Jump to content

Research talk:Automated classification of article importance: Revision history

View logs for this page (view abuse log)

Diff selection: mark the radio boxes of the versions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.

External tools: Revision history statistics (Aka) · Revision history statistics (XTools) · Revision history search · Page view statistics · Number of watchers
Legend: (cur) = difference with current version, (prev) = difference with preceding version, m = minor edit.

curprev 04:4104:41, 30 May 2017‎ Walkerma talk contribs‎ 19,133 bytes +4,167‎ →‎Evaluation metric: Followup (finally!) undo

curprev 17:0117:01, 15 May 2017‎ Nettrom talk contribs‎ 14,966 bytes +228‎ →‎Rethinking importance: re, awesome, thanks much undo

curprev 01:5001:50, 13 May 2017‎ LZia (WMF) talk contribs‎ 14,738 bytes +311‎ →‎Rethinking importance undo

curprev 20:2420:24, 20 April 2017‎ Nettrom talk contribs‎ 14,427 bytes +1,203‎ →‎Evaluation metric: re, that's a good point undo

curprev 05:3205:32, 19 April 2017‎ Basvb talk contribs‎ 13,224 bytes −10‎ →‎Evaluation metric undo
curprev 05:3105:31, 19 April 2017‎ Basvb talk contribs‎ 13,234 bytes +668‎ →‎Evaluation metric: new section undo

curprev 17:0317:03, 27 March 2017‎ Nettrom talk contribs‎ 12,566 bytes +1,211‎ →‎Amazing medical classifications: re, thanks so much for your help so far, here's what I'm working on undo

curprev 09:3609:36, 26 March 2017‎ Stuartyeates talk contribs‎ 11,355 bytes +226‎ link undo

curprev 22:2422:24, 23 March 2017‎ Bluerasberry talk contribs‎ 11,129 bytes +652‎ →‎Amazing medical classifications: new section undo

curprev 02:4002:40, 21 February 2017‎ Nettrom talk contribs‎ 10,477 bytes +13‎ adding work log template undo

curprev 20:4820:48, 17 February 2017‎ EllenCT talk contribs‎ 10,464 bytes +117‎ →‎Past discussion about Importance modeling: reply undo

curprev 18:4118:41, 16 February 2017‎ Halfak (WMF) talk contribs‎ 10,347 bytes +276‎ →‎Past discussion about Importance modeling: new section undo

curprev 09:1809:18, 10 February 2017‎ Stuartyeates talk contribs‎ 10,071 bytes +477‎ reply undo

curprev 23:2123:21, 9 February 2017‎ Nettrom talk contribs‎ 9,594 bytes +1,510‎ →‎definition of importance: re, not sure I understand the problem, here are some examples and thoughts undo

curprev 20:2520:25, 8 February 2017‎ Stuartyeates talk contribs‎ 8,084 bytes +783‎ →‎definition of importance: new section undo
curprev 01:2601:26, 8 February 2017‎ Nettrom talk contribs‎ 7,301 bytes +1,468‎ →‎Rethinking importance: re, yes to importance ratings, would like more research on importance vs scope, and thanks undo

curprev 23:5323:53, 7 February 2017‎ Nettrom talk contribs‎ m 5,833 bytes +1‎ →‎Importance of Wikidata Items: typo undo

curprev 23:3723:37, 6 February 2017‎ Halfak (WMF) talk contribs‎ 5,832 bytes +236‎ →‎Looking within WikiProjects undo
curprev 22:2822:28, 6 February 2017‎ Halfak (WMF) talk contribs‎ 5,596 bytes +425‎ →‎Looking within WikiProjects: new section undo
curprev 18:3618:36, 6 February 2017‎ LZia (WMF) talk contribs‎ 5,171 bytes +1,543‎ added a comment about the proposal undo

curprev 19:4419:44, 3 February 2017‎ Nettrom talk contribs‎ 3,628 bytes +2,769‎ →‎Importance of Wikidata Items: re, great comments, thanks… here are some thoughts undo

curprev 00:5400:54, 2 February 2017‎ Ewulczyn (WMF) talk contribs‎ 859 bytes +1‎ →‎Importance of Wikidata Items undo
curprev 00:5300:53, 2 February 2017‎ Ewulczyn (WMF) talk contribs‎ 858 bytes +2‎ →‎Importance of Wikidata Items undo
curprev 00:5300:53, 2 February 2017‎ Ewulczyn (WMF) talk contribs‎ 856 bytes +856‎ →‎Importance of Wikidata Items: new section

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_talk:Automated_classification_of_article_importance"