Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions
→YellowMonkey: enacting motion 2 |
→John J. Bulten: removing |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<br clear="all"/> |
<br clear="all"/> |
||
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header}} |
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header}} |
||
== John J. Bulten == |
|||
'''Initiated by ''' [[User:Brendanology|<font color="navy">'''→ Brendan'''</font>]] <small>'''([[User talk:Brendanology|<font color="orange">talk</font>]], [[Special:Contributions/Brendanology|<font color="green">contribs</font>]])'''</small> '''at''' 06:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
=== Involved parties === |
|||
<!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator --> |
|||
*{{userlinks|Brendanology}}, ''filing party'' |
|||
*{{userlinks|John J. Bulten}} |
|||
<!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. --> |
|||
;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request |
|||
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. --> |
|||
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AJohn_J._Bulten%2FFriends&action=historysubmit&diff=403845405&oldid=402543291] |
|||
;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried |
|||
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration --> |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2010-01-04/Longevity myths]] |
|||
*[[Talk:List_of_the_verified_oldest_people#Merge_proposal]] (slightly more informal, but (failed) attempt at dispute/difference resolution by several users seen) |
|||
*[[Talk:List_of_the_verified_oldest_people/Archive_14#Bolding_war]] (Ditto) |
|||
=== Statement by Brendanology === |
|||
*I will confess that I have not always been entirely civil in my interactions with John J. Bulten; however, ArbCom will be shown evidence that repeated attempted dispute resolution on longevity-related articles (both official and unofficial) with Bulten has failed time and again or shown to have been counterproductive. Bulten has behaved inappropriately on multiple longevity-related articles, such as a) intimidating and attempting to convert editors [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_the_verified_oldest_people&diff=390808826&oldid=390800593], b) threatening editors with blocks without prior attempts to seek consensus [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brendanology&diff=390795674&oldid=390779455], c) submitting batches of biographies on long-lived people for deletion under near-identical criteria; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Margaret_Skeete][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yukichi_Chuganji][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Louisa_Thiers][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Maude_Farris-Luse] d) spamming the same AfD message with minimal differences [see diffs for c)], e) broken multiple AfD contributing policies (such as not voting on your own AfD [again, see diffs for c)], attempts, using spammed messages, to scare off editors who voted "keep" on articles he nominated for deletion [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yukichi_Chuganji&diff=400687088&oldid=400653104][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yukichi_Chuganji&diff=400921954&oldid=400910357][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Margaret_Skeete&diff=400920925&oldid=400912119]. |
|||
The request sent to ArbCom is intended as a last resort; an ArbCom discussion will provide solutions to John J. Bulten's disruptive and damaging behaviour for which previous attempts of resolution have failed time and again. [[User:Brendanology|<font color="navy">'''→ Brendan'''</font>]] <small>'''([[User talk:Brendanology|<font color="orange">talk</font>]], [[Special:Contributions/Brendanology|<font color="green">contribs</font>]])'''</small> 08:37, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
=== Statement by {Party 2} === |
|||
=== Statement by {Party 3} === |
|||
=== Clerk notes === |
|||
:''This area is used for notes by non-recused Clerks.'' |
|||
:I have left a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABrendanology&action=historysubmit&diff=403858826&oldid=398844654 note] on the filing party's talkpage regarding the ongoing Longevity case involving both parties. [[User:AlexandrDmitri|Alexandr Dmitri]] ([[User talk:AlexandrDmitri|talk]]) 11:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:The filing party has [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AlexandrDmitri&diff=prev&oldid=403991490 contacted me] regarding this request for arbitration and I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AlexandrDmitri&diff=next&oldid=403991490 explained] that he or she may address this issue at the ongoing case. [[User:AlexandrDmitri|Alexandr Dmitri]] ([[User talk:AlexandrDmitri|talk]]) 07:05, 24 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
=== Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/4/0/0) === |
|||
* '''Decline'''. There is already an ongoing case regarding these disputes (''Longevity''); I see no reason why opening another would be necessary or beneficial. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill]] <sup>[[User talk:Kirill Lokshin|[talk]]] [[User:Kirill Lokshin/Professionalism|[prof]]]</sup> 16:04, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Decline''' per Kirill. Perhaps there may need to be consideration of a temporary injunction in relation to the existing case. [[User:Risker|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker|talk]]) 16:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Decline''' as a separate case, but the issues can be addressed in the pending ''Longevity'' case, as suggested by Kirill and Risker. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad|talk]]) 16:50, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Decline'''. Existing case. [[User:SirFozzie|SirFozzie]] ([[User talk:SirFozzie|talk]]) 20:54, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:05, 25 December 2010
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
Case name | Closed |
---|---|
Conflict of interest management | 13 Apr 2024 |
Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing | none | (orig. case) | 30 April 2024 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Requests for arbitration
Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. This page is for statements, not discussion.
|