Research talk:Wikimedia Research Best Practices Around Privacy Whitepaper/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
answer question
add suggestion
Line 14: Line 14:


3. What do you see as missing, if anything, as recommendations for researchers?
3. What do you see as missing, if anything, as recommendations for researchers?
* We can and should be expecting researchers who wish to engage with us to be aware of relevant ethics standards (including privacy and transparency activities; things like pre-registration, ethics boards, etc, etc) in their fields of research. [[User:Stuartyeates|Stuartyeates]] ([[User talk:Stuartyeates|talk]]) 06:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
* response_1
* response_2
* response_2
* ...
* ...

Revision as of 06:45, 9 April 2024

Questions for the Wikipedia Communities and Arbitration Committees

In particular, from this group we are seeking input on the following questions:

1. Starting with a review of some of the basics we've sketched so far in the white paper draft, what should the recommendations be for Wikipedians (section 4.2)? What is missing?

  • response_1
  • response_2
  • ...

2. What values do you think should be mentioned in Section 3.1 'Understanding key values of Wikipedians'? What community essays, policies, or guidelines should be referenced in communicating key values of Wikipedians?

3. What do you see as missing, if anything, as recommendations for researchers?

  • We can and should be expecting researchers who wish to engage with us to be aware of relevant ethics standards (including privacy and transparency activities; things like pre-registration, ethics boards, etc, etc) in their fields of research. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • response_2
  • ...

4. Where would you like to see future work on this topic? What opportunities should be highlighting for researchers to examine more deeply?

  • response_1
  • response_2
  • ...

5. Do you have ideas about how we can address one or more of the "TODO"s we have listed throughout the draft?

  • response_1
  • response_2
  • ...

Questions for researchers

In particular, from this group we are seeking input on the following questions:

1. What recommendations are unclear, and maybe therefore unhelpful, for you?

  • response_1
  • response_2
  • ...

2. What questions do you still have about privacy on Wikipedia after reading this?

  • response_1
  • response_2
  • ...

3. Do you have ideas about how we can address one or more of the "TODO"s we have listed throughout the draft?

  • response_1
  • response_2
  • ...

Additional comments and feedback

To all reviewers and commenters, please try to organize your feedback by either adding it to an existing topic on this talk page, or by adding new topics so we can keep discussions around similar topics organized.

We will be monitoring this page until 30 April 2024, but won't be able to respond directly to comments. However, all comments will be reviewed and considered in the ongoing drafting and revising process.

If you are more comfortable leaving comments in a language other than English, please feel welcome to do so. Please note that we may utilize machine translation in reviewing non-English content. Thanks for your feedback!