Talk:Stewards: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
ArchiverBot (talk | contribs)
Bots
46,010 edits
m Bot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 30 days) to Talk:Stewards/Archive 5
 
(214 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Archive box non-auto|
''See also'':
'''Archives''': [[/Archive 1|2004]], [[/Archive 2|2004-2006]], [[/Archive 3|2007-2012]], [[/Archive 4|2013-2016]], [[/Archive 5|2017-2019]], [[/Archive 6|2020-2023]]
*[[Stewards/elections 2005]]
<br><br>
*[[Stewards/elections 2006]]
'''See also''':<br>
*[[Stewards/elections 2006-2]]
[[Stewards/elections 2004]], discussion on the role of stewards (with "developer access"), the vote and other related issues<br>
*[[Stewards/elections 2007]]
[[Special:PermaLink/30630|Vote]] at original close date of 5 April 2004<br>
*[[Stewards/confirm]]
[[Special:PermaLink/31732|Vote]] at second close date of 12 April 2004<br>
*[[talk:developer access]], discussion on the role of stewards, the vote and other related issues
**[http://meta.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Developer_access&oldid=30630 Vote] at original close date of 5 April 2004
[[Special:PermaLink/32809|Vote]] at final close date of 20 April 2004 (Tim close)<br>
[{{fullurl:Stewards/elections 2004|action=history}} Vote], full page history<br>
**[http://meta.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Developer_access&oldid=31732 Vote] at second close date of 12 April 2004
[[Stewards/elections 2005]]<br>
**[http://meta.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Developer_access&oldid=32809 Vote] at final close date of 20 April 2004 (Tim close)
[[Stewards/elections 2006]]<br>
**[http://meta.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Developer_access&action=history Vote], full page history
[[Stewards/elections 2006-2]]<br>
[[Stewards/elections 2007]]<br>
[[Stewards/elections 2009]]<br>
[[Stewards/elections 2010]]<br>
[[Stewards/elections 2011]]<br>
[[Stewards/elections 2011-2]]<br>
[[Stewards/Elections 2012]]<br>
[[Stewards/Elections 2013]]<br>
[[Stewards/Elections 2014]]<br>
[[Stewards/Elections 2015]]<br>
[[Stewards/Elections 2016]]<br>
[[Stewards/Elections 2017]]<br>
[[Stewards/Elections 2018]]<br>
[[Stewards/Elections 2019]]<br>
[[Stewards/Elections 2020]]<br>
[[Stewards/Elections 2021]]<br>
[[Stewards/Elections 2022]]<br>
[[Stewards/Elections 2023]]<br>
[[Stewards/confirm]]<br>
<br>
See [[Steward requests]] for all request pages related to stewards.
}}


{{User:MiszaBot/config
'''Archives''': [[/Archive 1|2004]] | [[/Archive 2|2004-2006]] | [[/Archive 3|since 2007]]
|archive = Talk:Stewards/Archive %(counter)d
|algo = old(30d)
|counter = 5
|archiveheader = {{talk archive}}
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|minthreadsleft = 1
}}


== Is the phrasing "made 600 edits" (rather than "having made 600 edits") correct? ==
__TOC__


[[User:Apokrif|Apokrif]] ([[User talk:Apokrif|talk]]) 20:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
== Policies ==
=== Steward policies overhaul ===
I've sandboxed an [[User:Pathoschild/Sandbox4|overhauled version of the steward policies]] ([{{fullurl:User:Pathoschild/Sandbox4|oldid=500693&diff=501132}} diff]). Please see [[Talk:Steward policies#Overhaul]] for discussion and a summary of changes. —<small>{[[Meta:Admins|admin]]} [[User talk:Pathoschild/s|Pathoschild]] 06:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)</small>

=== Proposed security policy ===
Please see [[en:Wikipedia:Security]] for a proposed policy that may have ramifications for stewards discovered to have [[en:Password strength|weak passwords]]. I'm uncertain how this will affect stewards, since Meta policy isn't English policy, but I definitely think that in principle the policy should be heeded by all stewards, who (since they're sometimes called in to perform emergency desysoppings) must be more aware than most of the potential for abuse of privileged accounts. --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]]|[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 15:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

: English Wikipedia policy does not apply to stewards (not even in principle), although some are locally subject to it as English Wikipedia editors. Further, that policy looks more like a help page than a policy; it explains passwords and their importance, describes current security measures, and offers plenty of suggestions and "tips", but it doesn't actually codify anything.

: I do agree that stewards (and everyone else) should have [[w:password strength|strong passwords]], though. —<small>{[[Meta:Admins|admin]]} [[User talk:Pathoschild/s|Pathoschild]] 02:42:07, 08 May 2007 (UTC)</small>

:: Just as a note to this, Brion Vibber is now running a server-side password cracker, which has already run on enwiki, and I believe he will be running it on all wikis as well. As such, stewards with weak passwords (of which I certainly hope there are none) will be found out. Unfortunately, forcing stewards and others to have strong passwords is difficult to codify with policy, though hopefully this will soon be done technically. In any case, it may be a good idea to spread the word to all stewards, admins, and crats on meta that they should change their passwords if they think they may be weak. [[User:AmiDaniel|AmiDaniel]] 05:14, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

== Helping projects without community ==

Policy on projects without activity or community. [[User:Bastique|Cary Bass]] <sup>[[User talk:Bastique|demandez]]</sup> 10:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

:If there are any contributors at all and they appear reasonable, promote a pair (similar to checkuser, that way they can monitor each other) and allow them to attempt to build activity and community. If there is actually zero activity, there are no people who have standing to complain about stewards doing needed tasks on the project.

:I'd suggest that if there are no significant contributions to a project within a three month time (that is, other than vandalism, bots, and userpage activity) that the stewards be free to maintain the project as they see fit. <b><i><font color="#FF00FF">~Kylu ([[User:Kylu|u]]|[[User talk:Kylu|t]]) </font></i></b> 05:19, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

::Seems eminently reasonable to me, as a non steward. We presumably would like to avoid repeats of the goldfarming management episode (some obscure language wiki was being used to manage an online gaming guild or some such thing, IIRC without even anyone being a sysop) so keeping at least a sporadic eye on temporaries and on the wiki activities is good... 3 months seems the guideline for temporary sysopping and there is no reason to change that, in my view. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 13:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

== New stewards (needed) ==

=== Needed steward for South Slavic issues ===

From time to time I realize that we need (at least) one steward to deal with our local issues. The last incident is related to impersonation of one admin from Croatian Wikipedia ([[w:hr:User:Roberta F.]]) on Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia and Wiktionary (at least there, we didn't investigate more). Only Wikipedias (and not all of them) have checkusers and it is hard to make fast investigation without a steward from this region. So, I propose myself for stewardship for this issues (I am bureaucrat on all Serbian projects except on Wikipedia and on Serbo-Croatian Wiktionary, as well as I am admin here, on Meta; I was checkuser on Serbian Wikipedia, but I resigned from the position). However, it would be also perfect if some of other well known people from this region would become stewards (like [[User:Dungodung|Dungodung]], [[User:Romanm|Romanm]] or [[User:SpeedyGonsales|SpeedyGonsales]]). I see that last election was at December 2006; and I am not completely sure what is needed to do next... --[[User:Millosh|Millosh]] 06:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

: New stewards are selected following full Wikimedia elections, which are only held when new stewards are needed on a general basis. All you can do is wait until the next election, which I suspect will occur sometime before this month next year. However, the [[steward policies]] prohibit the use of steward tools on a project where you are active. —<small>{[[Meta:Admins|admin]]} [[User talk:Pathoschild/s|Pathoschild]] 16:25:31, 09 August 2007 (UTC)</small>

::Thanks for info. I think that policy which forbids being active on some project is not so useful, even I fully understand why it is so. Because of such policy, for example, only this region will need three stewards... It is much more easy to communicate with a person who is familiar with the situation then with someone who is not. Even I am not active presently on local wikis (my present plans are to be active only on sh.wikt), being steward means that I wouldn't be able to be active on any of project on which I may give some significant input (in the most cases generating articles about places and similar with bots). And, unlikely with languages with much bigger number of speakers, we don't have such number of persons who are willing not to be active. Whatever... I just wanted to say that because I think that it is a problem related not only to our region. --[[User:Millosh|Millosh]] 21:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

::*Stewards can use and have been using the checkuser tool in their home projects. [[User:Hillgentleman|Hillgentleman]] 23:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

=== [[Stewards/Application_guidelines]] probably needs updating ===

Per [[Steward_policies#Processes]] typically elections and confirmations are held yearly. This page refers to the process for last year's election. Is it time to start working on the process and pages for this year's election? Has that work already gotten underway? Similarly, [[Stewards/confirm]] probably also needs updating. I am interested in this topic, naturally, (as it is fairly common knowledge that I intend to stand again this year) but am not sure it is appropriate that I work directly, however I can presumably help with some of the mechanics/documentation. I suspect there is no reason to change the process, just create and update the appropriate texts. If work is underway please point me at it, thanks. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 14:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
:Typically so they say... :) Well, I agree it would be appropriate to hold elections yearly. Whether it's really necessary is another question. Are there many steward backlogs, and/or do the current most active stewards feel under pressure? I don't know the answers to these questions. Last year, I do believe the elections were brought up simply by suggesting it on a talk page, and there being general agreement that it would be a good idea. Btw, I don't think it really matters that you work with it and stand - last year Redux brought it up and ran, so it won't be a problem, just how you feel I suppose. So the question, should we have some elections? If so, when? '''[[User:Majorly|<span style="color:#002bb8">Majorly</span>]]''' (''[[User talk:Majorly|talk]]'') 15:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
::It seems to be that time of year again. I do not think this month is the optimal time.... but December perhaps? Mid-December? I think we should hold these elections sometime around then. --<strong>[[user:Anonymous Dissident|<font face="Script MT Bold"><font color="DodgerBlue">Anonymous Dissident</font></font>]]</strong>[[user talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 23:05, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
:::The disadvantage of December is that it will clash with the [[w:Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007|elections for the English Wikipedia Arbitraion Committee]]. [[User:Angela|Angela]] 23:59, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
::::Were they not at the same time last year? '''[[User:Majorly|<span style="color:#002bb8">Majorly</span>]]''' (''[[User talk:Majorly|talk]]'') 00:19, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
:::::Well, I think the steward elections should not be dependent on dates of other elections. To vote for (or against) a couple of people doesn't need that much time that it would be a real clash if steward elections and arbcom elections are held parallelly. But the end of December might bring the problem that many people are on holidays then... ;o) So why not in the first weeks of December? Btw., the German Wikipedia has arbcom elections in November. :p --[[User:Thogo|Thogo]] <small>([[User talk:Thogo|talk]])</small> 01:16, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
::::::Well, we would probably like to announce the steward elections globally, so the Fundraiser notice would clash too, wouldn't it? But otherwise, I think a steward election in late-December would be great. :-) '''[[User:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:green">Cbrown1023</span>]]''' '''<small>[[User talk:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:#002bb8">talk</span>]]</small>''' 15:57, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
:::*Stewards are the least relevant to the English Wikipedians, who have the support of bureaucrats, mediators, arbitrators, checkusers, and board members (e.g. the chair recently used the checkuser tool on the English wikipedia) :-). -[[User:Hillgentleman|Hillgentleman]] 18:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

The elections were more or less at the same time last year as the en:wp arbcom elections, as I recall. The Steward elections finished first, winding up well before Jan 1, but definitely had some overlap in timing, as I recall. I don't think that caused any major issues. I think having them at the same time again, more or less, this year makes a fair bit of sense. I do think Hillgentleman has a point, about the only thing stewards have to do for en:wp is remove permissions (and perhaps occasionally do a cross wiki CU). If one looks for a time when there are no overlaps at all with anything, I suspect one will never find such a time, so there is argument for going with precendent. At this point I think there is time to do the things that need doing if the consensus is to have them at the same time. On reflection, I'm not sure there's actually a conflict of interest with candidacy in helping to set up the pages so I'm willing to help if my help is desired. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 19:49, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

I am not convinced that new people are really needed, but generally think that it is a good idea to make that an annual event, as well as a turn of confirmation of the current stewards. Let's do that in december ! [[User:Anthere|Anthere]] 11:41, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

:OK, unless there is strong objection, and unless someone beats me to it, I will start preparing the pages (with markers on them that the elections are not underway yet) based on last years pages, for both the reconfirmations and the new elections. No changes in process, just changing dates and fresh pages. That will give time to check for errors. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 13:13, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
:: Fresh pages aren't necessary; we just need to update the dates when they're known. —<small>{[[Meta:Admins|admin]]} [[User talk:Pathoschild/s|Pathoschild]] 15:27:04, 08 November 2007 (UTC)</small>
::: I haven't actually reviewed the entire set, but ya, that's what I mean, dust off, archive what needs archiving if anything, etc. As for the dates, I propose the same exact calendar dates as last year (except, for you pedants, add a year :) ) for everything... that would be a starting point. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 18:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

While it could be argued that "new" people were not needed to my mind there are some current stewards who I would describe as "dormant" (politely) and I guess that alone would indicate that some fresh blood might be useful? --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 13:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
:New people is welcome, so I don't oppose election (let them do all the work so we can laze). However, I don't see a ''pressing need'' for election at this time. Requests are being handled fast enough and we don't have huge backlogs. [[User:Drini|drini]] <sup>[[:es:User:Drini|[es:] ]]</sup><sub>[[:Commons:User:Drini|[commons:] ]]</sub> 13:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
::Yes - I've seen in the rights log just how much you "laze" Drini:) However the last time I did needed a steward on IRC (a while back) I got no one. Equally the CU requests are frequently not speedily done (I know what disruption that can cause a small community). No "pressing need" I agree but .... --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 15:21, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
:::I think, at the moment the stewards come through with their tasks, but if the amount of work would increase a little bit (and there were times this year with much more work), it would lead to a nice backlog. So it would just be safer/nicer/whatever to have more active people. One would have more time to do other stuff (like writing nice articles or the like or doing some other work on the "home" wiki...) if there are more people sharing the work. :o) --[[User:Thogo|Thogo]] <small>([[User talk:Thogo|talk]])</small> 18:12, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

*Is there any need for new stewards? For example, let us look... [[#Needed steward for South Slavic issues|upstairs]]. [[User:Hillgentleman|Hillgentleman]] 01:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
**I think so. As Herby noted, we have several dormant stewards. New people who are active and wanting to be stewards should be welcomed. --<strong>[[user:Anonymous Dissident|<font face="Script MT Bold"><font color="DodgerBlue">Anonymous Dissident</font></font>]]</strong>[[user talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 02:17, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

To be honest, I've been positively surprised when [[User:MaxSem|MaxSem]] made a promptly reaction for one of our needs (cross-wiki impersonation, based on sh.wikt, hr.wiki etc.). It is much different now then in 2004-2005, when mostly Angela and Anthere were giving prompt responses. While Wikipedias have their own checkusers, almost none of other projects has; and, generally, there are no needs for them. But, from time to time checkuser (and similar) actions are needed and for that reason we need prompt reaction by stewards. However, in the past year or two (with the last exception) I had to spend a lot of time to get steward help. --[[User:Millosh|Millosh]] 09:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

== Steward request page organization ==
<span id="reorganization"></span>
Based on a discussing in the [irc://irc.freenode.net/wikimedia-stewards #wikimedia-stewards] IRC channel, I propose the following reorganization of steward request pages. This will neatly organize them under a single page (making it much easier for inexperienced users to find what they're looking for), standardize and shorten the titles (making them easy to remember), and allow for very simple scaling to meet future needs (for example, [[Steward requests/Usurpation]] will soon be created to deal with [[Help:Unified login|unified login]] merge conflicts).
{| class="prettytable"
!colspan="3"| User groups
|-
| [[Requests for permissions]] ([[RFP]]) || → || [[Steward requests/Permissions]] ([[SRP]])
|-
| [[Requests for bot status]] ([[RFBS]]) || → || [[Steward requests/Bot status]] ([[SRB]])
|-
!colspan="3"| Other
|-
| [[Requests for CheckUser information]] ([[RFCU]]) || → || [[Steward requests/Checkuser]] ([[SRCU]])
|-
| [[Requests for username changes]] ([[RFUC]]) || → || [[Steward requests/Username changes]] ([[SRUC]])
|-
| [[Multilingual speedy deletions]] ([[MSD]]) || → || [[Steward requests/Speedy deletions]] ([[SRSD]])
|-
| ''n/a'' || → || [[Steward requests/Usurpation]] ([[SRU]])
|}

Requests for checkuser information and username changes will thus be split from Meta requests, which are now processed by local bureaucrats and checkusers instead of stewards. (Once this is done, I'll separately propose a parallel organization under "Meta:Requests/*".) —<small>{[[Meta:Admins|admin]]} [[User talk:Pathoschild/s|Pathoschild]] 20:54:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)</small>

:I like this idea very much. The archives should be rearranged too in a similar fashion. '''[[User:Majorly|<span style="color:#002bb8">Majorly</span>]]''' (''[[User talk:Majorly|talk]]'') 20:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

::Seconded. @All: Please also check [[SRU]] if something is missing or should be changed. Consider it a draft for now. --[[User:Thogo|Thogo]] <small>([[User talk:Thogo|talk]])</small> 21:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

:::Eminently reasonable and sensible idea, thanks to all who sorted through this, it should help a lot. The archives may be work but rationalising them will be good. May I suggest leaving some soft redirects behind so that people who have mentioned links in talk pages and the like aren't completely at sea (I suggest soft because we presumably want to encourage new habitual names, which I think leaving real redirects would not encourage as much) ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 22:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
:{{comment}} This idea looks great to me. I say, go for it. [[User:Bastique|Cary Bass]] <sup>[[User talk:Bastique|demandez]]</sup> 22:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

:I have no objection, except my general bias toward not enacting a change when it provides no obvious benefit. &mdash; [[User:Rdsmith4|Dan]] | [[User talk:Rdsmith4|talk]] 23:18, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
::Standardization seems a fairly obvious benefit to me. Interfaces and data organization schemes should be predictable where possible. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 13:57, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
:Yeah. [[user:guillom|guillom]] 08:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
:+1 —[[User:DerHexer|DerHexer]]&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:DerHexer|(Talk)]]</small> 09:11, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
:Why not? The titles should be shorter now and grouped under one base page. --[[User:Dungodung|<span style="color:blue;">'''FiLiP'''</span>]] [[User talk:Dungodung|'''¤''']] 10:17, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
:I totally agree with guillom, well put :) ...--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">[[User:Cometstyles|Comet]][[User talk:Cometstyles|styles]]</span> 10:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
:Yes. '''&ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Mike.lifeguard|<font color="Indigo">Mike</font>]].[[User talk:Mike.lifeguard|<font color="Indigo">lifeguard</font>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;<sup>[[b:User talk:Mike.lifeguard|<font color="Indigo">@en.wb</font>]]</sup> 22:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
:Ya. [[User:Daniel|Daniel]] 23:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
:ok, why not, --[[User:Spacebirdy|birdy <small>geimfyglið</small>]] [[User_talk:Spacebirdy|<sub>(:>&nbsp;)=|</sub>]] [[commons:User:Spacebirdy/Myndir|<small>∇</small>]] 23:11, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
:✓--[[User:Shanel|Shanel]] 23:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
:Yes, [[User:M7|M/]] 13:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
:I agree!--[[User:Nick1915|Nick1915]] -<sup><small> [[User_talk:Nick1915|all you want]]</small></sup> 14:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
:What Shanel said. '''[[User:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:green">Cbrown1023</span>]]''' '''<small>[[User talk:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:#002bb8">talk</span>]]</small>''' 21:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
:Looks good to me. This will also be helpful in explaining to new metans what stewards do, when to ask them for help, &c. [[User:Sj|-- sj]] <small><nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Meta:Babylon|''help translate'']] |</small>[[User Talk:Sj|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 21:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


== Requests for stewards ==
=== Russian arb elections ===

Dear stewards! Please take a look at [[Metapub#Illegitimate_arbitrators_elections_in_Russian_Wikipedia.3F]] ... --[[User:Jaroslavleff|Jaroslavleff]] 07:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Dear stewards!
I want that [http://diq.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Xosere Xosere] will be removed from the sysop position at [http://diq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pela_Seri diq.wikipedia]. Because of his ignorant personal views, it will be achieved no increase in this project for months. He sees himself as an individual owner of the project and prevents other people from any contribution. Although he, himself is not powerful in the Zazaish language generally. He can’t even speak its own dialect, because he is from the Central Zaza region. He destroys the project, as he contributes. My statement is absolutely true, and many others can testify it. I already started a desysop process on [http://diq.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Portal%C3%AA_cemaeti&action=edit&section=2 diq.wikipedia]. Please implement whatever it is our community comes up with and help us in this matter. Thanks! --[[User:Mirzali|Mirzali]] 21:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
:Steward do not decided, try opening up a [[requests for comments]]. '''[[User:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:green">Cbrown1023</span>]]''' '''<small>[[User talk:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:#002bb8">talk</span>]]</small>''' 23:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

=== Boîte Utilisateur stewards ===

Bonjour à tous, je fais parti du projet de boîte utilisateur de la wikipédia francophone et j'ai créé récemment la boîte [[w:fr:Modèle:Utilisateur steward]] pour ceux qui ont une page personnelle sur ce wiki. Amicalement. [[w:fr:User:FrankyLeRoutier]] [[User:FrankyLeRoutier|FrankyLeRoutier]] 07:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


=== Import on fr:wp ===

As an admin on the French Wiktionary, I wanted to become an importer on the French Wikipedia for when people (usually IPs) mistakenly create Wikipedia-style articles on the Wiktionary. However [[:w:fr:Wikipédia:Importateurs|The French Wikipedia]] doesn't seem to have any election process for this, although it does have a WP page on it!! Any idea how to get elected? [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 19:42, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

: You'd have to ask on French Wikipedia. We can give you the rights, either temporary or permanent, if you have an election on fr.wp. Using the same method as used for administrators might be a solution. [[User:Laaknor|Laaknor]] 20:25, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

=== Desysop ===
I'm taking a break, so it's probably best to remove my bit in case I don't return ([[:En:User:Deacon of Pndapetzim]]). Much appreciated. [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] 21:47, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
: Answered on user's talk page. [[User:Leinad|Leina<span style="font-weight: bold;">D</span>]] [[User talk:Leinad|<small>(<span style="color:#CC0000; font-weight: bold;">t</span>)</small>]] 22:40, 9 August 2009 (UTC)


=== Desysop on Zazaki wikipedia ===
I want that [http://diq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xosere Xosere] will be removed from the sysop position at [http://diq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pela_Seri this project]. Because of his ignorant personal views, it will be achieved no increase in this project for months. He sees himself as an individual owner of the project and prevents other people from any contribution. Among so many other of his stupid ideas he recently tries to introduce the Kurdish alphabet in Zazaki Wikipedia. See the discussion [http://diq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Portal%C3%AA_cemaeti/Dessysop_process here]! --[[User:Mirzali|Mirzali]] 15:05, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

:Our patience has gradually end up with [http://diq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xosere ''Xosere'']. Please, read in detail about the matter ([http://diq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Portal%C3%AA_cemaeti/Dessysop_process here], [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Sysop_abuse_on_Zazaki_Wikipedia here]) and you will hopefully reach a positive decision on our behalf. Best regards! --[[User:Mirzali|Mirzali]] 06:03, 4 December 2009 (UTC)



== Admin-Fishing ==

Dear Stewards,

Just to let you know, some people try to become Admin in a ... way :-(

See you :-) [[User:Fantasy|Fantasy]] [[User_talk:Fantasy|容]] 16:31, 11 May 2009 (UTC)


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The WFFs <wikifreedomfighter@googlemail.com>


Date: 2009/5/11
Subject: Wikipedia e-mail
To: Fantasy

Dear Fantasy,

We notice you haven't edited Wikipedia for some time. Perhaps you grew disillusioned with the project after seeing the corruption and bureaucracy at every level? If so, why not help us to help you. We are currently expanding our portfolio of administrator accounts, and as yours remains dormant perhaps you could consider donating it to us - to do so will take you only two minutes: change the password (if desired) and then reply to this email with your login details. We'll do the rest!

Thank you for your time and consideration, and naturally do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.

Kind Regards,

The Wikipedia Freedom Fighters

--
This e-mail was sent by user "The WFFs" on the English Wikipedia to user "Fantasy". It has been automatically delivered and the Wikimedia Foundation cannot be held responsible for its contents.
----
:Hello Fantasy, thanks for this, You always contact a local checkuser or a steward via [special:emailuser] and give us the IP address of this User or just forward the complete mail, I have forwarded this one now, thanks, best regards, --[[User:Spacebirdy|<font color="black">birdy</font> <small style="color:gray">geimfyglið</small>]] [[User talk:Spacebirdy|<sub style="color:teal">(:>&nbsp;)=|</sub>]] 16:43, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

:Do we have a good and direct abuse contact @google?
::--[[User:M7|M/]] 17:05, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
:::I'm not quite sure why we'd need one... this isn't abuse of their services, and seems to have been handled appropriately. &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;<b style="color:#309;">[[User:Mike.lifeguard|Mike]].[[User talk:Mike.lifeguard|lifeguard]]</b>&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;<sup>[[:b:en:User talk:Mike.lifeguard|<span style="color:#309;">@en.wb</span>]]</sup> 22:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
::::If you want the mail account itself suspended, it could be handy to send that and corroborating IP evidence (check the privacy policy to ensure compliance first) to Google, so they can do whatever closure/suspension/etc they want on their end. Generally, I've noticed that major search engines tend to take notes from WP people seriously enough. [[User:Kylu|Kylu]] 12:13, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

== Steward reflection & activity ==

During this year's steward confirmations, there were a few discussions about steward activity and how to observe inactivity and encourage steady sustained contributions. We discussed making review/deflagging of inactive stewards regular and undramatic so that confirmations could focus on reliability and quality of work, as originally intended.

[[user:mike.lifeguard|Mike]] and I came at the problem from different angles, and agreed to discuss this more over the course of the Spring. Some specific suggestions follow. [[User:Sj|-- sj]] <small><nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Meta:Babylon|''help translate'']] |</small>[[User Talk:Sj|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]]


=== Discussion ===
''from an email discussion b/t [[user:mike.lifeguard|mike.lifeguard]] and [[user:sj|sj]]''

We want to define inactivity of stewards so that those who are busy or off-wiki for a while have time to get involved again; and so that there can be automatic flag removal for those with no time at all. We also want to capture all of the ways stewards help support small wikis and cross-wiki projects, many of which are not logged as steward db actions. Several stewards kept their tools [this winter] on the basis that they would become more active, or would continue to offer wisdom on stewards-l or other non-front-line venues.


Some thoughts: Launchpad helps visualize recent project activity in a useful way. I like how it defines a few different roles, and lets people gather karma through any/all of them. I even like the launchpad 'leaderboard' system that lets everyone see how they are doing and what others are up to. (who is really
being active by community metrics? &c) For the inactive, guilt/reminders are useful, but should be passing --sj

We could use a reminder that there is work to do on a daily basis and to please consider setting a few user rights next week. or something equally gentle. --mike


What about something like this:

* define a crude script that checks for edits to core pages, contributions on dedicated mailing lists, bug filing w/related categories or tags (even bug comments? depends on the role for which activity is being measured), use of available tools/powers.
*: nb: BryanBot has a weak version of a 'list of core pages' which has a simple editable interface for updating the list. So someone who feels their work is being undercounted can just publicly modify parts of the metrics.
*: For stewards the challenge is completeness; this should list:
*# global (un)blocks, (un)locks/hiding
*# user rights changes (esp on yourself, which would be for oversight/checkuser on small wikis normally)
*# mailing list posts
*# talk page posts (could maybe count anything on steward-related pages, stewards' individual talk pages, some more general community areas)
*# bug reports relevant to stewards
*:: I still like the idea of a steward-bug-watch-l mailing list. I have a number of shared Bugzilla searches. For example for CheckUser bugs, or SpamBlacklist bugs. You can (I think) see them at https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=saved-searches --mike

* the recent activity page should not focus people on their action-count but simply make it casually visible who is working on which types of tasks.

* have regular barnraisings or reminders once a <period>. [If the group of <foo> can't even define a barnraising every <period>, they are collectively being inactive in a community-building way.
** ping everyone's talkpage and remind them to come and help out. -sj] perhaps include an additional "you have been inactive for <otherperiod> message - come help us <barnraise> this week!" for those less involved.
** check activity stats a few weeks after a reminder/barnraising for automatic inactivity removals.


The above is not meant to be steward-specific, for easy comparison to how this is done with other activity assessments (adminship on meta, commons). For stewards, since it's already come up at the start of the year, we could have a single barnraising or reminder, start a thread on what types of metrics make sense (to shake out the lingering uncertainty about whether we're counting availability and common sense shepherding, &c), and ping all stewards on-wiki about getting involved. This might also help raise awareness about what stewards can help with [the [[talk:Stewards|recent renaming of Requests pages]] helps here also].

Under this scheme every <period> (~two weeks after a reminder) there could be automatic flag removals for those who had been inactive for a long time. Note the similarity to Commons admin review, in which simply saying "I'd like to retain my flag" counts as activity enough - we simply need to agree on what constitutes enough activity. We also have the benefit of the stewards email list to which all must be subscribed, for broadcast messages.

* Can you speak more about what Launchpad is, at least conceptually? If it's something that is a way to consolidate the kinds of activities we do and make them easier, that would be a great thing... right now there is rather a welter of pages that we need to visit to do various things, a dashboard or launchpad that maps out tasks would be really neat. Also, as a note I like the idea of semi-formalising mailing list contributions as one more metric to measure involvement. We don't want to get too focused on numbers alone but it is another metric. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 22:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
* I somehow fail to see that "external" software like Launchpad could be of immense help. It would just make things more complex, IMhO. Also, for what it's worth, I have 2 scripts with steward statistics: [http://toolserver.org/~dungodung/cgi-bin/rightschanges User rights changes] & [http://toolserver.org/~dungodung/cgi-bin/stewctivity Stewards activity statistics]. --[[User:Dungodung|<span style="color:blue;">F'''ili'''P</span>]] [[User talk:Dungodung|██]] 23:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

:What might be more useful is weekly reminders of any backlogs, if there are any. Right now, it feels like everything is handled almost immediately, which I guess makes some people look inactive because they're not on IRC to spot those things as soon as they happen. [[User:Angela|Angela]] 23:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
::i strongly agree with angela here. also i watch over vandalism on smaller wikis, in which case my work doesn't always show up in the checklists above. and i'd hate to be forced into a contest for a number of log-entries really. [[User:Oscar|oscar]] 01:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
:::Also, actions on non-native wikis should be counted; it doesn't need to be even a sysop task: revert of some edit or talk with community members of small wiki xx.xx is a useful steward job. --[[User:Millosh|Millosh]] 03:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
::Agree with Angela - I check the request pages weekly and almost all the time everything is taken care of or only requires a comment. Simply having reminders on what areas need help is enough. --[[User:Mav|Daniel Mayer (mav)]] 05:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

So what's the upshot here? :) ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 23:28, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
:The intent looks like a solution in search of a problem since there does not seem to be a real backlog on the Steward request pages. But I'd really like to see a centralized action backlog page that can list things Stewards can do related to SWMT actions that require sysop/steward tools (we already have the request pages here that Stewards can check). All that may be needed, is ot make tools like the [http://toolserver.org/~erwin85/delete.php delete tag check tool] more prominent to Stewards and to emphasize the need (not requirement) for Stewards to help with SWMT. SWMT actions that require more-than-autoconfirmed tools most certainly should count as Steward activity during the next confirmation (rollback, delete, block, unblock, etc). A tool that can log such actions would be useful during the next confirmation. [http://toolserver.org/~pathoschild/crossactivity/ CrossActivity tool] comes close, but only gives the date of last action. --[[User:Mav|Daniel Mayer (mav)]] 17:19, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
::Birdy just told me about the [http://toolserver.org/~dungodung/cgi-bin/recentlogs CrossWiki log tool], which shows all recent log activity for any user. That may be enough. --[[User:Mav|Daniel Mayer (mav)]] 18:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


== Appointment process ==

When the current process of appointment was created (having the Board appoint stewards after elections ended, not necessarily bound by the election results), the process as a whole wasn't well defined. There was disagreement about whether it would be a straight vote, what level of support was needed to appoint stewards, and how many were needed. Now the election process and schedule is more clearly defined (though it could even be a bit more reliable), and we have moved towards a simple 80% bar, so we can get by with something simpler. [having to wait for Board review of the election results has resulted in delays in years past]

On the other hand, the confirmation process is less clear cut; to speed it up this year, it was decided to have three stewards who received little or no negative feedback review the confirmation commentary and act on the results.

To cut down on delays: I propose expanding the description of the election process to include preparation and confirmation review, and to ask the same group to confirm both processes. [[User:Sj| Sj]][[User Talk:Sj|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] <small><small>[[Meta:Babylon|''help translate'']]</small></small> 04:55, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Currently this page says:
:''Stewards are elected roughly annually by the global Wikimedia community, and appointed from the elected candidates by the Board of Trustees. The number of stewards is not limited by policies. Candidates must have a support/oppose ratio of at least 80% with at least 30 supporting users. Current stewards are confirmed during each election. Stewards are subject to the steward policies; further documentation may be found in the steward handbook.''

;Proposed changes:
: ''Stewards are elected roughly annually by the global Wikimedia community. Their total number is not limited. Elections are organized by existing stewards and the [[Volunteer Coordinator]], and run for roughly three weeks. Successful candidates must have a support/oppose ratio of at least 80% more with at least 30 supporting editors.''
: ''Current stewards are also [[Stewards/confirm|confirmed]] during the elections through an open call for community feedback and commentary, followed by discussion and consensus-building among the stewards. A team of stewards closes the elections and confirmation discussions. Further documentation may be found in the [[steward policies]], [[steward elections|election process]], and [[steward handbook|handbook]].''


<span style="border:1px solid #eee;padding:0 2px 0 2px;background-color:white;color:#bbb;">&ndash;[[User:Sj|SJ]][[User Talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f90;">'''+'''</font>]]</span> <small>[[User:Sj/trans|''help translate'']]</small> 04:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
: Support with three corrections: (1) should be "coordinators" (plural) as experience shows that having only one coordinator is not enough; (2) ''Current stewards are also [[Stewards/confirm|confirmed]] during the elections, through '': 'also' and comma are not necessary here. [[User:Ruslik0|Ruslik]] 17:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
:: Correction made. There is only one Coordinator at present. If that changes, it would be easy to change this sentence. By moving this from a Board-mandated process to a community-run process, updates to the process/language should also become easier. <span style="border:1px solid #eee;padding:0 2px 0 2px;background-color:white;color:#bbb;">&ndash;[[User:Sj|SJ]][[User Talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f90;">'''+'''</font>]]</span> <small>[[User:Sj/trans|''help translate'']]</small> 23:50, 8 March 2010 (UTC) &middot; Updated to move the specific details to the [[steward elections]] page. <span style="background-color:white;color:#bbb;">&ndash;[[User:Sj|SJ]][[User Talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f90;">+</font>]]</span> 22:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
::: I've updated the page with the new text. <span style="background-color:white;color:#bbb;">&ndash;[[User:Sj|SJ]][[User Talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f90;">+</font>]]</span> 20:06, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
:::: Good idea :-) [[User:Leinad|Leina<span style="font-weight: bold;">D</span>]] [[User talk:Leinad|<small>(<span style="color:#cc0000; font-weight: bold;">t</span>)</small>]] 22:35, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

== Editnotice ==

Due to the large ammount of requests made here concerning wikis with local bureaucrats (and thus, declined by us) I created an [[MediaWiki:Editnotice-0-Steward requests-SUL requests|editnotice]] for [[SR/SUL]]. My english is not perfect so perhaps you may want to review the wording or add/remove further content. Best, &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Dferg|Dferg]] [[User talk:Dferg|☎]] 18:21, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
: Added for [[SRUC]] too. Regards, &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Dferg|Dferg]] [[User talk:Dferg|☎]] 21:25, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

== arrange [[template:StewardsList]] in langual order ==

Hello, in deWP a user announced his/her suicide a few days ago. A checkuser detected the IP and notified the police.


Now there's an attempt to give quick WP-user-"adresses" in similar cases on [[de:WP:Verhalten im Notfall]] (for pendants look at the interwikis). The diffrence to enWP ist the number of checkusers: While there are [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&group=checkuser 44], in deWP there're [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spezial:Benutzer/checkuser 3] and e.g. in frWP [http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sp%C3%A9cial:Liste_des_utilisateurs&group=checkuser 6], in arWP [http://ar.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D8%AE%D8%A7%D8%B5:%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%B6_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%AE%D8%AF%D9%85%D9%8A%D9%86&group=checkuser 3] as well & in jaWP [http://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E7%89%B9%E5%88%A5:%E7%99%BB%E9%8C%B2%E5%88%A9%E7%94%A8%E8%80%85%E4%B8%80%E8%A6%A7&group=checkuser 7].<br/>
An important fact is the rapidity of reaction by community, (at first) no matter troll- or joke-suspicions. In projects with little number of CUs there's imho normally a lower probability of quick reaction to such cases.


The long and short of it: I want to suggest to configurate the list, so that it's easier (& faster) to find out which steward is able to understand what language. I know there's the IRC-channel, but maybe someone doesn't have got according software or the channel is emty. --[[User_talk:Hæggis|Hæggis]] 15:15, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
:The latter is not likely (in my experience there are stewards available on irc practically 24/7). The first should not be a big problem too: even without an irc client anyone can log into the stewards' channel via [http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=wikimedia-stewards Freenode's Webchat]. You are of course welcome to create some sort of a language matrix (perhaps with some nifty country flags), but I doubt whether that would really be useful in shortening response time. [[User:Wutsje|Wutsje]] 16:35, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


Is it required to be 18 years old and have confirmed my identity to Wikimedia Founditation?--[[User:Westnest|<font color="Green"><b>Westnest</b></font>]] [[User Talk:Westnest|<font color="red"><sup><u>message</u></sup></font>]] 10:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
:If you are going to be a [[steward]], the answer is 'yes'. [[User:Ruslik0|Ruslik]] 10:45, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
:: Speaking as of potential suicide threats, etc. the Foundation has created an email address to report them. It is: {{email|emergency|wikimedia.org}} and reaches some staff members. Members of the global staff group has global CheckUser access so they can get the IP of the account (if it's a registered user). What I do not know is if they will give you the IP and therefore you must yourself inform the police or if the Foundation will inform the police themselves. I'll ask Philippe. Regards, -- [[User:Dferg|Dferg]] <sup>[[User talk:Dferg|☎ talk]]</sup> 10:52, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:55, 5 April 2023

Archives: 2004, 2004-2006, 2007-2012, 2013-2016, 2017-2019, 2020-2023

See also:
Stewards/elections 2004, discussion on the role of stewards (with "developer access"), the vote and other related issues
Vote at original close date of 5 April 2004
Vote at second close date of 12 April 2004
Vote at final close date of 20 April 2004 (Tim close)
Vote, full page history
Stewards/elections 2005
Stewards/elections 2006
Stewards/elections 2006-2
Stewards/elections 2007
Stewards/elections 2009
Stewards/elections 2010
Stewards/elections 2011
Stewards/elections 2011-2
Stewards/Elections 2012
Stewards/Elections 2013
Stewards/Elections 2014
Stewards/Elections 2015
Stewards/Elections 2016
Stewards/Elections 2017
Stewards/Elections 2018
Stewards/Elections 2019
Stewards/Elections 2020
Stewards/Elections 2021
Stewards/Elections 2022
Stewards/Elections 2023
Stewards/confirm

See Steward requests for all request pages related to stewards.

Is the phrasing "made 600 edits" (rather than "having made 600 edits") correct?

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Apokrif (talk) 20:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stewards&oldid=24829776"