Vandalism reports
 |
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} and sections whose most recent comment is older than 7 days. For the archive overview, see Vandalism reports/Archives. The latest archive is located at 2024-05.
|
Current cross-wiki vandalism
2602:30A:2C48:EB10:8CBA:C520:6F13:EECB at dzwiki
- 2602:30A:2C48:EB10:8CBA:C520:6F13:EECB xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye ← (curiously, not showing any contributions at the moment)
One of many IPs of a longtime cross-wiki vandal is back creating "year" stubs to push dzwiki up to 200 articles). In this case, the stubs cover a random assortment of years, including 2000, 2004, 2033, 2040, 2042, 2043, and 2044. Some of these (the first two) already exist on the wiki as articles using Hindu-Arabic numerals, and these should probably should be moved to the corresponding titles using Dzongkha numerals. Because of this fact, this case is perhaps a little trickier than the typical "year stub" spamming. I'm hoping that the new stubs can be deleted with maximum prejudice (as they have the hallmarks of a longtime vandal), but perhaps others would have a different opinion? - dcljr (talk) 02:27, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks. - dcljr (talk) 10:15, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
User:Peadar (User:Borgatya at enwiki)
- Peadar [stalktoy] – [cross-wiki edits]
Crosswiki vandalism in en:Ágnes Csomor (Revision history), hu:Csomor Ágnes (Revision history), ja:チョモル・アーグネシ (Revision history) and de:Ágnes Csomor (Revision history): He removed much content. In dewiki and enwiki he stopped his vandalism (after his account has been blocked). Salute --Jivee Blau (talk) 15:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- I refuse the accusation of vandalism, and I firmly ask JiveBlau to stop the continuous crosswiki insults. Another editors also already have accused me of vandalism earlier but I was claimed that I was not a vandal, I am a confirmed editor, I have created a lot of articles crosswiki in several languages, I have created the article of this Hungarian actress in question, so as a wiki creator I can change its contents, this is not an abuse. I am a useful editor and I am working for wikipedia with pleasure and my interest is to create new articles and to improve the other articles. JiveBlau exaggerates this problem and he decries me, so I ask you all who read this to tell him to finish decrying me and accusing me of vandalism and abusing. Thank you.Peadar (talk) 11:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC) (crosswiki but Borgatya (talk) 11:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC) at enwiki)
- ???
- 1. I have never insulted you!
- 2. You removed near 99 % of the contents of the articles without stating any understandable reason; for example, see ja:Special:Diff/60082164, hu:Special:Diff/17625344 and ja:Special:Diff/59883936. Nowhere an understandable reason is given. This is vandalism. Bgwhite (talk · contribs) told to you that „you are indeed vandalizing the article by removing 99% of the content [and that you have to] give a reason why the entire article was wiped“, see en:Special:Permalink/723142165#June 2016.
- --Jivee Blau (talk) 21:55, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Atleast on enwiki, Peadar/Borgatya is vandalizing the article by continuing to delete most of it and refusing to say why. However, I don't see Peadar/Borgatya's actions across all the wikis as vandalism, but more page ownership. They either have created the articles or has been the main contributor. They refuse to offer any indication why material was removed or added. They just revert other people's edits and continue on. Even after multiple people revert their edits, they continue on. This is the classic symptoms of disruptive editing. Page ownership, vandalism and disruptive editing is abusing the system. Does it warrant a global block? I don't know. On individual wikis, it is a blockable offense and they have been blocked on enwiki. Bgwhite (talk) 00:08, 21 June 2016 (UTC)