Wikiversity/Vote/Votes yes: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Fwk2005 (talk | contribs)
2 edits
No edit summary
Line 100: Line 100:
#[[kaivalya]] 22:22, 20 September 2005 (UTC) Rock on Wiki!
#[[kaivalya]] 22:22, 20 September 2005 (UTC) Rock on Wiki!
#[[ChidoOne]] 19:22, 20 September 2005 (UTC) Knoledge belongs to te world and anyone should have acces to it.
#[[ChidoOne]] 19:22, 20 September 2005 (UTC) Knoledge belongs to te world and anyone should have acces to it.
Exciting idea!

Revision as of 17:54, 22 September 2005

  1. Winterlord 00:27, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
  2. Gabe Sechan 00:27, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Marcos Antônio Nunes de Moura 00:57, 16 September 2005 (UTC) I'm interested in portuguese version of this project.[reply]
  4. NGerda 01:42, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --JWSurf 00:55, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Ambi 03:37, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Brim 03:39, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Dr.alf 04:15, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Robert Harrison 04:19, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Dovi 05:39, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Adam12 08:16, 16 September 2005 (CET)
  12. Bokken 06:18, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Daniele 07:59, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Ourobouros 08:19, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Nojhan 08:31, 16 September 2005 (UTC) Interessé par une version française.[reply]
  16. Dirkpetsch 09:53, 16 September 2005 (UTC) I'm interested in collaborating with this project, especially the german version.[reply]
  17. Starwiz 11:00, 16 September 2005 (UTC) Sounds like something I'd enjoy being involved with[reply]
  18. le Korrigan bla 11:12, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Shanel 11:22, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Rdb/de:Benutzer:Rdb 11:36, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. John N. 12:03, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  22. None 12:40, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Traroth 12:42, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Alvaro 13:30, 16 September 2005 (UTC) fr[reply]
  25. --Aurox 13:46, 16 September 2005 (UTC) really interested to collaborate to en based and also fr one, if ever born. thinking about a it version... (it's one of most bautiful wiki-dea i ever heard)[reply]
  26. vanGore 13:50, 16 September 2005 (UTC) could it be too early? I dont think so. Be bold.[reply]
  27. Garrett 13:55, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Faager 15:24, 16 September 2005 (UTC) (fr)[reply]
  29. --MisterX 15:48, 16 September 2005 (UTC) IT - Why not?[reply]
  30. Ascánder 15:50, 16 September 2005 (UTC) - Interesado en participar en la versión en español.[reply]
  31. --Nick1915 16:49, 16 September 2005 (UTC) io a quella italiana!!![reply]
  32. Langec 17:19, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --Javier Carro 17:49, 16 September 2005 (UTC) Though I understand certain skepticism of those who say that it seems too early,... let's try it! lot's of people is longing for it.[reply]
  34. Anthere Comment : the project is not only about opening YET another university. Its frame is much larger.
  35. Physchim62 20:18, 16 September 2005 (UTC) Would be interest in participating in English or French. I feel that this project would be complemantary to Wikipedia, helping to improve the latter as well.[reply]
  36. Chairboy 20:49, 16 September 2005 (UTC) - Comment: I really like the idea, and have sketched out some concepts that might help spur conversation on my wikipedia user page.[reply]
  37. Jacoplane 20:51, 16 September 2005 (UTC) I was sceptical about wikinews, but since that was successful I think this might just be too.[reply]
  38. Eloquence 21:43, 16 September 2005 (UTC) (The software isn't there yet, the planning is lacking, and the name is too limiting. But the idea of building a global, free institution of learning carries an amazing potential for humankind. Giving people an official framework to develop this idea seems reasonable, especially when denying it now would likely kill it for the forseeable future.)[reply]
  39. Knuxus 22:54, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Nilsandi 01:13, 17 September 2005 (UTC) I like the project, I would like to contribute within the Mathematics/Computer Science field of knowledge, focussing on the german project. If someone helps, I would like to prepare a set of slides and exercises for the subject "Informatik I" (Computer Science 1), which usually deals with introducing Java and some other basic Problems, like the "Halteproblem" and the term "algorithm".[reply]
  41. puppiesd_fly 02:31, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Marshman 04:25, 17 September 2005 (UTC) I must say I find the reasons to vote "no" that are stated below to be quite compelling. Still, these Wikimedia projects have a way of stumbling around completely clueless and then just seem to right themselves and sail into success. I expect this "launch" to pretty much show the same course. But you gotta launch...[reply]
  43. 4lex 07:57, 17 September 2005 (UTC) Participé en las pruebas en español. Dispuesto a trabajar en el proyecto.[reply]
  44. Chaos 11:32, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Taxman 13:42, 17 September 2005 (UTC) Enough potential to make a pilot worth it. I'm skeptical it will work, but we'll leave that to the people passionate about it. Few thought Wikipedia would work either.[reply]
  46. Bobwinmill 14:19, 17 September 2005 (UTC) The chicken or the egg? Moot point. The egg is laid, let it be hatched. Then, we will see the chicken. Be Bold, BE VERY BOLD.[reply]
  47. Slehar 15:13, 17 September 2005 (UTC) Yes! Do it! It is a very powerful idea! The current academic establishment is so ossified that we really need an alternative![reply]
  48. Cnu 16:36, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Gryphon688 17:23 17 September 2005 (UTC)
  50. Garrone 00:47 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  51. Cormaggio @ 00:17, 18 September 2005 (UTC) Am very interested in helping create this resource. I think the criticisms below are valid (ie. too soon, no vision) but it needs its own domain, a group of dedicated and hopefully experienced volunteers and a proper brainstorm to see what we can really do with it - what an opportunity! Here's my vision..[reply]
  52. Snowdog 01:04, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Azertus 10:52, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  54. manu0x0 13:52, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  55. on2see 9:35 AM, 18 September 2005 (EST)
  56. osaminha 14:29, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Digby I think the notion of an anarchic University whose identity will depend only on the quality of the ideas that it transmits is excellent although its success will require major effort from some dedicated people
  58. sramam It's an excellent idea. The experiment should definitely be tried.
  59. Alex beta 19:11, 18 September 2005 (UTC) I am interested in participating. I have already been working in the School of Philosophy in Wikibooks.[reply]
  60. Fephisto 18:56, 18 September 2005 I have learned so much from Wikiversity, and letting it have the ability to spread into video format, etc., is pretty exciting. I actually don't think of it so much as an unacredited university, as a just more focues learning format.
  61. YolanC 00:13, 19 September 2005 (UTC) -- intéressé par une version française (interested)[reply]
  62. --555 02:15, 19 September 2005 (UTC) - I need to help in portuguese language version.[reply]
  63. --Super1 06:48, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Jb-adder 08:17, 19 September 2005 (UTC) I'd love to work on the course creation side of things for Wikiversity, especially the mathematics and computer science end of it.[reply]
  65. Hannibal 07:12, 19 September 2005 (AUT)
  66. MMSequeira 10:32, 19 September 2005 (UTC) Excellent idea[reply]
  67. Blakwolf 12:07, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Chun-hian 15:52, 19 September 2005 (UTC) - Say yes to Wikiversity![reply]
  69. Suprano 17:35, 19 September 2005 (UTC) - This is a great idea. I love to see some activity in this project[reply]
  70. Eshafoshaf 20:19, 19 September 2005 (UTC) This is what I have been waiting for, and now that I found it, I can't wait any longer.[reply]
  71. Masterzora 22:53, 19 September 2005 (UTC) I would love to both use and contribute to this. They don't want it on Wikibooks, but it's too good of an idea to completely abolish.[reply]
  72. Boku wa Kage 18:15, 19 September 2005 (GMT-4)
  73. Rmrfstar 00:43, 20 September 2005 (UTC) - Does not belong in Wikibooks and is quite deserving of its own project.[reply]
  74. ~Amish 03:35, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Klingoncowboy4 03:56, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Shuikaun 23:55, 19 September 2005 (GMT-7) i always like learning more
  77. --Taichi - (^_^) 06:38, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  78. --Destrogal 07:09, 20 September 2005 (UTC) -- The vision is there, but there is a great need to make the wiki-professors feel like they should contribute to this cause. As of right now, I do not see any cause for this. There is no ultimate goal. What need be told is that, as wiki-professors, you are not only creating a text in some instances, but you are also creating a course. That is, you are creating lectures, demonstrations, and assignments. You are discussing topics and not simply letting your course sit for days.[reply]
  79. Martin.Wiki 08:50, 20 September 2005 (UTC) - There is already quite a lot of material for lectures and exercises on the web. It is though possible to encourage people to contribute. Wikiversity would help to provide an easier access to scientific material for educational purposes.
  80. Chlewey 09:40, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Purodha Blissenbach 11:01, 20 September 2005 (UTC) - I do not expect accredition to be a problem at medium sight. We shall find corroborators in existing universities and academia. Some are even eager to jump start new traits of teaching. Apparent organizational/technical success of Wikipedia imho attracts institutions to link into well defined Wikversity projects with their own ressources and support. I want to see this as an experiment to grow over the next 10 years, then maybe re-evaluate Questions such as credits etc. internationally.[reply]
  82. Cidandrade 13:31, 20 September 2005 - I hope help this wiki.
  83. Arthur Eisele 17:48, 20 September 2005 - Wikibooks should be a subproject of Wikiversity, not the other way around.
  84. Nakki 11:20, 20 September 2005
  85. spitzl 22:30, 20 September 2005 (UTC) I think it's worth a try.
  86. Taejo 21:20, 20 September 2005 (UTC): Understand concerns expressed below, but the infinite ideals of the wiki projects appeal to me.[reply]
  87. Kwhitefoot 21:47, 20 September 2005 (UTC): A qualified yes. I just hope that what is intended is a University and not yet another vocational training system. Accreditation should not be attempted, it will only drain energy and time away from the real work of a University which is education not training.[reply]
  88. Magicmonster 23:34, 20 September 2005 (UTC) This seems like a great idea and, with enough effort put into it, could rivel wikipedia[reply]
  89. GalaxiaGuy 23:42, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  90. splintax (talk) 04:41, 21 September 2005 (UTC) Sounds like a great idea.[reply]
  91. Michiel Sikma 08:01, 21 September 2005 (UTC) Sure is early, but if you kickstart this project and nurture it carefully during the first six months, you'll surely be able to at least build a proper foundation for when the project reaches its maturing stages. Software enhancements to MediaWiki can be made after there has been created a reason to. For that reason, I vote yes.[reply]
  92. Alphax 08:07, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Mattwj2002 12:02, 21 September 2005 (UTC) I think it is important for people to easily self educate, to help with humality projects like educating people in Africa, and to give teachers a tool that can help in the classroom. I believe that this proposal could really help make this a better world.[reply]
  94. --Pirenne# 14:33, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Canaen 03:51, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Destrogal 04:55, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Michael Le 09:42, 22 September 2005 (UTC) If it fails, it fails, give it a try.
  98. GerardM 13:40, 22 September 2005 (UTC) It is good for its own sake but it will also generate a need for functionality. :)[reply]
  99. Crystal Matrix 19:00, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
  100. kaivalya 22:22, 20 September 2005 (UTC) Rock on Wiki!
  101. ChidoOne 19:22, 20 September 2005 (UTC) Knoledge belongs to te world and anyone should have acces to it.

Exciting idea!

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiversity/Vote/Votes_yes&oldid=211762"