Steward requests/Permissions/2019-03

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests‎ | Permissions
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Leaderboard (talk | contribs) at 13:21, 21 July 2021 (lint fix). It may differ significantly from the current version.

Administrator access

Bikarhêner@kuwiktionary

Status:    Done

Hello! Could you give adminstrator and Interface administrator access to the User:Bikarhêner. Thanks in advance Ghybu (talk) 01:28, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Bikarhêner must enable 2FA first. Ruslik (talk) 20:38, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
How is that supposed to work? Enabling 2FA requires (interface) admin access (cf. ku:wikt:Taybet:ListGroupRights). --Vogone (talk) 21:09, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Indeed, Bikarhêner has no current way to enable 2FA access. So we can either stop asking them to enable it before assigning the permissions (especially since we can't actually check, my preferred option), or give them access to the oathauth testers group when asking them to enable it rather than sending them to make a request elsewhere. – Ajraddatz (talk) 21:17, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
It has activated. --Bikarhêner (talk) 23:03, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2019-08-28. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:36, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
It would be simpler to grant sysop access first and then request them to enable 2FA and after that granting interface admin access. Ruslik (talk) 20:26, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
@Ruslik0:, that's unnecessarily bureaucratic, as I said before, and simply wastes time. Leaderboard (talk) 08:57, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Infogeek244@es.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

I made a mistake on the ES Wiki! I need the admin right for 2 minutes. --Infogeek244 (talk) 12:12, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Infogeek244, that is not how it works :) You need to become an active contributor to eswiki and then go through the procedure described at w:es:Wikipedia:Bibliotecarios. In the meanwhile the mistake you wanted to fix was fixed for you. You just need to use a speedy deletion template, {{Plantilla:Destruir}} in case of eswiki, if you see that something meets speedy deletion criteria. --Base (talk) 12:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Okay, thanks! I did not know the template and accidentally took a wrong one. --Infogeek244 (talk) 12:32, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Omid Jeyhani@tgwiki

Status:    Done

(Over 10 years, Russian, Persian and Tajik Wikipedian edit articles. I have never been blocked. He says here. He is a decent adminstrator in the Tajik Wikipedia.) Jaloliddin Madaminov (talk) 18:15, 1 March 2019 (UTC).

Done. Omid Jeyhani, поздравляю, не стесняйтесь обращаться с вопросами о технической стороне инструмента администратора. --Base (talk) 12:16, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

ZI Jony@bpy.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

I would like to ask for adminship right for the purpose of housekeeping tasks about deleting off-topic pages. I also contribute there. local community sysop inactive globally since August 2017. I can understand that I've requested sysop again and again which is not good but please understand the Situation. Thanks and Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 21:01, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Pinging NahidSultan who created the pages you tagged as offtopic. Vermont (talk) 21:51, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
MarcoAurelio Could you please assign infinitely. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 19:25, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
You tagged a dozen or so pages (created by a steward) for deletion and ask for indefinite administrator permissions without any community discussion. Considering your recent forced removal from OTRS, history of seeking permissions without any experience in the related field, and lack of experience on bpywiki, I oppose your request. Vermont (talk) 19:37, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Vermont you ping Nahid two days ago but no response, on bpywiki he was created on 2013 when he was new Wikipedian. Regarding community discussion on bpywiki it’s quite difficult because there is no experience active user except Vogone, someone should take responsibly so I've taken as an local person. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 20:08, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

@ZI Jony: we can't give any permission(s) without local discussion, so please open it and put the link here, then we should waiting for 7 days at least! --Alaa :)..! 20:30, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Request withdrawn Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 20:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

ZI Jony@test.Wikidata

Status:    Locally handled

I would like to request administrator access for test property, admin and related tools. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 21:00, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Could you please ask any of the users at https://test.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:ListUsers/bureaucrat?. Thanks. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:30, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio: I'm not getting response there, if you could please. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:35, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
I see Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) is editting there. Maybe this mention will also get to her so she can decide. I am not really willing to step on test.wikidata bureaucrats if at least some are active. Thanks for your understanding. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
I gave you admin rights now. Please use them responsibly. --Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) (talk) 17:38, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you very much!Thanks both of you. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 18:20, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Locally done Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 20:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

مصعب@ar.wikibooks

Status:    Done

The discussion opened on 41 Feb 2019 (since more than 7 days) with 4 supports. Please grant him sysop flag for 1 year. I'm sysop there so can't preform this request. Thanks on advance --Alaa :)..! 10:38, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Done. -- Lofty abyss 12:55, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Ahmad K Hasan@ar.wikibooks

Status:    Done

The discussion opened on 11 Feb 2019 (since more than 7 days) with 4 supports. Please grant him sysop flag for 6 months. I'm sysop there so can't preform this request. Thanks on advance --Alaa :)..! 10:38, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Done. -- Lofty abyss 12:55, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

The Living love@hawikipedia

Status:    Done

Please grant administrator rights to this user. –Ammarpad (talk) 06:34, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until 11 March --Alaa :)..! 13:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
@علاء: The request was opened on 3 March and today 10 March it's full 7 days now, including the UTC timestamps. So it's not "6" days. –Ammarpad (talk) 14:15, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2019-09-11. -- --Alaa :)..! 15:26, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

AmaryllisGardener@scowiki

Status:    Done

I've been administrator on this wiki for quite a few years now and I would like to continue my service. --AmaryllisGardener talk 17:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Question Question: @Ajraddatz and Ruslik0: Is it fine to grant permanent instead of temporary adminship this time? AmaryllisGardener has been an admin there since 2014 without issues (to the best of my knowledge). Defender (talk) 17:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
I am personally fine with granting permanent access. There is no risk of abuse that must be mitigated in this case. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
I am afraid if we start making exceptions, then anyone will start demanding be granted said exceptions (thus becoming rule). I can understand having to ask each year for adminship is annoying, and that's why I'd support 2 years temporary adminship; but not permanent while agreeing with Ajraddatz in that there's no apparent risk of tools abuse here. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:10, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Clarification: In this case, with 7 successful RfAs and an having had temporary adminship for several years (last one lasted 2 years) I am not totally opposed though. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 20:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Granted permanent. They are admin there for over 5 years, in one of previous votes, w:sco:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/AmaryllisGardener 4, the community indicated that they would want to see him a permanent admin. Besides other administrators hold permanent permissions there. While it is a small wiki, I see no need for superfluous bureaucracy. --Base (talk) 23:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

-revi@kowikinews

Status:    Done

Not sure if George Ho qualifies within our community RfA voter requirement (voter need to have at least 10 contribs on kowikinews, or have over 500 edits on ko.wiki* domains combined, he only has contribs on VP and I am not sure if that is 'contribution'.), but I've asked *Youngjin to decide. The right expires tomorrow so the request is here regardless of his decision. — regards, Revi 14:53, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

I just closed as elected.--*Youngjin (talk) 12:26, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Done Granted for 2 years to expire on 2021-03-13. Ruslik (talk) 20:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Satpal (CIS-A2K)@pawikisource

Status:    Withdrawn
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Not done--Biplab Anand (Talk) 06:01, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

I need admin rights to upload some books via local uploader. Thank you - Satpal (CIS-A2K) (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Tito (CIS-A2K) Is it ok to using CIS-A2K account for books uploading?--Jayprakash >>> Talk 21:01, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Dear Tito (CIS-A2K), I think its okay but I need your view as Jay said. Please confirm so I can get admin rights. - Satpal (CIS-A2K) (talk) 06:10, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello! As I discuss with fellow wikimedians personally and In group, I feel that I have to use my User:Satpal Dandiwal account for this purpose. I mean I don't need admin rights for my CIS-A2K account. So, I withdraw my request. Please close this section. Thank you. - Satpal (CIS-A2K) (talk) 05:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Closing then as not done because Request withdrawn by requested user, Satpal (CIS-A2K).--Biplab Anand (Talk) 06:01, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Dimon2711@uk.wikivoyage

Status:    Done

Dimon2711 (talk) 18:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2019-09-15. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:39, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

夢蝶葬花@hak.wikipedia

Status:    Done

↑ 夢蝶葬花 (talk) 10:17, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2019-06-19. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Alaa :)..! 17:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

夏侯韜@zh-classical.wikipedia

Status:    Done

夏侯韜 was an admin of zh-classicalwp since 6 February, 2017, and was elected as admin again per community RfA for another term. Thank you! 丁子君 (talk) 21:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year and 6 months to expire on 2020-09-19. --Base (talk) 22:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

夢蝶葬花@gan.wikipedia

Status:    Done

These two projects are currently almost unmanaged and have been disrupted, so I hope to continue to apply for administrators to stop the damage. Temporary permissions can be, thank you. 夢蝶葬花 (talk) 10:17, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2019-06-18. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 21:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Ooswesthoesbes@chr.wikipedia

Status:    Done

I would like to request admin access for another term on the Cherokee Wikipedia :) --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 10:46, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2019-09-19. . Thank you for your maintenance work and good luck with your quest of reviving the project. --Base (talk) 16:14, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! :) --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 16:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Editor D.S@ptwikinews

Status:    Done

Editor D.S has been approved to his third term as administrator of ptwikinews. Please assign the tools for him. Best regards. EVinente (talk) 14:15, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2020-03-21. Unfortunately too soon to assign up to 2099 yet, but they are on that way :) --Base (talk) 16:24, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Sami_At_Ferḥat@kab.wikipedia.org

Status:    Done

I'd like to renew my user rights in this wiki. (admin status lost in january) Sami At Ferḥat (talk) 21:42, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until 22 March 2019 Ruslik (talk) 20:58, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2019-09-23. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Alaa :)..! 15:15, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Vit Koz@be.wikiquote

Status:    Done

Extension. No one against, 1 user supports. Vit; talk 21:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2019-09-27. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:44, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Vit Koz@be.wikibooks

Status:    Done

No one against, 1 user supports. Vit; talk 21:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2019-09-27. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:45, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Turkmen@az.wiktionary

Status:    Done

Thanks Turkmen talk 00:01, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2020-03-28. Ruslik (talk) 14:31, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

H78c67c@yuewiktionary

Status:    Done

(Note: My account is renamed from Hello903hello to H78c67c)--H78c67c (talk) 01:44, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2019-09-29. Ruslik (talk) 17:32, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Araz Yaquboglu@az.wiktionary

Status:    Done

Thanks. --►Cekli829 09:11, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 10:28, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Interface administrator access

Xiplus@zh.wikisource

Status:    Done

Request for temporary interface adminship (2FA enabled). I want to fix gadget bugs. Xiplus (talk) 13:16, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Done. Xiplus, As it is your second temporary IA there I have granted it for 6 months. --Base (talk) 13:34, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

NMW03@azwikibooks

Status:    Done

Here

I am sysop of azwikibooks. I need this right for edit interface pages.NMW03 (talk) 19:48, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

You need a new request and also, please, enable 2FA. Ruslik (talk) 20:21, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: I've already enabled 2FA.--NMW03 (talk) 13:24, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Where is a new request? Ruslik (talk) 20:36, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
@Ruslik0:, here--NMW03 (talk) 16:27, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 On hold until 2 March 2019 Ruslik (talk) 19:25, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Done. NMW03, granted for 3 months. But please note, and this goes for both your azwikibooks and azwikipedia rights, that local MediaWiki pages are fine only for custom scripts, styles and interface messages or interface messages that you want to be different from the original (e.g. use custom template in them). If you just want to translate the interface from English to Azerbaijani, please use translatewiki.net. --Base (talk) 13:54, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

JAn Dudík@skwiktionary

Status:    Done

Thanks.
— Danny B. 12:20, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

2FA enabled. JAn Dudík (talk) 12:56, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Done Ruslik (talk) 20:41, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Danny B.@skwiktionary

Status:    Done

Thanks.
— Danny B. 12:20, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Danny B., JAn Dudík, Zdenekk2, could you confirm that you have Two Factor Authentication enabled? (Danny you probably do as you already have an IA, but just to make sure). In case you don't you have to enable it for these rights per WMF requirement. It can be done in in preferences on skwikt. --Base (talk) 22:42, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
I do. JAn Dudík confirmed below. I can't speak on behalf of Zdenekk2, we can postpone that until he's back from vacations, I'll poke him. Thanks for care.
— Danny B. 21:09, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi everyone. Note that the discussion extends two sections below the linked one. The two extra sections cover my concerns. I thought I would mention them here, so that they don't get ignored. I am obviously in the minority, but I am also the one most likely to suggest interface changes (one planned change is already in the pipeline). Of particular concern to me is that Danny B. did not confirm his willingness to obey the community (which is not a matter of course due to some past incidents). Also, Zdenekk2 did not make any edits recently and it's not clear whether he is interested in these permissions. I don't have any issues with JAn Dudík even though his own support for the proposal is tentative. (see below) I am happy to answer any questions you might have. — Robert Važan (talk) 22:05, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Now I have doubts about JAn Dudík too. Even though he confirmed his willingness to obey the community, his bot has just performed controversial mass content removals (example) without so much as posting an announcement first, apparently on Danny's request who was shown proof two days before that such content is established practice introduced long ago by several editors. This kind of unilateral decision-making is what I am worried about. It can completely wreck the project when armed with interface access. — Robert Važan (talk) 16:52, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

The appropriate place to discuss all your grievances is sk.wiktionary. This board is for requests only. Please, do not post long comments here anymore. Ruslik (talk) 20:36, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Yes, understood. The reason for posting here was that Danny B. reformatted the discussion on SK Wiktionary in such a way ([1], [2], [3]) that my comments were made easy to miss. I wouldn't have posted here otherwise. — Robert Važan (talk) 06:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Done Ruslik (talk) 20:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Joachim Mos@nds.wiktionary

Status:    Not done

(deine Erläuterungen) Joachim Mos (talk) 07:55, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

@Joachim Mos:, do you have 2FA enabled? einsbor talk 09:51, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
No, must I do so? --Joachim Mos (talk) 08:41, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Yes, it's now required. Leaderboard (talk) 10:03, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
I don't know how. My English is not good enough, to understand without a dictionary, how to do. And generelly: Since years I'm the only one, who works continue for nds.wiktionary, get no help from Wikipedia, if their is a problem, problems, I would not have, if not often someone, I do not know who, makes changes, and nobody looks, that it will not make problems, they make changes and I can make the rest, do not know, what was changed, and so I need often hours, to find, what's going wrong. At time, I cannot use the Edit-Help, someone has change something and I do not know, what. And so I have many work, that has nothing to do with to make a Dictionary, many times, I do look, what's going wrong. And then, I can as an Admin not longer open for example https://nds.wiktionary.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Edit.js to do something, that it will run again in future, after Mr. Unknown had made a change, and if I will do it, there is a first problem, suddenly I must become a special Admin, a interface administrator, who is allowed to make changes in MediaWiki-Files, and that is not enough, a little second problem, now you must install something on your computer or so, a Password is not enough, and the page, where is written how to do, is a mix of German and English, before I can install, I have to do a hour or more, to translate. I have work years on nds.wiktionary.org, but now it is enough. You can close the nds.wiktionary, in future there is nobody, who will do anything continouisly, no Admin, no one who makes templates, and no one, who will look, that every thing is okay, nobody, who will look, that the shit, what someone makes, so that their are errors and bugs, will be become okay. And clear, a Interface administrator access I do not need in future, shall the one, who has made the problems for example with the https://nds.wiktionary.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Edit.js do something, that the problem will be no longer be. I will do in future other things, things, that make sence and make fun. nds.wiktionary maks both no longer. For me is that, what is going on on nds.wiktionary, only a form of sabotage and that's not all, I have look many hours on Wikimedia and so on for someone, who helps me, to correct errors, nobody will do so, no, but make errors is no problems. Now for me it's more than enough, call the troubleshooter, they have made the problems, let them correct it. I not longer will do so, and so I also not need to be a shit interface administrator. --Joachim Mos (talk) 11:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
I know you might be in a hurry, but whoa, watch your mouth. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 12:18, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
@Joachim Mos: calm down, please. 2FA is mandatory to get the permission you're asking. Go to your preferences site (click here), now on first page you got button "Enable two factor autentication" (or Die Zwei-Faktor-Authentifizierung aktivieren). Then install Google authenticator or other app on your mobile. It's simple and easy to use. I asked for it not because I want you to get mad, I asked because I cannot grant the permission wihtout 2FA enabled. einsbor talk 15:03, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Die Anleitung von Einsbor stimmt, allerdings musst du dafür die Einstellungen auf ndswiktionary besuchen, nicht auf Meta. :-) --Vogone (talk) 12:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Not done no response. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:26, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

H78c67c@yuewiktionary

Status:    Done

(Note: My account is renamed from Hello903hello to H78c67c; 2FA enabled)--H78c67c (talk) 01:44, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2019-09-29. Ruslik (talk) 17:33, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

CheckUser access

Ptjackyll@plwikipedia

Status:    Done

Following an 168-hour vote, as per community standards, Ptjackyll is to be granted CheckUser access, indefinitely, with 62/2/0 supprt (96,9%; at least 25 votes in favor and 85% support ratio needed for this access). Wojciech Pędzich Talk 19:14, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Can they please be asked to comply with Access to nonpublic personal data policy/Noticeboard? -- Mentifisto 19:25, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
User notified. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 20:04, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
@Mentifisto: Statement signed. Ptjackyll (talk) 17:20, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Your request will be completed once your username is listed on IN. — regards, Revi 09:09, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
@Ptjackyll: Please see the email I send and reply. Thank you. Trijnsteltalk 02:24, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
@Trijnstel: I replied. @PEarley (WMF), Kalliope (WMF), Kbrown (WMF), and Samuel (WMF): Can one of you update the noticeboard? Ptjackyll (talk) 05:36, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
@Ptjackyll: Kalliope told me Samuel will update the noticeboard tomorrow. Trijnsteltalk 21:30, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
@Trijnstel: Marvelously; thank you for the information. :-) Ptjackyll (talk) 21:32, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Done. Trijnsteltalk 20:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Стефанко1982@ukwiki

Status:    Done

Please grant the checkuser rights, thanks. --Piramidion 17:35, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

 On hold pending addition to the access policy noticeboard (see here how you need to sign). Trijnsteltalk 17:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Agreement signed and therefore Done. I'll also do the other administrative things. Trijnsteltalk 22:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Aldnonymous@idwikipedia

Status:    Done

After long inactivity, Aldnonymous is back! Based on local vote, Aldnonymous got 100% approval as CheckUser on id.wikipedia. Bonaditya (talk) 03:43, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Done — Defender (talk) 04:17, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
@RadiX and Trijnstel: could you please handle IRC, mailing list and CUwiki access for them? Defender (talk) 17:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Done. Thank you. Trijnsteltalk 21:01, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Gratus@frwikipedia

Status:    Done

Per French arbcom decision here. Thanks, --Cbyd (talk) 13:18, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

 On hold User has not yet signed the Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information. Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
I signed the french version of the text on Sun, Mar 24, 3:17 PM. Regards, --Gratus (talk) 15:25, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Done Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
@Gratus: I've just send an email to you. Please take a look at it and reply. Trijnsteltalk 20:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Hexasoft@frwikipedia

Status:    Done

Per French arbcom decision here. Thanks, --Cbyd (talk) 13:18, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

 On hold User has not yet signed the Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information. Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
@Hexasoft: I've just send an email to you. Please take a look at it and reply. Trijnsteltalk 20:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
@Samuel (WMF): Hexasoft told me they now signed the new agreement. Can you please check, and if so, add him to the noticeboard? Thank you. Trijnsteltalk 23:15, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Hey Trijnstel, I confirmed that Hexasoft signed the agreement on Tue, Mar 26. After internal review, the Noticeboard was updated (Special:Diff/18971287). Cheers --Samuel (WMF) (talk) 15:19, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Done by Jon Kolbert; @Trijnstel: please update the other stuff. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:28, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Done. Thank you. Trijnsteltalk 20:46, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Oversight access

Arcyon37@frwikipedia

Status:    Done

Per French arbcom decision here. Thanks, --Cbyd (talk) 13:15, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

 On hold User has not yet signed the Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information. Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Done Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:37, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
@Arcyon37: I've just send an email to you. Please take a look at it and reply. Trijnsteltalk 20:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Removal of access

Magiers@dewikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop rights in de.wikipedia. Since the WMF recently started, to rule the local projects in their own non-transparent and unrevisable way ([3]), I see no need for local administratorship any more. So I don't want to waste my time any longer in just an alibi function. Magiers (talk) 18:01, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions — regards, Revi 18:04, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Done. Matiia (talk) 19:25, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Kingturtle@enwiki

Status:    Done

Request removal of bureaucrat flag only (not sysop), per the English Wikipedia bureaucrat activity policy (linked in discussion above). — xaosflux Talk 00:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Done. I would ask to thank them for their service, but you already did :) --Base (talk) 00:51, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Confirming that this is a valid request supported by local policy on enwp. UninvitedCompany (talk) 00:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Eynre@dewiki

Status:    Done

due to local inactivity policy, user is inactive for > 1 year, he was informed about the upcoming removal of sysop rights 90 days ago Dschungelfan (talk) 08:52, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

removed, einsbor talk 08:57, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Putnik@wikidatawiki

Status:    Done

User has made less than 5 actions in the last 6 months. Please remove sysop. Rschen7754 04:08, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Sadly, this time Done. Putnik, наращивай активность и возвращайся, спасибо за работу :) --Base (talk) 11:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Bogdangiusca@enwiki

Status:    Done

Please remove the sysop flag from Bogdangiusca as a suspected compromised account. ~ Rob13Talk 18:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Done. We were also told by BU Rob13 that stewards are still allowed to desysop on this cases on enwiki so I did the desysop. The account is also globally locked. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:23, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Just to clarify that comment, en:WP:LEVEL1 explicitly allows either a local bureaucrat or a steward to desysop pursuant to that procedure upon the request of an arbitrator. ~ Rob13Talk 18:51, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

आर्यावर्त@hiwiki

Status:    Not done

Please Remove my sysop right on This wiki. I don't want to more edit wikipedia. Thanks.--आर्यावर्त (talk) 11:20, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

 On hold for one day per standard procedure. You are free to withdraw the request at any time until it is completed. --Base (talk) 11:29, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I am an old Sysops on Hindi Wikipedia and been bureaucrat also for long period in past. Request to please let thus request be delayed for atleast a month, as this is due to some harassed mental state, following some petty issues, that I think to resolve in due course. For the same reason am requesting the delay. The user is being worked with Hindi wiki for long and his services are much needed there. So we don't want to lose such worker for this much reason. So I strongly request to hold the request up to April. Thanks in anticipation. --Ashish Bhatnagartalk 15:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the delay as per my request. I hereby retreat from my previous request of delaying. The user request for surrender of sysops rights may be adhered to. Thanks one again. --Ashish Bhatnagartalk 16:32, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
@Steward Please give some more time. There are a group of people who make a plan to harass the user. So that user will leave the wiki. This request is one of the results of that. This user is one of the ruby stone for hiwiki. आर्यावर्त take your time.--Jayprakash >>> Talk 21:00, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Unless the editor themselves retract the request, the request will be processed later today. — regards, Revi 00:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
as per discussion with hon.Admin shri Ashish Bhatnagar, now i want to withdrawn it for one month.--आर्यावर्त (talk) 09:56, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Closed as not done, if you decide to step down you can always make new request. einsbor talk 10:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Lameiro@glwikipedia

Status:    Done

The user, a prominent, experienced contributor to Galician Wikipedia, who had worked for many years, declared not to have time enough to deal with the duties of Administrator, and renounced to this position Xabier Cid (talk) 12:47, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Done, with thanks for their past work. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:47, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Whaledad@nlwiki

Status:    Done

Whaledad decided to resign as CU on nlwiki and asked the ArbCom to remove the rights from their account. Trijnsteltalk 23:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Done, with thanks for their past work. RadiX∞ 00:00, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Milos trifunovic@srwiktionary

Status:    Not done

User is inactive ~4 years. See this. So, I think to rights should be removed. Too, he got this right temporary, per summary for giving right from Dungodung (po zahtevu sa trga (privremeno)) - per request on page n:sr:Викиречник:Трг (temporary) Zoranzoki21 (talk) 13:00, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Not done. AAR doesn't work this way. First a steward has to message both the wiki and the user, then after a month if there's no reply, the rights can be removed (of if there's reply the community opposes). AAR is not meant to be used outside the review period. I can start the process for sr.wiktionary shortly though (I am going wiki by wiki in alphabetical order, so it's a slow process). —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:44, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
You can help in the process if you wish. Admin activity review/Notice to communities/sr and Admin activity review/Notice to inactive right holders/sr are untranslated. If you wish to update them I'd appreciate it. Thanks. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:46, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio: Thanks, done. Zoranzoki21 (talk) 21:20, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. I have started the process there. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 21:28, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Biplab Anand@global

Status:    Done

The last Global Sysop action by Biplab Anand was more than 6 months ago, in February 2018. Savhñ 09:40, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

GS flag has been removed. einsbor talk 10:37, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Note Huji is formally also inactive (having never logged as a GS), but his rationale for his request already motivated this; not sure how that should be handled though. Savhñ 10:41, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Not entirely true, Savh; I recently used my GS access to fix a few abuse filters (see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T209565#4832170 for some examples). I think the tool you mentioned cannot capture that though. Huji (talk) 18:15, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Lokal Profil@commons

Status:    Done

--Krd 10:53, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

I consider this as standard self removal request, so put this on hold for 24h. einsbor talk 10:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
admin flag has been removed. einsbor talk 20:21, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Zoranzoki21@srwikisource

Status:    Done

It can be removed without waiting 24 hours. --Zoranzoki21 (talk) 21:24, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Admin flag has been removed. Thank you for your work, einsbor talk 05:52, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Nilfanion@commonswiki

Status:    Done

Inactivity. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:46, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Done, thank them for their service. --Base (talk) 16:09, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Gdarin@pl.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

Please remove my sysop status on Pl-Wiki. Gdarin | talk 15:10, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

 On hold for one day as per the standard self-removal procedure. You are free to withdraw the request at any time until it is done. --Base (talk) 15:13, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Request withdrawn Regards, Gdarin | talk 09:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Elitre@commonswiki

Status:    Done

Inactivity. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:46, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Done, thank them for their service. --Base (talk) 16:09, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

پاڵوێنەی کەڵکاوەژوو@ckb.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

Who is this user? We don’t know how they have administrator access and who’s account this is! Please remove administrator access immediately.--▸ ‎épine talk♬ 00:05, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Not done Épine, it is impossible to fulfill your request. It is not a real user, but a virtual one used by mw:Extension:AbuseFilter (ckb:تایبەت:AbuseFilter) when a filter needs to perform a block. I recommend you or some technical users from your community to subscribe to Tech News, for instance in the issue of Tech/News/2019/02 wikis were notified of this creation. It is the best way to track any significant changes happening. --Base (talk) 00:17, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Jastrow@commonswiki

Status:    Done

Inactivity. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:46, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Done, thank them for their service. --Base (talk) 16:09, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Sphilbrick@commonswiki

Status:    Done

Inactivity. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:46, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Done, thank them for their service. --Base (talk) 16:09, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

DaB.@dewiki

Status:    Done
Done, thank them for their service. --Base (talk) 16:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Hubertl@dewikiversity

Status:    Done

The user has made fewer than 10 edits in a year. Per local policy, please remove sysop and bureacrat rights. Esteban16 (talk) 00:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until 11 March 2019 Ruslik (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep as admin and bureaucrat at dewikiversity. Wir sind zu wenige Admins und die inaktiven schaden nicht, können im Bedarfsfall helfen, auch wenn sie ein Jahr nicht editiert haben. Auch die inaktiven Admins besitzen unsere Unterstützung und sind vertrauenswürdig, ich sehe keinen Grund, die Rechte zu entziehen. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 21:20, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Done, einsbor talk 17:55, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

アイザール@jawiki

Status:    Done

This user is inactive for 3 months. Please remove a sysop rights from this user as per local de-sysop policy for inactivity. Thanks. rxy (talk) 11:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Done, thank them for their service. --Base (talk) 11:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Exxu@dewikiversity

Status:    Done

The user has made fewer than 10 edits in a year. Per local policy, please remove sysop and bureacrat rights. Esteban16 (talk) 00:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until 11 March 2019 Ruslik (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep as admin and bureaucrat at dewikiversity. Wir sind zu wenige Admins und die inaktiven schaden nicht, können im Bedarfsfall helfen, auch wenn sie ein Jahr nicht editiert haben. Auch die inaktiven Admins besitzen unsere Unterstützung und sind vertrauenswürdig, ich sehe keinen Grund, die Rechte zu entziehen. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 21:20, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Done, einsbor talk 17:55, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Lupo@dewikiversity

Status:    Done

The user has made fewer than 10 edits in a year. Per local policy, please remove sysop and bureacrat rights. Esteban16 (talk) 00:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until 11 March 2019 Ruslik (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep as admin and bureaucrat at dewikiversity. Wir sind zu wenige Admins und die inaktiven schaden nicht, können im Bedarfsfall helfen, auch wenn sie ein Jahr nicht editiert haben. Auch die inaktiven Admins besitzen unsere Unterstützung und sind vertrauenswürdig, ich sehe keinen Grund, die Rechte zu entziehen. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 21:21, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Done, einsbor talk 17:55, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Renepick@dewikiversity

Status:    Done

The user has made fewer than 10 edits in a year. Per local policy, please remove sysop rights. Esteban16 (talk) 00:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until 11 March 2019 Ruslik (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep as admin and bureaucrat at dewikiversity. Wir sind zu wenige Admins und die inaktiven schaden nicht, können im Bedarfsfall helfen, auch wenn sie ein Jahr nicht editiert haben. Auch die inaktiven Admins besitzen unsere Unterstützung und sind vertrauenswürdig, ich sehe keinen Grund, die Rechte zu entziehen. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 21:21, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Done, einsbor talk 17:55, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Frank Schulenburg @dewikiversity

Status:    Done

The user has made fewer than 10 edits in a year. Per local policy, please remove sysop and bureacrat rights. Esteban16 (talk) 00:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until 11 March 2019 Ruslik (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep as admin and bureaucrat at dewikiversity. Wir sind zu wenige Admins und die inaktiven schaden nicht, können im Bedarfsfall helfen, auch wenn sie ein Jahr nicht editiert haben. Auch die inaktiven Admins besitzen unsere Unterstützung und sind vertrauenswürdig, ich sehe keinen Grund, die Rechte zu entziehen. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 21:20, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Done, einsbor talk 17:55, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Jan Luca@dewikiversity

Status:    Done

The user has made fewer than 10 edits in a year. Per local policy, please remove sysop and bureacrat rights. Esteban16 (talk) 00:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until 11 March 2019 Ruslik (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep as admin and bureaucrat at dewikiversity. Wir sind zu wenige Admins und die inaktiven schaden nicht, können im Bedarfsfall helfen, auch wenn sie ein Jahr nicht editiert haben. Auch die inaktiven Admins besitzen unsere Unterstützung und sind vertrauenswürdig, ich sehe keinen Grund, die Rechte zu entziehen. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 21:21, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Done, einsbor talk 17:55, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Жељко Тодоровић@srwikipedia

Status:    Done

Adminship resign. --Жељко Тодоровић (talk) 19:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC) с. р.

On hold for 24h per standard practice. einsbor talk 19:50, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Done Ruslik (talk) 20:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Cspannagel@dewikiversity

Status:    Done

The user has made fewer than 10 edits in a year. Per local policy, please remove sysop and bureacrat rights. Esteban16 (talk) 00:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Regarding all of these, have the users been given two weeks to comment? I can't see any notifications given to them. – Ajraddatz (talk) 01:24, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
@Esteban16: Ruslik (talk) 19:25, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Ruslik: Sorry about that. I have notified them. Some of them have been inactivy on Wikimedia for years, though. Esteban16 (talk) 01:04, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Where have you notified them? In your diff I only see some pings which are not notifying users at all unless they log in. --Vogone (talk) 22:51, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 On hold until 11 March 2019 Ruslik (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep as admin and bureaucrat at dewikiversity. Wir sind zu wenige Admins und die inaktiven schaden nicht, können im Bedarfsfall helfen, auch wenn sie ein Jahr nicht editiert haben. Auch die inaktiven Admins besitzen unsere Unterstützung und sind vertrauenswürdig, ich sehe keinen Grund, die Rechte zu entziehen. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 21:19, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Ralf Roletschek: This isn't a voting page (or at least those requests are not). The reason why they rights should be removed is because of the inactivity policy on your wiki. And if there wouldn't be a local policy, then Admin activity review would take place. Esteban16 (talk) 00:31, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Also, as far as I understand, v:de:Wikiversity:Administratoren#Verfahren_bei_Inaktivität doesn't trigger any kind of vote of any sort. If the user does not reply within 2 weeks after the notification, the user is removed. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
I removed the rights, local policy is quite clear and all listed users were not active. einsbor talk 17:55, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Wondering whether the users should have also been notified with messages on their talk pages.... - dcljr (talk) 01:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio: Apparently it's not as simple as "If the user does not reply within 2 weeks after the notification, the user is removed", since one of the (now former) admins there, Hubertl, did actually respond shortly after being pinged at v:de:Wikiversity:Cafeteria#Inactive sysops. They had a bit of back and forth with Esteban16 and then they were desysopped two weeks later (granted, they did mention taking a "wikirest"). In light of this, it would seem that the two-week wait was in fact a probationary period during which time the notified admins were required to raise their adminstrative activities to the requisite level or lose the ability to perform them. This probably should have been spelled out in the original notice made on the wiki (which, like I said before, should have been made individually to each user on their talk page, as would have been done under the normal AAR process — I have now posted such [after-the-fact] notices on each user's talk page). - dcljr (talk) 04:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Muhraz@idwiki

Status:    Done

I request to remove my adminship access. Thanks. Muhraz (talk) 15:45, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

On hold for 24h per standard practice. einsbor talk 16:33, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Done. Stryn (talk) 10:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. Muhraz (talk) 16:57, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Hanamanteo@id.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove Hanamanteo's sysop status as established by consensus in the Indonesian Wikipedia. --Glorious Engine (talk) 02:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Done anyway, thanks for working on id.wikipedia --Wim b 12:43, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Никола Смоленски@sr.wikisource

Status:    Done

Please remove sysop access. The user didn't make any sysop action within last thirteen months. --Novak Watchmen (talk) 23:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

FriedrickMILBarbarossa, Ранко Николић, could you confirm this? I am not sure if you count moves without leaving a redirect as an admin action or not and user has one in December. --Base (talk) 16:12, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
@Base: Such moves aren't only limited to sysops on the Serbian Wikisource. In fact, four more user groups can do it, too. Oh, by the way, I'm FriedrickMILBarbarossa. --Novak Watchmen (talk) 18:02, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Done, thank them for their work. Novak Watchmen, I didn't notice the cross link, thanks for clarifying both things :) --Base (talk) 13:07, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. --Novak Watchmen (talk) 15:13, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

LipeFontoura@ptwiktionary

Status:    Done

Please remove the sysop flag from this user per our inactivity policy. They have made less than 50 edits in the last 2 years. Defender (talk) 17:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

removed, einsbor talk 13:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Sturm@ptwiktionary

Status:    Done

Please remove the sysop flag from this user per our inactivity policy. They have made less than 50 edits in the last 2 years. Furthermore, they have never made use of their sysop access. Defender (talk) 17:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

removed, einsbor talk 13:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

EYoung (WMF)@wikimania2015wiki

Status:    Done

Former WMF staff, account locked, wiki also locked. Please remove bureaucrat rights. Rschen7754 04:51, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

removed from wikimania2015. einsbor talk 06:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

EYoung (WMF)@wikimania2018wiki

Status:    Done

Former WMF staff, account locked. Please remove bureaucrat rights. Rschen7754 04:51, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

removed from wikimania2018. einsbor talk 06:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Machaerus@nlwikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop rights Machaerus (talk) 16:00, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

On hold for 24h. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:39, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Done Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:15, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

محمد شعیب@ur.wikipedia

Status:    Done

I am voluntarily retiring from sysop and bureaucrat rights on Urdu wikipedia. Please remove my rights, Thanks. Muhammad Shuaib (talk) 10:50, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

 On hold for one day as per the standard practice for self-removals. You are free to withdraw this request until it is completed. --Base (talk) 10:57, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Where is the discussion.— Bukhari (Talk!) 11:13, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately, for resignation, no discussion is needed but I do hope they reconsider. Can we hold slightly longer?--Cohaf (talk) 11:21, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
No please. Due to my personal reasons I will not be available for any kind of sysop action anymore. Muhammad Shuaib (talk)
I know the actual reason. Please hold slightly longer. Thanks— Bukhari (Talk!) 03:51, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
If the user does not withdrawn this request by theyself, both flags will be removed today. einsbor talk 07:44, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Done - @محمد شعیب: would you like your interface admin and importer flags removed as well? – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:11, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Yes of course, Thanks. Muhammad Shuaib (talk) 16:15, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
@Ajraddatz: I request you to only remove those rights which the user has requested originally - plz do not encourage a dejected user to totally quit Wikipedia. --Muzammil (talk) 16:33, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Done. Thanks for your past work. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:17, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Deineka@uk.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove the user's sysop flag. Due to Deineka's inactivity, the community has decided to remove the flag (see the discussion here; the result is 52.94% in favor of removal, with 51% required by the rules). Aced (talk) 14:13, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 17:35, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Rotpunkt@itwiki

Status:    Done

Please remove sysop and interface-admin rights per local policy, Rotpunkt has already been notified. Thanks, Daimona Eaytoy (talk) 16:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Done: Only the admin flag, local bureaucrats can be revoke the IA flag. However, I wanted to thank Rotpunkt for the work done over the years --Wim b 18:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

NMW03@azwikipedia

Status:    Not done

Hello. Please grant me importer rights for import some gadget modules. Our gadgets not working. I want to be a fix gadgets. NMW03 (talk) 10:52, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

  1. Support Support A¥×aᚢ ⚔ Zaÿïþzaþ€ 11:27, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Please do not have a voting here, but on azwiki. --MF-W 13:33, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
@MF-Warburg:, done. Can be not temporarily?--NMW03 (talk) 17:24, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Will there be a continuous need to import gadgets/modules? What you described above sounded more like a one-time action. --MF-W 17:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
@MF-Warburg: Yeah. This need it all the time. For create new gadgets/modules.--NMW03 (talk) 18:48, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
What about giving them a year or 6 months and then granting perma if it is good? Import is a serious business, we usually grant it (only) temporarily. — regards, Revi 10:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Dear @MF-Warburg: and @-revi:, @NMW03: is a interface administrator on azwiki and he actively crate and edit gadgets. I think you can give him a year or 6 months, the permanently. Our wiki support his efforts. --Drabdullayev17 (talk) 16:02, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
@MF-Warburg:, @-revi: OK. You can give temporarily.--NMW03 (talk) 16:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
As I said, please vote/discuss locally first, not here. A discussion should run for at least 1 week on the wiki in question, generally. --MF-W 17:37, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
@MF-Warburg:, @-revi: 17 user voted. Is it enough?--NMW03 (talk) 09:52, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
@علاء:--NMW03 (talk) 15:54, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until 10 Feb ("discussion should run for at least 1 week on the wiki") --Alaa :)..! 16:47, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

@Xaosflux:, @علاء: Yes. I want to import from English Wikipedia and other WMF projects.--NMW03 (talk) 07:27, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
@NMW03: 'transwiki importer' is a less risky access level, and setting up transwiki will also allow any of your admins to run import - but you have to define a list of sources. So adding 'enwiki' is easy - but it dosen't work so much for "any project" - in addition to enwiki, are there specific projects you need to import from? An example of requesting sites can be seen here: phab:T34500. — xaosflux Talk 10:40, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Or I can help you with the process, if rest of your community members are also fine with this idea. — regards, Revi 18:40, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
@-revi: @Xaosflux: Mainly I'll import from enwiki. Is the 'importer' enough?--NMW03 (talk) 06:59, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Provided you can get another consensus to Request for configuration change, you will just need admin account to the stuff. — regards, Revi 11:36, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
@-revi: with their community supporting 'importer' (perhaps without knowing all of the implications) this request should easily be able to be 'downgraded' to 'transwiki importer' (provided they improve the import sources) right? In the meantime @NMW03: can you start a local thread to approve "Enable transwiki imports from the English Wikipedia" on azwiki? For the summary say that it would allow "administrators and transwiki importers" to use w:az:Special:Import to import (copy in) histories from enwiki. This could be used for technical imports such as modules, or for articles that you want to translate. — xaosflux Talk 13:17, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
@Xaosflux: OK. Thanks. You can close this request.--NMW03 (talk) 13:27, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
@NMW03: do you not want this anymore? If xwiki resources are added you would still need to be a local 'transwiki importer' (which could be added in advance) or admin to use the import process. — xaosflux Talk 13:57, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
@Xaosflux:, Should we request phabricator to activate the "Import" function?--NMW03 (talk) 14:25, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
@NMW03: yes, and you would need to link to a local discussion. As soon as that is done all of your admins would be able to transwiki import. If you personally will be doing to imports and are not an admin, this request should still be able to add you to 'transwiki importers' (though that is useless until there is somewhere to import from). — xaosflux Talk 14:29, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
@Xaosflux: This right can be given when the request resolve? So user groups will be enabled?--NMW03 (talk) 15:21, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
@-revi: your ball :D Can this be resolved out with the 'lesser' transwiki group access for NMW03 - then they can self-service their own phab ticket to add sources. — xaosflux Talk 15:43, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay, I'll get this done this week. — regards, Revi 14:30, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

@NMW03, sorry for the delay. Can you make sure there is a consensus to make use of 'transwiki-import'? Thanks. — regards, Revi 00:24, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

@NMW03:? --Alaa :)..! 13:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
@-revi:, @Xaosflux:, @علاء: I'm sorry for the late reply. I started the discussion.--NMW03 (talk) 17:31, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Not done per user comment above --Alaa :)..! 20:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

OlegCinema@be.wiktionary

Status:    Done

No one is against OlegCinema (talk) 12:08, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

On hold until 2 March. --MF-W 19:18, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-03-02. Discussion open with no significant opposition for sufficient length of time to support temporary adminship for 1 year. Neither enough response nor enough project activity to justify permanent adminship at this time. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 18:03, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

AmaryllisGardener@scowiki

Status:    Done

My temporary adminship ran out, and the discussion part of scowiki is not active, only content creation. I've been an active admin on scowiki for a few years now and would like to continue my service. I would like to have adminship for another year just as it was granted last year if possible. Regards, --AmaryllisGardener talk 05:30, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year and 6 months to expire on 2019-03-03. --MF-W 12:04, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Ashiq Shawon@bn.wiktionary

Status:    Done

Ashiq Shawon asked for sysop status on 15 february. discussion ended 7 days later. no objection from anyone. time for sysop status: 1 year. (NahidSultan can you confirm this?) -- Aftabuzzaman (talk) 19:05, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

I can confirm and as Bengali is my home project, I'll leave this task to my colleagues. Thanks. ~ Nahid Talk 19:12, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-03-07. --Alaa :)..! 19:49, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

-revi@kowikinews

Status:    Done

5th RfA. (Previous RfAs on the RfA page.) — regards, Revi 06:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your term has not expired yet. Ruslik (talk) 18:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Yup, but it expires in a few weeks, and I'd rather get my term extended sooner than later. — regards, Revi 18:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
On hold until the 13th of March. Savhñ 15:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Done Granted for 2 years to expire on 2019-03-13. Savhñ 01:32, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Tiven2240@mrwikisource

Status:    Done

Was granted access for 3 months requesting extension for atleast a year for maintainance and clearing backlog of the wiki. Tiven2240 (talk) 09:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

 On hold until 18 March --Alaa :)..! 11:23, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-03-18. -- --Alaa :)..! 09:28, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Why 1 year? This is the second time it's granted and there's no support comment at the RfA page. Matiia (talk) 16:19, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Per above, changed for 6 months to expire on 2018-09-18 --Alaa :)..! 17:59, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Iliev@bg.wikisource

Status:    Done

Previous request: /Approved_temporary#Iliev@bg.wikisource (discussion: s:bg:Уикиизточник:Разговори#Request for adminship)

I'm pleased to report that my main objective—curbing the aggressive, persistent, and vigorous vandalism and harassment that had been plaguing the Bulgarian projects at the time—has been successfully achieved. Being also a sysop on bgwiki (for 6 years now), bgwikt (2 years), bgquote (6 months), and bgbooks (3 months), this goal has also been met on all these projects, preventing the vandals from jumping from one wiki to another. Needless to say, this success is not a product that you deliver once and forever. The old vandals continue testing whether they can slip through, and new ones will always emerge. Hence why I'd like to ask for an extension of my sysop rights on bgsource. As always, my commitment to the anti-vandalism efforts is long-term, so I (and obviously my colleagues too) will appreciate a longer term extension: if not permanent, then hopefully for at least a year, so that people aren't bothered to repeat their votes too often.

Thank you very much for considering my request,
— Luchesar • T/C 11:22, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-03-28. The community is now not large enough to grant permanent sysopship. --Alaa :)..! 22:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Alaa , thank you! Concerning the note on permanent sysopship, am I understanding correctly that next time, in a year, we can explicitly vote to grant permanent sysop rights?
— Luchesar • T/C 10:16, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
@Iliev: with 18 active user it'll be hard to grant permanent sysopship, because there's no real community. Also if we take a look at the voters on your request, we'll found that only 4 (from 14) have more than 50 edits, and 10 with less than 10 edits! --Alaa :)..! 15:42, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Alaa , ah, I understand: you meant to write “The community is not large enough to grant permanent sysopship.” With “now” it sounded the opposite way. :) Thank you for the explanation and thanks again for the rights—one year is totally fine.
— Luchesar • T/C 17:20, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
@Iliev: oh sorry! I fixed it now --Alaa :)..! 17:38, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions/2019-03&oldid=21767104"