通用行为准则/2021咨询

通用行为准则

• 政策
• 执行规范
• 协调委员会（U4C） 章程 / 2024年选举 (候选人 / 提问)
• 项目概要
• 常见问题
• 培训模块

是次协商计划于2021年4月进行有关通用行为准则之应用的讨论。 此协商以独立项目形式举行，并将集中总结。如有任何疑问或意见，请以任何语言于 讨论页 进行讨论。

添加并查看下面的本地讨论！ 查看或翻译讨论文本

维基媒体基金会正在寻求全球社群对通用行为准则(Universal Code of Conduct, 简称UCoC)的应用提出意见。该意见征询期计划从2021年4月5日开始，到2021年5月5日为止。

这些咨询之目的是帮助为通用行为准则起草委员会概述清晰的执法途径，以设计今年稍后进行全面社群审核的建议。提议方案可以与现有过程或可能提出的其他途径整合而成。这些咨询将补充在整个UCoC项目中聚集的讨论。有关通用行为准则(Universal Code of Conduct, 简称UCoC)专案的更多信息，请参见通用行为准则概述。

这些咨询需要全球广泛的意见，以使《通用行为准则》及其应用对于不同的维基媒体社群都是合理的。

咨询目的

每一个维基媒体社群都有不同的需求和结构。在是次协商中，我们将收集并组织各个社群对这些需求和结构的反馈，以支持通用行为准则第二阶段起草委员会的工作。该起草委员会的任务是概述明确的执法途径，并为今年稍后进行的全面社群审核提出建议。

收集来自维基媒体社群的反馈贯穿了整个通用行为准则的专案。 通用行为准则(Universal Code of Conduct, 简称UCoC)专案的第二阶段于2021年2月开始，针对性地扩展到一些维基媒体社群。例如，当地语言咨询要求邀请了11个目标社群提供意见。维基媒体分支机构咨询正在进行，维基媒体工作人员的咨询计划于4月10日至11日进行。

是次咨询旨在从所有维基媒体社群收集有关通用行为准则(Universal Code of Conduct, 简称UCoC)专案第二阶段的反馈，尤其是那些尚未提供有关项目第二阶段反馈的社群。这些咨询之目的是帮助通用行为准则起草委员会概述明确的执法措施，并于今年稍后进行的全面社群审核提出建议。如果您已经提交了反馈，请继续进行对话，但是如果您已经在其他第二阶段的对话中提交了反馈，则可不必再次重复。

作为对反馈之回应，执法途径可以与现有做法保持一致，或帮助支援新的解决途径。我们希望听到有经验的用户，以及不熟悉如何解决冲突或报告问题的专案新用户，以及熟悉其他全球性平台如何应对这些挑战的用户之资讯。我们希望支持良好的对话——每个人都可以分享观点，并向他人学习。

咨询结构

全球性的对话正在不同的维基媒体专案上以多种语言进行。各个社群被邀请以该专案的语言或内容展开讨论。每个社群都应要求一名可信任的用户或一组用户以英语提交具有代表性的公正摘要。如果社群内没有英语翻译，则可以以任何语言提交摘要——专案团队将寻找翻译。

您可以选择自己喜欢的语言和参与方式。我们的协调员团队正在观察多个渠道，并组织来自各个社群和团体的反馈。参与者可以在已经开始的任何讨论中进行讨论，也可以在元维基(Meta)上进行讨论；同时可以使用我们提供的问题开始对专案进行讨论。协调员可为组织过程提供帮助。

讨论主题

本节中的内容是讨论子页面中的转录。

There are five topics with several questions to help start conversations. Feedback provided will have a significant impact on the draft for enforcement guidelines that will be prepared following the comment period.

• Please do not feel obligated to answer every question, focusing on what is important or impactful. We understand giving opinions on this topic can be difficult.
• While it will be necessary to describe experiences in a general way, these discussions are not the place to re-visit previously decided matters which should be handled at a more appropriate location.
• Each topic has several questions to help understand how the Universal Code of Conduct might interface with different communities.
• For answers to some frequently asked questions, please see this page.

Please note: If you wish to report a specific incident, please use existing pathways. If that is not an acceptable pathway, outlining in more general terms why the existing process does not work will be useful. Please avoid sending incident reports or appeals to facilitators or organizers. The people organizing discussions are not the staff that handle specific abuse reports or appeals and are not able to respond in that capacity.

Community Support

1. How can the effectiveness of anti-harassment efforts be measured?
2. What actions can be taken and what structures should be available to support those being targeted by harassment and those that respond to conduct issues?
3. What formal or informal support networks are available for contributors? What is necessary for these groups to function well, and what challenges are there to overcome?
4. What additional opportunities are there to deliver effective support for contributors? What would be useful in supporting communities, contributors, targets of harassment, and responders?

Reporting Pathways

1. How can reporting pathways be improved for targets of harassment? What types of changes would make it more or less challenging for users to submit appropriate reports?
2. What is the best way to ensure safe and proper handling of incidents involving i) vulnerable people; ii) serious harassment; or iii) threats of violence?
3. In your experience, what are effective ways to respond to those who engage in behaviours that may be considered harassment?
4. In what ways should reporting pathways provide for mediation, reform, or guidance about acceptable behaviours?

Managing Reports

1. Making reporting easier will likely increase the number of reports: in what ways can the management of reports be improved?
2. What type of additional resources would be helpful in identifying and addressing harassment and other conduct issues?
3. Are there human, technical, training, or knowledge-based resources the Foundation could provide to assist volunteers in this area?
4. How should incidents be dealt with that take place beyond the Wikimedia projects but are related to them, such as in-person or online meetings?

Handling Reports

1. In what ways should reports be handled to increase confidence from affected users that issues will be addressed responsibly and appropriately?
2. What appeal process should be in place if participants want to request a review of actions taken or not taken?
3. When private reporting options are used, how should the duty to protect the privacy and sense of safety of reporters be balanced with the need for transparency and accountability?
4. What privacy controls should be in place for data tracking in a reporting system used to log cross-wiki or persistent abusers?

Global Questions

1. How should issues be handled where there is no adequate local body to respond, for example, allegations against administrators or functionary groups?
2. In the past, the global movement has identified projects that are struggling with neutrality and conduct issues: in what ways could a safe and fair review be conducted in these situations?
3. How would a global dispute resolution body work with your community?

参与

现在进行的对话在以下列出。如果您所在社群尚未开始讨论，则可以通过将问题从讨论子页面复制到本地专案的页面上来创建一个讨论。请注意，文本可能需要翻译。准备就绪后，您可以邀请用户参加，并包括指向以下页面的链接。如要需要帮助，请以任何语言发布到对话页 。

请在开始对本地专案的讨论之后，于下面添加讨论：

查看或翻译讨论文本 复制讨论文本 添加本地讨论