Talk:Language committee: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:58, 24 November 2006

Please add your questions to the subcom "New languages" here.

Action required

There is a war going on at Proposals for closing projects/Close Siberian wikipedia. There are lots of unwanted way of discussions and voting hapening. Since it is a language issue, I think it is a good idea, that one of you guys start moderation there. --Dbl2010 18:09, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of diversity?

It seems that all committee members are European (maybe one is from the Americas, but I don't believe so). Considering that Europe has less linguistic diversity than any other continent besides Antarctica (although if you weight it by number of speakers, it comes in ahead of the Americas and Australia), and the smallest population of any continent excepting Australia and Antarctica (or at least I think so -- I may be incorrect), I think there should be members from other contents, preferrably Asia and Africa (although the latter is relatively unlikely unless you can get Mark Dingemanse to join). --Node ue 13:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The idea for the specification

I just made a document Wikimedia projects are not for nation-building. --Millosh 14:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Meta:Language proposal policy

Special project committee, Do you support the new Meta:Language proposal policy?--Hillgentleman 03:58, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 I just made a document [[Wikimedia projects are not for nation-building]]. --[[User:Millosh|Millosh]] 14:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
+==Meta:Language proposal policy==
+*Special project committee, Do you support the new [[Meta:Language proposal policy]]?--[[User:Hillgentleman|Hillgentleman]] 03:58, 24 November 2006 (UTC)