Meta:Requests for adminship/Trijnstel

Trijnstel

• Trijnstel (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

  End date: 14:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello all! I'm here today to nominate Trijnstel for adminship here on meta. She's tagged many pages for deletion here and also reverted lots of vandalism. As a sysop on nlwiki, she also fulfils the requirements. Trijnstel furthermore is already a global rollbacker. I think she has shown some need for the mop here and is also trusted enough to be an admin. I hope you agree with me. Good luck! -Barras 14:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for nominating me and of course I accept it. With love, Trijnstel 14:07, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

•  Support - as nom... -Barras 14:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support. Active cross-wiki user, sysop on nlwiki and judging by the deleted contributions could make use of the tools here as well. Jafeluv 14:11, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Sure mickit 14:28, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --WizardOfOz ^talk 14:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Sure. Theo10011 15:18, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
• Support. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support, of course - Hoo man (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
• Support - Seen her around quite a bit doing small wiki work, no reason why not. Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Natuurlijk, trustful and active. Savh^ñ 21:02, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
• Sure. --Erwin 21:31, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Grunny (talk) 00:00, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Don't see a reason to oppose. –BruTe ^talk 05:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Obviously yes. :) Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 08:05, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --თოგო ^(D) 12:33, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Alex Pereira ^falaê 17:16, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:39, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support. Além do que foi dito, ela é bastante cuidadosa e respeitosa.” T_ele^s (T_alk @ C G) 05:52, 26 March 2011 (UTC)