Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Adjusting links to archived content
→‎Arbitration motion regarding Armenia-Azerbaijan 3: Adding links to talk page sections (bot)
(46 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
}}
}}


== Mschwartz1 granted extended confirmed for the purpose of participating in arbitration ==
== Proposed motion to create Reliable source consensus-required restriction procedures and add the restriction to the Lithuania topic area ==


{{user|Mschwartz1}} is granted the [[WP:XC|extended-confirmed]] user group for the exclusive purpose of participating in a case request about Israel-Palestine.
The Arbitration Committee is considering '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Motion: Reliable source consensus-required restriction|a motion]]''' to amend the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Procedures#Modification_of_procedures|procedures]] and to extend reliable source requirements to Lithuania as a topic area. Comments are welcome at the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_Antisemitism_in_Poland|relevant request for clarification]].


For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 18:33, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Firefly|<span style="color:#850808;">firefly</span>]] <small>( [[User talk:Firefly|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Firefly|c]] )</small> 15:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
: Archived discussion at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51|Proposed motion to create Reliable source consensus-required restriction procedures and add the restriction to the Lithuania topic area}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 18:36, 31 December 2023 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
: Archived discussion at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51|Mschwartz1 granted extended confirmed for the purpose of participating in arbitration}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 15:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->


== Resignation ==
== Arbitration motion regarding reliable source consensus-required restrictions ==


I resign my seat on ArbCom with immediate effect. To all those who voted for me - I'm sorry I wasn't the arbitrator either of us hoped I'd be. [[User:GeneralNotability|GeneralNotability]] ([[User talk:GeneralNotability|talk]]) 11:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Special:Permalink/1193639157#Motion: Reliable source consensus-required restriction|motion]] that:
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Resignation}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 11:38, 2 April 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
{{ivmbox|1=Clerks are instructed to add a new section, entitled "Reliable source consensus-required restriction" to the Enforcement section of the [[WP:ARBPROC|Arbitration Procedures]] with the following text:
<blockquote>The Committee may apply the "Reliable source consensus-required restriction" to specified topic areas. For topic areas with this restriction, when a source that is not an article in a peer-reviewed scholarly journal, an academically focused book by a reputable publisher, and/or an article published by a reputable institution is removed from an article, no editor may reinstate the source without first obtaining consensus on the talk page of the article in question or consensus about the reliability of the source in a discussion at the [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard|Reliable Sources Noticeboard]]. Administrators may enforce this restriction with page protections, topic bans, or blocks; enforcement decisions should consider not merely the severity of the violation but the general disciplinary record of the editor in violation.</blockquote>
[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism_in_Poland#Article_sourcing_expectations|Remedy 5 of ''Antisemitism in Poland'']] is superseded by the following restriction:
<blockquote>All articles and edits in the topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland are subject to a "reliable source consensus-required restriction".</blockquote>
[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe]] is amended to include the following restriction:
<blockquote>All articles and edits in the topic area of Lithuania history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Lithuania are subject to a "reliable source consensus-required restriction."</blockquote>
Clerks are instructed to link to the Arbitration Procedures in the two restrictions above and are empowered to make other changes necessary to implement this new enforcement procedure.}}
For the Arbitration Committee,<br /> &#8211;<span style="font-family:CG Times, times">[[User:MJL|<span style="color:black">MJL</span>]]&thinsp;[[User talk:MJL|‐'''Talk'''‐]]<sup>[[User:MJL/P|☖]]</sup></span> 21:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
: Archived discussion at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51|Arbitration motion regarding reliable source consensus-required restrictions}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 21:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->


== Revocation of Mschwartz1's extended-confirmed permission ==
== Proposed motions on email canvassing ==


The Arbitration Committee makes the following update to [[Special:Diff/1210786930/1214689736|its 20 March announcement]]:
The Arbitration Committee is considering a '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions#Motions:_PIA_Canvassing|series of proposed motions]]''' related to allegations of inappropriate email canvassing within the Israel-Palestine topic area in violation of Wikipedia policy. Community statements and evidence submissions are welcome at the above link, or by email to {{arbcom-en}} if information cannot be posted publicly. For the Arbitration Committee, '''[[User:L235|KevinL]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 21:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
: Archived discussion at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51|Proposed motions on email canvassing}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 21:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->


{{User|Mschwartz1}}'s extended-confirmed permission is revoked as they did not meet the Arbitration Committee's expectations when the request for the permission was granted. The Committee apologises for the time spent by the wider Community on this affair.
== Arbitration motion regarding ''GiantSnowman'' ==
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Special:Permalink/1194194627#Motion:_GiantSnowman_restrictions_amended_(January_2024)|motion]] that:
{{ivmbox|1=Remedy 1.2 of the ''GiantSnowman'' case ("GiantSnowman admonished and placed under review") is amended to read as follows:
<blockquote>
1.2) GiantSnowman is admonished for overuse of the rollback and blocking functions, and reminded to [[w:WP:ADMINCOND|"lead by example" and "strive to model appropriate standards of courtesy"]]; to [[w:WP:ADMINACCT|"respond promptly and civilly to queries about their Wikipedia-related conduct and administrative actions and to justify them when needed"]]; to not use admin tools in [[w:WP:INVOLVED|"cases in which they have been involved" including "conflicts with an editor" and "disputes on topics"]]; to [[w:WP:BITE|"treat newcomers with kindness and patience"]]; and to apply these principles in all interactions with all editors.


Guerillero is recused from consideration of this matter.
With the exception of obvious vandalism or obvious violations of the policy on biographies of living persons:
* GiantSnowman is prohibited from reverting another editor's contribution without providing an explanation in the edit summary. Default edit summaries provided by MediaWiki or user scripts are not sufficient for the purpose of this restriction. For the avoidance of doubt, use of MediaWiki rollback with an edit summary via a user script such as [[w:User:DannyS712/AjaxRollbackSummary|this one]], or via massRollback.js, is permitted.
* GiantSnowman is prohibited from blocking an editor who has not been recently warned for the conduct in question. For the purposes of this restriction, "recently" is assumed to be within 7 days.


On behalf of the Committee, [[User:Sdrqaz|Sdrqaz]] ([[User talk:Sdrqaz|talk]]) 01:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Violations may be reported by any editor to [[w:WP:AE|the Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard]]. GiantSnowman may [[w:WP:ARCA|appeal these restrictions directly to the Arbitration Committee]] at any time.
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Revocation of Mschwartz1's extended-confirmed permission}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 01:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
</blockquote>}}


== [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conflict of interest management]] closed ==
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Firefly|<span style="color:#850808;">firefly</span>]] <small>( [[User talk:Firefly|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Firefly|c]] )</small> 19:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motion regarding GiantSnowman}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 19:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
The Arbitration case "[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conflict of interest management|Conflict of interest management]]" has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

*The Arbitration Committee requests that a new [[WP:VRT|VRT]] queue be established to accept reports of undisclosed conflict-of-interest or paid editing, where reporting such editing on-wiki is in conflict with [[WP:OUTING]]. The queue membership is to be decided by the Arbitration Committee and is open to any functionary and to any administrator by request to the Committee and who passes a functionary-like appointment process (including signing the [[:wmf:ANPDP|ANPDP]]). Following the creation of the queue, the existing checkuser-only paid-en-wp queue will be archived, and access will be restricted to checkusers indefinitely. Functionaries and administrators working this queue may, at their discretion, refer a ticket to the Arbitration Committee for review; an example of a situation where a ticket should be referred to the committee is when there is a credible report involving an administrator.
*For posting non-public information about another editor—after a previous post by Fram in the same thread was removed and oversighted—[[User:Fram|Fram]] is admonished against posting previously undisclosed information about other editors on Wikipedia ("[[WP:OUTING|outing]]") which is a violation of the [[WP:HA|harassment policy]]. Concerns about policy violations based on private evidence ''must'' be sent to the appropriate off-wiki venue. Any further violations of this policy may result in an Arbitration Committee block or ban.
*For his failure to meet the conduct standards expected of an administrator, specifically as pertains to conflict of interest editing and conflict of interest disclosure, [[User:Nihonjoe|Nihonjoe]]'s administrator and bureaucrat user rights are removed. Nihonjoe may regain these user rights via a successful request for adminship and a successful request for bureaucratship, respectively.
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Firefly|<span style="color:#850808;">firefly</span>]] <small>( [[User talk:Firefly|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Firefly|c]] )</small> 17:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conflict of interest management closed}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 17:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->

== Changes to the functionaries team, April 2024 ==

Following requests to the Arbitration Committee, the CheckUser access of [[User:Joe Roe|Joe Roe]] is restored and the Oversight access of [[User:GeneralNotability|GeneralNotability]] is removed. The Committee sincerely thanks GeneralNotability for his service as a member of the Arbitration Committee and Oversight team.

On behalf of the Committee, [[User:Sdrqaz|Sdrqaz]] ([[User talk:Sdrqaz|talk]]) 23:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Changes to the functionaries team, April 2024}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 23:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->

== Arbitration motion regarding ''Armenia-Azerbaijan 3'' ==

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Special:Permalink/1219529140#Motion:_Olympian's_topic_ban_rescinded_with_suspension|motion]] that:
{{ivmbox|[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan_3#Topic_ban_(Olympian)|Remedy 3.1]] of the case ''Armenia-Azerbaijan 3'' ("Topic ban (Olympian)") is lifted subject to a probationary period lasting eighteen months from the date this motion is enacted. During this period, any uninvolved administrator may re-impose the topic ban as an arbitration enforcement action, subject to appeal only to the Arbitration Committee. If the probationary period elapses without incident, the topic ban is to be considered permanently lifted.}}

For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Dreamy Jazz|Dreamy <i style="color:#d00">'''Jazz'''</i>]] <sup>''[[User talk:Dreamy Jazz|talk to me]]'' &#124; ''[[Special:Contribs/Dreamy Jazz|my contributions]]''</sup> 09:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motion regarding Armenia-Azerbaijan 3}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 09:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->

Revision as of 09:15, 18 April 2024

This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.

Announcement archives:

Mschwartz1 granted extended confirmed for the purpose of participating in arbitration

Mschwartz1 (talk · contribs) is granted the extended-confirmed user group for the exclusive purpose of participating in a case request about Israel-Palestine.

For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 15:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51 § Mschwartz1 granted extended confirmed for the purpose of participating in arbitration

Resignation

I resign my seat on ArbCom with immediate effect. To all those who voted for me - I'm sorry I wasn't the arbitrator either of us hoped I'd be. GeneralNotability (talk) 11:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Resignation

Revocation of Mschwartz1's extended-confirmed permission

The Arbitration Committee makes the following update to its 20 March announcement:

Mschwartz1 (talk · contribs)'s extended-confirmed permission is revoked as they did not meet the Arbitration Committee's expectations when the request for the permission was granted. The Committee apologises for the time spent by the wider Community on this affair.

Guerillero is recused from consideration of this matter.

On behalf of the Committee, Sdrqaz (talk) 01:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Revocation of Mschwartz1's extended-confirmed permission

The Arbitration case "Conflict of interest management" has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

  • The Arbitration Committee requests that a new VRT queue be established to accept reports of undisclosed conflict-of-interest or paid editing, where reporting such editing on-wiki is in conflict with WP:OUTING. The queue membership is to be decided by the Arbitration Committee and is open to any functionary and to any administrator by request to the Committee and who passes a functionary-like appointment process (including signing the ANPDP). Following the creation of the queue, the existing checkuser-only paid-en-wp queue will be archived, and access will be restricted to checkusers indefinitely. Functionaries and administrators working this queue may, at their discretion, refer a ticket to the Arbitration Committee for review; an example of a situation where a ticket should be referred to the committee is when there is a credible report involving an administrator.
  • For posting non-public information about another editor—after a previous post by Fram in the same thread was removed and oversighted—Fram is admonished against posting previously undisclosed information about other editors on Wikipedia ("outing") which is a violation of the harassment policy. Concerns about policy violations based on private evidence must be sent to the appropriate off-wiki venue. Any further violations of this policy may result in an Arbitration Committee block or ban.
  • For his failure to meet the conduct standards expected of an administrator, specifically as pertains to conflict of interest editing and conflict of interest disclosure, Nihonjoe's administrator and bureaucrat user rights are removed. Nihonjoe may regain these user rights via a successful request for adminship and a successful request for bureaucratship, respectively.

For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 17:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conflict of interest management closed

Changes to the functionaries team, April 2024

Following requests to the Arbitration Committee, the CheckUser access of Joe Roe is restored and the Oversight access of GeneralNotability is removed. The Committee sincerely thanks GeneralNotability for his service as a member of the Arbitration Committee and Oversight team.

On behalf of the Committee, Sdrqaz (talk) 23:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Changes to the functionaries team, April 2024

Arbitration motion regarding Armenia-Azerbaijan 3

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

Remedy 3.1 of the case Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 ("Topic ban (Olympian)") is lifted subject to a probationary period lasting eighteen months from the date this motion is enacted. During this period, any uninvolved administrator may re-impose the topic ban as an arbitration enforcement action, subject to appeal only to the Arbitration Committee. If the probationary period elapses without incident, the topic ban is to be considered permanently lifted.

For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 09:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Armenia-Azerbaijan 3