Steward requests/Checkuser: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
→‎Rubi64: remark
→‎Rubi64: addendum
Line 24: Line 24:
Regards, [[User:Guido den Broeder|Guido den Broeder]] 07:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Regards, [[User:Guido den Broeder|Guido den Broeder]] 07:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
:{{comment}}: I deferred this case to meta from [[w:en:Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/de:Rubi64]], due to the multi-project nature of it. If possible, I'd imagine it would be appreciated if some sort of notification back (although it's likely I'll keep an eye here, but just in case) regarding the results, perhaps on the case page, or on Checkuser-l, so action can be taken by the appropriate persons. [[User:AGK|<font color="#2A8B31">'''Anthøny'''</font>]] 08:55, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
:{{comment}}: I deferred this case to meta from [[w:en:Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/de:Rubi64]], due to the multi-project nature of it. If possible, I'd imagine it would be appreciated if some sort of notification back (although it's likely I'll keep an eye here, but just in case) regarding the results, perhaps on the case page, or on Checkuser-l, so action can be taken by the appropriate persons. [[User:AGK|<font color="#2A8B31">'''Anthøny'''</font>]] 08:55, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
:Note also my alert at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts] about a group of people 'discussing' nl:Wikipedia events on en:Wikipedia. Regards, [[User:Guido den Broeder|Guido den Broeder]] 10:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)


===Цуценятко@ukwiki ===
===Цуценятко@ukwiki ===

Revision as of 10:51, 16 April 2008

To request checkuser access, see Requests for permissions.
Shortcut:
SRCU
This page allows you to request checkuser information on a wiki with no local checkusers. Make sure to specify the wiki on which you want the check to be performed. Note that many projects have local checkuser procedures, and checkuser information on these wikis should be requested locally; see also the Steward handbook.

Please use headers in the format "username@wiki", such as "billy@enwikisource".

Local checkuser request pages:

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests

Rubi64

Copied from [1].

I am requesting a checkuser to confirm that I am, in fact, not Benutzer:Rubi64, as is claimed by single-purpose account user:Jorrit-H [2], and would appreciate appropriate measures against user:Jorrit-H. Guido den Broeder (talk) 22:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regards, Guido den Broeder 07:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Comment: I deferred this case to meta from w:en:Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/de:Rubi64, due to the multi-project nature of it. If possible, I'd imagine it would be appreciated if some sort of notification back (although it's likely I'll keep an eye here, but just in case) regarding the results, perhaps on the case page, or on Checkuser-l, so action can be taken by the appropriate persons. Anthøny 08:55, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note also my alert at [3] about a group of people 'discussing' nl:Wikipedia events on en:Wikipedia. Regards, Guido den Broeder 10:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Цуценятко@ukwiki

similiar vandal offensive edits, similiar names --Ilya K 21:17, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please could You give a bit more info, why was Цуцик blocked, what is the "offensive edit" about? Thanks, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 21:22, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed, also multiple other users found (all already blocked). Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 21:47, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

김종국@kowiki

Considering IP user's recent vandals on the calendar pages at Korean Wikipedia, 김종국 who often claims the change of the calendars is suspicious of editing the calendar pages anonymously on purpose. IP user's edits were in accord with 김종국's own claim. Please let me know whether they are the same user.--Goodgood 11:19, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like fishing to me. Can you, please, give a more detailed and reasoned explanation regarding the requested check? --FiLiP ¤ 11:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I'm so sorry that it looked like fishing to you. That was absolutely my fault and I was too hasty then. Well, 211.214.13.147 at Ko Wikipedia's consistent vandals on the calendar pages like [4], [5], [6],[7], etc...which claimed ko:식목일(Arbor Day in Korea) is still holiday in Korea and vandals at the user pages like [8], [9] offended all Ko wikipedians. BTW, the content that IP user claimsed on the calendar pages are very similar to 김종국 at Ko Wikipedia's [10] which claimed ko:식목일(Arbor Day in Korea) is still holiday in Korea. But now Arbor Day is no longer holiday in Korea since 2006.(you can confirm it in the ko:식목일) Moreover, 김종국's userpage wrote: 법령이 개정되었다고 하던데 난 절대로 이 법령 받아들일 수 없다.(translation:I cannot accept the amendment of the holiady law). Those are reasons that I suspect they are the same user.--Goodgood 09:42, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed. Yes, it is highly likely that those are the same users. --FiLiP ¤ 17:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also