User talk:Geo Swan

Archived, old material to User talk:Geo Swan/archive 2022-03-19

Questions for en.wiki administrator Moneytrees...

En.wiki administrator Moneytrees closed a discussion on en:WP:ANI today, ruling I was banned from en.wiki.

Moneytrees wrote:

Closing this, this has been here for close to a month and responses have petered out- no need to drag it out any longer. Commenters are pretty unified: {{Ivanvector}}'s actions are endorsed, and there is consensus for Geo Swan to be community banned.

1. Should it matter whether the record shows I actually did not do what my accusers claim I did?
2. The main accusation I faced was that en:Dan Trotta was an en:WP:ATTACK page. Did you, User:Moneytrees, consider taking thirty seconds to look at en:Dan Trotta yourself, to confirm, for yourself, it was an en:WP:ATTACK page?
3. Would you still have ruled I merited a site ban if you found en:Dan Trotta was NOT an en:WP:ATTACK page?
4. Aren't community bans, theoretically, appealable? In theory, isn't an individual who has been community banned, entitled to request re-instatement, stating they are contrite, understand what they did wrong, and offering a promise not to do that again?
5. So, as the person who made the ruling, do you think it was your responsibility to indicate what I should promise not to do again, if I were to appeal this ban? If that wasn't your responsibility, whose responsibility do you think it was?

Inquiring minds want to know. Geo Swan (talk) 02:03, 21 March 2022 (UTC)