Abstract Wikipedia/Wikifunctions logo concept/Proposal 9

Proposal 9

+ Support (mobile)
(Support (Mobile))

It should be fairly obvious that the design is based on a fusion of two letters "W" (for wiki) and "λ" (for functions).
The logo is also a carefully organized composition of four triangular arrows. Arrow is used in the design as the building block because it is commonly used to represent functions under various circumstances, such as arrow notation for mathematical functions, and arrow functions in different programming languages.
Because of its simplicity, it works well at different sizes and can be easily adapted for different applications (the "powered by" button is an example application).
Shapes in the logo are based on the design grid to create geometric harmony.

Discussion

Voting

Support Mahir256 (talk) 00:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thadguidry (talk) 00:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shizhao (talk) 01:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support By far the most pleasing one to look at. In contrast to a lot of others, it works great in small sizes and low resolutions, because it is not too detailed. Yet it perfectly conveys what Wikifunctions will be about using common symbols. Would still look great in black and white. Bonus: the W looks a bit like horns symbolising the potential of the project. CamelCaseNick (talk) 02:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Original. Love it. — 🍕 Yivan000 ^view_talk 03:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support —〚 Arronwan 〛 03:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Strong support to this one! Jeeputer (talk) 03:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Labdajiwa (talk) 04:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love it. Legoktm (talk) 04:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support –SJ talk 05:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amadalvarez (talk) 06:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Babu (talk) 06:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mysterymanblue (talk) 07:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Elegant, evocative, clear, and nice to look at Julio974fr (talk) 07:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support GeographieMan (talk) 07:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support J'aime cette présentation. I like the design. Huguespotter (talk) 07:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Markus Krötzsch (talk) 08:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just because of lambda reference Papuass (talk) 08:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ornek11222^talk 08:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support TFerenczy (talk) 09:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sintakso (talk) 09:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support GPSLeo (talk) 11:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lepticed7 (talk) 11:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kpjas (talk) 11:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tulp8 (talk) 12:03, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Root992 (talk) 13:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --★ Ano op✉ 13:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tgr (talk) 13:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mcoffsky (talk) 13:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sgd. —Hasley 14:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pinky sl (talk) 14:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Imetsia (talk) 17:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support this one just stood out to me. ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Carlsrator (talk) 18:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support even if you don't see the lambda, it is visually appealing. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ponor (talk) 19:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Achird (talk) 19:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pennenetui3000 (talk) 20:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support clean, distinguished Bertux (talk) 23:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]