Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Resignation: new section |
m Adjusting links to archived content |
||
| (37 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
| ⚫ | |||
== Motions on amending the scope of appeals considered by the Arbitration Committee == |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Special:Permalink/1219893542#Sri_Lanka_motion|motion]], in resolution of [[Special:Permalink/1219893542#Designating_Sri_Lanka_as_a_contentious_topic|a case request]], that: |
|||
Two motions are proposed to amend the scope of appeals considered by the Arbitration Committee at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions#Amending_the_scope_of_appeals_considered_by_the_Arbitration_Committee|Arbitration/Requests/Motions]]. Community feedback is invited and welcomed. [[User:Maxim|Maxim]] ([[User talk:Maxim|talk]]) 16:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | : Archived discussion at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51| |
||
{{ivmbox|1=This case request is resolved by motion as follows: |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Sri Lanka, broadly construed, is designated as a contentious topic.}} |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Special:Permalink/1204279524#Motion_to_suspend|motion]] that: |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{Ivmbox|1=Given {{user|Mzajac}}'s absence from editing, the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mzajac|''Mzajac'' case]] will be suspended for a period of three months and Mzajac will be temporarily desysopped. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
== Dovidroth unbanned == |
|||
Should Mzajac return to active editing on the English Wikipedia during this time and request that this case be resumed, the Arbitration Committee shall unsuspend the case by motion and it will proceed through the normal arbitration process. Such a request may be made by email to {{arbcom-en}} or at the [[WT:AC/C|clerks' noticeboard]]. Mzajac will remain temporarily desysopped for the duration of the case. |
|||
Following a successful appeal of his [[Special:Permalink/1197461960#Dovidroth|site ban]] to the Arbitration Committee, {{user|Dovidroth}} is unbanned. The [[Special:Permalink/1197461960#Dovidroth_topic_ban|topic ban]], which was passed at the same time as the site ban, remains in force. |
|||
If such a request is not made within three months of this motion or if Mzajac resigns his administrative tools, this case shall be automatically closed, and Mzajac shall remain desysopped. If tools are resigned or removed, in the circumstances described above, Mzajac may regain the administrative tools at any time only via a successful [[WP:RFA|request for adminship]].}} |
|||
Support: Barkeep49, Guerillero, HJ Mitchell, Maxim, Primefac, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
Oppose: Firefly, Moneytrees |
|||
== Arbitration motion regarding the scope of appeals considered by the Arbitration Committee == |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Maxim|Maxim]] ([[User talk:Maxim|talk]]) 15:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Special:Permalink/1207074962#Motion:_appeals_of_CheckUser_blocks_generally_not_heard|motion]] that: |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
== Changes to the functionaries team, May 2024 == |
|||
{{ivmbox|The Arbitration Committee resolves to amend the scope of block appeals it handles, thus updating the guidance from [[Special:Permalink/690747247#Motion: BASC disbanded|previous motion]] in 2015, as follows: |
|||
Following a request to the Arbitration Committee, the Oversight access of [[User:Dreamy Jazz|Dreamy Jazz]] is removed. The Committee sincerely thanks Dreamy Jazz for their service as a member of the Oversight team. |
|||
The Arbitration Committee hears appeals from editors who are (a) blocked for reasons that are unsuitable for public discussion, or (b) blocked or banned by Arbitration and Arbitration Enforcement decisions. Examples of reasons that are unsuitable for public discussion include blocks (i) marked as an [[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Oversight_blocks|Oversight block]], or (ii) based on CheckUser evidence, and where there exists disagreement between checkusers as to the interpretation of the technical evidence. It is expected that blocks marked as a [[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#CheckUser_blocks|CheckUser block]] are by default appealed on-wiki; however, the Arbitration Committee may hear appeals of such blocks if there are compelling reasons to hear an appeal in private. |
|||
}} |
|||
On behalf of the Committee, [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 14:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: Archived discussion at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51| |
: Archived discussion at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51|Changes to the functionaries team, May 2024}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 14:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> |
||
== [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mzajac]] closed == |
|||
== Mschwartz1 granted extended confirmed for the purpose of participating in arbitration == |
|||
An arbitration case regarding [[User:Mzajac]] has now closed. The Arbitration Committee resolved by motion in February to suspend the case, which could be unsuspended if Mzajac requested it within three months. Because Mzajac has not requested that the case be unsuspended, the case has been automatically closed. The motion which has now closed the case is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mzajac#Motion to suspend]]. |
|||
{{user|Mschwartz1}} is granted the [[WP:XC|extended-confirmed]] user group for the exclusive purpose of participating in a case request about Israel-Palestine. |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User: |
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]]) 21:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
: |
: Archived discussion at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51|Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mzajac closed}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 21:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> |
||
== Resignation == |
|||
I resign my seat on ArbCom with immediate effect. To all those who voted for me - I'm sorry I wasn't the arbitrator either of us hoped I'd be. [[User:GeneralNotability|GeneralNotability]] ([[User talk:GeneralNotability|talk]]) 11:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 18:48, 19 May 2024
| Wikipedia Arbitration |
|---|
 |
|
|
| Track related changes |
This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.
Arbitration motion regarding Sri Lanka
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion, in resolution of a case request, that:
This case request is resolved by motion as follows:
Sri Lanka, broadly construed, is designated as a contentious topic.
For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 14:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51 § Arbitration motion regarding Sri Lanka
Dovidroth unbanned
Following a successful appeal of his site ban to the Arbitration Committee, Dovidroth (talk · contribs) is unbanned. The topic ban, which was passed at the same time as the site ban, remains in force.
Support: Barkeep49, Guerillero, HJ Mitchell, Maxim, Primefac, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree
Oppose: Firefly, Moneytrees
For the Arbitration Committee, Maxim (talk) 15:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51 § Dovidroth unbanned
Changes to the functionaries team, May 2024
Following a request to the Arbitration Committee, the Oversight access of Dreamy Jazz is removed. The Committee sincerely thanks Dreamy Jazz for their service as a member of the Oversight team.
On behalf of the Committee, Primefac (talk) 14:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51 § Changes to the functionaries team, May 2024
An arbitration case regarding User:Mzajac has now closed. The Arbitration Committee resolved by motion in February to suspend the case, which could be unsuspended if Mzajac requested it within three months. Because Mzajac has not requested that the case be unsuspended, the case has been automatically closed. The motion which has now closed the case is Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mzajac#Motion to suspend.
For the Arbitration Committee, Aoidh (talk) 21:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)