Meta:Requests for adminship/Multichill (temp): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Older edit Newer edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 09:31, 24 July 2011

Multichill

Ending 30 June 17:00 UTC

Multichill (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

Hey, most people probably know Multichill from his work on Wikimedia Commons and the Dutch Wikipedia. He is heavily involved with all kind of Cultural Heritage cooperations, Wiki Loves Monuments and mass upload projects. He has been an admin on the Dutch Wikipedia since November 2007 and on Wikimedia Commons since May 2008. Multichill runs multiple crosswiki bots, including CommonsDelinker.

He will likely be involved in some centralnotice stuff later this year to announce Wiki Loves Monuments, so it would be helpful for him to have admin status by then. I think Multichill is a highly trusted user and common with having extra user rights. I would like to nominate Multichill for admin status on Metawiki because he would be a valuable addition to the team. Effeietsanders 16:43, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I accept :-) Multichill 16:45, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I certainly know Multichill from Commons where good work is done. However the contributions here are so minimal I cannot support this. 100 contribs goes back over two years. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:12, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In passing - temporary admin would seem perfectly appropriate to the needs. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:31, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Of course Multichill can be trusted with the mop, but he doesn't need it atm. Perhaps a temporary adminship during the Wiki Loves Monuments project? Trijnstel 18:21, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That's fine with me too. That would be from start of August (prep time) to the start of October (finish up). Multichill 22:45, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm sure the tools would be useful for the work Multichill is doing and certainly trust him. Aude 01:29, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm with Aude on this one. Courcelles 07:20, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per herby, but wouls support temporary per trijnstel. --WizardOfOz ^talk 08:30, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 08:30, 24 July 2011 edit WizardOfOz (talk \| contribs) Autopatrollers 2,679 edits m →‎Multichill ← Older edit		Revision as of 09:31, 24 July 2011 edit undo Herbythyme (talk \| contribs) Administrators, Translation administrators 12,696 edits →‎Multichill: + Newer edit →
Line 9: '''Oppose''' I certainly know Multichill from Commons where good work is done. However the contributions here are so minimal I cannot support this. 100 contribs goes back over two years. --[[User:Herbythyme\|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme\|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 17:12, 23 July 2011 (UTC) :In passing - temporary admin would seem perfectly appropriate to the needs. --[[User:Herbythyme\|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme\|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 09:31, 24 July 2011 (UTC) '''Neutral''' Of course Multichill can be trusted with the mop, but he doesn't need it atm. Perhaps a temporary adminship during the Wiki Loves Monuments project? [[User:Trijnstel\|Trijnstel]] 18:21, 23 July 2011 (UTC) ** That's fine with me too. That would be from start of August (prep time) to the start of October (finish up). [[User:Multichill\|Multichill]] 22:45, 23 July 2011 (UTC)