User talk:SlimVirgin: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 8 years ago by SlimVirgin in topic Question about the Board minutes
Content deleted Content added
Line 72: Line 72:
hello! I am sorry for being (maybe) too bold. organising the page by users does not seem to help, we can repeat ourselves and it would be a mess :) --[[user talk:antanana|アンタナナ]] 22:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
hello! I am sorry for being (maybe) too bold. organising the page by users does not seem to help, we can repeat ourselves and it would be a mess :) --[[user talk:antanana|アンタナナ]] 22:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
:Hi Antanana, I've replied on that talk page. [[User:SlimVirgin|SarahSV]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk]]</sup></small> 22:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
:Hi Antanana, I've replied on that talk page. [[User:SlimVirgin|SarahSV]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk]]</sup></small> 22:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

==Question about the Board minutes==
[copied from [[User talk:Pundit]]] Hi Dariusz, could you please look into the issue of which Board meeting approved the 2015–2016 budget of $2,445,873 for the Knowledge Engine/Discovery? (See [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/a/a7/Knowledge_engine_grant_agreement.pdf grant application], p. 9, which says the budget obtained Board approval.)

I've asked about it twice on the mailing list, [https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-February/081817.html][https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-February/081940.html] and I've looked through [[Wikimedia Foundation board meetings|the minutes]], but I can't find it. I'm hoping that, as a member of the Board Governance Committee, you'll be in a position to look into it further. Best wishes, [[User:SlimVirgin|SarahSV]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk]]</sup></small> 01:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)


*Hi Sarah, regarding the budget, it is clearly within the focus of the Audit Committee (the Governance Committee is basically for board composition, good practices, etc.). I was not a member of the Board if the grant was discussed in the summer. I will ask as well. [[User:Pundit|Pundit]] ([[User talk:Pundit|talk]]) 15:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
*Hi Sarah, regarding the budget, it is clearly within the focus of the Audit Committee (the Governance Committee is basically for board composition, good practices, etc.). I was not a member of the Board if the grant was discussed in the summer. I will ask as well. [[User:Pundit|Pundit]] ([[User talk:Pundit|talk]]) 15:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

::{{u|Pundit|Dariusz}}, thanks for the reply. I've copied my question here to keep the discussion in one place. I was thinking it would be a matter for the Board Governance Committee because it's about votes not being recorded.

::Anyway, thanks for asking about it, and also thank you in general for making yourself available to answer questions. It's very much appreciated, especially as I know you must be busy with all this. [[User:SlimVirgin|SarahSV]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk]]</sup></small> 01:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:26, 19 February 2016

change of vote after deadline

Hi, SlimVirgin,

I reverted your change of vote after the deadline of the voting. Thanks for your understanding. Effeietsanders 01:14, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

m:WM:SPAM

Please clarify exactly which domain you're talking about here so we can consider the request without guesswork - thanks  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:00, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Gender gap/women on wikipedia month

Thanks for jumping in and creating that page. Just wondering if you think we should start a category at this point? Steven Walling at work 00:28, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sure, good idea, Steven. Anything that might help to get things noticed. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:07, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Letter petitioning WMF to reverse recent decitions

The Wikimedia Foundation recently created a new feature, "superprotect" status. The purpose is to prevent pages from being edited by elected administrators -- but permitting WMF staff to edit them. It has been put to use in only one case: to protect the deployment of the Media Viewer software on German Wikipedia, in defiance of a clear decision of that community to disable the feature by default, unless users decide to enable it.

If you oppose these actions, please add your name to this letter. If you know non-Wikimedians who support our vision for the free sharing of knowledge, and would like to add their names to the list, please ask them to sign an identical version of the letter on change.org.

I'm notifying you because you participated in one of several relevant discussions. -Pete F (talk) 22:20, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Community discussion on harassment reporting

There are many current proposals as part of the 2015 Inspire Campaign related to harassment management. I’ve created a page, Grants:IdeaLab/Community discussion on harassment reporting meant to serve as a central space where the various stakeholders in these proposals and other community members can discuss which methods might serve our community best so that we can unify our ideas into collective action. I encourage you to join the conversation and contribute your ideas! OR drohowa (talk) 01:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

How can we improve Wikimedia grants to support you better?

Hi! The Wikimedia Foundation would like your input on how we can reimagine Wikimedia Foundation grants to better support people and ideas in your Wikimedia project.

After reading the Reimagining WMF grants idea, we ask you to complete this survey to help us improve the idea and learn more about your experience. When you complete the survey, you can enter to win one of five Wikimedia globe sweatshirts!

In addition to taking the the survey, you are welcome to participate in these ways:

This survey is in English, but feedback on the discussion page is welcome in any language.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) (talk · contribs) through MediaWiki message delivery. 01:24, 19 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Last call for WMF grants feedback!

Hi, this is a reminder that the consultation about Reimagining WMF grants is closing on 8 September (0:00 UTC). We encourage you to complete the survey now, if you haven't yet done so, so that we can include your ideas.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) (talk · contribs) through MediaWiki message delivery. 19:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Harassment workshop

Greetings! You are receiving this message because, at some point in the past, you have participated in a discussion around the topic of harassment. The Support and Safety team is holding a series of consultations gathering feedback on the best potential solutions to the problem. The next stage is a workshop where we hope to narrow the focus to individual actionable ideas and explore how to bring some of these ideas to life.

Best regards, the Support and Safety team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Knowledge Engine/FAQ

hello! I am sorry for being (maybe) too bold. organising the page by users does not seem to help, we can repeat ourselves and it would be a mess :) --アンタナナ 22:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi Antanana, I've replied on that talk page. SarahSV talk 22:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Question about the Board minutes

[copied from User talk:Pundit] Hi Dariusz, could you please look into the issue of which Board meeting approved the 2015–2016 budget of $2,445,873 for the Knowledge Engine/Discovery? (See grant application, p. 9, which says the budget obtained Board approval.)

I've asked about it twice on the mailing list, [1][2] and I've looked through the minutes, but I can't find it. I'm hoping that, as a member of the Board Governance Committee, you'll be in a position to look into it further. Best wishes, SarahSV talk 01:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Hi Sarah, regarding the budget, it is clearly within the focus of the Audit Committee (the Governance Committee is basically for board composition, good practices, etc.). I was not a member of the Board if the grant was discussed in the summer. I will ask as well. Pundit (talk) 15:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Dariusz, thanks for the reply. I've copied my question here to keep the discussion in one place. I was thinking it would be a matter for the Board Governance Committee because it's about votes not being recorded.
Anyway, thanks for asking about it, and also thank you in general for making yourself available to answer questions. It's very much appreciated, especially as I know you must be busy with all this. SarahSV talk 01:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply