User talk:Guido den Broeder

RETIRED

This user is no longer active on this wiki.

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Meta Unblock tools: block log • gblock log • blocklist • stalktoy • luxo's • unblock • remove gblock • contribs: +/-

— regards, Revi 15:01, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Note. Talk page access has been revoked from user due to continuance of actions that got them blocked in the first place.

Re the latest comment it was removed and revision deleted. User directed to where to take their matter. As the user has declared themselves retired, the page is now soft protected to stop the continuing arguments and continuing of the activity that has been contentious. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:32, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Global ban request notification

Hello, Guido, due to your continued incivility, sockpuppetry and self-promotion this notification is to let you know that I have nominated you for a global ban in accordance with the Global bans policy at Requests for comment/Global ban for Guido den Broeder. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 05:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

user talk page block changed due to ban discussion

As someone has taken the step to have you globally banned, I have removed the block on you so it does not affect your user talk page, so that you can contribute components here, and we will organise for that discussion to be moved to the discussion as it is deemed appropriate. If, however, the behaviour that took place to have that user talk page access removed reoccurs, then there is the potential for that access to be removed.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, much appreciated. However, I have already responded on nl:wikibooks here. You have permission to move it to the disussion. Guido den Broeder (talk) 16:58, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Am I allowed to post an unblock request? Guido den Broeder (talk) 17:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

@Billinghurst: ^^

You can always reasonably appeal a block. If you do so, and I see it, I will refer it to M:RfH for community comment rather than action it. I would presume that a limited scope request would be more favourably granted. I would also see that the community would hold you closely to Meta:Civility in such a circumstance.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Responding to individual complaints

There are only a few actual complaints, none of which comes close to what the policy considers worthy of a global ban. I will address them nonetheless.

• incivility - Stop saying things about me or others that aren't true and you will find me kind, generous and patient.
• self-promotion - Uploading an image of your national flag is not self-promotion, and neither is linking to another encyclopedia than Wikipedia for background information.
• operates a wiki where he as the owner allows attack page of Wikimedians - We only allow articles and essays, attack pages are not acceptable. If you see one, provide the link and it will be dealt with.
• harassment and legal threats - Never in my life have I harassed a person or made a legal threat against someone.
• impersonating an administrator across multiple projects - I have been an administrator on a range of projects for over half a century, as well as a board member, a developer, a designer, a producer, and so forth. But not on any WMF wiki, and I never said I was. Wikiversity invited me to apply for custodianship once, but the place got into disarray before we could go forward with it. Guido den Broeder (talk) 20:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
• has a many years long history of "contributing" to multiple WMF projects about essentially one subject only, i.e. Guido den Broeder - I have not been active on nl:wikipedia since 2008. At the time, chess users asked me to write a small article about myself as a chess player. I haven't been active on en:wikipedia since 2009, except for a few months in 2017. I didn't write an article about myself there, nor on any other WMF wiki. The single photo of me on Commons was uploaded in 2022 by Mdd.
• lock evasion - This is my global account, carrying my own name. It is not locked. Guido den Broeder (talk) 18:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
• here was definitely socket puppeting going on as the user Lyrda and The Jolly Bard has the same singular focus on this one obscure russian child actor - She has some 7 million followers, so statistically some of them are bound to be on Wikipedia. There is no claim that Lyrda is my sockpuppet. The Jolly Bard's checkuser didn't match. He only showed a brief interest in the topic after he was accused of being me. As for me, I gave up on Wikipedia in 2008. As a courtesy, I released some pictures that I took of her in 2017, and corrected some errors in her articles on various wikis. Guido den Broeder (talk) 19:29, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Answering questions

• did we take into account the rarity of film set photos? - When Kristina's mother wanted to add a photo to her article and correct a few errors, she was immediately threatened with a block by en:wikipedia administrators. That is why she left it to me to take care of things. Of course I can only release pictures that I took myself but I have lots, not just from The Russian Bride but also from other movies. As things stand, however, they will not become available to Commons. Guido den Broeder (talk) 08:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Partial unblock request

This blocked user has asked to be unblocked. Blocked editor Please paste the contents of the block infobox below to help administrators locate your block in the logs. Please note that trolling or otherwise abusing your ability to edit your talk page will result in that ability being revoked. Request reason: I would like the ability to edit my user page as it is used on many projects where I am in good standing, and it needs maintenance. It has been more than 5 years. At the time I was hurt and emotional because of mean things that were said about me both on- and off-wiki, of which you could only see a small part. My behavior in response to this was subpar, for which I apologize. I have no wish to edit anywhere outside my user space. Administrators If this request is declined, it should be replaced with: {{Unblock declined|1=Request reason.|2=Decline reason. ~~~~}} If this request is granted, it should be replaced with: {{Unblock granted|1=Request reason.|2=Grant reason. ~~~~}} Do not unblock users without consulting with the administrator who placed the block, except in obvious, uncontroversial cases. Blocks marked as {{Checkuserblock}} will be reviewed by a CheckUser. English | dansk | español | français | 日本語 | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | русский | 中文 | edit

block log gblock log blocklist stalktoy guc unblock gunblock contribs: +/-

Guido den Broeder (talk) 01:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

 On hold Put to the community special:diff/26063167  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. Guido den Broeder (talk) 02:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Response to individual comments

• would it satisfy appellant's needs to just delete the user page

  It is mandatory on most WMF wikis to declare any (potential) conflicts of interest on your user page. Guido den Broeder (talk) 17:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)