Translations:Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees/Call for feedback: Community Board seats/Reports/2021-03-17 Weekly/9/fr

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by MPossoupe (WMF) (talk | contribs) at 01:15, 23 April 2021 (Created page with "* Talk:Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees/Call for feedback: Community Board seats/Ranked voting system#Support%2C%20NOW%20OPPOSE%20ranked%20choice%2C%20preferably%20Sch..."). It may differ significantly from the current version.
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
  • Une personne sur la page de discussion de l'idée sur Meta dit, “Le vote transférable est un mauvais système de classement... Nous pourrions peut-être discuter de la possibilité d'inventer un système qui inclurait à la fois une option d'opposition et un classement.”
  • Un volontaire dans le panel sur "Board-Conseil global-Hubs" panel was in favor of this idea for the upcoming board election, with some fairly loose quotas of representation, because the support/oppose voting system puts an awful lot of weight on opposing votes. And, the volunteer said that without preferential voting or quotas then the elections will result in very similar kinds of people being elected.
  • Dans le formulaire anonyme de l'appel à commentaires: ils conseillent vivement de choisir le système de vote par classement, qui est déjà utilisé dans de nombreuses situations (comme les élections du conseil d'administration de la Fondation Open Street Map), et qui donne à la communauté tout son pouvoir.