Steward requests/Global

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Billinghurst (talk | contribs) at 11:32, 10 November 2021 (Global blocks/FAQ and SRGP). It may differ significantly from the current version.
Shortcut:
SRG
This page hosts requests for global (un)blocks, (un)locks and hidings.

If you are here because you have been affected by a global block, please see Global blocks/FAQ for more information about global block and routes to appeal.

Note: (un)blocks apply to IP addresses; and (un)locks apply to global accounts.


Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests for global (un)block

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Please also review Global blocking . Only IP addresses can be globally blocked at this moment. Please see #Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding if your request involves an account.
Global blocks don't affect Meta-Wiki, so if your IP address is blocked, you can still appeal here. IP addresses that cause disruption on Meta should be reported at Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat instead of here so that they can be blocked locally.
Please describe the kind of cross wiki abusive activity you see from the IP. Saying an IP is a long term abuser is not helpful, but saying "IP vandalizes at ban.wikipedia, no.wikipedia and vi.wikipedia" is. This is especially important for range blocks. If you do not provide enough details, your request might be declined.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You know the IP address(es) you wish to have globally blocked or unblocked.
  2. For blocks, the global blocking criteria are met.
  3. For unblocks, your request addresses the original reason for blocking the IP, if any.

To make a request for the address(es) to be blocked or unblocked

Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why the address(es) should be blocked/unblocked.
=== Global block/unblock for [[Special:Contributions/Some IP address|Some IP address]] ===
{{Status}} <!-- Do not remove this template -->
* {{Luxotool|IP address}}
Description, evidence, diffs, etc. --~~~~
When requesting that your IP be unblocked, note that stewards need to know your IP address to even consider a request.
To find your IP, please visit https://www.whatismyip.com/
You are not required to disclose your IP in public - you may make requests privately to any steward on IRC or by email at: stewards@wikimedia.org

Global block for 2A0B:F4C0:16C:0:0:0:0:0/48

Status:    In progress

Tor node. -- CptViraj (talk) 17:08, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global block for 50.81.165.0/24

Status:    Not done

Global lock evasion by LTA TyrusThomas4lyf. ---- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 06:52, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These should be handled by local wikis. They should not be handled globally.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global block for 89.250.166.112

Status:    Not done

Cross-wiki abuse. ---- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 13:34, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

short term issues at major wikis, better handled locally.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:50, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global block for POV warrior of South Azerbaijan

Status:    Not done

Destructive POV editing in favor of Republic of South Azerbaijan. ---- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 13:52, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: Single IP is finished, and it is complete overreach to block two Iranian /17s mobile space. Local communities should be making that sort of decision, not stewards.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global unblock for 2a01:4f8:c17:3e93::1

Status:    In progress
/home/scripts/.ruby/gems/mediawiki_api-0.7.1/lib/mediawiki_api/client.rb:211:in `send_request': '''Your IP address is in a range that has been [[m:Special:MyLanguage/Global blocks|blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis]].''' The block was made by [//meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Kolbert Jon Kolbert] (meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given is ''[[m:NOP|Open Proxy]]: Colocation webhost - Contact [[m:Special:Contact/stewards|stewards]] if you are affected''. * Start of block: 18:18, 15 nov 2019 * Expiry of block: 18:18, 15 feb 2022 Your current IP address is 2a01:4f8:c17:3e93::1 and the blocked range is 2A01:4F8:0:0:0:0:0:0/29. Please include all above details in any queries you make. If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the [[m:Special:MyLanguage/No open proxies|No open proxies]] global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please [[m:Steward requests/Global|post a request for review on Meta-Wiki]] or send an email to the [[m:Special:MyLanguage/Stewards|stewards]] [[m:Special:MyLanguage/OTRS|OTRS]] queue at "stewards@wikimedia.org" including all above details. (wikimedia-globalblocking-ipblocked-range) (MediawikiApi::ApiError)

Hi, 2a01:4f8:c17:3e93::1 is the IPv6 equivalent of 78.47.150.64, the server of mine where I operate Wikimedia bots from. I can confirm that it won't be used as OpenProxy, could you please unblock it? (It's a static IP, there's no need to unblock the range, only that specific IP)--Ferdi2005[Mail] 14:50, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ferdi2005 Though I'm not as active on the Wikimedia wikis, I do follow the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel, and this thread caught my attention. I believe, since this is a web host/colocation provider IP address, it's quite unlikely to be unblocked globally by Wikimedia stewards, per NOP. If you operate approved Wikimedia bots on one or more Wikimedia wikis, I think the better venue for this request would be to request a global IP exemption (and very likely local IP block exemption(s)) for your bot account. Hope that helps. Dmehus (talk) 16:38, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Dmehus:. But that IP corresponds only to my server (it isn't a web host. I'ts a VPS server) and I operate also an OAuth bot, so ad hoc IP extemptions won't work. The IPv4 has already been unlocked in July, but now there's also IPv6. I'll notice stewards when and if I stop using this IP (for instance, because I change VPS provider)--Ferdi2005[Mail] 16:44, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, if it's a dedicated IP address assigned only to your VPS server, I'm not certain what the preferred practice is in this case, but since the entire range is blocked globally, it's sort of a block all or nothing approach (at least globally). That being said, globalblock-whitelist user right exists, to which, at least on this wiki, Meta administrators can be requested to whitelist specific IPs, presumably with a very valid use case. However, because this is done locally, you'd still be in the scenario of having to request this locally on wikis where your approved bot operates. Personally, I would think the global IP block exemption/local IP block exemption(s) would probably still be the preferred practice, but I guess we will have to see what Stewards recommend here. Dmehus (talk) 17:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ferdi2005: Global blocks/FAQ and SRGP  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:32, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global block for 2600:387::/32

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki abuse. Fully blocked on 3 wikis, partially blocked on many more. ---- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 00:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: isn't that a rather large IPv6 residential ISP range to globally block, or did you mean the ::/64? Dmehus (talk) 04:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is large, but the damage by anons in it is quite impressive. -- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 11:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global block for 1.43.167.57

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. --Mtarch11 (talk) 03:37, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mass cross-wiki deletion also needed — surjection ⟨??⟩ 11:59, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Support I have done as much a clean up as is reasonable and easy.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:29, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global block for 137.163.18.64

Status:    Done

Cross-wiki abuse. Harassing established users since 4 Aug 2021. --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 08:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robot clerk note: Done by Stryn. MajavahBot (talk) 07:45, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global block for 85.200.216.126

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. Cross-wiki abuse. --Eihel (talk) 12:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest that this would be better as local blocks as it is isolated edits to the same couple of wikis for a long period.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global block for 2001:1BB0:E000:1E:0:0:0:17B

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse, active on metawiki, simplewiki, plwiki, plwikiquote, etc., see also global block log. Sgd. —Hasley 13:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global block for 67.71.231.178

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. Cross-wiki abuse. frWP, simpleWP, WD. --Eihel (talk) 14:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Support I cannot see a good edit in 18 months from random checks, so a one year block sounds like a good start as it seems to be a home IP.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global block for 210.242.153.201

Status:    Not done

Long term abuse: Xayahrainie43. Was blocked in zhwiki. See also enwiki previous block log. --SCP-2000 16:37, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Think that this is better handled by the local wikis, there are only a few of them impacted.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:24, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global block for 2601:8C:4180:3510:C187:19AE:3E1E:8F9B

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki abuse: Jordanene7. See GUC. --Unnamed UserName me 22:59, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Support a minimum of a couple of weeks would be good here.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:26, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for cross-wiki abuse and LTA 米記123 sock 42.3.120.0/24 and 219.77.184.0/22

Status:    Not done

Same user of Special:CentralAuth/米記123.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 11:43, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MCC214: Please make requests at the individual wikis, these are busy ranges and they are better managed by the wikis. Stewards are not meant to be taking the place of local admins.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:29, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding

Note that global blocking currently only applies to IPs, due to a technical limitation. If you wish to request a named account for global [un]locking, please request a global [un]lock here instead. Be sure to follow the instructions below:
  • Your request might be rejected if it doesn't include the necessary information.
  • Warning! This page is publicly viewable. If the account name is grossly insulting or contains personal information please contact a steward privately in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect or email your request to the stewards VRT queue at stewards-oversight@wikimedia.org (direct wiki interface) but do not post it here. Thanks.
  • Warning! This is not the place to ask for locks based on your opinion that someone is disruptive. Global locks are used exclusively against vandalism and spam, not because of content disputes, not because you think that someone deserves to be globally blocked. In such cases, you should ask for local blocks at appropriate places.
  • If you are globally locked, you should appeal your lock to stewards-appeals@wikimedia.org.

Please describe abusive activity of an account before reporting them here. Since stewards are often not active at projects the reported accounts are, things that seem obvious to you may not be equally obvious to the reviewing steward.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting that a global account be (un)locked, please be sure that:

  1. You have evidence of cross-wiki disruption from the account(s).
  2. You can show that it is not feasible to use local-only blocks or other measures like page protection to combat the disruption.
  3. You have considered making the request in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect, especially for account names which will be hidden, or for urgent requests.
To make a request for an account to be locked or unlocked
Copy one of the codes below to the bottom of this section and explain why the account(s) should be locked/unlocked.
=== Global lock/unlock for Foo ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
* {{LockHide|username}}
* {{LockHide|username|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the name to be visible on this page -->
*...
Reasons, etc. --~~~~

For many accounts: 

=== Global lock for spambots/vandals ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
{{MultiLock|username|username2|username3}}
{{MultiLock|username|username2|username3|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the names to be visible on this page -->
*...
Reasons, etc, --~~~~

Global lock for spam accounts

Status:    In progress

Extended content

Spam/Promotion-only accounts. See also: c:COM:AN (perl). Unnamed UserName me 01:24, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh, special:CentralAuth/Kane0606wwiki does not exist. Do you mean special:CentralAuth/Kane0606wiki? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4: My bad. Sorry. Unnamed UserName me 14:27, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Broke out the below accounts (the ones above are all locked). @NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh: was there a typo with Auto365mydinh? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdaniels5757: They was renamed to Diemdangphuong. Unnamed UserName me 04:20, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Changed below accordingly. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:18, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Khalisha Azzahra

Status:    On hold

Long-term abuse. Cross-wiki abuse. LTA Hitzeed/BD. --– Symphonium264 (talk) 03:26, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Symphonium264: Hitzeed is only locally blocked on idwiki. This looks more like a local affair, which doesn't warrant a lock but rather a local block. Trijnsteltalk 10:12, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Trijnstel: Here's his account that globally locked, BD Vinsa malica ashviya and Hitzeed Ch Reborn. – Symphonium264 (talk) 10:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Symphonium264: Thank you, one more question: why isn't Khalisha Azzahra locally blocked? I would expect to see that with an LTA. --Trijnsteltalk 13:08, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 On hold pending the outcome of a local CU. Trijnsteltalk 11:12, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for II. Niveles and sockpuppets

Status:    In progress

Lock all:

  • ...

II. Niveles has been carrying out attack activities for a long time by creating sockpuppets on Turkish Wikipedia, the puppets have been approved by the checkuser. Global locks are requested. --Kadıköylü (talk) 14:43, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • According to the global lock reasons, this request is not suitable. My alternative accounts, including VT Bot and Sheldon Cooper, is have a positive edits on Turkish Wikipedia and own account has contributed to various Wikimedia project. Being blocked from a Wikipedia project does not require being blocked from all Wikimedia projects. Best, --Victor Trevor (talk) 15:31, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is not a talk page. It has been proven by the checkuser's review that you are a sock puppet of II. Niveles, which has been blocked in many projects. While making positive contributions with this sock puppet, you tried to hide other harmful sock puppets. Your explanations are not valid.--Kadıköylü (talk) 15:38, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just a little correction: Victor and his alternative accounts were banned because of probable meat puppetry, not sock puppetry. It's worth to point out. --07 (talk) 15:46, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hello, @علاء:. Could you also evaluate this request? Kind regards.--Kadıköylü (talk) 15:03, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Diasporahh

Status:    In progress

Global lock evasion by Caux9. ---- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 10:19, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: How do you know? They're nowhere blocked. Trijnsteltalk 10:54, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Trijnstel: Please see this edit in particular. -- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 15:32, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Buihuong.fb

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki abuse. Spam / spambot. Sockpuppet of Lanquynhfb, confirmed by Wikidata CU. --Unnamed UserName me 21:37, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Vipserv777

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki abuse. Spam / spambot. --Unnamed UserName me 22:56, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure about this one. While the user has some deleted and reverted edits, it doesn't appear to be an evidently bad faith account that would warrant a global lock. Comments welcome. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Chung Ho Mun

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki abuse. --20041027 𝓽𝓪𝓽𝓼𝓾（talk） 01:08, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Singerashik and Singerashikbd

Status:    In progress

Crosswiki promotion. Global lock evasion by AshikMusicbd24. ---- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 08:50, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Global unblock

Status:    In progress

Dear colleagues, I decided to contact you based on the e-mail address of the Azerbaijani-speaking Wikipedian, I would like to inform you that the user is one of the active Wikipedia patrols in Azerbaijan, and I present his appeal to you below.

Hello, I apologize for writing here, but there is no other way, please take a step on the issue.

Dear Steward Please comment on this injustice - I ask for a reasonable approach to my personal application, I do not have another profile, Perhaps they considered the issue that happened in 2019. In 2019, I wrote to the admins that - Please to stop my User:Elshadiman profile and activate User:Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) profile, because I do my editing with User:Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) in my Azerbaijani and Russian profiles and I do not need an alternative user profile https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Elshad_Iman_(El%C5%9Fad_%C4%B0man)/Archive_1#October_2014

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Global/2021-w43#Global_lock_for_Elshadiman_sock(s)

but they wrote that I was using other profiles Please contact (Check user) and make sure that I have 1 profile and do not need another one. I want to continue my edits because wikipedia has become my way of life and I ask you to remove the block of my profile. The IP address is 85.132.29.163, the block ID is 11796216. Thanks --Araz Yaquboglu (talk) 09:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I think something went wrong with the block. The user explicitly requested his side profile to be banned (which was later determined as a sock?). Elshad Iman is an experienced and helpful user; admins (including me) has given him certain privileges based on his contributions. There might be reasons to block him from a particular Wikimedia project, but as for azwiki, I think the otherwise. Please, reconsider the global block decision. Cheers, — Toghrul R (talk) 07:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for СЛАВОЉУБ ТОМАНИЋ УСТАШКА ПОЛИЦИЈА

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. --~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Poopopoqwer

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki vandalism. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 22:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Two wikis, ancient account. @LightandDark2000 Do you have any signs of recent activity? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 23:08, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, but this was something I found while scrolling through a page history. I'm not that familiar with the stuff on es.wiki, so I can't say for sure whether or not this is the sock of a more active LTA. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 23:10, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
While the edits on English Wikipedia are definitely vandalism, it looks like that wiki just opted to swiftly revert the vandalism and move on. The CheckUser extension would be useless here, given the age of this account and, behaviourally, it's pretty run of the mill vandalism (i.e., page blanking), so nearly impossible to suggest a behavioural link. I wouldn't think this needs any action, but you could always keep an eye on the user and see if it suddenly edits again. Dmehus (talk) 00:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Rxtr0id

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki socking. Also a CU-confirmed sock account of an LTA. Please run a sleeper check. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 22:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Дуготрајна злоупотреба

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. --~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:56, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Paco es un trol

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. Diegusjaimes lock evasion. --LuchoCR (talk) 00:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Garrardian

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. ---- LuK3 (Talk) 02:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Norbock4720

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. Pepi003. --LuchoCR (talk) 08:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for JorgeMartínez20

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. Jocer Blandino. --LuchoCR (talk) 08:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Irkham mahfudh

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. Cross-wiki abuse. LTA Hitzeed, impersonating Fervent Attack. --– Symphonium264 (talk) 10:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for やなかぁやさたな

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. See also w:ja:LTA:SLIME (User:すらいむさん sock) or copycat. --しみはる君 (talk) 15:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Peter Hoang Cong Minh

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. Nipponese Dog Calvero. --Unnamed UserName me 18:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Brian Laundrie enjoy your hell

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. --Aeschylus (talk) 22:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for multiple deceased users' accounts

Status:    In progress
User list

The majority of the accounts of ruwiki's deceased users listed on a special page here ru:Википедия:Умершие участники are not locked, because only the recent deaths were actually reported to Meta (by me or people from the other communities). So i have listed them all here now. Most of these are now unused for years and are potentially very susceptible to being compromised. --Meiræ 22:52, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Бсадовски1

Status:    In progress

LTA, Impersonation: SwissArmyGuy. --Sgd. —Hasley 00:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Suativilimosa

Status:    In progress

Spam / spambot. --SCP-2000 08:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for multiple socks of Огірко Ігор Васильович

Status:    In progress

Lock all:

Sockpuppets of Special:CentralAuth/Огірко Ігор Васильович, investigation page in nl.wiki, confirmation from checkuser in uk.wiki --Renvoy (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Adam833

Status:    In progress

Checkuser confirmed new sock of Adam Asrul. Thanks. --Renvoy (talk) 12:53, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Mugnuts

Status:    In progress

Abusive username. Impersonation. ---- LuK3 (Talk) 13:01, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for GeordieVanessa

Status:    In progress

Lock evasion of MariaJaydHicky, please see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky/Archive. --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 14:44, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for OrnIuLeLoup

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. Fraud; impersonation. --Bédévore (talk) 15:04, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock

Status:    In progress

Abusive Username. --しみはる君 (talk) 15:36, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Levungocthaicuc

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki abuse. Spam / spambot. Promotion-only account. See also it.wiki talk page. --Unnamed UserName me 17:37, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Julles78120

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. fraud; impersonation. --Bédévore (talk) 17:44, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Freanjkser432

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki abuse. Cross wiki vandalism and sockpuppetry. Please gblock the associated IP and check for sleepers. --LuchoCR (talk) 19:17, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for WilfredCargill

Status:    Done
User list

Spam / spambot. ntsamr. --~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:13, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robot clerk note: Done by Jon Kolbert. MajavahBot (talk) 06:45, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Eskalation im ICE Syrer sticht mit Messer wahllos auf Deutsche ein

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. Abusive username. Avoided. --~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:56, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Zomblofisabilillah

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. Cross-wiki abuse. LTA Ratna Sarita.– Symphonium264 (talk) 02:46, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for हिन्दू1

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. हिन्दू1 on Hindi Wiki is blocked by hindi wiki administrator and हिन्दू2 and जैसे चौहान are Two suspects sockpuppet account of हिन्दू1. please look -[1]. --LaticAacid (talk) 04:36, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Anyaonline

Status:    In progress

Spam / spambot. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 05:06, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for MariaJaydHicky sock(s)

Status:    In progress

Sockpuppet(s) found in enwiki sockpuppet investigation, see w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky. Spicy (talk) 05:36, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Spambots

Status:    Done

Spambots. --Mtarch11 (talk) 06:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robot clerk note: Done by Jon Kolbert. MajavahBot (talk) 07:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for Hireahacker3

Status:    Done

Spam / spambot. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 06:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robot clerk note: Done by Jon Kolbert. MajavahBot (talk) 07:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for XX your momitgoesyeet Xx

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki abuse. Also refer kn.wikipedia contribs. --~aanzx ✉ © 08:36, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock for SharifulIslamNaikBD

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki abuse. --—Yahya (talk • contribs.) 10:26, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Global&oldid=22317130"