User:Juan90264/Teste/ja

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< User:Juan90264
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Ecute (talk | contribs) at 10:16, 21 August 2021 (Created page with "いいえ"). It may differ significantly from the current version.
Other languages:

アダム・ワイト

  • アダム・ワイト (Adamw)

    Adamw (talk • meta edits • global user summary • CA • AE)

    候補者の詳細
    • 自己紹介:
      • 名前: アダム・ワイト
      • 居住地: ドイツ、ベルリン
      • 言語: en-N、es-2
    • 活動:
      • ウィキメディア参加時期: 2012年
      • 活動中のウィキ: メディアウィキ、メタ
    所信表明 （450語以内）

    Problem: Our institutions should reflect our movement. If knowledge is a mountain, then we should be terraced gardens spanning its slopes, rather than a fortress built on the summit. Wikimedians spread themselves out into every subject and language, rather than building a single dominant project in some colonial language. But the Wikimedia Foundation is dominant, its revenue is over 12 times greater than the largest chapter.

    Proposal: Progressively increase the proportion of resources going to smaller local organizations, have these take over many of the Foundation's roles. Movement-wide decisions made by a confederation of local groups.

    Problem: Editors and contributors create all of our wealth, but have minority control over electing the Board's representatives.

    Proposal: Contributors directly elect the full Wikimedia Foundation Board, one person one vote. This will require the Board to change its Bylaws, and possibly requires conversion (back) to a membership organization. Then, future questions will be resolved according to popular mandate.

    Problem: The boundaries of our projects are tightly guarded. Any new communities can only launch after a long and difficult process, and only if they are similar to existing projects and rooted in similar values. The many who are denied must turn to commercial or other hosting, with inconsistent safety policies, licensing, and even with imposed advertising.

    Proposal: We need a diaspora of projects, such as an ad-free, open wiki farm with stable funding and consistent community safety. We might also draw new life into the movement with: real-time collaborative editing, partnering with journalists to fight disinformation, and reaching beyond on-wiki life with initiatives like the Knowledge Equity Fund.

    About myself: As a Board member, I will push for direct democracy, and will take a pledge to support any recall or referendum vote by the contributors. My priorities are aligned with the strategic recommendations and the outcome of the 2019 governance review, and I'm happy to listen to others and adapt what I advocate as needed.

    My professional background is mostly as a software developer, or as a manual laborer depending on what I can find. I enjoy community organizing, have helped start a sidewalk food collective, a free school, and along with others attempted to unionize Wikimedia Foundation staff. I've helped maintain industrial arts shops, and see some parallels to what needs to be done as a Board member: set up a structure that lets every individual thrive and be creative, keep the lights on, and talk a lot with everyone.

    My wiki experience is a total of 9 years staff at WMF and WMDE. I can say that staff universally respect what they call the "Community", and if anything may be slightly afraid of the editors. I'll work to rebuild the Foundation's trustworthiness.

    理事会の上位三優先事項

    1. Democracy: Elect the full Board, with contributors recognized as the legal owners of the Foundation.

    2. Diversity: Phase out some of the roles played by the Foundation, focusing on coordination between chapters, stewardship of trademarks, international law and safety issues. Greatly increase the proportion of funds distributed to local entities. Evaluate splitting out organizations to focus on MediaWiki, and another to provide wiki hosting.

    3. Diaspora: Support a non-profit, ad-free wiki farm open to all, with the benefit of a uniform safety framework.

    ウィキメディア運動戦略の上位三優先事項

    1. Equity in decision-making

    2. Safety and inclusion

    3. Innovation for free knowledge

    確認 完了した確認作業
    立候補資格: 身分証明:
    Trustee Evaluation Form
    理事評価フォーム
    経験年数
    <1 1–2 2–5 5–10 10+

    ウィキメディアにおける経験 候補者には、ウィキメディア運動への献身的な貢献者であることが求められます。要件を満たす貢献には以下を含みます：ウィキメディア・プロジェクトへの貢献、ウィキメディア財団や提携団体の構成員であること、ウィキメディア運動の取りまとめ役としての活動、もしくはウィキメディア運動の協力組織への参加。

    		WMF software developer, 7 years. WMDE software developer, 2 years.

    理事としての経験 候補者が、全国的もしくは世界的な組織(非営利、営利、もしくは政府)において理事や取締役などを務めたことがあるか。

    		いいえ

    役員経験 候補者が、規模、複雑性、活動範囲においてウィキメディア財団に匹敵するかそれを上回る規模の組織、部門もしくはプロジェクトにおいて役員を務めたことがあるか。

    		No

    内容領域専門性 候補者が、ウィキメディア財団と理事会の活動に関連する分野において働いたか、もしくはかなりのボランティア活動を行ったことがあるか。これらの分野は毎年決定され、グローバル運動の構築やコミュニティの組織化、企業レベルのプラットフォーム技術と製品の開発、公共政策と法律、知識分野(例：学術/GLAM/教育)、人権と社会正義、オープンインターネット／フリー・オープンソースソフトウェア、組織戦略と運営、財務と財務監督、非営利の資金調達、人材管理、理事会のガバナンスのような分野を含みます。

    		Software engineering.

    多様性：経歴 候補者が、権力構造の中で歴史的差別や低代表に直面してきた集団に属しているか、属していたか（例えば、性、人種、民族、障害、LGBTQ+、社会階級、経済的地位、もしくはカースト）

    		いいえ

    多様性：地理的 候補者が地理的な居住地域に基づき、理事会の全体的な地理的多様性に貢献するか。

    		いいえ

    多様性：言語 候補者が、英語以外の言語のネイティブスピーカーであるか。

    		いいえ

    多様性：政治システムの経験 候補者に、非民主的・検閲国家・抑圧的な状況において長く居住もしくは就労した経験があるか。

    		No
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Juan90264/Teste/ja&oldid=21916057"