Meta:Requests for adminship/Trijnstel: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:24, 25 March 2011

Trijnstel

Trijnstel (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)
End date: 14:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello all! I'm here today to nominate Trijnstel for adminship here on meta. She's tagged many pages for deletion here and also reverted lots of vandalism. As a sysop on nlwiki, she also fulfils the requirements. Trijnstel furthermore is already a global rollbacker. I think she has shown some need for the mop here and is also trusted enough to be an admin. I hope you agree with me. Good luck! -Barras 14:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for nominating me and of course I accept it. With love, Trijnstel 14:07, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support - as nom... -Barras 14:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Active cross-wiki user, sysop on nlwiki and judging by the deleted contributions could make use of the tools here as well. Jafeluv 14:11, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure micki t 14:28, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WizardOfOz ^talk 14:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure. Theo10011 15:18, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, of course - Hoo man (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Seen her around quite a bit doing small wiki work, no reason why not. Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Natuurlijk, trustful and active. Sa vh ^ñ 21:02, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. --Erwin 21:31, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Grunny (talk) 00:00, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Don't see a reason to oppose. –BruTe ^talk 05:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 *{{Support}} [[User:Grunny|<span style="color:#6B8E23;">'''Grunny'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Grunny|<span style="color:#6B8E23;">talk</span>]]) 00:00, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 *{{Support}} Don't see a reason to oppose. –[[User:BRUTE|BruTe]] <sup>[[User talk:BRUTE|talk]]</sup> 05:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
+*{{support}} Why not? -'''[[User:Fastily|<span style='font-family: "Trebuchet MS"; color:#4B0082'><big>F</big><small>ASTILY</small></span>]]''' <sup><small>[[User talk:Fastily|<span style = 'color:#4B0082'>(TALK)</span>]]</small></sup> 07:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)