User talk:Geo Swan: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Geo Swan in topic Questions for en.wiki administrator Moneytrees...
Content deleted Content added
archive Tag: Replaced |
reply |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Archived, old material to [[User talk:Geo Swan/archive 2022-03-19]] |
Archived, old material to [[User talk:Geo Swan/archive 2022-03-19]] |
||
==Questions for en.wiki administrator Moneytrees...== |
|||
[[en:User:Moneytrees|En.wiki administrator Moneytrees]] closed a discussion on [[en:Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Action_review:_Geo_Swan_and_imissdisco|en:WP:ANI]] today, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=1078275105&oldid=1078273019 ruling] I was banned from en.wiki. |
|||
Moneytrees wrote: |
|||
:{| class="wikitable" |
|||
| |
|||
: <code>Closing this, this has been here for close to a month and responses have petered out- no need to drag it out any longer. Commenters are pretty unified: {{tl|Ivanvector}}'s actions are '''endorsed''', and there is consensus for '''Geo Swan to be [[en:WP:CBAN|community banned]]'''.</code> |
|||
|} |
|||
# Should it matter whether the record shows I actually did not do what my accusers claim I did? |
|||
# The main accusation I faced was that [[:en:Dan Trotta]] was an [[:en:WP:ATTACK]] page. Did you, [[User:Moneytrees]], consider taking thirty seconds to look at [[:en:Dan Trotta]] yourself, to confirm, for yourself, it was an [[:en:WP:ATTACK]] page? |
|||
# Would you still have ruled I merited a site ban if you found [[:en:Dan Trotta]] was '''NOT''' an [[:en:WP:ATTACK]] page? |
|||
# Aren't community bans, theoretically, appealable? In theory, isn't an individual who has been community banned, entitled to request re-instatement, stating they are contrite, understand what they did wrong, and offering a promise not to do that again? |
|||
# So, as the person who made the ruling, do you think it was your responsibility to indicate what I should promise not to do again, if I were to appeal this ban? If that wasn't your responsibility, whose responsibility do you think it was? |
|||
Inquiring minds want to know. [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan#top|talk]]) 02:03, 21 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:03, 21 March 2022
Archived, old material to User talk:Geo Swan/archive 2022-03-19
Questions for en.wiki administrator Moneytrees...
En.wiki administrator Moneytrees closed a discussion on en:WP:ANI today, ruling I was banned from en.wiki.
Moneytrees wrote:
Closing this, this has been here for close to a month and responses have petered out- no need to drag it out any longer. Commenters are pretty unified: {{Ivanvector}}'s actions are endorsed, and there is consensus for Geo Swan to be community banned.
- Should it matter whether the record shows I actually did not do what my accusers claim I did?
- The main accusation I faced was that en:Dan Trotta was an en:WP:ATTACK page. Did you, User:Moneytrees, consider taking thirty seconds to look at en:Dan Trotta yourself, to confirm, for yourself, it was an en:WP:ATTACK page?
- Would you still have ruled I merited a site ban if you found en:Dan Trotta was NOT an en:WP:ATTACK page?
- Aren't community bans, theoretically, appealable? In theory, isn't an individual who has been community banned, entitled to request re-instatement, stating they are contrite, understand what they did wrong, and offering a promise not to do that again?
- So, as the person who made the ruling, do you think it was your responsibility to indicate what I should promise not to do again, if I were to appeal this ban? If that wasn't your responsibility, whose responsibility do you think it was?
Inquiring minds want to know. Geo Swan (talk) 02:03, 21 March 2022 (UTC)