Talk:Software Collaboration for Wikidata/Call Submissions: Difference between revisions
Linking BrokenSegue's review here so we can collect everything in one place |
→Synergy and Enrichment by LabDom: new section |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Review by BrokenSegue == |
== Review by BrokenSegue == |
||
Linking it here so we can collect everything in one place: [[d:User:BrokenSegue/ProposalReview|User:BrokenSegue/ProposalReview]]. -<font style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#FF0000 0.1em 0.1em 1.5em,#01EE796D -0.1em -0.1em 1.5em;color:#00000F">[[User:Masssly|<font color="#01EE796D"><b>—M@sssly</b></font>]][[User talk:Masssly|<font color="#FFEG0000"><sup>✉</sup></font>]]</font> 11:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC) |
Linking it here so we can collect everything in one place: [[d:User:BrokenSegue/ProposalReview|User:BrokenSegue/ProposalReview]]. -<font style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#FF0000 0.1em 0.1em 1.5em,#01EE796D -0.1em -0.1em 1.5em;color:#00000F">[[User:Masssly|<font color="#01EE796D"><b>—M@sssly</b></font>]][[User talk:Masssly|<font color="#FFEG0000"><sup>✉</sup></font>]]</font> 11:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Synergy and Enrichment by LabDom == |
|||
Two interesting words '''Synergy''' and '''Enrichment''' ! Such ideas are also identifiable in the papers arguing for the leverage of the new item creator tool in order to increase the knowledge figured by the data. |
|||
Should I understand that the two words are dedicated to a new community with two classes of users : one in charge of data enrichment and a second the data consumers creating the synergy for the first. Both classes expected new tools to accomplish their tasks ! |
|||
I would suggest decision makers, involved in the current selection, to have a look at and promote the new paradigm based on the usage of micro services in order to separate new business logic (like Rest API) from mediawiki core and encapsulate new UI in existing pages as HTML iFrame . On this point I also suggest reviewing the very recent delivery of Template:OWID to access external data from OWD sites (https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haurdunaldi#Nerabezaroa) , an example of interactive content ! [[User:LabDom|LabDom]] ([[User talk:LabDom|talk]]) 17:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:50, 26 April 2024
QuickStatements 3.0
@EPorto I'm glad to see someone take on QuickStatements. We at WBUG originally considered proposing improvements to QS but decided to focus on an in-wiki reimplementation of Cradle-like functionality. Hopefully there'll be funding for both! GreenReaper (talk) 17:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Community Feedback
WMDE is curious to hear your feedback! Share your thoughts on the project proposals below. Maria Lechner (WMDE) (talk) 12:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Expression of support
- I greatly appreciate the proposal for a new Cradle editor.
- Also, the OR reconciliation service should be included as an standard feature in the Wikibase product bundles. I don't have an opinion about rewriting or not, but it would be appreciated from the very small GLAM point of view.
Personally, I regret a lot to have misunderstood the call opportunity. Now I'm checking the proposals, I see we could have sent the Wikimedia LEADS concept too. That's life. —Ismael Olea (talk) 17:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Review by BrokenSegue
Linking it here so we can collect everything in one place: User:BrokenSegue/ProposalReview. -—M@sssly✉ 11:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Synergy and Enrichment by LabDom
Two interesting words Synergy and Enrichment ! Such ideas are also identifiable in the papers arguing for the leverage of the new item creator tool in order to increase the knowledge figured by the data.
Should I understand that the two words are dedicated to a new community with two classes of users : one in charge of data enrichment and a second the data consumers creating the synergy for the first. Both classes expected new tools to accomplish their tasks !
I would suggest decision makers, involved in the current selection, to have a look at and promote the new paradigm based on the usage of micro services in order to separate new business logic (like Rest API) from mediawiki core and encapsulate new UI in existing pages as HTML iFrame . On this point I also suggest reviewing the very recent delivery of Template:OWID to access external data from OWD sites (https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haurdunaldi#Nerabezaroa) , an example of interactive content ! LabDom (talk) 17:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)