Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JNW (talk | contribs) at 05:06, 3 August 2010 (→‎User-reported: report). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 19:11 on 27 April 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.




    Alerts

    Bot-reported

    User-reported

    • Note: User is in the category: Wikipedian usernames editors have expressed concern over. HBC AIV helperbot3 (talk) 03:42, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • I should also point out to the reviewing admin that there are two open Afd discussions for the articles this author has made; this one should probably be closed as a speedy delete, or lacking that, per WP:SNOW as the only person fighting to keep it is the author. The other one should probably be speedily closed per db-g11 too but I'll let the other one sit for a few days just in case. elektrikSHOOS 03:53, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]