page (ie. [[m:Requests for permissions#Urdu wikipedia]]). Datrio 11:20, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Granted permanent status. Datrio 12:17, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
translate the interface complete, and that was longer than a week. esysopped.--Shizhao 15:58, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
What?im was the only active admin there.the other one is off since 2004,and i have 953 edits there.Shouldnt there be any admin? Wisesabre 16:36, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please created a request for adminship locally and link it here. Thanks --Shizhao 11:50, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Ok! its here.I have also requested for bureaucrat status above. Wisesabre 15:48, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chobot

Bot status is not set at pl:. Please check again. -- ChongDae 14:51, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed pl. Datrio 09:55, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

en

According to this page, I request bureaucrat status for the English Wikisouce.Zhaladshar 04:58, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Shizhao 01:29, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

it

According to [3], may I have bureucrat status? Thanks. Frieda 13:15, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Yann 07:40, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ja

I, User:Tietew, request for sysopship and bureaucratship on Japanese wikisource, According to wikisource:Wikisource:Language domain requests#ja.wikisource.org (日本語). Tietew 04:31, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Shizhao 01:32, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

sv

I, User:EnDumEn, request bureaucratship on Swedish Wikisource, according to wikisource:Wikisource:Language domain requests#sv.wikisource.org (svenska). /EnDumEn 09:31, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Shizhao 01:35, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Urdu wikipedia bureaucrat

I'm currently the only active sysop and most active contributer on Urdu Wikipedia with more then 940 edits.Please allow me bureaucrat status so that i could motivate other users also.Wisesabre 04:34, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

could you list your candidacy over there (for example on the admin page) so that we can check your community opinion ? Thanks Anthere
OK! but how will you decide they support me or oppose? Im expecting only 1 vote to be casted.I have enlisted my self here. Wisesabre 16:37, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
urdu wiki user خاور has voted in my favour here Wisesabre 17:03, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I won't oppose, but we'll just wait a week to see if no one will oppose on your candidature. If not, you'll be made sysop/bureaucrat. Datrio 09:36, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
done, be made sysop/bureaucrat. --Shizhao 01:28, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ar

Hi, I am Chaos, I would like to become an administrator/bureaucrat in the Arabic Wikibooks since there is no Admin there till now .i ahve the same username there --Chaos 11:43, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My Page on Wikibooks : Ar_Wikibooks:Chaos

  1. Hi, I have known Chaos from ar.wikipedia.org for some time, he is very dedicated and I think he will make a good administrator or bureaucrat. I strongly recommend him for this position. --Tarawneh 19:24, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

With Choas nomination: I'm a sysop on ar.wikipedia and I support fully Chaos to be a sysop in ar.wikibooks and I recommend him according to his active and productive membership in our wikipedia .--Oxydo 18:18, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tarawneh's Page on ar Wikibooks : Ar_Wikibooks:Tarawneh

Thanks but this is not really what we are asking. Do you have a local page where editors can make request and other editors can give their comments ? Anthere

Ar_Wikibooks:Administrators

Hi , Actually there is no big number of Active users in the Arabic sister projects , most of active users give attention now for growing the wikipedia project up , but we need Adminship in Wikisource and WikiBooks especially for organizing some pages and setting up the rules , we will repeat the Election after few monthes when the number of active users increase .--Chaos 09:04, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  1. موافق على ترشيح كاوس (i approve the nomination)مبتدئ 20:33, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

lv

Hello! I am User:Juzeris and I am mostly active on English Wikipedia (w:User:Juzeris) and Latvian Wikipedia (lv:User:Juzeris). I have been an admin on Latvian Wikipedia since November 2004 and have translated most of the user interface. From time to time I have been contributing also to the English Wiktionary (User:Juzeris). The community of Latvian Wikipedia is finally ready to start working on its own Latvian Wiktionary. Therefore, I kindly ask you to grant me administrator/bureaucrat status there. Thank you! --Juzeris|talk 09:28, August 22, 2005 (UTC)

Sorry for the wrong order of procedure. Now I have informed the community of Latvian Wikipedia (since there are no active users in Latvian Wiktionary to inform). If you're interested in getting the opinions of Latvian administration, the other two Latvian admins are Tail (she's a bureaucrat as well) and Feens. --Juzeris|talk 19:59, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
I see that Juzeris is sysop now, so I guess this has been handled. - Andre Engels 09:00, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I am a sysop in Latvian Wikipedia, but I was asking about Wiktionary. --Juzeris|talk 16:17, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
Well, the Latvian Wiktionary hasn't had any edits in some time. Please first:
  1. Make some edits to it, so we can see you're interested in this project
  2. List your request for adminship on some local page on Wiktionary, so the community users in the future will be aware you have been made a sysop in that way.
After that, you'll probably be granted sysop/bureaucrat status. Datrio 09:45, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at a broader span of recent edits, say, more than a week, you can see that I had been contributing to it even before this morning.
I have placed a separate notice on Latvian Wiktionary as well.
Is there a issue concerning the language of those notices? Is that the reson why it is taking so long? If it helps, my interest in this whole project in long-term could be seen, e.g., from my contributions to English Wikipedia.
Frankly speaking, I'm quite confused. What else should I had done to be granted adminship? Should I had become more involved in the English speaking community of Wikimedia? --Juzeris|talk 14:13, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
  • Done. Actually in the last month the only edits on lv.wiktionary are from Juzeris. I don't see any point in making him waiting any longer, and he informed the lv.wikipedia community on august 22. Seems there are no oppositions. --Snowdog 23:46, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! --Juzeris|talk 09:05, September 6, 2005 (UTC)

ar

Hi, I am Chaos, I would like to become an administrator/bureaucrat in the Arabic Wikiquote since there is no Admin there till now . --Chaos 11:57, 28 August 2005 (UTC)--[reply]

I recommend you to follow the procedure described on the above. Aphaia++ 12:55, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I have known Chaos, from ar.wikipedia.org for some time, he is very dedicated and I think he will make a good administrator or bureaucrat. I strongly recommend him for this position. --Tarawneh 19:30, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  1. موافق على ترشيح كاوس (i approve the nomination)مبتدئ 20:33, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but please make a local request for adminship over there and link it here. thanks Anthere 06:08, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So please
  1. create a page on ar wikiquote for requests for adminship, and
  2. link it to this page
  3. also, to Chaos, please give a link to your local user page from here.
Good luck! --Aphaia++ 06:14, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Angela 11:48, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CyeZBot

AgentSpartiBot

Please grant Bot status to de:Benutzer:AgentSpartiBot for de. -- de:Benutzer:Sparti 12:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

Please announce this on a local request page. Datrio 10:41, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No explicit request for bot status; no history of bot edits. Request refused for now. - Andre Engels 10:09, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Archived since it's been a month. Feel free to move back to the main requests page if this is still needed. Angela 11:48, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

UcuchaBot

I'd like to have a bot flag for wikispecies:User:UcuchaBot. See Wikispecies:Village Pump#Bot. Ucucha 12:23, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone knows what's the Wikispecies database suffix? :P Datrio 10:15, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It's "@specieswiki". Angela 11:48, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

fr:Utilisateur:DasBot

This bot is made for creating/updating french cities articles. Agreement discussion is here : fr:Wikipédia:Le_Bistro/13_août 2005#(pour un bureaucrate) Demande de status de Bot pour_DasBot -- User:Jef-Infojef 20:02, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked the bot flag the 7 may 2005 in french wikipedia too : see fr:Wikipédia:Le Bistro/7 mai 2005#Robot demande hébergement -- User:Jef-Infojef
Done by Datrio

fr:Utilisateur:Solbot

Requesting bot status for Solbot. Bot will fix common spelling/grammar errors, and help categorizing. Announced on Solbot. Thanks.
Solensean 21:34, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Datrio

Zwobot

Hi, I need more bot flags for my interwiki bot:

--Head 18:51, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ZwoBot is now a bot at ru, ko, sr, and en. Angela 11:48, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

KnightRider

Add bot flag to es:KnightRider in es wikipedia, thanks.

Please link to a local request and sign yourself. Datrio 10:21, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Here you got: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Caf%C3%A9/Agosto_de_2005_04#Petici.C3.B3n_de_bot --Armin76 15:46, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Angela 11:48, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]



Daniel B.(de)

see [4]. Regards, John N. 11:14, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, can this double-redirect fixer bot be given a bot flag on en.wikinews.org? The only objection raised was it "spamming" RC, ie that it hasn't been flagged. This bot would be a godsend for us... Dan100 15:37, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Datrio 10:18, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for bot status for fr:User:Lt-wiki-bot (reqest is made on fr:Discussion Wikipédia:Bot before 10 days and noone disaproved) and ru:User:Lt-wiki-bot (local bureaucrat ru:User:Maximaximax asked to request bot status). Bot only runs interwiki.py (it already has bot status on English and Lithuanian Wikipedias. Knutux 07:58, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Datrio 10:18, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please, give bot status to gl:User:NTBot at the galician wikipedia. Agreement discussion is here. Thanks. Nuno Tavares 12:18, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Datrio 10:12, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to ask for the bot flag for my bot, LoquBot on wikipedia:es. The local agreement discussion is here. Thanks. Loqu 21:28, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to know if there is any trouble with the bot flag I asked for, it's been one week since then and the agreement discussion on the local wikipedia is getting so old that it will be archived soon. Thanks. Loqu 15:25, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Datrio 10:11, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I need bot status on wikipedia:pl agreement discussion here. Thanks, Leonardo Gregianin 11:11, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Datrio 10:07, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please also grant SpaceBirdyBot bot status on the icelandic wiktionary, many thanks in advance (local request), greetings --birdy (:> )=| 19:51, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Datrio 10:04, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to request bot status for NyenyecBot in the Hungarian Wikipedia. It will fix common spelling errors and do other non-interwiki related automated tasks. I announced it in HuWiki at the Village Pump in Huwiki.

Thanks, Nyenyec 00:25, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Datrio 10:02, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

can I have bot status on sc.wiki for CruccoBot, on scn.wiki for scn:User:CruccoBot and on fur.wiki for fur:Utent:CruccoBot --Cruccone 11:29, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You already have bot status on sc.wiki, but please inform the communities of scn.wiki and fur.wiki about your bot. Datrio 10:00, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please mark li:RobotQuistnix as a bot on the li: Wikipedia. -- Quistnix 20:59, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request a bot status for users it:User:PalicaBOT, he:User:PalicaBOT. Request on local pages are here it:User_talk:PalicaBOT, he:User_talk:PalicaBOT. Thank you in advance. --Palica 08:24, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Datrio 10:00, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • I request for deadminship of my account Sblive at pl.Wikinews, due to my retire from all Wikimedia projects. I've already put this request message on "Przyznawanie uprawnień administratora" page at Polish Wikinews. Sblive 19:43, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

May I request the CheckUser flag for myself on enbooks? It would help us greatly with our attempts to stop the ongoing AP vandalism. - Aya T C 17:46, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I do not support that. There is currently a privacy policy very little respected by anyone, and supposingly, this tool is only accessible to one arbcom member and Tim. We are far from the account. So, if we change this, we must absolutely change first the privacy policy not to claim we do not do certain things that are in reality done routinely. Either way will be fine by me, but claims on our privacy policy should be respected. Aya, this is not personal, this is policy. Anthere 07:01, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This seems a little more contentious than I originially supposed. My reasoning for requesting this is, as per m:Privacy policy: Where the user has been vandalising articles or persistently behaving in a disruptive way, data may be released to assist in the targeting of IP blocks, or to assist in the formulation of a complaint to relevant Internet Service Providers. If you wish to U-turn this policy, that is fine also, and I shall withdraw my request. In the past I had been taking each case of AP vandalism (which happens quite regularly) to Brion VIBBER (or another one of the admin-dudes) who released the IP info as per this policy, but I got the impression he was getting a bit fed up with my frequent requests, so it was suggested by another one of the admin-dudes (I forget which), that I should apply for this flag. Also, I don't consider this a personal attack at all, and you are right to be concerned, since the page CheckUser seems to read more like a discussion page than a policy document, and is thus unclear as to when this flag should be granted, and under what circumstances it should be used. It might be suggested to wait until this document is more clearly defined, but since no-one is actually personally responsible for maintaining this document, it may never happen. - Aya T C 16:54, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please list examples where the privacy policy is not respected? I do not remember any cases, since the privacy policy became official, where information was given out in violation of it. -- Jeronim 08:57, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Let me explain more. Here are some bits of from the m:privacy policy which are currently of my concern :

When using a pseudonym, your IP address will not be available to the public, but it will be stored on the wiki servers for a relatively short amount of time. Thus it will be available to developers and may be released under certain circumstances (see below).

Below mentions It is the policy of Wikimedia that personally identifiable data collected in the server logs will not be released by the developers who have access to it, except as follows: In response to a valid subpoena or other compulsory request from law enforcement

  • With permission of the affected user
  • To Jimbo Wales, his legal counsel, or his designee, when necessary for investigation of abuse complaints.
  • Where the information pertains to page views generated by a spider or bot and its dissemination is necessary to illustrate or resolve technical issues.
  • Where the user has been vandalising articles or persistently behaving in a disruptive way, data may be released to assist in the targeting of IP blocks, or to assist in the formulation of a complaint to relevant Internet Service Providers
  • Where it is reasonably necessary to protect the rights, property or safety of the Wikimedia Foundation, its users or the public.

Wikimedia policy does not permit public distribution of such information under any circumstances, except as described above.

Now, the line might be between what we qualify as "public release" to "release to some editors". But I already witnessed myself one case where an ip check was made on a user who was hardly disruptive and did not qualify as vandal, he was not told an ip check was made on him, and the request was simply done by an admin. This is frankly very borderline with our privacy policy. So, I think that before giving any check user rights to ANYONE (and this include stewards as well) we must clarify what is okay to do and not okay to do and under which circonstances. Or we need to update the privacy policy to indicate ip checks may be done with very limited restrictions. If the community is okay with this, then why not, but we should not write something and do another. Please see what is currently written on the check user page as well. Anthere 09:42, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly oppose. After a discussion on IRC I got the impression that Aya is misunderstanding the purpose of checkuser and is not (yet) able to handle this feature in a responsible manner. --Elian 14:58, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
You can hardly blame the misunderstanding if you take the time to read how vague the page CheckUser actually is. But since your strong opposition would imply that this page makes perfect sense to you, perhaps you wouldn't mind clarifying it for the rest of us. See also Brion's first comment on bugzilla:1 - Aya T C 00:54, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Datrio agreed to make a draft of a policy under which a group of editors from one project could ask to a steward to check an editor ip. I think this could be a good solution Anthere 15:41, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but I can get this infomation more quickly by asking for it in #wikimedia-tech. At least one of the people in there is actually paid money to take on the responsibility for providing this information, whereas (as far as I am aware) stewards are merely volunteers and have no responsibilities at all, thus they can all go on an indefinite Wikibreak if they like. But I could be wrong. - Aya T C 01:11, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Brion's is absolutely not bound to give you this information and is not paid for this task. I also trust he will give it to you only for cases of vandalism. Which is precisely the problem at stack. Brion or stewards (who are just as trusted than Brion) can at least ensure this tool is not abused and used strictly to fight vandalism. Anthere 06:58, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I would only ask in cases of vandalism (this is the whole context of this thread). I don't care about sock-puppetry (which was the original, rather pathetic, reason for introducing this feature). We have far more sane ways of dealing with this, which is to judge disagreements not by the the number of "votes", but the reasoning behind said "votes". A "me-too vote" which is merely "I agree with Bob", is not weighed very highly. We never claimed to be a "direct democracy". I'm making this request to help prevent vandalism, thus your hinderences on this request encourage vandalism. I submit that this attitude makes you a vandal by proxy. - Aya T C 15:28, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Aya, while the logic and reasoning about Anthere being a vandal by proxy is somewhat sound, I think it's ridiculous anyhow, and it certainly isn't helping you to accuse a member of the board of the foundation of being a vandal, even if only by proxy. --Node ue 00:24, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • support for adminship. I think one bureaucrat is enough for the starting time and Balû was relatively inactive on wikisource.org (last edit 3 May) before and still is on de.wikisource up to now. Please let the future community decide who should be further bureucrat. Anyway, Balû is working well on wiktionary, therefore he should be admin on wikisource if he wants, of course :-) --:Bdk: 13:34, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi, I am Chaos, and if the Arabic language domain of wikisource is ready, I would like to become an administrator/bureaucrat there.i have the same user name there , i,m trying to develop arabic Wikisource by adding the availbale historical texts and old literal texts and the Admin/Bureaucrate is necessary for protecting/deprotecting the Edited texts --Chaos 11:47, 28 August 2005 (UTC
My Page on Wikisource : Ar_Wikisource:Chaos
  1. Hi, I have known Chaos from ar.wikipedia.org for some time, he is very dedicated and I think he will make a good administrator or bureaucrat. Currently we are the only two persons working in Arabic wikisource. And I hope we will continue to work with others also to improve it. I strongly recommend him for this position. --Tarawneh 19:21, 2 September 2005 (UTC).[reply]
    Tarawneh's Page on Wikisource : Ar_Wikisource:Tarawneh
  2. With Choas nomination.(sysop in ar wikipedia ) My Arabic Wikipedia page --Jak 16:59, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. With Choas nomination: I'm a sysop on ar.wikipedia and I support fully Chaos to be a sysop in ar.wikisource and I recommend him according to his active and productive membership in our wikipedia .--Oxydo 18:17, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. موافق على ترشيح كاوس (i approve the nomination)مبتدئ 20:33, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator's Page on AR_Wikisource : Ar_Wikisource:Administrators

Hi , Actually there is no big number of Active users in the Arabic sister projects , most of active users give attention now for growing the wikipedia project up , but we need Adminship in Wikisource and WikiBooks especially for organizing some pages and setting up the rules , we will repeat the Election after few monthes when the number of active users increase .--Chaos 09:04, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • After this Wikipedia will be created, please make a page that would list all the administrators, and put a special information there saying you've requested sysop/bureaucrat status here, on Meta. Datrio 09:34, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please make me Sysop for the Malayalam Wikipedia. I find only myself as an active user there. I have made so many modifications in the Main Page and would like to make the entire place a standard one. Also I have saved the main page from vandalism many times. At times I waited for someone who does care about our page. But I'm sorry to say, no one was there to protect the pages.

Look out the following links. [[6]] [[7]] Hope my intensions are clear.
Manjithkaini
Manjithkaini
Manjithkaini 05:32, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • You seem like a good guy, so there you go ;). You're a sysop now, just please list this fact on some appropriate page (which lists the admins on the project, or somewhere like that). If you'll ever have more users and either you or someone else will need a bureaucrat status, please contact us here. Datrio 09:39, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that was longer than 24 hours ;). Desysopped. Datrio 08:28, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

For Wikisource. The bot will assist me in uploading large texts that are scattered across a number of pages like The Rig Veda. I am using a variety of tools but the actual upload portion is done with a modified pywikipediabot. (local discussion) --CSN

Do I get notification somewhere when this goes through? Is it going to take long? If this process doesn't move along, I'm just going to start running the bot on my main account. What is the holdup? --CSN
Hi CSN,
Create a page for bot on Wikisource if it doesn't exist yet. Then I can give you bot status if there is no opposition. Yann 18:32, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Yann 21:10, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please grant bot status in the Russian wiki (ru.wikipedia.org) - ru:User:JaroslavleffBot. --Jaroslavleff 10:45, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Datrio 09:38, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

on Bot pour les pays i have call to have a bot for country, than i have create the user StéBot@wikipédia-fr.

Thanks in advance to permit it Sté ~ ✎ 22 août 2005 à 10:02 (CEST)

Please grant bot status for ru:Участник:BotInok in russian wikipedia. Лий 22:29, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please also mark ca:RobotQuistnix as a bot on the ca: Wikipedia. -- ca:Joanjoc, catalan administrator 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Please mark eo:Vikipediisto:Gpvosbot as a bot on eo.wikipedia. It is used for all kinds of things. gpvos 19:22, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please mark fr:Utilisateur:Gpvosbot as a bot on fr.wikipedia. It is used for interwikis, mostly from nl: and la:. I requested this earlier, but inadvertently deleted my own request when requesting bot status on la:. :-) gpvos 19:18, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Currently I am sysop in pt.wikiquote; the project is needing one bureaucrat. For gentility, I am needing the permission of bureaucrat, as indication of the local community.--Chico 17:13, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The correct link is [8]. I have made you a bureaucrat. - Andre Engels 09:08, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Currently there isn't a sysop at sr wikiquote and I'd like to become bureaucrat so I can translate the most obvious part of the interface, delete unnecessary pages and better coordinate the project keeping it alive. --Dungodung 00:39, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I should add that I'm a bureaucrat at sr wikipedia, wikinews and wikisource and known to the community as a responsible and loyal person. --Dungodung 01:40, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]


You should first create a local page for request and give the opportunity to any editor to voice their support and opposition. Then link the page here. Thanks Anthere 08:41, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the page, but I'm warning you that no one will vote unless I explicitly tell them so, because the project is largely inactive. --Dungodung 12:05, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
yes dear, but that preserve an appearance of community decision rather than steward decision (which would be bad for spirit generally). And visitors coming here do not get the idea that they just need to ask to get things. It would be too much Father Christmas type :-) Anthere 14:32, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. - Andre Engels 09:03, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Slovene Wiktionary start working on its own wiktionary. I'm admin on Slovene Wikipedia and I ask you to grant wikt:sl:User:Andrejj (me) administrator/bureaucrat status on Slovene Wiktionary (there are no adminis so far). See wikt:sl:Wikislovar:Administratorji. Tnx --Andrejj 14:28, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sysop status granted to Andrejj. I suppose Eleassar will be sysop as well? --Snowdog 16:50, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tnx! Actually I thought that bureaucrat status will be also granted, so we could manage admins ourself.--Andrejj 17:06, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I would also like to ask for the admin status, for the same reason as Andrejj - so that we can manage the site ourselves as much as possible. I have been granted the sysophood on Slovenian Wikipedia and on Commons. My user page on Slovenian wiktionary: wikt:sl:User:Eleassar. Thanks very much and happy wiki-ing! --Eleassar 12:13, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You should first create a local page for request and give the opportunity to any editor to voice their support and opposition. Then link the page here. Thanks Anthere 08:40, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Since there is not any sysop in the Ido Wiktionary I want to be one. See about my activity there in the Ido Wiktionary - io:User:Artomo, sysop in the Ido Wikipedia.

As current only hr bureaucrat hr:User:Denny is very rarely on wiki, and we have a need for at least some 3-4 new administrators, I would like to become a hr wikipedia bureaucrat (currently I am an administrator). Wikilink to request on hr wikipedia is: hr:Wikipedia:Prijedlozi_za_administratora#Novi_birokrat. SpeedyGonsales 09:55, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hr users voted on hr:Wikipedia:Prijedlozi_za_administratora#Novi_birokrat, our bureaucrat responded, I am promoted, so this request can be archived (or deleted). SpeedyGonsales 07:41, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
have is bureaucrat--Shizhao 01:14, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ba:User:Rail Please, make this user a bureaucrat!

Support:

please create a local page where you can mention your request. Link it here. Thanks Anthere 08:38, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please make am:User:Elfalem a sysop on am.wikipedia. He is currently the main active contributor, and has requested to be a sysop. In addition, the only other admin there (Codex Sinaiticus) has supported this at my talkpage on en.wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Node_ue#Amharic_wikipedia and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Node_ue#Amharic_Wikipedia .

The Amharic admin page is: am:Wikipedia:Administrators. Thanks. --Node ue 04:01, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please, make this active user io:User:Mithridates as a sysop in the Ido Wikipedia. – io:User:Artomo, current sysop in the Ido Wikipedia.

Could you please show us an announcement on the local Wikipedia? - Andre Engels 08:51, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. - Andre Engels 09:00, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

August

Hi, I am Quistnix, and if the nl language domain of wikisource is ready, I would like to become an administrator/bureaucrat there. -- Quistnix 14:44, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Yann 20:38, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am Rocastelo and according to [Wikisource:Language domain requests] I ask for bureaucrat there, thanks.--Rocastelo 16:19, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Yann 20:38, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am Dungodung, and the sr (Serbian) wikisource subdomain is ready, so I would like to become a bureaucrat there for some basic mediawiki messages translation and basic admin stuff. Thanks in advance. --Dungodung 15:33, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Yann 20:38, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I, User:.:Ajvol:., ask for bureaucrat status at ru.wikipedia according to vote at Wikisource:Wikisource:Language_domain_requests. My user account at ru.wikisource.org is .:Ajvol:. --ajvol 06:05, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

done--Shizhao 05:59, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I, Christian S, hereby ask for bureaucrat/admin status at da.wikipedia, see Wikisource:Wikisource:Language_domain_requests. My user account at da.wikisource. I'm already admin at the international wikisource. --Christian S 18:41, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Yann 20:38, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Jofi, I'm admin at de.wikipedia and would like to become bureaucrat/admin at de.wikisource. --Jofi 22:09, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • support for both functions. Jofi was very active on wikisource.org in the past and is already hard working on the new domain de.wikisource. He's also well known as a reliable admin on de.wikipedia and I know him as a very balanced user, therefore I trust him to do a good job as sysop and bureaucrat :-) --:Bdk: 13:34, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Yann 18:06, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • On the new project, pl.wikisource.org, as agreed:
    • Special:Log/rights * Datrio * Changed group membership for User:Tsca.bot@plwikisource from to bot
    • Special:Log/rights * Datrio * Changed group membership for User:Niki K@plwikisource from to sysop, bureaucrat

Please could you rename Birdy to Jean D'Alembert on de.Wiktionary.org.

Many thanks in advance, Nikolaus --81.217.36.31 15:40, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Datrio 14:15, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please grant RobotGMwikt bot status on the Islandic wiktionary.. Thanks, GerardM 16:03, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please notify the local community on your bot. Datrio 16:10, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I support this request and posted a notification here thanks a lot --birdy (:> )=| 18:35, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done ;). Datrio 19:00, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please grant Jumbuck bot status on the English Wikipedia, see en:Wikipedia talk:Bots#Bot flag for Jumbuck and on the Faroese Wikipedia, see fo:Wikipedia:Undirhúsið#Bot flag. —Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 03:06, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Datrio 14:04, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please leave a notice of you running this bot on a local village pump, or some other public page. Datrio 14:00, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
We do not yet have any local lithuanian page where bots are listed (but we have plans to make one soon). Anyway, I support this request - bot already does great job creating latin redirect, but some users would like to hide it (mark bot) as these changes fill up recent changes list. Knutux 18:58, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
as there is no appropriate page for this yet on lt.wikipedia to list bots, please kindly accept this request by EBOLA_rulez as his bot is clogging up RecentChanges :) Dirgela2 19:00, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Datrio 19:01, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Datrio 13:59, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please grant bot status to my bot Kovácsinas on hu.wiki. I have already made an announcement on the local Wikipedia. Thank you. KovacsUr 20:06, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Datrio 13:55, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RobotGMwikt is not a bot yet on the Chinese wiktionary, please give it this status. Thanks, GerardM 21:02, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

done--Shizhao 01:20, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Can I have bot status? --Cruccone 14:37, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Snowdog 21:24, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please put a request on en:Wikipedia talk:Bots for a bot flag - listing yourself under en:Wikipedia:Bots isn't enough. Datrio 10:30, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
M7bot is in test under parole for one week (until Aug 19th). --M/ 11:00, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. No complaints after 1 week. --Snowdog 23:09, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi everybody. I'm Sturm, from the Wikiquote.pt, and I was elected to be an administrator (last week) and now I ask to some Steward give me the adm status. Hope you all can understand my poor English. Bye.

Done. Could you ask your community to elect someone for a bureaucrat? Datrio 18:04, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm Watcharakorn, from th.wikipedia (admin), th.wikibooks, th.wiktionary. And I want to translate interface of th.wiktionary.org and th.wikibooks.org. I would like to become an administrator/bureaucrat there. Watcharakorn 12:02, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

have is admin--Shizhao 01:41, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. --Dungodung 23:53, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Pokrajac 00:06, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Jovanvb 09:21, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Now that's the support I've been waiting for ;). Datrio 10:36, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Datrio 10:33, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please give me bot status for es: and da: in agreement discussion here: es.wiki and da.wiki. Thanks, Leonardo.
Done. Datrio 13:54, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Bot status fr om it.wiki too. Leonardo 20:10, 8 August 2005 (UTC).[reply]
Done. Datrio 10:32, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Whew, that took some time. Anyway, done. Datrio 10:46, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Datrio 09:00, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Datrio 20:29, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am currently sysop at te:. Please grant me Bureaucrat permissions on Telugu wikipedia to address the growing demands of the project - Vyzasatya
Please make a local request for the status, so the community will be aware of this change. Datrio 16:31, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, one more thing - please provide us with your user ID - you can find it in your preferences. Datrio 10:01, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
My UserID no is 58. - Thanks -Vyzasatya
Done. Good luck on the project. Datrio 21:35, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Datrio -Vyzasatya

We have elected Admins in nds.wiktionary.org, see [10]. ("xy is mit 4:0 Stimmen as Administrater wählt worrn." translates into English as "xy has been elected to be Admin with 4:0 votes") The result is that the users "Slomox" and "Heiko Evermann" have been elected Admins. (SabineCretella missed the majority of votes.) Please adjust the access privileges accordingly. Besides there is the user "GerardM" who was granted temporary sysop privileges before we had the election. (He was running a robot and needed the possibility to delete pages.) He did not run for sysop election and was not elected. Now that there are elected Admins in nds.wiktionary.org, his temporary sysop privilege is no longer neccessary and should be removed, as he was not elected.

Kind regards, HeikoEvermann 20:38, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. users "Slomox" and "Heiko Evermann" is sysop. user "GerardM" removed sysop.--Shizhao 11:19, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Datrio 10:10, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Datrio 08:18, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Datrio 21:03, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please inform the local community about a fact you're running a bot. Datrio 06:38, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I said that to the admin and now i've put the info in the Bar here. ΗΣLΙΦS89 Μ α ι L
Done. Datrio 10:12, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Still, even if not request, please inform the local community about a fact you're running a bot (yes, I copied this text from the message up above, I'm lazy). Datrio 06:39, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Well, they can see that from Recent changes ;). I created a new page just for you Boti. PS: I'm also an admin there, so I think that there is no problem (now). Regards, --Klemen Kocjancic 18:04, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, a page for me, thanks! ;) Okay, no objections neither from me, nor the community - so done. Datrio 10:15, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done, but please inform the local community on the fact that these bots are running. Datrio 08:21, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Datrio 08:24, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
[19:26:58] <PMA> could you de-admin me on the En-wikipedia please
[19:27:37] <Datrio> that's temporary, or permanent?
[19:27:53] <PMA> for a while at least 
[19:28:31] <Datrio> well... okay, but if you'll want to become a sysop again,
you'll have to ask the local community for sysop status, you're aware of that?
[19:28:56] <PMA> yes ive been through that before 
[19:29:48] <Datrio> fine, just a second
[19:30:34] <PMA> thank you
[19:31:26] <Datrio> okay, done and logged
Done. Datrio 14:11, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • A Wikipedian told me that on cs.wikipedia.org a vote to desysop Víta Zvánovce was passed with 25 for desysop and 11 against. Since also some Admins voted for De-Sysop, I see this as a clear vote of distrust for this user and take away his Sysop rights. I would recommend to this user that he tries to get again to an election for sysop. If he gets his rights back by just complaining everywhere he shows that he does not care about the trust of the community in his work... Sorry :-( Fantasy 容 21:26, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Erm.. Fantasy, why did you put that here, after you took down his sysop flag? ;) In any case, I talked with the cs community - they agree that this decision is legitimate, even though there's a bit of controversy on the vote - 67% of people should be for his desysoping, but only 65.8% are for (...or 69%, if you'll ignore the two other votes). Anyway, I'll try to be up-to-date on this situation, as Czech and Polish are pretty common. Datrio 22:05, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I got an email with the request to do it, and the right place to put the request would have been here, so I have put it here, that is why. I also don't like to do things without comment. Therefore I wrote here why I did it, and that it can be undone, if the one is crying too loud...
Thanks for your help :-) Fantasy
  • Hello, I have done a lot for the german Wiktionary and now I am also interested in improving the icelandic Wiktionary.

If you have questions about my reputation, please take a look at my user pages. I announced my request in the icelandic Wiktionary here. Many thanks in advance, --Spacebirdy 21:24, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Datrio 10:06, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • eo : Ĉar estas malcerte ke mi konservos stivardajn rajtojn (oni proponis ke ili estu de mi forigitaj pro malsufiĉa agado), mi petas burokratajn rajtojn por esperantlingvaj projektoj. --Arno Lagrange ✉ 11:04, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • en : Because it is uncertain I'll keep my stewards rights (one proposed I lose them because of my inactivity), I ask for getting bureaucrat rights on esperanto language projects. --Arno Lagrange ✉ 11:04, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Well, same thing as the others - please first notify the local community of your request. Datrio 11:06, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I did so --Arno Lagrange ✉ 11:15, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
ArnoLagrange is now a bureaucrat on the Esperanto Wikipedia. Datrio 10:01, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Requests_for_permissions/Archives/2005/12&oldid=219422"