Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 14) (bot |
m Adjusting links to archived content |
||
| (44 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
| ⚫ | |||
== Feedback requested for AE's "Information for administrators" section == |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Special:Permalink/1219893542#Sri_Lanka_motion|motion]], in resolution of [[Special:Permalink/1219893542#Designating_Sri_Lanka_as_a_contentious_topic|a case request]], that: |
|||
Feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at [[WP:AE]]. The draft text and feedback section can be found at [[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Consultation: Admin information draft]]. Thank you to everyone who participates. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 20:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{ivmbox|1=This case request is resolved by motion as follows: |
|||
== Arbitration motion regarding the severity of remedies == |
|||
Sri Lanka, broadly construed, is designated as a contentious topic.}} |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Special:Permalink/1200775605#Remind,_warn,_admonish|motion]] that: |
|||
{{ivmbox|1= |
|||
Add the following to the [[WP:ARBPROC|Arbitration Procedures]] as a subsection of "Arbitration Proceedings" |
|||
<blockquote> |
|||
When used in arbitration motions or remedies, the words below should be considered to have the following order of severity: |
|||
#Remind (weakest) |
|||
#Warn |
|||
#Admonish (strongest) |
|||
</blockquote> |
|||
}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
== Dovidroth unbanned == |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Following a successful appeal of his [[Special:Permalink/1197461960#Dovidroth|site ban]] to the Arbitration Committee, {{user|Dovidroth}} is unbanned. The [[Special:Permalink/1197461960#Dovidroth_topic_ban|topic ban]], which was passed at the same time as the site ban, remains in force. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
Support: Barkeep49, Guerillero, HJ Mitchell, Maxim, Primefac, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree |
|||
== Motions on amending the scope of appeals considered by the Arbitration Committee == |
|||
Oppose: Firefly, Moneytrees |
|||
Two motions are proposed to amend the scope of appeals considered by the Arbitration Committee at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions#Amending_the_scope_of_appeals_considered_by_the_Arbitration_Committee|Arbitration/Requests/Motions]]. Community feedback is invited and welcomed. [[User:Maxim|Maxim]] ([[User talk:Maxim|talk]]) 16:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Special:Permalink/1204279524#Motion_to_suspend|motion]] that: |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{Ivmbox|1=Given {{user|Mzajac}}'s absence from editing, the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mzajac|''Mzajac'' case]] will be suspended for a period of three months and Mzajac will be temporarily desysopped. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Should Mzajac return to active editing on the English Wikipedia during this time and request that this case be resumed, the Arbitration Committee shall unsuspend the case by motion and it will proceed through the normal arbitration process. Such a request may be made by email to {{arbcom-en}} or at the [[WT:AC/C|clerks' noticeboard]]. Mzajac will remain temporarily desysopped for the duration of the case. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
== [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mzajac]] closed == |
|||
If such a request is not made within three months of this motion or if Mzajac resigns his administrative tools, this case shall be automatically closed, and Mzajac shall remain desysopped. If tools are resigned or removed, in the circumstances described above, Mzajac may regain the administrative tools at any time only via a successful [[WP:RFA|request for adminship]].}} |
|||
An arbitration case regarding [[User:Mzajac]] has now closed. The Arbitration Committee resolved by motion in February to suspend the case, which could be unsuspended if Mzajac requested it within three months. Because Mzajac has not requested that the case be unsuspended, the case has been automatically closed. The motion which has now closed the case is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mzajac#Motion to suspend]]. |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, '''[[User:L235|KevinL]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 20:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motion regarding Mzajac}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 20:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]]) 21:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Arbitration motion regarding the scope of appeals considered by the Arbitration Committee == |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Special:Permalink/1207074962#Motion:_appeals_of_CheckUser_blocks_generally_not_heard|motion]] that: |
|||
{{ivmbox|The Arbitration Committee resolves to amend the scope of block appeals it handles, thus updating the guidance from [[Special:Permalink/690747247#Motion: BASC disbanded|previous motion]] in 2015, as follows: |
|||
The Arbitration Committee hears appeals from editors who are (a) blocked for reasons that are unsuitable for public discussion, or (b) blocked or banned by Arbitration and Arbitration Enforcement decisions. Examples of reasons that are unsuitable for public discussion include blocks (i) marked as an [[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Oversight_blocks|Oversight block]], or (ii) based on CheckUser evidence, and where there exists disagreement between checkusers as to the interpretation of the technical evidence. It is expected that blocks marked as a [[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#CheckUser_blocks|CheckUser block]] are by default appealed on-wiki; however, the Arbitration Committee may hear appeals of such blocks if there are compelling reasons to hear an appeal in private. |
|||
}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motion regarding the scope of appeals considered by the Arbitration Committee}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 13:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> |
|||
Latest revision as of 18:20, 12 May 2024
| Wikipedia Arbitration |
|---|
 |
|
|
| Track related changes |
This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.
Arbitration motion regarding Sri Lanka
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion, in resolution of a case request, that:
This case request is resolved by motion as follows:
Sri Lanka, broadly construed, is designated as a contentious topic.
For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 14:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51 § Arbitration motion regarding Sri Lanka
Dovidroth unbanned
Following a successful appeal of his site ban to the Arbitration Committee, Dovidroth (talk · contribs) is unbanned. The topic ban, which was passed at the same time as the site ban, remains in force.
Support: Barkeep49, Guerillero, HJ Mitchell, Maxim, Primefac, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree
Oppose: Firefly, Moneytrees
For the Arbitration Committee, Maxim (talk) 15:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51 § Dovidroth unbanned
Changes to the functionaries team, May 2024
Following a request to the Arbitration Committee, the Oversight access of Dreamy Jazz is removed. The Committee sincerely thanks Dreamy Jazz for their service as a member of the Oversight team.
On behalf of the Committee, Primefac (talk) 14:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51 § Changes to the functionaries team, May 2024
An arbitration case regarding User:Mzajac has now closed. The Arbitration Committee resolved by motion in February to suspend the case, which could be unsuspended if Mzajac requested it within three months. Because Mzajac has not requested that the case be unsuspended, the case has been automatically closed. The motion which has now closed the case is Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mzajac#Motion to suspend.
For the Arbitration Committee, Aoidh (talk) 21:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)